Citations

Background: Immunosuppressive therapy (IST) is considered the standard front-line treatment for acquired severe aplastic anemia (SAA) for pts >40 years. For pts aged <40 years who have a suitable human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor (MSD), hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is recommended. This recommendation is based on the toxicity associated with alternative donors; haploidentical (HAPLO) and unrelated donor (URD) HSCT for patients who lack a MSD. However, the hematopoietic response after IST is ~ 70-80%, even after augmentation with eltrombopag in the front-line setting, and failure-free survival (FFS, defined as patients alive and in remission without clonal disease more than 10 years after IST) remains < 40%. HSCT is often employed as a second line salvage therapy for those who do not respond to IST or have disease recurrence. However, outcomes after HSCT are often compromised because of IST-related complications such as clonal evolution, development of donor specific antibodies, infectious adverse events and organ dysfunction. In contrast, a successful allogeneic HSCT leads to relatively prompt hematopoietic and immune reconstitution and mitigates the risk of secondary clonal disease. Innovations in recent decades, such as improved graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis and supportive care, have steadily reduced the morbidity and mortality of adults undergoing HSCT from unrelated or mismatched donors and expanded the donor pool such that almost all pts with SAA have a potential donor available. The use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is now a well-established approach to facilitate engraftment and mitigate the risk of GVHD. It was successfully used in relapsed/refractory SAA pts using HAPLO donors in the multi-center BMT CTN #1502 trial (NCT02918292). Similar PTCy based approaches have been effective in the upfront setting with HAPLO and URD in small single center studies. Opened in July 2024, the CureAA trial (NCT06517641), seeks to increase donor options for SAA pts who have not yet received IST by using PTCy based GVHD prophylaxis for HSCT using HAPLO or URD. Study Design and Methods: This BMT CTN study (#2207) is a prospective multi-center phase II trial to assess efficacy of HSCT using HAPLO or URD bone marrow with a reduced intensity, thymoglobulin (ATG)-containing preparative regimen and PTCy GVHD prophylaxis in previously untreated SAA pts. This trial has two parallel cohorts for each donor type, HAPLO and URD, with an accrual goal of 30 participants in each cohort. All will receive ATG (0.5mg/kg on day -9 and 2mg/kg on days -8 and -7), cyclophosphamide (14.5mg/kg on days -6 and -5), fludarabine (30mg/m2 on days -6 to -2), 400 cGy total body irradiation (day -1 in a single fraction), a marrow graft (goal >2.5 x 108 nucleated cells per kg of recipient) on day 0 and PTCy (50mg/kg on days +3 and +4). Additionally, participants receive tacrolimus (until day +180) and mycophenolate mofetil days +5-35. The primary objective of the trial is to estimate the GVHD-free failure-free survival (GFFS) rate at 1 year after initiation of conditioning. GFFS is a composite endpoint of survival without grade III-IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD requiring immunosuppression, or primary or secondary graft failure requiring second definitive therapy within 1 year after initiation of conditioning. Secondary objectives will evaluate patient survival, engraftment, transfusion dependence, cumulative incidence of GVHD and hematologic response. Health related quality of life, healthcare utilization and financial toxicity data will also be collected. These endpoints will allow clinical comparison with current results achieved with upfront IST in other studies. We hypothesize that this HSCT approach will improve survival without significant transplant-associated morbidity by using a low toxicity regimen that reduces rates of GVHD and provides rapid hematologic recovery without graft failure, thereby making HAPLO and URD HSCT a viable option for initial upfront treatment of SAA. The ability to use mismatched donors will also ensure that a HSCT option is more widely available to all racial/ethnic groups. This collaborative study was funded by grants U10HL069294, U24HL138660 to the BMT CTN from the NHLBI/ NCI, along with funding from Sanofi. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Background and Significance Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and other LBCLs account for 35-40% of non-Hodgkin lymphoma cases in North America, Europe, and East Asia. Rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP), typically administered for 6 cycles, is the standard therapy for DLBCL and is curative in ~60-70% of patients (pts). However, 30-40% of pts have relapsed/refractory (RR) DLBCL following treatment with R-CHOP, with poor clinical outcomes. International Prognostic Index (IPI) scores of 3-5 are used to identify high-risk (HR) pts who are more likely to be RR following treatment. Additionally, pts with IPI scores of 1-2 who also have bulky disease and/or very high lactate dehydrogenase levels (LDH), have been identified as a HR subset with similar outcomes to pts with an IPI score of 3 (Maurer et al. ASH 2023, #4512). First-line therapy represents the greatest opportunity to address the unmet need for these pts. Golcadomide (GOLCA) is a potential first-in-class oral cereblon E3 ligase modulator (CELMoD™) agent purposefully designed for the treatment of lymphoma. GOLCA co-opts cereblon to induce targeted degradation of the transcription factors Ikaros/Aiolos, inducing deep, rapid, and extensive tumor killing, independent of cell of origin, and enhanced immunostimulatory activity. In the phase 1b study CC-220-DLBCL-001, GOLCA combined with R-CHOP was well tolerated, showing promising activity and combinability with high rates of durable responses irrespective of cell of origin in pts with previously untreated aggressive BCL, including those with HR disease (Hoffmann et al. EHA 2024, S235). Additionally, GOLCA has shown encouraging efficacy and safety profiles in pts with RR DLBCL, both as a monotherapy (Michot et al. ICML 2023, P90) and in combination with rituximab (Chavez et al. ASH 2023, P4496). The efficacy and safety data observed in early-phase studies suggest promising activity and a manageable safety profile. This supports further investigation of the GOLCA + R-CHOP combination in the phase 3 setting. Here, we present the study design of GOLSEEK-1, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study (NCT06356129) comparing the efficacy and safety of GOLCA + R-CHOP vs placebo + R-CHOP in pts with previously untreated HR LBCL. Study Design and Methods Approximately 850 pts with previously untreated LBCL will be randomized 1:1 to either GOLCA + R-CHOP or placebo + R-CHOP. Pts must have a histologically confirmed diagnosis of LBCL according to WHO 2022 classification, including: DLBCL, not otherwise specified (NOS) including ABC and GCB subtypes; high-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 rearrangements, or NOS; T-cell/histiocyte-rich LBCL; Epstein-Barr Virus-Positive DLBCL. Other key inclusion criteria include an IPI score of 1 or 2 considered HR (LDH > 1.3 × upper limit of normal and/or bulky disease, defined as a single lesion of ≥ 7 cm [Maurer et al. ASH 2023, #4512]), or IPI score ≥ 3; and measurable disease as defined by the Lugano classification. Key exclusion criteria include other lymphoma subtypes such as primary mediastinal LBCL; primary cutaneous DLBCL-leg type, grade 3b follicular lymphoma (FL); transformed indolent lymphoma; anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive LBCL; primary effusion lymphoma; and Burkitt lymphoma, as well as documented or suspected central nervous system involvement. Randomization will be stratified by IPI score (1-2 with risk factors and 3 vs 4-5) and bulky disease (> 7 cm vs ≤ 7 cm). After a screening period of ≤ 4 weeks, pts will receive GOLCA (0.4 mg) or placebo orally once daily for 7 consecutive days in each of 6 cycles in combination with R-CHOP in 21-day cycles. The primary endpoint of this study is progression-free survival (PFS) in untreated HR LBCL, assessed by investigator based on the Lugano Response Criteria. Key secondary endpoints include PFS in untreated non-high-grade BCL, event-free survival in pts with untreated HR LBCL, independently assessed complete metabolic response rate, undetectable minimal residual disease by PhasED-Seq (defined as undetectable circulating tumor DNA levels at treatment end), and overall survival. Patient follow-up will occur for up to approximately 67 months after beginning treatment. This study is recruiting at 293 sites in 37 countries, across the United States, Europe, Latin America, and East Asia.

Background Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is more common in males, with a male to female ratio of approximately 3:1. However, it is unclear whether disease characteristics and survival outcomes differ by sex. Additionally, the impact of race and ethnicity in MCL is understudied due to underrepresentation of minorities in clinical studies and trials. In this study, we utilized the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to examine patient and disease characteristics and survival outcomes of MCL by sex, race and ethnicity. Methods Patients diagnosed with MCL in 2004-2020 were identified from NCDB. Patient and disease characteristics were compared between groups using Chi-squared tests. Overall survival (OS) analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards model. Results A total of 35,135 patients was included. The median follow-up was 83.0 months (95% CI 81.9-84.1). 24,980 (71.1%) patients were male and 10,155 (28.9%) were female. Females had more elderly (age ≥65: 65.9% vs 59.0%; p<0.001), lower Charlson-Deyo Score (CDS ≥2: 7.0% vs 8.6%; p<0.001) and fewer stage III-IV diagnoses (80.5% vs 82.6%; p<0.001). Females were less likely to receive upfront treatment (80.7% vs 85.3%; p<0.001), treatment at academic centers (36.8% vs 40.9%; p<0.001) or transplant (11.0% vs 13.7%; p<0.001). Compared to males, females were more likely to live in metropolitan areas (83.7% vs 81.6%; p<0.001), had similar incomes, had more Medicare (60.4% vs 53.1%) and fewer private insurance (33.2% vs 38.6%; p<0.001). Female patients had better OS, with a median OS of 76.0 (95% CI 72.4-79.6) vs 67.8 months (95% CI 65.9-69.6; p<0.001). In the multivariable Cox model adjusting for age, race, ethnicity, CDS, stage, upfront treatment (vs surveillance or no treatment), facility (academic vs nonacademic), transplant, residence (metropolitan vs urban or rural) and insurance, female sex remained associated with superior OS (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.793-0.890; p<0.001). For race, 32,399 (92.2%) patients were White, 1,465 (4.2%) were Black, 942 (2.7%) were others and 329 (0.9%) were unknown. Compared to White patients, Black patients had fewer elderly (52.9% vs 61.7%; p<0.001), higher CDS (≥2: 11.4% vs 7.9%; p<0.001), similar stage III-IV (80.7% vs 82.1%; p=0.276) and upfront treatment (84.7% vs 84.0%; p=0.074), were more likely to be treated at academic centers (50.6% vs 38.9%; p<0.001), were less likely to receive transplant (11.1% vs 13.0%; p=0.042), were more likely to live in metropolitan areas (91.0% vs 81.5%; p<0.001), had lower income, had more uninsured (4.4% vs 2.0%) and Medicaid (9.8% vs 3.7%) and fewer Medicare (47.4% vs 56.0%; p<0.001). Black and White patients had similar OS, with a median of 67.9 (95% CI 57.5-78.2) vs 69.6 months (95% CI 67.8 vs 71.3; p=0.697). In the multivariable Cox model, Black vs White race was not associated with OS (HR 1.086, 95% CI 0.952-1.240; p=0.219). For ethnicity, 31,717 (90.3%) patients were non-Hispanic, 1,894 (5.4%) were Hispanic and 1,534 (4.3%) were unknown. Hispanics had fewer elderly (51.3% vs 61.5%; p<0.001), lower CDS (≥2: 6.4% vs 8.2%; p=0.018), similar stage III-IV (81.2% vs 82.1%; p=0.467), were more likely to receive upfront treatment (86.0% vs 83.9%; p<0.001), more likely to be treated at academic centers (49.9% vs 39.5%; p<0.001), equally likely to receive transplant (13.0% vs 13.1%; p=0.943), more likely to live in metropolitan areas (95.4% vs 81.6%; p<0.001), had lower income, had more uninsured (9.6% vs 1.8%) and Medicaid (15.2% vs 9.6%) and fewer Medicare (40.3% vs 55.9%; p<0.001). Hispanics had better OS, with a median OS of 84.4 (95% CI 71.7-97.1) vs 70.5 months (95% CI 68.7-72.2; p<0.001). However, in the multivariable Cox model, Hispanic ethnicity was not associated with OS (HR 0.952, 95% CI 0.839-1.080; p=0.448). Conclusion This study is the first of its scale to demonstrate that female MCL patients have superior survival outcomes compared to males. It also demonstrated that neither Black race nor Hispanic ethnicity appears to be associated with worse survival outcomes. Despite its size, the NCDB is limited in the treatment information and disease characteristics it provides, including MIPI score, Ki-67, blastoid/pleomorphic morphology, and TP53 status. Thus, additional real-world dataset studies are needed to gain a deeper understanding of potential differences in sex, race and ethnicity with regards to disease characteristics and survival outcomes.

Background: Follicular dendritic cell sarcoma (FDCS) is a rare low- to intermediate-grade sarcoma, typically presenting as a slowly growing, painless mass composed of spindle-shaped cells in a whorled pattern. First described in 1986, FDCS has since been identified in several hundred cases. FDCS originates from mesenchymal dendritic cells and is distinct from other histiocytic neoplasms. Its management aligns more with soft tissue sarcomas. Epidemiologically, FDCS is exceedingly rare, constituting less than 0.4% of soft tissue sarcomas. Methods: With IRB approval, we identified patients with biopsy-proven FDCS treated at Mayo Clinic. Chart review extracted clinical characteristics, laboratory testing, treatment data, and clinical outcomes, compiled into Excel. Data analysis was performed through RStudios. Descriptive statistics of patient characteristics, such as gender and stage of disease, were summarized in tables. We compared overall survival (OS) through Kaplan Meier curves, stratifying patients into cohorts based on topics of interest, such as differences in survival in nodal vs. extranodal disease or differences in survival among different chemotherapy regimens. Results: Forty patients met the inclusion criteria, of biopsy proved FCDS. Median age at diagnosis was 57.7 years (SD 14). Men comprised 45% of patients. Locations of malignancy were abdomen and pelvis (32.5%), thoracic and pulmonary regions (32.5%), lymph nodes and neck (20.0%), musculoskeletal (2.5%), and other locations (12.5%). Primary therapies included surgical resection (42.5%), systemic chemotherapy (32.5%), no treatment (10.0%), radiation (2.5%), with data missing for 12.5% of cases. Concurrent or preceding Castleman's Disease was seen in 7.5% (3/40) of patients; one case preceded FCDS, and two were concurrent. Of these patients with Castleman's Disease, one was resected and the other two were not. Two cases were unicentric, and one was multicentric. First-line systemic chemotherapy was most often gemcitabine and docetaxel, with 9/40 patients receiving this regimen. Ifosfamide and doxorubicin were utilized in 3/40 patients. 2/4 patients had received doxorubicin alone. 2/4 patients had received CHOP. The response rate for patients with gemcitabine and docetaxel was complete response for 2/9 (22%) patients, partial response for 2/9 (22%), stable disease for 2/9 (22%), progressive disease for 1/9 (11%), and missing for 2/9 (22%), giving an overall response rate of 67%. For ifosfamide and doxorubicin, one patient had partial response (33%), another had stable disease (33%), and the last patient's data was missing (33%), adding up to a 66% overall response rate. For CHOP, one patient had progressive disease, and the other had partial response. For doxorubicin, both patients had stable disease. At a median follow-up of 29.5 months (IQR 9.2-75.2 months), the median OS was 160.68 months for the group with both nodal and extranodal disease versus 39.95 months for the extranodal disease-only group. The median OS of the nodal disease alone was not reached, with an estimated 2-year OS of 75%. To evaluate the impact of various primary therapies on outcomes in patients with advanced disease, we conducted a survival analysis by therapy used (no treatment, radiation, surgical resection, and systemic chemotherapy). Patients receiving no treatment had a median survival time of 28.9 months, while those treated with radiation had a median survival time of 19.3 months. Patients undergoing surgical resection had an undetermined median survival time, but notably, 80% were alive at the end of the time period analyzed in this study with a median follow-up time of 60.7 months. Those receiving systemic chemotherapy had a median survival time of 30.7 months. Conclusions: This project is one of the largest known single-center studies dedicated to FDCS. We show that the incidence of preceding or concurrent Castleman's Disease is relatively low. Gemcitabine and docetaxel was the most utilized chemotherapy regimen, but there weren't enough data to conclude if this regimen had a better response rate compared to others. Surgical resection of advanced disease is associated with superior outcomes. When systemic therapy is needed, the median survival was lower.

ABSTRACT Background Immune exclusion inhibits anti-tumor immunity and response to immunotherapy, but its mechanisms remain poorly defined. In triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), an aggressive and generally immune-rich subtype, an immune-cold microenvironment predicts poor prognosis due to a limited response to chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. This study aimed to identify mechanisms regulating immune infiltration in TNBC. Methods We performed spatial transcriptomic analysis comparing immune-enriched versus immune-cold treatment-naïve TNBCs. Functional analyses, including loss-of-function and reconstitution experiments, were conducted to investigate the role of Trophoblast Cell-Surface Antigen 2 (TROP2), a key target of anti-cancer Antibody Drug Conjugates (ADCs), in promoting TNBC progression. A humanized TROP2 syngeneic TNBC model was used to assess the effects of TROP2-targeting in combination with anti-PD1 therapy. Additionally, data from patients treated with immune checkpoint blockade were used to test hypotheses from the preclinical findings. Results We reveal that TROP2 controls barrier-mediated immune exclusion in TNBC through Claudin 7 association and tight junction regulation. TROP2 expression is inversely correlated with T cell infiltration and predicts poor outcomes in TNBC. We demonstrate that TROP2 is sufficient to drive tumor progression in vivo in a CD8 T cell-dependent manner, while its loss deregulates expression and localization of multiple tight junction proteins, enabling T cell infiltration. We show that TROP2 targeting via hRS7, the antibody component of the ADC Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), enhances the anti-PD1 response and improves T cell accessibility and effector function. Correspondingly, TROP2 expression is highly associated with lack of response to anti-PD1 therapy in human breast cancer. Conclusions This study defines a new mechanism of barrier-mediated immune exclusion in cancer controlled by TROP2-dependent tight junctions. This mechanism drives tumor progression but can be targeted via TROP2-directed therapy to activate anti-tumor immunity and enhance immunotherapy response. What is already known on this topic Barrier-mediated immune exclusion is emerging as a mechanism of immune evasion in cancer such as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), but its molecular underpinnings remain poorly understood. TROP2 is a surface glycoprotein targeted by antibody-drug conjugates such as Sacituzumab govitecan, yet its functional role beyond drug delivery has been unclear. What this study adds This study identifies TROP2 as a key regulator of tight junction-mediated immune exclusion in TNBC, independent of its intracellular signaling function. TROP2 promotes an immune-cold tumor microenvironment by enforcing mechanical barriers that limit T cell infiltration. How this study might affect research, practice or policy These findings establish TROP2 as a functional driver of immune evasion and provide a mechanistic rationale for combining TROP2-targeting therapies with immune checkpoint inhibitors to overcome resistance in immune-excluded tumors.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Stereotactic procedures are used to manage a diverse set of patients across a variety of clinical contexts. The stereotactic devices and software used in these procedures vary between surgeons, but the fundamental principles that constitute safe and accurate execution do not. The aim of this work is to describe these principles to equip readers with a generalizable knowledge base to execute and understand stereotactic procedures. METHODS: A combination of a review of the literature and empirical experience from several experienced surgeons led to the creation of this work. Thus, this work is descriptive and qualitative by nature, and the literature is used to support instead of generate the ideas of this framework. RESULTS: The principles detailed in this work are categorized based on 5 clinical domains: imaging, registration, mechanical accuracy, target planning and adjustment, and trajectory planning and adjustment. Illustrations and tables are used throughout to convey the concepts in an efficient manner. CONCLUSION: Stereotactic procedures are complex, requiring a thorough understanding of each step of the workflow. The concepts described in this work enable functional neurosurgeons with the fundamental knowledge necessary to provide optimal patient care.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Identifying and characterizing sources of targeting error in stereotactic procedures is essential to maximizing accuracy, potentially improving surgical outcomes. We aim to describe a generic framework which characterizes sources of stereotactic inaccuracy. METHODS: We assembled a list of stereotactic systems: ROSA, Neuromate, Mazor Renaissance, ExcelsiusGPS, Cirq, STarFix (FHC), Nexframe, ClearPoint, CRW, and Leksell. We searched the literature for qualitative and quantitative work identifying and quantifying potential sources of inaccuracy and describing each system's implementation using Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines. Our literature search spanned 1969 to 2024, and various studies were included, with formats ranging from phantom studies to systematic reviews. Keyword searches were conducted, and the details about each system were used to create a framework for identifying and describing the unique targeting error profile of each system. RESULTS: We describe and illustrate the details of various sources of stereotactic inaccuracies and generate a framework to unify these sources into a single framework. This framework entails 5 domains: imaging, registration, mechanical accuracy, target planning and adjustment, and trajectory planning and adjustment. This framework was applied to 10 stereotactic systems. CONCLUSION: This framework provides a rubric to analyze the sources of error for any stereotactic system. Illustrations allow the reader to understand sources of error conceptually so that they may apply them to their practice.

Abstract Background The phase III RxPONDER trial has affected treatment for node-positive (1-3), hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer with a 21-gene recurrence score (RS) less than 26. We investigated how these findings apply to different racial and ethnic groups within the trial. Methods The trial randomly assigned women to endocrine therapy (ET) or to chemotherapy plus ET. The primary clinical outcome was invasive disease-free survival (IDFS), with distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) as a secondary outcome. Multivariable Cox models were used to evaluate the association between race/ethnicity and survival outcomes, adjusting for clinicopathological characteristics, RS, and treatment. Results A total of 4048 women with self-reported race/ethnicity were included: Hispanic (15.1%), non-Hispanic Black (NHB) (6.1%), Native American/Pacific Islander (0.8%), Asian (8.0%), and non-Hispanic White (NHW) (70%). No differences in RS distribution, tumor size, or number of positive nodes were observed by race/ethnicity. Relative to NHWs, IDFS was worse for NHB participants (5-year IDFS 91.6% vs 87.1%, HR = 1.37; 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.81) and better for Asians (91.6% vs 93.9%, HR = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.46 to 0.91). Relative to NHW, DRFS was worse for NHB participants (5-year DRFS 95.8% vs 91.0%, HR = 1.65; 95% CI = 1.17 to 2.32) and better for Asians (95.8% vs 96.7%, HR = 0.59; 95% CI = 0.37 to 0.95). Adjusting for clinical characteristics, particularly body mass index, diminished the effect of race on outcomes. Chemotherapy treatment efficacy did not differ by race/ethnicity. Conclusions NHB women had worse clinical outcomes compared with NHWs in the RxPONDER trial despite similar RS and comparable treatment. Our study emphasizes the persistent racial disparities in breast cancer outcomes while highlighting complex interactions among contributing factors. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01272037.

Linked article: This Correspondence comments on Deslandes and Leonardi. Click here to view the article.