Back to Authors

Seibert, Tyler M.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4089-7399

Mayo Clinic

University of California San Diego

Citations 3

Comprehensive genomic profiling of Black and non-Hispanic White (NHW) men with prostate cancer (PCa).
Choi, Sharon H. , Sartor, Alton Oliver, Smith, Norm D. , McKay, Rana R. , Adeyelu, Tolulope Tosin , Elliott, Andrew , Rose, Brent Shane , Bagrodia, Aditya , Seibert, Tyler M. , Agarwal, Neeraj , Barata, Pedro C.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 28, 2025 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: 5022-5022

10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.5022 Get It

5022 Background: Racial disparities are evident in PCa, with Black men experiencing a higher incidence and worse survival compared to NHW patients (pts). The molecular alterations that distinguish these groups remain incompletely characterized. Herein, we investigate the clinical-genomic features that potentially contribute to the differences in outcomes between Black and NHW pts with PCa. Methods: Comprehensive next-generation sequencing of DNA (592-gene panel/whole exome) and RNA (whole transcriptome) was performed at Caris Life Sciences on PCa tissue samples (n = 5,412), collected from 2015 to 2023. Transcriptomic signatures – Androgen Receptor (AR), Neuroendocrine PCa (NEPC) scores – were calculated. Real-world overall survival (OS) data was obtained from insurance claims and was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimation. Results: Overall, 1,078 pts with PCa identified as Black, while 4,334 were NHW. Black pts were younger at biopsy collection than NHW pts (median age 66 vs 71 years, P < 0.001). The proportion of metastatic samples was higher in Black pts compared to NHW pts (43% vs 38%, P < 0.01). The prevalence of castrated PCa specimens was similar between Black and NHW pts (26.0% vs 25.4%, P = 0.72). Among non-castrated PCa tumors, tumors from NHW pts had more frequent alterations in TP53 , PTEN , PIK3CA , and CHEK2 , while tumors from Black pts had more SPOP and CTNNB1 mutations. In the castrate setting, TP53 and PTEN alterations were more frequent in tissue samples from NHW pts, while CDK12 and SPOP mutations were more frequent in tumors from Black pts. TMPRSS2 fusions were more prevalent in the NHW cohort across both castrated and non-castrated tumors. Tumors from Black pts had higher FOLH1 / PSMA and STEAP1 expression, elevated AR scores, but lower CD276 / B7H3 expression and NEPC scores. In the overall cohort, Black pts demonstrated a shorter median OS from diagnosis compared to NHW pts (86 vs 94 mos, P = 0.03). Black pts had a significantly longer time on treatment with enzalutamide in both the non-castrate (HR 0.82, P= 0.04) and castrate subgroups (HR 0.77, P= 0.03). Among pts with homologous recombination repair (HRR) deficiency-harboring tumors, PARP inhibitors provided a numerically longer survival benefit in Black pts than in NHW pts (21 vs 13 mos, P = 0.09). Conclusions: This multi-institutional study reveals distinct molecular profiles between Black and NHW pts with PCa. Despite having molecular features associated with better prognosis, Black men demonstrated worse survival outcomes, pointing to multifaceted determinants of disease outcomes. Notably, Black pts had improved outcomes on enzalutamide and showed potential benefit from PARP inhibitors in the presence of HRR mutations. These findings highlight genomic differences in diverse PCa populations and suggest therapeutic opportunities to address outcome disparities.
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Prostate Cancer Early Detection, Version 1.2023
Moses, Kelvin A. , Sprenkle, Preston C. , Box, Geoffrey N., Carlsson, Sigrid , Catàlona, William J. , Dahl, Douglas M. , Dall’Era, Marc , Davis, John W. , Epstein, Jonathan I. , Etzioni, Ruth B., Farrington, Thomas A., Garraway, Isla P. , Jarrard, David F. , Kauffman, Eric, Kaye, Deborah R. , Kibel, Adam S. , LaGrange, Chad A. , Maroni, Paul, Ponsky, Lee , Salami, Simpa S. , Shaneyfelt, Terrence, Smaldone, Marc C. , Sonn, Geoffrey A. , Tyson, Mark D. , Vapiwala, Neha , Wake, Robert, Washington, Samuel L. , Yu, Alice , Yuh, Bertram, Berardi, Ryan A., Freedman-Cass, Deborah A., Salami, Simpa S , Bahler, Clinton D. , Drake, Bettina F. , Etzioni, Ruth B., Reys, Brian D. , Sánchez, Alejandro , Seibert, Tyler M.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | March 10, 2023 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 236-246

10.6004/jnccn.2023.0014 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Prostate Cancer Early Detection provide recommendations for individuals with a prostate who opt to participate in an early detection program after receiving the appropriate counseling on the pros and cons. These NCCN Guidelines Insights provide a summary of recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines with regard to the testing protocol, use of multiparametric MRI, and management of negative biopsy results to optimize the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer and minimize the detection of indolent disease.
A Genetic Risk Score to Personalize Prostate Cancer Screening, Applied to Population Data
Huynh‐Le, Minh‐Phuong , Fan, Chun Chieh , Karunamuni, Roshan , Walsh, Eleanor , Turner, Emma L. , Gillatt, David , Martin, Richard M. , Neal, David E. , Donovan, Jenny , Parsons, J. Kellogg , Eeles, Rosalind A. , Easton, Douglas F. , Kote‐Jarai, Zsofia , Olama, Ali Amin Al , Garcia, Sara Benlloch, Grönberg, Henrik , Schleutker, Johanna , Tammela, Teuvo L.J. , Nordestgaard, Børge G. , Travis, Ruth C. , Pashayan, Nora , Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Schaid, Daniel J. , Maier, Christiane, Vogel, Walther , Luedeke, Manuel, Herkommer, Kathleen , Kibel, Adam S. , Wokołorczyk, Dominika , Kluźniak, Wojciech , Holleczek, Bernd , Sellers, Thomas A. , Slavov, Chavdar Kroumov, Kaneva, Radka , Mitev, Vanio , Batra, Jyotsna , Teixeira, Manuel R. , Paulo, Paula , Maia, Sofia , Pandha, Hardev , Mills, Ian G. , Dale, Anders M. , Seibert, Tyler M. , Lane, J. Athene , Walsh, Eleanor I , Lane, J Athene , Donovan, Jenny L , Eeles, Rosalind A , Amin Al Olama, Ali , Muir, Kenneth , Grönberg, Henrik , Wiklund, Fredrik E. , Schleutker, Johanna , Key, Tim , Travis, Ruth C , Pharoah, Paul D P , Pashayan, Nora , Herkommer, Kathleen , Cannon-Albright, Lisa A , Brenner, Hermann , Schöttker, Ben , Park, Jong Y , Lin, Hui-Yi , Spurdle, Amanda B , Teixeira, Manuel R , Michael, Agnieszka , Mills, Ian G , Seibert, Tyler M , Dale, Anders M , Martin, Richard M , Batra, Jyotsna , Hamdy, Freddie C. , Muir, Kenneth , Aly, Markus , Sipeky, Csilla , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Khaw, Kay‐Tee , McDonnell, Shannon K. , Cybulski, Cezary , Cannon‐Albright, Lisa , Park, Jong Y. , Lin, Hui‐Yi , Clements, Judith A. , Spurdle, Amanda B. , Michael, Agnieszka , Andreassen, Ole A.

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | June 24, 2020 | Volume: 29 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1731-1738

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-19-1527 Get It

Abstract Background: A polygenic hazard score (PHS), the weighted sum of 54 SNP genotypes, was previously validated for association with clinically significant prostate cancer and for improved prostate cancer screening accuracy. Here, we assess the potential impact of PHS-informed screening. Methods: United Kingdom population incidence data (Cancer Research United Kingdom) and data from the Cluster Randomized Trial of PSA Testing for Prostate Cancer were combined to estimate age-specific clinically significant prostate cancer incidence (Gleason score ≥7, stage T3–T4, PSA ≥10, or nodal/distant metastases). Using HRs estimated from the ProtecT prostate cancer trial, age-specific incidence rates were calculated for various PHS risk percentiles. Risk-equivalent age, when someone with a given PHS percentile has prostate cancer risk equivalent to an average 50-year-old man (50-year-standard risk), was derived from PHS and incidence data. Positive predictive value (PPV) of PSA testing for clinically significant prostate cancer was calculated using PHS-adjusted age groups. Results: The expected age at diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer differs by 19 years between the 1st and 99th PHS percentiles: men with PHS in the 1st and 99th percentiles reach the 50-year-standard risk level at ages 60 and 41, respectively. PPV of PSA was higher for men with higher PHS-adjusted age. Conclusions: PHS provides individualized estimates of risk-equivalent age for clinically significant prostate cancer. Screening initiation could be adjusted by a man's PHS. Impact: Personalized genetic risk assessments could inform prostate cancer screening decisions.