Smaldone, Marc C.

The NCCN Guidelines for Prostate Cancer Early Detection provide recommendations for individuals with a prostate who opt to participate in an early detection program after receiving the appropriate counseling on the pros and cons. These NCCN Guidelines Insights provide a summary of recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines with regard to the testing protocol, use of multiparametric MRI, and management of negative biopsy results to optimize the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer and minimize the detection of indolent disease.

503 Background: We evaluated temporal patterns in the utilization of systemic therapy among patients undergoing cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) for metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) from a large national cancer registry and assessed patient characteristics associated with receipt of systemic treatment. Methods: We reviewed the National Cancer Database to identify patients with stage IV RCC who underwent CN between 1998-2010. Systemic therapy was defined as any treatment with immunotherapy and/or chemotherapy (including targeted agents). We evaluated the association between clinicopathologic features and receipt of systemic therapy using multivariable logistic regression with generalized estimating equations, and assessed the interaction of treatment with time, stratified as immunotherapy (1998-2004) versus targeted-therapy (2005-2010) eras. Results: Of 22,409 patients with mRCC undergoing CN, 8,830 (39%) received systemic therapy. Receipt of systemic therapy increased from 32% in 1998 to 49% in 2010 (p<0.001), largely due to increased utilization of chemotherapy (13.9% vs. 46.7%; p<0.001). Following adjustment, increasing patient age (51-60 years: OR 0.82 [CI 0.73-0.92]; 61-70 years: OR 0.67 [CI 0.59-0.76]; ≥71 years: OR 0.36 [CI 0.31-0.43]), as well as coverage with Medicaid (OR 0.61 [CI 0.5-0.74]), Medicare (OR 0.70 [CI 0.62-0.79]), or no insurance (OR 0.75 [CI 0.63-0.91]) were associated with decreased utilization of systemic therapy. Although use of systemic therapy in the elderly (≥71 years) and in patients with Medicare/Medicaid remained lower throughout the study period, each of these cohorts was significantly more likely to receive systemic treatment in the targeted versus immunotherapy era (all p values <0.05). Conclusions: Utilization of systemic therapy among patients undergoing CN has increased over time, coinciding with the introduction of targeted therapies. Nevertheless, still less than half of such patients receive systemic treatment. While the etiology for lack of treatment is likely multifactorial, the potential health policy implications of continued disparities in care warrant further investigation.

89 Background: Lymph node counts have been proposed as a quality metric for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). It is unclear whether surgical approach and hospital characteristics independently determine the number of lymph nodes removed at PLND. Therefore, we assessed the variation in lymph node counts from a population-based cohort of patients undergoing surgery for intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer. Methods: Using the National Cancer Database, we identified all surgically treated patients diagnosed with pre-treatment intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer from 2010 to 2011. The primary outcome was the number of lymph nodes retrieved at the time of RP. Generalized estimating equations were used to assess for differences in the adjusted number of lymph nodes retrieved after accounting for patient and hospital characteristics and surgical approach. Results: Overall, 35,876 patients were diagnosed with intermediate (61.2%) and high-risk (38.8%) prostate cancer and underwent RP and PLND. On multivariable analysis, open radical prostatectomy (ORP) and high volume and academic hospitals were independently associated with greater lymph node counts compared to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and medium/low and community hospitals, respectively (all p<0.001). After adjusting for patient and hospital variables, higher adjusted lymph nodes counts were observed for ORP compared to RARP (7.1 vs. 6.1; p<0.001). Adjusted counts were also higher for high volume compared to medium/low volume hospitals (7.8 vs. 5.9; p<0.001), and academic compared to community hospitals (7.3 vs. 5.6; p<0.001). Conclusions: Among patients with aggressive prostate cancer treated with RP and PLND, lymph node counts varied by surgical approach and hospital characteristics.

Objective To evaluate the relationship between partial nephrectomy ( PN ) and hospital availability of robot‐assisted surgery from a population‐based cohort in the USA . Methods After merging the Nationwide Inpatient Sample ( NIS ) and the A merican Hospital Association survey from 2006 to 2008, we identified 21 179 patients who underwent either PN or radical nephrectomy ( RN ) for renal cell carcinoma ( RCC ). The primary outcome assessed was the type of nephrectomy performed. Multivariable logistic regression identified the patient and hospital characteristics associated with receipt of PN . Results We identified 4832 (22.8%) and 16 347 (77.2%) patients who were treated for RCC with PN and RN , respectively. On multivariable analysis, patients were more likely to receive PN at academic centres (odds ratio [ OR ] 2.77; P < 0.001), urban centres ( OR 3.66; P < 0.001) and A merican College of Surgeons ( ACOS )‐designated cancer centres ( OR : 1.10; P < 0.05) compared with non‐academic, rural and non‐ ACOS ‐designated cancer centre hospitals, respectively. Robot‐assisted surgery availability at a hospital was also associated with a higher adjusted odds of PN compared with centres without that availability ( OR 1.28; P < 0.001). Conclusions Although academic and urban locations are establi s hed factors that affect the receipt of PN for RCC , the availability of robot‐assisted surgery at a hospital was also independently associated with higher use of PN . Our results are informative in identifying other key hospital characteristics which may facilitate greater adoption of PN .

Objective To assess recommendations for prostate‐specific antigen ( PSA ) screening in a national survey of radiation oncologists and urologists following the recent USA P reventive S ervices T ask F orce ( USPSTF ) grade D recommendation. Methods A random sample of 1366 radiation oncologists and urologists were identified from the A merican M edical A ssociation P hysician M asterfile. From N ovember 2011 to A pril 2012, a mail survey was sent to query PSA screening recommendations for men at average risk of prostate cancer for the following age groups: 40–49, 50–59, 60–69, 70–74, 75–79 and ≥80 years. Multivariable logistic regression was used to test for differences in PSA ‐based screening recommendations by physician characteristics. Results Response rates were similar at 52% for radiation oncologists and urologists ( P = 0.92). Overall, 51.5% of respondents recommended PSA ‐based screening for men aged 40–49 years, while nearly all endorsed it for those aged 50–74 years (96.1% for 50–59, 97.3% for 60–69, and 87.7% for 70–74 years). However, screening recommendations decreased to 43.9% and 12.8% for men aged 75–79 and ≥80 years, respectively. On multivariable analysis, urologists were more likely to recommend screening for men aged 40–49 (odds ratio [ OR ] 3.09; P < 0.001) and 50–59 years ( OR 3.81; P = 0.01), but less likely for men aged 75–79 ( OR 0.66; P = 0.01) and ≥80 years ( OR 0.45; P = 0.002) compared with radiation oncologists. Conclusion While radiation oncologists and urologists recommended PSA screening for men aged 50–69 years, there was less agreement about screening for younger (40–49 years old) and older (≥70 years) men at average risk for prostate cancer.