Ellisen, Leif W.

Background Immune exclusion inhibits antitumor immunity and response to immunotherapy, but its mechanisms remain poorly defined. In triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), an aggressive and generally immune-rich subtype, an immune-cold microenvironment predicts poor prognosis due to a limited response to chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. This study aimed to identify mechanisms regulating immune infiltration in TNBC. Methods We performed spatial transcriptomic analysis comparing immune-enriched versus immune-cold treatment-naïve TNBCs. Functional analyses, including loss-of-function and reconstitution experiments, were conducted to investigate the role of trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (TROP2), a key target of anticancer antibody drug conjugates (ADCs), in promoting TNBC progression. A humanized TROP2 syngeneic TNBC model was used to assess the effects of TROP2-targeting in combination with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) therapy. Additionally, data from patients treated with immune checkpoint blockade were used to test hypotheses from the preclinical findings. Results We reveal that TROP2 controls barrier-mediated immune exclusion in TNBC through claudin 7 association and tight junction regulation. TROP2 expression is inversely correlated with T-cell infiltration and predicts poor outcomes in TNBC. We demonstrate that TROP2 is sufficient to drive tumor progression in vivo in a CD8 T cell-dependent manner, while its loss deregulates expression and localization of multiple tight junction proteins, enabling T-cell infiltration. We show that TROP2 targeting via hRS7, the antibody component of the ADC sacituzumab govitecan, enhances the anti-PD-1 response and improves T-cell accessibility and effector function. Correspondingly, TROP2 expression is highly associated with lack of response to anti-PD-1 therapy in human breast cancer. Conclusions This study defines a new mechanism of barrier-mediated immune exclusion in cancer controlled by TROP2-dependent tight junctions. This mechanism drives tumor progression but can be targeted via TROP2-directed therapy to activate antitumor immunity and enhance immunotherapy response.

ABSTRACT Background Immune exclusion inhibits anti-tumor immunity and response to immunotherapy, but its mechanisms remain poorly defined. In triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), an aggressive and generally immune-rich subtype, an immune-cold microenvironment predicts poor prognosis due to a limited response to chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. This study aimed to identify mechanisms regulating immune infiltration in TNBC. Methods We performed spatial transcriptomic analysis comparing immune-enriched versus immune-cold treatment-naïve TNBCs. Functional analyses, including loss-of-function and reconstitution experiments, were conducted to investigate the role of Trophoblast Cell-Surface Antigen 2 (TROP2), a key target of anti-cancer Antibody Drug Conjugates (ADCs), in promoting TNBC progression. A humanized TROP2 syngeneic TNBC model was used to assess the effects of TROP2-targeting in combination with anti-PD1 therapy. Additionally, data from patients treated with immune checkpoint blockade were used to test hypotheses from the preclinical findings. Results We reveal that TROP2 controls barrier-mediated immune exclusion in TNBC through Claudin 7 association and tight junction regulation. TROP2 expression is inversely correlated with T cell infiltration and predicts poor outcomes in TNBC. We demonstrate that TROP2 is sufficient to drive tumor progression in vivo in a CD8 T cell-dependent manner, while its loss deregulates expression and localization of multiple tight junction proteins, enabling T cell infiltration. We show that TROP2 targeting via hRS7, the antibody component of the ADC Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), enhances the anti-PD1 response and improves T cell accessibility and effector function. Correspondingly, TROP2 expression is highly associated with lack of response to anti-PD1 therapy in human breast cancer. Conclusions This study defines a new mechanism of barrier-mediated immune exclusion in cancer controlled by TROP2-dependent tight junctions. This mechanism drives tumor progression but can be targeted via TROP2-directed therapy to activate anti-tumor immunity and enhance immunotherapy response. What is already known on this topic Barrier-mediated immune exclusion is emerging as a mechanism of immune evasion in cancer such as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), but its molecular underpinnings remain poorly understood. TROP2 is a surface glycoprotein targeted by antibody-drug conjugates such as Sacituzumab govitecan, yet its functional role beyond drug delivery has been unclear. What this study adds This study identifies TROP2 as a key regulator of tight junction-mediated immune exclusion in TNBC, independent of its intracellular signaling function. TROP2 promotes an immune-cold tumor microenvironment by enforcing mechanical barriers that limit T cell infiltration. How this study might affect research, practice or policy These findings establish TROP2 as a functional driver of immune evasion and provide a mechanistic rationale for combining TROP2-targeting therapies with immune checkpoint inhibitors to overcome resistance in immune-excluded tumors.

Abstract Background: Survival advantages with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) have been observed in patients (pts) with locally advanced breast cancer (BC) who achieve pathological complete response (pCR). Predicting risk of early recurrence in pts without pCR remains difficult. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may be a biomarker of neoadjuvant therapy response and recurrence. This study applied tumor genotyping of peripheral blood in pts with HER2− tumor BRCA-mutated (tBRCAm) BC treated with neoadjuvant niraparib. The relationship between ctDNA and tumor response was also characterized, with a focus on circulating TP53 mutant allelic frequency (MAF). Methods: Blood was collected from 21 pts enrolled in the study (NCT03329937) evaluating neoadjuvant niraparib in pts with localized HER2− tBRCAm BC. Pts received niraparib 200 mg once daily for two 28-day cycles. After 2 cycles, pts underwent surgery or received up to 6 cycles of niraparib and/or NACT prior to surgery. Blood samples were collected at screening, Cycle 1 Day 28 (C1D28), Cycle 2 Day 28 (C2D28), and pre-surgery. Ultrasound (USG) was done after each cycle and MRI after Cycle 2. Next-generation sequencing of cell-free plasma DNA was carried out using a proprietary target capture and analysis (Paweletz, Clin Cancer Res 2016). Results: ctDNA and TP53 mutations (TP53m) were detected at screening in 10/21 pts (47.6%). Across all 21 pts there was a correlation between TP53 MAF and baseline tumor stage (T) (mean [standard deviation], T1 0 [0], T2 0.05 [0.09], and T3 0.21 [0.12]; P=0.005). Linear regression modelling showed a positive correlation between tumor volume and baseline TP53 MAF (R2=0.206, P=0.0386). Baseline TP53 MAF also appeared to be associated with advanced disease stage (Table 1). Depletion of detectable TP53m from baseline was evident by C1D28 and persisted to pre-surgery (Table 2). This corresponded with decreases in tumor volume at C1D28 and further decreases at C2D28. Of 11 pts analyzed, 6 pts with >90% tumor volume decreases by MRI or USG at C2D28 had sustained TP53m depletion. Three pts had pCR; of these, 2 had sustained TP53m depletion (data unavailable for third pCR pt). Two pts with less robust tumor responses had increased pre-surgery TP53 MAF. Conclusions: We report the potential utility of ctDNA as a predictive biomarker for neoadjuvant niraparib response in pts with HER2− tBRCAm BC. Although sample size limited analysis of genes other than TP53, baseline ctDNA strongly correlated with tumor volume, and TP53 MAF was associated with tumor volume and trended towards association with disease stage. Longitudinal analysis of TP53 MAF suggested a correlation with niraparib response. Further study of ctDNA dynamics during NACT and correlation with pCR and long-term clinical outcomes is warranted. Funding: GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) study 213355; NCT03329937. Medical writing support was provided by Fishawack Indicia, part of Fishawack Health, funded by GSK. Table 1.Baseline TP53 MAF association with disease stage and subtypeTP53 MAFDisease Stage (I–III)Disease SubtypeStage IStage IIStage IIIHR+TNBC(n=8)(n=10)(n=3)(n=6)(n=15)Mean (SD)0.01 (0.02)0.07 (0.12)0.10 (0.05)0.02 (0.02)0.06 (0.10)HR, hormone receptor; MAF, mutant allelic frequency; SD, standard deviation; TNBC, triple-negative breast cancer. Table 2.TP53 MAF correlation with tumor volume decrease by ultrasound and MRIOutcomeScreeningCycle 1 Day 28 Cycle 2 Day 28 Pre-Surgeryn11997TP53 MAF, mean, (SD)0.09 (0.11)000.01 (0.02)n11112Percent change in tumor volume from baseline by MRI, mean (SD)-N/A*−72.6 (22.5)N/A*Percent change in tumor volume from baseline by ultrasound, mean (SD)-−60.8 (24.0)−80.6 (21.8)−95.9 (4.3)*MRI was only performed at Cycle 2 Day 28. MAF, mutant allelic frequency; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; N/A, not applicable; SD, standard deviation. Citation Format: Ming Shan, Laura Spring, Minetta C Liu, Erika Hamilton, Hanna Irie, Cesar A Santa-Maria, Steven J Isakoff, James Reeves, Leif W Ellisen, Lee P Lim, Kavita Garg, Caterina Bertucci, Bin Feng, Hailei Zhang, Kaiming Sun, Julie R Graham, Erin Hofstatter, Hyo Han. Relationship between circulating tumor DNA and response to neoadjuvant niraparib in HER2-negative, BRCA-mutated breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-13-21.

Abstract Background: Two PARP inhibitors are approved for germline BRCA1/2 mutant metastatic breast cancer (MBC), based on clinical trials demonstrating an improvement in patient outcomes and quality of life. However, germline BRCA1/2 mutations are identified in 5-10% of breast cancer, limiting their potential applicability. Our prior work demonstrated that somatic BRCA1/2 mutations can be detected in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in a proportion of patients with MBC who are not germline BRCA1/2 carriers, and that a PARP inhibitor caused growth inhibition in a circulating tumor cell line generated from a patient with MBC and a pathogenic somatic BRCA1 mutation (Vidula, Dubash, CCR, 2020). Thus, we hypothesize that a PARP inhibitor may have efficacy in somatic BRCA1/2 mutant MBC identified by cfDNA. Trial Design: This phase II investigator initiated open label clinical trial is enrolling 30 patients who have pathogenic somatic BRCA1/2 mutations found in cfDNA. Patients must not be known germline BRCA1/2 carriers. Patients receive treatment with the PARP inhibitor, talazoparib, until disease progression. Serial imaging (CT chest, abdomen, pelvis, and bone scan) occurs every 3 months, and cfDNA is collected monthly to evaluate changes in the genomic environment. Patients will also have blood collected at baseline for the Cancer Risk B assay (CR-B), a novel flow variant assay to assess double strand break repair mutations in circulating blood cells (Syeda, Genetics, 2017). Eligibility criteria: Patients with MBC (TNBC with ≥ 1 prior chemotherapy or HR+/HER2- with ≥ 1 prior hormone therapy or ineligible for hormone therapy) with a somatic BRCA1/2 mutation identified in cfDNA (established pathogenic variant) are being enrolled. Patients should not be known germline BRCA1/2 carriers (genetic testing is not required but can be obtained per physician discretion) and may not have previously received a PARP inhibitor. There is no limit on the number of prior therapies, and a prior platinum chemotherapy is allowed in the absence of disease progression on the platinum. Patients must have adequate performance status and organ function. Specific Aims: The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) using RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints include objective response rate and toxicity (NCI CTCAE v 5.0). Exploratory objectives include evaluating serial changes in BRCA1/2 mutant allelic frequency in cfDNA, evaluating the impact of BRCA1/2 reversion mutations, comparing pre- and post-treatment cfDNA results to identify markers of resistance, evaluating the CR-B assay positivity rate, and ultimately correlating these analyses with treatment response. Statistical Methods: A two-stage design with 80% power to demonstrate that talazoparib is associated with “success” (PFS > 12 weeks) in ≥53% patients (4% alpha) is being used. Accrual: This study (NCT03990896) is currently open at Massachusetts General Hospital, where 4 patients are completing screening for enrollment. This study will be activated soon at the University of California San Francisco, MD Anderson, Mayo Clinic Rochester and Jacksonville, Northwestern, and Emory (7 academic centers). Funding: Support for this study is provided by a Pfizer ASPIRE award and Conquer Cancer Foundation of ASCO–Breast Cancer Research Foundation- Career Development Award. Contact information: Neelima Vidula, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital, nvidula@mgh.harvard.edu Citation Format: Neelima Vidula, Erica Blouch, Erin Basile, Nathan Royce Ruffle-Deignan, Nora Horick, Senthil Damodaran, Alvaro Moreno Aspitia, Manali Bhave, Ami Shah, Minetta C. Liu, Joseph Sparano, Harry Ostrer, Hope Rugo, Leif W. Ellisen, Aditya Bardia. Phase II study of a PARP inhibitor in metastatic breast cancer with somaticBRCA1/2mutations identified by cell-free DNA: Genotyping based clinical trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-24-03.

Abstract This study evaluated neoadjuvant niraparib antitumor activity and safety in patients with localized HER2-negative, BRCA-mutated breast cancer. Twenty-one patients received niraparib 200 mg once daily in 28-day cycles. After 2 cycles, tumor response (≥30% reduction from baseline) by MRI was 90.5% and 40.0% (6/15) of patients who only received niraparib (2–6 cycles) had pathological complete response. No new safety signals were identified and high niraparib intratumoral concentration was observed.

TPS1110 Background: PARP inhibitors are approved for the treatment of HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with germline BRCA1/2 mutations, based on phase III studies demonstrating an improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) compared to chemotherapy in this population and better patient reported outcomes (Robson, NEJM, 2017; Litton, NEJM, 2018). However, germline BRCA1/2 mutations account for only 5-10% of breast cancer, limiting the current clinical applicability of PARP inhibitors. Somatic BRCA1/2 mutations are detectable in circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in ̃13.5% of patients with MBC; in pre-clinical models, pathogenic somatic BRCA1/2 mutations have been shown to respond to PARP inhibition (Vidula, CCR, 2020). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of talazoparib, a PARP inhibitor, in patients with MBC who have somatic BRCA1/2 mutations detectable in cfDNA, in the absence of a germline BRCA1/2 mutation, which we hypothesize will be effective in this setting. This study may help expand the population of patients with MBC who benefit from PARP inhibitors. Methods: This is an investigator initiated multicenter, single arm, phase II clinical trial studying the efficacy of talazoparib in 30 patients with MBC who have pathogenic somatic BRCA1/2 mutations detected in cfDNA. Patients with MBC who are found to have pathogenic somatic BRCA1/2 mutations detected in cfDNA in the absence of a germline BRCA1/2 mutation are eligible. Patients may have triple negative (with ≥ 1 prior chemotherapy), or hormone receptor positive/HER2 negative breast cancer (with ≥ 1 prior hormone therapy). Patients may have received any number of prior lines of chemotherapy, including a prior platinum (in the absence of progression). They must have adequate organ function and ECOG performance status ≤2, and should not have previously received a PARP inhibitor. Patients are treated with talazoparib 1 mg daily until disease progression or intolerability, with serial imaging using CT chest/abdomen/pelvis and bone scan performed at baseline and every 12 weeks, and cfDNA collection every 4 weeks. Primary endpoint is PFS by RECIST 1.1. Patients are being enrolled in a two-stage design with 80% power to demonstrate that the treatment is associated with “success” (PFS > 12 weeks) in ≥53% patients (4% alpha). Secondary endpoints include objective response rate and safety (NCI CTCAE v 5.0). Exploratory analyses include studying serial changes in cfDNA BRCA1/2 mutant allelic frequency and comparing pre-and post-treatment cfDNA for the emergence of BRCA1/2 reversion and resistance mutations. This study is activated and open at Massachusetts General Hospital, where 2 patients are completing screening. It is also opening soon at 6 other academic centers (NCT03990896). Grant support includes a Pfizer ASPIRE award and 2020 Conquer Cancer Foundation of ASCO – Breast Cancer Research Foundation – Career Development Award. Clinical trial information: NCT03990896 .

Abstract Background: Niraparib is a selective poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1/2 inhibitor that has demonstrated antitumor activity in advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in combination with a programmed cell death 1 inhibitor, with the greatest clinical activity seen in tumors with breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) mutations. Pharmacologically, niraparib has demonstrated a wide volume of distribution and high cell membrane permeability. In breast and ovarian cancer xenograft mouse models, niraparib achieved tumor exposures that were 3.3 times greater than plasma exposure. The objective of this study is to evaluate the antitumor activity of single-agent niraparib in the neoadjuvant treatment of patients with localized, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, BRCA-mutated breast cancer. The relative concentration of niraparib in tumor versus plasma was also assessed. Methods: Eligible patients were ≥18 years old, with HER2-negative, BRCA-mutated (germline or somatic) resectable breast cancer with a tumor size of ≥1 cm who had not received prior treatment for the current malignancy. Patients received niraparib 200 mg once daily for 2 months. At the end of 2 months, at their treating physician’s discretion, patients proceeded directly to surgery, received additional cycles of niraparib (maximum of 6 months), or received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was tumor response rate measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after 2 months of treatment. Response was defined as a ≥30% reduction in tumor volume from baseline. Secondary endpoints included tumor response rate measured by ultrasound, quantified percent change in tumor volume measured by MRI or ultrasound, pathological complete response, and safety and tolerability. Additionally, niraparib concentrations were measured in tumor and plasma samples using qualified liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Results: Twenty-one patients were enrolled. As of June 2019, 18 patients had both an MRI and ultrasound scan at the end of month 2 and were evaluable for response. Ten patients are currently on treatment. The median age of patients was 43 years (range, 21-73). Fourteen patients had a BRCA1 mutation, 6 patients had a BRCA2 mutation, and 1 patient had both. Fifteen patients had TNBC, and 6 patients had hormone receptor-positive disease. All 18 response-evaluable patients had a clinical response after 2 months of treatment by at least one imaging modality; no patient experienced disease progression. Tumor response rate measured by MRI after 2 months of treatment was 89% (n/N = 16/18). Results measured by ultrasound were similar, with a 94% response rate at cycle 2 (n/N = 17/18). The median percent decrease in tumor volume after 2 months of treatment was 88% (range, 26-100%) and 89% (range, 23-100%) as measured by MRI and ultrasound, respectively. In the 5 samples measured thus far, niraparib concentrations in tumor biopsies after 2 months of treatment ranged from approximately 4-131-fold higher than those in corresponding plasma samples. Efficacy and tumor concentration data for all patients will be presented at the meeting. The most common (≥10%) drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade were nausea, fatigue, anemia, insomnia, and decreased appetite. The only drug-related grade ≥3 toxicity in ≥10% of patients was anemia (3 patients). Three patients had a dose reduction due to a TEAE; no patient discontinued treatment due to a TEAE. Conclusion: Niraparib was well tolerated and showed promising antitumor activity in the neoadjuvant treatment of patients with localized HER2-negative, BRCA-mutated breast cancer. Niraparib achieved 4-131-fold higher concentrations in tumor than in plasma. Clinical trial information: NCT03329937. Funding: TESARO: A GSK Company (Waltham, MA, USA) sponsored the study. Citation Format: Hyo Han, Minetta C Liu, Erika Hamilton, Hanna Irie, Cesar A Santa-Maria, James Reeves, Andre Liem, Adrianna Milillo Naraine, Julie Nangia, David Page, Meghan Duncan, Ming Shan, Yongqiang Tang, Julie R Graham, Leif W Ellisen, Steven Isakoff, Laura Spring. Pilot neoadjuvant study of niraparib in HER2-negative, BRCA-mutated resectable breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-11-03.

Cancer tissue engineering has remained challenging due to the limitations of the conventional biofabrication techniques to model the complex tumor microenvironment. Here, the utilization of a sacrificial bioprinting strategy is reported to generate the biomimetic mammary duct‐like structure within a hydrogel matrix, which is further populated with breast cancer cells, to model the genesis of ductal carcinoma and its subsequent outward invasion. This bioprinted mammary ductal carcinoma model provides a proof‐of‐concept demonstration of the value of using the sacrificial bioprinting technique for engineering biologically relevant cancer models, which may be possibly extended to other cancer types where duct‐like structures are involved.