Back to Authors

Nadiminti, Kalyan V

0000-0001-9625-1178

Mayo Clinic

Division of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Madison, WI.

Citations 2

CHARM is prognostic of geriatric morbidity and toxicity after allogeneic transplant for older adults: BMT CTN 1704 study
Artz, Andrew , Logan, Brent R., Saber, Wael , Geller, Nancy L. , Bellach, Anna , Kou, Jianqun, Wood, William A. , McCarty, John M. , Knight, Thomas G. , Runaas, Lyndsey, Johnston, Laura, Nakamura, Ryotaro , Mishra, Asmita , Uberti, Joseph P., Morris, Lawrence E. , Nadiminti, Kalyan , Olin, Rebecca L. , Sobecks, Ronald , Wall, Sarah , Mattila, Deborah, Protz, Bailey, Horowitz, Mary M. , Artz, Andrew S , Nakamura, Ryotaro , Saultz, Jennifer N , Imus, Philip H , Hogan, William J , Nadiminti, Kalyan V , Bhatt, Vijaya Raj , Devine, Steven , Sorror, Mohamed , Knight, Thomas G , Wood, William A , Walston, Jeremy D , Dahi, Parastoo B , McCurdy, Shannon , Hogan, William J. , Bhatt, Vijaya Raj , Maakaron, Joseph E. , Devine, Steven M. , Sorror, Mohamed L.

Blood Advances | November 21, 2025 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1657-1669

10.1182/bloodadvances.2025018340 Get It

Abstract Despite concerns about the toxicity of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) in older patients, prospective data characterizing prevalence or risk stratification for geriatric morbidity such as disability or frailty are limited. We prospectively assessed the prognostic impact of the novel composite health assessment risk model (CHARM), a score established to predict 1-year nonrelapse mortality (NRM), among 1105 patients aged ≥60 years enrolled on the Bone Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network Study 1704. Secondary end points were assessed post-alloHCT at day 100 (D100), D180, and D365 in multivariable models adjusted with predetermined clinical variables. Among alloHCT survivors, the prevalence of disability by instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), frailty by the Physical Frailty Phenotype, and physical function impairment by Patient Reported Measurement Information System (PROMIS) was highest at D100 and lower on D180 and D365. Higher CHARM scores were independently associated with greater disability (coefficient, −0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.85 to −0.43; P< .001), increased frailty (coefficient, 0.19; CI, 0.081-0.31; P< .001), worse PROMIS physical function, greater PROMIS depression, increased serious organ toxicity by D100, more cognitive decline at D100, and higher mortality after acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) but not significantly associated with PROMIS anxiety or acute GVHD. Higher CHARM scores predicted worse disability-free survival (odds ratio [OR], 2.03; CI, 1.66-2.48; P< .001) and lower frailty-free survival (OR, 2.00; CI, 1.61-2.49). In summary, CHARM is an independent prognostic scoring system not only for NRM but also for geriatric morbidity and functional limitation–free survival through 1 year after alloHCT. Pre-alloHCT CHARM is a novel tool to aid shared decision-making for older patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03992352.
Allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation in advanced systemic mastocytosis in the new era: A CIBMTR study
Üstün, Celalettin , Zhang, Mei‐Jie , Peterson, Andrew C. , Baek, Alexander, Coltoff, Alex, Gandhi, Arpita , Ho, Vincent T., Lin, Adam, Gowda, Lohith , Mensah, Felix, Nadiminti, Kalyan , Trunk, Andrew D. , Uberti, Joseph P., Marcucci, Guido , Akın, Cem , Pullarkat, Vinod , Juckett, Mark, Saber, Wael , Burns, Linda J. , Alkhateeb, Hassan B , Borthakur, Gautam , Nadiminti, Kalyan V , Nishihori, Taiga , Trunk, Andrew , Hamadani, Mehdi , Oran, Betul , Peterson, Andrew, Agha, Mounzer , Alkhateeb, Hassan B. , Chhabra, Saurabh , Coltoff, Alex, Lima, Marcos de , Kassim, Adetola A , Lin, Adam, Borthakur, Gautam , DeAngelo, Daniel J. , McGuirk, Joseph P. , Nishihori, Taiga , Pantin, Jeremy , Gotlib, Jason , Akin, Cem , Hamadani, Mehdi , Valent, Peter , Grunwald, Michael R. , Oran, Betül

British Journal of Haematology | September 23, 2025 | Volume: 207 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 2486-2495

10.1111/bjh.70154 Get It

Summary We investigated the outcomes of patients with advanced systemic mastocytosis (AdvSM) undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic cell therapy (alloHCT) in the US. Twenty‐seven adult (median age, 58 years) patients with AdvSM received alloHCT from 2014 to 2021. Most patients were white (93%), male (63%) and had systemic mastocytosis (SM) with associated haematological neoplasm (SM‐AHN, 70%), received peripheral blood grafts (89%) and non‐myeloablative regimens. KIT mutation was detected in 14 of the reported 16 patients (87.5%). Post‐transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) was used in approximately 50% of the cohort. Approximately 1 year after alloHCT, median bone marrow mast cell burden decreased from 15% pre‐alloHCT to 1.5% (range 0–8) at 1 year post‐alloHCT. The median serum tryptase decreased from 55 ng/mL (range 3–400 ng/mL) pre‐alloHCT to 18 ng/mL (range 0–481 ng/mL) at 1 year post‐alloHCT. At 1 year, progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 59% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41%–77%) and 74% (95% CI, 56%–89%) respectively. In the subset of patients with SM‐AHN, 1‐year PFS and OS were 74% (52%–91%) and 79% (95% CI, 58%–94%) respectively. The cumulative incidence of relapse/progression for the entire population of patients with SM ( n = 27) was 4% (95% CI, 0–14) at 100 days and 15% (95% CI, 4–31) at 1 year. For the subset of patients with AHN, the cumulative incidence was 11% (95% CI, 1–28) at 100 days and 21% (95% CI, 6–42) at 1 year. Relapse/progression was the cause of death in six of 12 patients (5 died of AHN and 1 died of SM progression). Eighteen and nine patients received a KIT inhibitor before alloHCT and after alloHCT respectively. In addition, six patients received a KIT inhibitor for the treatment of relapse/progression of SM after alloHCT. Although it is difficult to delineate the exact effect of alloHCT and KIT inhibitors because of the size of the study in this era, the use of alloHCT and KIT inhibitors pre‐ and post‐ alloHCT is increasing. In the near future, larger studies are required to provide further insights into this subject.