Back to Authors

Kassim, Adetola A

0000-0002-0484-5903

Mayo Clinic

Vanderbilt University

Citations 5

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Version 3.2025, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines In Oncology
Loren, Alison W. , Bolaños‐Meade, Javier , Brammer, Jonathan E. , Cowden, Meredith , Stasi, Antonio Di , El‐Jawahri, Areej , Elmariah, Hany , Gundabolu, Krishna , Gutman, Jonathan A. , Ho, Vincent T. , Hoeg, Rasmus T. , Horwitz, Mitchell E. , Jamy, Omer , Dabaja, Mohamed Kharfan, Lee, Lauren , Luszcak, Christina, Magenau, John, Martin, Thomas , Mittal, Varun , Moreira, Jonathan , Muffly, Lori , Nakamura, Ryotaro , Nawas, Mariam, Ninos, Cameron , Oliai, Caspian , Pidala, Joseph A. , Randolph, Brion, Tessier, Jeffrey, Topal, Jeffrey , Varshavsky‐Yanovsky, Asya, Jones, Frankie, Stehman, Katie, Elmariah, Hany , Jamy, Omer , Muffly, Lori , Mielcarek, Marco B. , Kassim, Adetola A , Logan, Aaron C , Nawas, Mariam T. , Nieto, Yago , Oliai, Caspian H , Papanicolaou, Genovefa A. , Schroeder, Mark A. , Tzachanis, Dimitrios

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | October 9, 2025 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 10 | Pages: No page available

10.6004/jnccn.2025.0047 Get It

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) provide expert, multidisciplinary recommendations for autologous and allogeneic HCT based on current evidence. The NCCN Guidelines focus on pretransplant recipient evaluation, hematopoietic cell mobilization, conditioning, and the diagnosis and management of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), a common complication of allogeneic HCT that is associated with significant morbidity. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for HCT focuses on the diagnosis, workup, and management of acute and chronic GVHD, as well as important supportive care considerations.
Allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation in advanced systemic mastocytosis in the new era: A CIBMTR study
Üstün, Celalettin , Zhang, Mei‐Jie , Peterson, Andrew C. , Baek, Alexander, Coltoff, Alex, Gandhi, Arpita , Ho, Vincent T., Lin, Adam, Gowda, Lohith , Mensah, Felix, Nadiminti, Kalyan , Trunk, Andrew D. , Uberti, Joseph P., Marcucci, Guido , Akın, Cem , Pullarkat, Vinod , Juckett, Mark, Saber, Wael , Burns, Linda J. , Alkhateeb, Hassan B , Borthakur, Gautam , Nadiminti, Kalyan V , Nishihori, Taiga , Trunk, Andrew , Hamadani, Mehdi , Oran, Betul , Peterson, Andrew, Agha, Mounzer , Alkhateeb, Hassan B. , Chhabra, Saurabh , Coltoff, Alex, Lima, Marcos de , Kassim, Adetola A , Lin, Adam, Borthakur, Gautam , DeAngelo, Daniel J. , McGuirk, Joseph P. , Nishihori, Taiga , Pantin, Jeremy , Gotlib, Jason , Akin, Cem , Hamadani, Mehdi , Valent, Peter , Grunwald, Michael R. , Oran, Betül

British Journal of Haematology | September 23, 2025 | Volume: 207 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 2486-2495

10.1111/bjh.70154 Get It

Summary We investigated the outcomes of patients with advanced systemic mastocytosis (AdvSM) undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic cell therapy (alloHCT) in the US. Twenty‐seven adult (median age, 58 years) patients with AdvSM received alloHCT from 2014 to 2021. Most patients were white (93%), male (63%) and had systemic mastocytosis (SM) with associated haematological neoplasm (SM‐AHN, 70%), received peripheral blood grafts (89%) and non‐myeloablative regimens. KIT mutation was detected in 14 of the reported 16 patients (87.5%). Post‐transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) was used in approximately 50% of the cohort. Approximately 1 year after alloHCT, median bone marrow mast cell burden decreased from 15% pre‐alloHCT to 1.5% (range 0–8) at 1 year post‐alloHCT. The median serum tryptase decreased from 55 ng/mL (range 3–400 ng/mL) pre‐alloHCT to 18 ng/mL (range 0–481 ng/mL) at 1 year post‐alloHCT. At 1 year, progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 59% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41%–77%) and 74% (95% CI, 56%–89%) respectively. In the subset of patients with SM‐AHN, 1‐year PFS and OS were 74% (52%–91%) and 79% (95% CI, 58%–94%) respectively. The cumulative incidence of relapse/progression for the entire population of patients with SM ( n = 27) was 4% (95% CI, 0–14) at 100 days and 15% (95% CI, 4–31) at 1 year. For the subset of patients with AHN, the cumulative incidence was 11% (95% CI, 1–28) at 100 days and 21% (95% CI, 6–42) at 1 year. Relapse/progression was the cause of death in six of 12 patients (5 died of AHN and 1 died of SM progression). Eighteen and nine patients received a KIT inhibitor before alloHCT and after alloHCT respectively. In addition, six patients received a KIT inhibitor for the treatment of relapse/progression of SM after alloHCT. Although it is difficult to delineate the exact effect of alloHCT and KIT inhibitors because of the size of the study in this era, the use of alloHCT and KIT inhibitors pre‐ and post‐ alloHCT is increasing. In the near future, larger studies are required to provide further insights into this subject.
Trial in Progress: Cureaa - a Clinical Trial of Upfront Haploidentical or Unrelated Donor BMT to Restore Normal Hematopoiesis in Aplastic Anemia, Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) #2207
Mangaonkar, Abhishek A. , Fritz, Amber R. , Bellach, Anna , Malmberg, Craig, Henderson, Lori, DiFronzo, Nancy, Geller, Nancy L. , Ritzau, Nicole M., Sanikommu, Srinivasa Reddy , Tsai, Steven , Horowitz, Mary M. , Arai, Sally , Sharma, Akshay , Kassim, Adetola A , Saldaña, Blachy J. Dávila , Ball, Brian J. , Babushok, Daria V. , Pandey, Manu Raj , Martens, Michael J. , Patel, Sagar S. , Devine, Steven M. , Broglie, Larisa , Dezern, Amy Elizabeth

Blood | December 5, 2024 | Volume: 144 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 2134.1-2134.1

10.1182/blood-2024-207952 Get It

Background: Immunosuppressive therapy (IST) is considered the standard front-line treatment for acquired severe aplastic anemia (SAA) for pts >40 years. For pts aged <40 years who have a suitable human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor (MSD), hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is recommended. This recommendation is based on the toxicity associated with alternative donors; haploidentical (HAPLO) and unrelated donor (URD) HSCT for patients who lack a MSD. However, the hematopoietic response after IST is ~ 70-80%, even after augmentation with eltrombopag in the front-line setting, and failure-free survival (FFS, defined as patients alive and in remission without clonal disease more than 10 years after IST) remains < 40%. HSCT is often employed as a second line salvage therapy for those who do not respond to IST or have disease recurrence. However, outcomes after HSCT are often compromised because of IST-related complications such as clonal evolution, development of donor specific antibodies, infectious adverse events and organ dysfunction. In contrast, a successful allogeneic HSCT leads to relatively prompt hematopoietic and immune reconstitution and mitigates the risk of secondary clonal disease. Innovations in recent decades, such as improved graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis and supportive care, have steadily reduced the morbidity and mortality of adults undergoing HSCT from unrelated or mismatched donors and expanded the donor pool such that almost all pts with SAA have a potential donor available. The use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is now a well-established approach to facilitate engraftment and mitigate the risk of GVHD. It was successfully used in relapsed/refractory SAA pts using HAPLO donors in the multi-center BMT CTN #1502 trial (NCT02918292). Similar PTCy based approaches have been effective in the upfront setting with HAPLO and URD in small single center studies. Opened in July 2024, the CureAA trial (NCT06517641), seeks to increase donor options for SAA pts who have not yet received IST by using PTCy based GVHD prophylaxis for HSCT using HAPLO or URD. Study Design and Methods: This BMT CTN study (#2207) is a prospective multi-center phase II trial to assess efficacy of HSCT using HAPLO or URD bone marrow with a reduced intensity, thymoglobulin (ATG)-containing preparative regimen and PTCy GVHD prophylaxis in previously untreated SAA pts. This trial has two parallel cohorts for each donor type, HAPLO and URD, with an accrual goal of 30 participants in each cohort. All will receive ATG (0.5mg/kg on day -9 and 2mg/kg on days -8 and -7), cyclophosphamide (14.5mg/kg on days -6 and -5), fludarabine (30mg/m2 on days -6 to -2), 400 cGy total body irradiation (day -1 in a single fraction), a marrow graft (goal >2.5 x 108 nucleated cells per kg of recipient) on day 0 and PTCy (50mg/kg on days +3 and +4). Additionally, participants receive tacrolimus (until day +180) and mycophenolate mofetil days +5-35. The primary objective of the trial is to estimate the GVHD-free failure-free survival (GFFS) rate at 1 year after initiation of conditioning. GFFS is a composite endpoint of survival without grade III-IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD requiring immunosuppression, or primary or secondary graft failure requiring second definitive therapy within 1 year after initiation of conditioning. Secondary objectives will evaluate patient survival, engraftment, transfusion dependence, cumulative incidence of GVHD and hematologic response. Health related quality of life, healthcare utilization and financial toxicity data will also be collected. These endpoints will allow clinical comparison with current results achieved with upfront IST in other studies. We hypothesize that this HSCT approach will improve survival without significant transplant-associated morbidity by using a low toxicity regimen that reduces rates of GVHD and provides rapid hematologic recovery without graft failure, thereby making HAPLO and URD HSCT a viable option for initial upfront treatment of SAA. The ability to use mismatched donors will also ensure that a HSCT option is more widely available to all racial/ethnic groups. This collaborative study was funded by grants U10HL069294, U24HL138660 to the BMT CTN from the NHLBI/ NCI, along with funding from Sanofi. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Version 3.2022
Saad, Ayman , Loren, Alison W. , Bolaños‐Meade, Javier , Chen, George , Couriel, Daniel R. , Stasi, Antonio Di , El‐Jawahri, Areej , Elmariah, Hany , Gundabolu, Krishna , Gutman, Jonathan A. , Ho, Vincent T. , Hoeg, Rasmus T. , Horwitz, Mitchell E. , Hsu, Joe L. , Dabaja, Mohamed Kharfan, Magenau, John, Martin, Thomas , Moreira, Jonathan , Nakamura, Ryotaro , Ninos, Cameron , Oliai, Caspian , Patel, Seema M., Randolph, Brion, Tzachanis, Dimitrios , Varshavsky‐Yanovsky, Asya, Vusirikala, Madhuri , Algieri, Frankie, Pluchino, Lenora A. , Kharfan Dabaja, Mohamed, Saad, Ayman , Elmariah, Hany , Farag, Sherif Shafik , Kassim, Adetola A , Mielcarek, Marco B. , Nieto, Yago , Oliai, Caspian H , Schroeder, Mark A.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | February 15, 2023 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 108-115

10.6004/jnccn.2023.0007 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) provide an evidence- and consensus-based approach for the use of autologous and allogeneic HCT in the management of malignant diseases in adult patients. HCT is a potentially curative treatment option for patients with certain types of malignancies; however, recurrent malignancy and transplant-related complications often limit the long-term survival of HCT recipients. The purpose of these guidelines is to provide guidance regarding aspects of HCT, including pretransplant recipient evaluation, hematopoietic cell mobilization, and treatment of graft-versus-host disease—a major complication of allogeneic HCT—to enable the patient and clinician to assess management options in the context of an individual patient’s condition. These NCCN Guidelines Insights provide a summary of the important recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines for HCT, including the incorporation of a newly developed section on the Principles of Conditioning for HCT.