Citations

Abstract Disclosure: A.A. Khan: Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Amgen Inc, Amolyt Pharma, Ascendis Pharma. B.L. Clarke: Amolyt Pharma, Ascendis Pharma, EnteraBio, Extend Bio, Takeda. M.R. Rubin: Ascendis Pharma, MBX Biosciences. P.E. Schwarz: Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Genmab, Novo Nordisk. D.M. Shoback: Ascendis Pharma. C. Gagnon: Amgen Inc, Ascendis Pharma, Novo Nordisk, Shire, Takeda. A. Palermo: None. L.G. Abbott: Abbott Laboratories, Ascendis Pharma, Clarus, Shire, Takeda. L. Kohlmeier: Amgen Inc, Ascendis Pharma, Radius Health, Inc. E. Tsourdi: Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ascendis Pharma, Kyowa Kirin, Takeda, UCB. F. Cetani: None. R. Jain: Amgen Inc, Ascendis Pharma. C. Zhao: Ascendis Pharma. B. Lai: Ascendis Pharma. M.A. Makara: Ascendis Pharma. J. Ukena: Ascendis Pharma. C.T. Sibley: Ascendis Pharma. A.D. Shu: Ascendis Pharma. L. Rejnmark: Amolyt Pharma, Ascendis Pharma, BridgeBio, Kyowa Kirin, Takeda. Background: Hypoparathyroidism is an endocrine disease caused by insufficient levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH) and is associated with reduced quality of life and a high comorbidity burden. Conventional therapy for hypoparathyroidism (active vitamin D and elemental calcium) aims to alleviate hypocalcemia but does not address insufficient PTH and may increase the risk of renal complications. Palopegteriparatide is a prodrug of PTH(1-34), administered subcutaneously once daily, designed to provide active PTH within the physiological range for 24 hours/day. It is approved by the Food and Drug Administration, European Commission, and Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. This analysis evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of palopegteriparatide in adults with chronic hypoparathyroidism through week 156 of the PaTHway trial. Methods: PaTHway is a phase 3 trial with a 26-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled period followed by an ongoing open-label extension period. Serum biochemistries were assessed at baseline and regular intervals. Renal function was assessed by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Safety assessments included 24-hour urine calcium and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Results: At week 156, 89% (73/82) of participants remained in the trial; of those, 96% were independent from conventional therapy (no active vitamin D and ≤600 mg/day elemental calcium) and 88% had normal albumin-adjusted serum calcium levels (8.3-10.6 mg/dL) with a mean (SD) of 8.9 (0.6) mg/dL. Mean (SD) serum phosphate (3.4 [0.6] mg/dL) and calcium x phosphate product (30.6 [5.4] mg2/dL2) levels remained within normal ranges through week 156. Mean (SD) eGFR at week 156 was 78.0 (14.5) mL/min/1.73 m2, reflecting a mean (SD) increase of 8.8 (11.9) mL/min/1.73 m2 from baseline (P<0.0001); 59% and 43% of participants had an increase in eGFR of ≥5 mL/min/1.73 m2 and ≥10 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. Among participants with baseline eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (n=23), the mean (SD) increase in eGFR was 14.0 (8.9) mL/min/1.73 m2 from baseline to week 156. Mean (SD) 24-hour urine calcium levels normalized with palopegteriparatide treatment, remaining below the upper limit of normal (≤250 mg/day) through week 156 (162.1 [117.8] mg/day). TEAEs were mostly grade 1 or 2, with no new safety signals identified. Conclusion: Through year 3 of the PaTHway trial, retention rate was high and palopegteriparatide demonstrated consistent longer-term safety and efficacy, which included the maintenance of serum and urine biochemistries within normal levels and sustained improvement in renal function. Presentation: Saturday, July 12, 2025

Abstract Disclosure: D.S. Ali: None. Z. Chung: None. L. Kamel: None. S. Björnsdottir: Shire. B.L. Clarke: Shire, Takeda, Ascendis, Calcilytix. S. Hahner: None. L.C. Hofbauer: Amgen Inc, Ascendis, UCB, Ascendis, Amolyte. P. Houillier: None. S.W. Ing: Amgen Inc, Radius Health, Inc, Takeda, AscendAlexion, Amolyt, Ascendis, Calcilytix, Kyowa Kirin. M.A. Levine: Takeda, Amolyt, Calcilytix. M. Mannstadt: Takeda, Amolyt, Calcilytix. L. Rejnmark: Takeda, Amolyt, Ascendis, Calcilytix. D.M. Shoback: Amolyt, Ascendis, member of the advisory board (PARADIGHM). M. Brandi: Takeda, Eli Lilly & Company, Calcilytix, Kyowa Kirin, UCB, Abiogen, Alexion, Amolyt, Amorphical, Bruno Farmaceutici, CoGeDi, Echolight. A.A. Khan: Takeda, Amgen Inc, Alexion, Ascendis, Amolyt, Calcilytix. Background: Hypoparathyroidism (HypoPT) is a rare endocrine disorder that requires close evaluation and follow up during pregnancy to minimize maternal and fetal complications. The primary objectives of this study are to evaluate the use of rhPTH (1-84) during pregnancy by analyzing data from the PARADIGHM disease registry, and to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes among patients who continued PTH therapy during pregnancy versus those on conventional therapy (CT). Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of data in the PARADIGHM registry. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in women treated with rhPTH (1-84) were compared to women who received CT. Results: We analyzed 39 pregnancies of 32 women. Of those, 4 women (6 pregnancies) used rhPTH (1-84) either before or during pregnancy and 28 women (33 pregnancies) continued CT during pregnancy. The mean (SD) maternal age at enrollment was 31.7 (5.6) years. Postsurgical HypoPT was the most common etiology (68.8%). The mean gestational age at delivery was 36 (2.4) weeks (PTH-treated) vs 38.3 (3.3) weeks (CT) (p=0.162). Preterm delivery rates were higher in the PTH-treated group (50% vs. 27%, p=0.591), but this was not statistically significant. Two women had pre-eclampsia, one in each group (PTH-treated and CT). In the PTH-treated group, one pregnancy resulted in a stillbirth, and one infant was born with congenital anomalies (16.7% each). Conclusions: The safety of rhPTH (1-84) use in pregnancy cannot be determined at this time. The PTH-treated group exhibited trends towards higher rates of preterm delivery, but the rates of stillbirth, and congenital anomalies were low and comparable in both groups of women. Larger studies are necessary to determine the optimal approach to manage women with HypoPT during pregnancy. Presentation: Sunday, July 13, 2025

BACKGROUND: Pelvic exenteration is the treatment of choice for selected patients with locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal cancer. Involvement of major pelvic neurovascular structures and bone was historically considered a contraindication due to unacceptably high rates of morbidity and low R0 resection rates. OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of these “high-complexity” exenterative resections to those of “conventional” pelvic exenteration. DESIGN: International multicenter retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: Sixteen specialized exenteration centers. PATIENTS: Those who underwent total pelvic exenteration for locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal cancer between 2018 and 2023 at participating centers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perioperative resource utilization, morbidity, mortality, and R0 resection rates were reported. RESULTS: Seven hundred sixty-three patients underwent total pelvic exenteration, of whom 478 (63%) and 285 (37%) required conventional and high-complexity procedures, respectively. High-complexity pelvic exenteration was associated with longer operating time (600 vs 480 minutes, p < 0.001 for locally advanced primary rectal cancer, 623 vs 480 minutes, p < 0.001 for locally recurrent rectal cancer), intensive care stay (2 vs 1 day, p < 0.001 and 3 vs 1 day, p < 0.001), hospital stay (19 vs 15 days, p = 0.008 and 23 vs 15 days, p < 0.001), and higher blood loss (2000 vs 1236 mL, p < 0.001 and 3000 vs 1600 mL, p < 0.001). Morbidity and mortality outcomes and R0 resection rates were similar between the groups. LIMITATIONS: Generalizability of findings outside of expert units. CONCLUSIONS: High-complexity pelvic exenteration for the treatment of rectal cancer is associated with similar morbidity, mortality, and R0 resection rates, but it has a significantly higher operative time, blood loss, and hospital resource utilization compared to conventional pelvic exenteration. In high-volume, specialized centers, these techniques are considered the standard of care for appropriately selected patients with tumors that involve major pelvic bone or neurovascular structures. See Video Abstract . EXENTERACIÓN PÉLVICA TOTAL CONVENCIONAL FRENTE A EXENTERACIÓN PÉLVICA TOTAL DE ALTA COMPLEJIDAD PARA EL CÁNCER RECTAL LOCALMENTE AVANZADO Y LOCALMENTE RECURRENTE: UN ESTUDIO MULTICÉNTRICO INTERNACIONAL ANTECEDENTES: La exenteración pélvica es el tratamiento de elección para determinados pacientes con cáncer rectal primario y recurrente localmente avanzado. La afectación de las principales estructuras neurovasculares y óseas pélvicas se consideraba históricamente una contraindicación debido a las tasas inaceptablemente altas de morbilidad y a las bajas tasas de resección R0. OBJETIVO: Comparar los resultados de estas resecciones exenteración «de alta complejidad» con los de la exenteración pélvica «convencional». DISEÑO: Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo multicéntrico internacional. ENTORNOS: Dieciséis centros especializados en exenteración. PACIENTES: Aquellos que se sometieron a una exenteración pélvica total por cáncer rectal primario y recurrente localmente avanzado entre 2018 y 2023 en los centros participantes. PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADOS: Se informaron la utilización de recursos perioperatorios, la morbilidad, la mortalidad y las tasas de resección R0. RESULTADOS: 763 pacientes se sometieron a una exenteración pélvica total, de los cuales 478 (63 %) y 285 pacientes (37 %) requirieron procedimientos convencionales y de alta complejidad, respectivamente. La exenteración pélvica de alta complejidad se asoció con un tiempo quirúrgico más prolongado (600 frente a 480 minutos, p < 0,001 para el cáncer rectal primario localmente avanzado, 623 frente a 480 minutos, p < 0,001 para el cáncer rectal localmente recurrente), estancia en cuidados intensivos (2 frente a 1 día, p < 0,001 y 3 frente a 1 día, p < 0,001), estancia hospitalaria (19 frente a 15 días, p = 0,008 y 23 frente a 15 días, p < 0,001) y mayor pérdida de sangre (2000 frente a 1236 ml, p < 0,001 y 3000 frente a 1600 ml, p < 0,001). Los resultados de morbilidad y mortalidad, así como las tasas de resección R0, fueron similares entre los grupos. LIMITACIONES: Generalización de los resultados fuera de las unidades especializadas CONCLUSIONES: La exenteración pélvica de alta complejidad para el tratamiento del cáncer de recto se asocia con tasas similares de morbilidad, mortalidad y resección R0, pero con un tiempo quirúrgico, una pérdida de sangre y una utilización de recursos hospitalarios significativamente mayores en comparación con la exenteración pélvica convencional. En centros especializados con un gran volumen de casos, estas técnicas se consideran el tratamiento estándar para pacientes adecuadamente seleccionados con tumores que afectan a los huesos pélvicos principales o a las estructuras neurovasculares. ( AI-generated translation )

Abstract Women make up 51% of the world's population, and the global population of postmenopausal women is growing. About 25% of these women experience debilitating menopausal symptoms. Since it is important that all health care professionals have a fundamental knowledge of managing women presenting with symptoms related to the menopause, this European Society of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline was developed. It provides guidance on evaluation and optimal clinical management of women who go through the menopause in middle age, those with Premature Ovarian Insufficiency (POI), Early Menopause and those for whom hormones are not appropriate, including women with, or at high risk of, breast cancer. This guideline discusses the benefits and risks of hormone therapy administration as well as summarizing other treatments for menopausal symptoms. Further, the contentious issue of the impact of menopausal hormone therapy in the prevention of chronic disease is considered.

ABSTRACT Background Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) has demonstrated potential in characterizing intracranial tumors, including glioblastoma. The influence of pathology on measurement consistency and interobserver agreement needs evaluation to promote MRE implementation as a quantitative biomarker. Purpose To assess repeatability and interobserver agreement of absolute and normalized magnitude of the complex shear modulus (| G *|), storage modulus ( G ′), and loss modulus ( G ″) in glioblastoma. Study Type Prospective. Population Thirteen adults (5 male, 8 female, mean age 66.23 years) with histopathologically confirmed glioblastoma. Field Strength/Sequence 3 T MRI, modified single‐shot spin‐echo echo‐planar imaging. Assessment Two same‐session MRE acquisitions were performed with patient repositioning. The solid tumor component was independently segmented by 2 observers on contrast‐enhanced T1‐weighted images co‐registered to MRE maps. Statistical Tests Repeatability was assessed using the repeatability coefficient, coefficient of variation, and Bland–Altman plots, and interobserver agreement by the intraclass correlation coefficient. The Wilcoxon signed‐rank test compared parameters and coefficients of variation between tumor‐normal‐appearing white matter and absolute and normalized measurements. Significance was set at 0.05. Results Tumor | G *| and G ′ showed repeatability coefficients of 0.07–0.08 kPa and 0.05 kPa, compared with 0.13 kPa (| G *|) and 0.15–0.16 kPa ( G ′) for normalized measurements. Coefficients of variation in tumor regions were 1.42% ± 1.12%–1.60% ± 1.41% for | G *| and 1.19% ± 0.96%–2.08% ± 2.22% for G ′, significantly lower than normalized values (4.82% ± 4.49%–4.21% ± 4.27% for | G *|; 5.12% ± 5.04%–5.45% ± 4.53% for G ′). Tumor | G *| and G ′ showed excellent interobserver agreement (intraclass correlation coefficients 0.97 and 0.95). Tumor G ″ demonstrated higher variability than | G *| and G ′ (coefficients of variation 8.58% ± 7.69%–7.51% ± 6.73%), with no significant difference between absolute and normalized measurements ( p = 0.14). Data Conclusion Tumor | G *| and G ′ are the most repeatable metrics in glioblastoma. Normalization reduces measurement repeatability due to normal‐appearing white matter variability. The small sample size ( n = 13) limits generalizability. Evidence Level 2. Technical Efficacy Stage 2.

Abstract In recent years, various tracking technologies that work independently of imaging systems have been proposed to automate, simplify, and enhance various tasks in the brachytherapy treatment workflow. These tasks, critical to the overall accuracy of the therapeutic dose delivery, include applicator, catheter and needle insertion guidance, and reconstruction as well as transfer tube connection in afterloading technique. Task Group 317 was established as a joint American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) and European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) committee to review: the current state‐of‐the‐art scientific literature as it pertains to tracking technology in the field of brachytherapy; the benefits and issues related to the use of the technology for automated reconstruction of brachytherapy implants, quality control (QC) tasks such as channel path and tip reconstruction, and real‐time guidance tasks; their limitations, in particular in the clinical environment and, finally, to develop recommendations related to commissioning, quality assurance (QA) and clinical use. The Task Group has looked in detail at key tracking technologies in advanced brachytherapy applications: infrared, electromagnetic, fiber optic shape sensing (fiber Bragg grating), and active radiofrequency coil tracking. For each, the performance and accuracy in well‐controlled conditions as well as in clinically relevant environments are provided. Guidelines for clinical implementations, including target accuracy and performance needed for critical tasks, are summarized. Risk‐based analysis is discussed in the context of an electromagnetic‐based tracking system used as part of a clinical trial. The report concludes with the essential elements of an effective quality management program dedicated to the advanced features enabled by the above‐described technology.

Background & aims Pregnancy can be a complex and risk filled event for women with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). High-quality studies in this population are lacking, with limited data on medications approved to treat IBD during pregnancy. For patients, limited knowledge surrounding pregnancy impacts pregnancy rates, medication adherence, and outcomes. Limited provider knowledge leads to highly varied practices in care affected by local dogma, available resources, individual interpretation of the literature, and fear of harming the fetus. The variations in guidelines by different societies and countries reflect this and lead to confusion for physicians and patients alike. The Global Consensus Consortium is a group of 39 IBD and content experts and 7 patient advocates from 6 continents who convened to review and assess current data and come to an agreement on best practices based on these data. Methods The GRADE process was used when sufficient published data were available and the RAND process in those instances where expert opinion was needed to guide consistent practice. Recommendations were informed by the guiding principle that maternal health best supports infant health. Results The topics were divided into ten categories with 34 GRADE recommendations and 35 Consensus statements. Conclusions Overall, the goal of the group was to provide data-driven and practical guidance to improve the care of women with IBD around the globe based on the best available research.

Abstract Background & Aims Pregnancy can be a complex and risk-filled event for women with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). High-quality studies in this population are lacking, with limited data on medications approved to treat IBD during pregnancy. For patients, limited knowledge surrounding pregnancy impacts pregnancy rates, medication adherence, and outcomes. Limited provider knowledge leads to highly varied practices in care affected by local dogma, available resources, individual interpretation of the literature, and fear of harming the fetus. The variations in guidelines by different societies and countries reflect this and lead to confusion for physicians and patients alike. The Global Consensus Consortium is a group of 39 IBD and content experts and 7 patient advocates from 6 continents who convened to review and assess current data and come to an agreement on best practices based on these data. Methods The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) process was used when sufficient published data were available and the RAND (Research and Development) process in those instances where expert opinion was needed to guide consistent practice. Recommendations were informed by the guiding principle that maternal health best supports infant health. Results The topics were divided into ten categories with 34 GRADE recommendations and 35 consensus statements. Conclusions Overall, the goal of the group was to provide data-driven and practical guidance to improve the care of women with IBD around the globe based on the best available research.