Citations

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Rising US healthcare costs and the COVID-19 pandemic put increased pressure on hospitals to reduce patient length of stay (LOS) while maintaining high-quality care. We aimed to determine if implementing a pathway for same-day discharge after elective neuroendovascular procedures to a monitored hotel setting is safe, feasible, and cost-effective. METHODS: We evaluated patient outcomes after elective neuroendovascular procedures and same-day discharge to an on-campus Care Hotel. The study enrolled patients aged ≥18 years from October 1, 2020, to February 28, 2023. Exclusion criteria comprised major comorbidities, additional care necessitating hospitalization, absence of a caregiver, insurer-mandated hospitalization, or patient refusal of the Care Hotel model. Primary outcomes were readmission rate or prolonged LOS, new ischemic or hemorrhagic complications rate, and death rate from vascular causes within 6 months. Secondary outcomes included adverse events and deaths related to causes other than vascular complications within 6 months and changes in modified Rankin Scale score by 1 or more points at last follow-up. Healthcare cost savings associated with same-day discharge were analyzed using a control group. RESULTS: The study included 42 patients discharged to the Care Hotel and 84 controls. The average age was 61 years in the Care Hotel group and 64 years in the control group, and aneurysm treatment was the most frequent neuroendovascular procedure (83.3% and 79.8%, respectively). The readmission and extended LOS rates were 4.8% for the Care Hotel group. The rate of new ischemic or hemorrhagic complications was 4.8%. Cost analysis estimated savings of $7730.12 per procedure. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the Care Hotel model is a safe, feasible, and cost-effective option for carefully selected patients undergoing elective neuroendovascular interventions. Adherence to discharge readiness criteria and meticulous patient selection are critical to minimizing complications and readmissions.

Objective: Multicancer Detection (MCD) tests, such as the GRAIL Galleri, offer a novel approach to cancer screening by detecting cancer-specific methylation patterns in cell-free DNA through a single blood sample. This study evaluated an 18-month implementation of MCD testing in a tertiary ambulatory internal medicine clinic. Patients and Methods: Between June 2022 and November 2023, 2244 asymptomatic (without symptoms attributed to cancer) patients underwent MCD testing. The study focused on operational workflows, patient and physician education, and diagnostic follow-up of positive results. Standardized materials, including electronic health record (EHR) workflows, FAQs, and diagnostic pathways, were developed to facilitate implementation. Challenges included managing false positives, patient anxiety, costs, and ethical considerations. Results: Of the 2244 patients tested, 17 (0.76%) had positive results, and 15 underwent further diagnostic evaluation. Cancer was confirmed in 11 (73.3%) patients, including cases of breast, colon, esophageal, lymphoma, ovarian, and pancreatic cancers. Four patients had no identifiable malignancy despite comprehensive work-up. Conclusions: MCD testing is feasible in routine clinical workflows, with 73% of positive cases yielding cancer diagnoses. While promising, further research is required to assess long-term outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and optimal implementation strategies of cancer interception in broader healthcare settings.

Objectives/Goals: The expanding emphasis on translational science necessitates a rethinking of traditional academic formats. To align with the central themes of CTS, we have redesigned our PhD journal club and WIP sessions, introducing novel and innovative approaches that enhance the relevance of these activities to real-world scientific and clinical challenges. Methods/Study Population: The newly adapted journal club format for CTS Predoctoral students at Mayo Clinic maintains the traditional focus on literature review but now incorporates a structured analysis of the clinical implications and potential applications of the research. This innovation aims to foster a deeper understanding of how basic research findings can be translated into improved patient outcomes and healthcare practices. Similarly, the WIP sessions have been restructured to offer an engaging and dynamic learning environment designed to empower clinical and translational science predoctoral students to effectively present their research while emphasizing the challenges they have overcome, demonstrating the translational potential of their findings, and enhancing their communication skills. Results/Anticipated Results: Feedback from participants demonstrates strong support for the new format. Students report a greater engagement with the material and a clearer understanding of how their research can contribute to improving patient outcomes. Discussion/Significance of Impact: These changes accommodate the diverse projects in CTS and embody a commitment to pushing the boundaries of knowledge in CTS. This dual transition marks a significant advancement in preparing PhD students for careers in translational science, ensuring that their research is not only rigorous but also impactful in the real world.

Abstract Despite the availability of effective vaccines and a recent decrease in annual deaths, COVID-19 remains a leading cause of death. Serological studies provide insights into host immunobiology of adaptive immune response to infection, which holds promise for identifying high-risk individuals for adverse COVID-19 outcomes. We investigated correlates of anti-nucleocapsid antibody responses following SARS-CoV-2 infection in a US population-based meta-cohort of adults participating in longstanding National Institutes of Health–funded cohort studies. Anti-nucleocapsid antibodies were measured from dried blood spots collected between February 2021 and February 2023. Among 1419 Collaborative Cohort of Cohorts for COVID-19 Research participants with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, the mean age (standard deviation) was 65.8 (12.1), 61% were women, and 42.8% self-reported membership in a race/ethnicity minority group. The proportion of participants reactive to nucleocapsid peaked at 69% by 4 months after infection and waned to only 44% ≥12 months after infection. Higher anti-nucleocapsid antibody response was associated with older age, Hispanic or American Indian Alaskan Native (vs White) race/ethnicity, lower income, lower education, former smoking, and higher anti-spike antibody levels. Asian race (vs White) and vaccination (even after infection) were associated with lower nucleocapsid reactivity. Neither vaccine manufacturer nor common cardiometabolic comorbidities were not associated with anti-nucleocapsid response. These findings inform the underlying immunobiology of adaptive immune response to infection, as well as the potential utility of anti-nucleocapsid antibody response for clinical practice and COVID-19 serosurveillance.

Portopulmonary hypertension (POPH), pulmonary arterial hypertension that develops in the setting of portal hypertension, has long been of significant interest to the pulmonary, cardiology, and hepatology communities. Optimal management of POPH has been challenging to define due to a lack of evidence from clinical trials regarding pulmonary arterial hypertension therapies and uncertainty regarding the role of liver transplantation (LT). Initially, the high risk of intraoperative and early post-transplant death in predominantly untreated patients with POPH tempered consideration of LT. More recently, the observation that POPH can improve, and sometimes even resolve, following LT, has led to reconsideration of the role of LT in selected patients. The first International Liver Transplantation Society (ILTS) POPH and hepatopulmonary syndrome practice guideline was a multidisciplinary consensus of expert opinions based on available evidence. Since that publication, hemodynamic definitions, management approaches, and POPH MELD exception criteria have evolved, and there have been new randomized controlled trials in POPH as well as studies regarding long-term outcomes. In order to ensure the guidelines remained current and reflected recent evidence, the original writing committee of the 2016 guidelines, leaders of the ILTS Cardiovascular Special Interest Group, and colleagues active in POPH research were invited to participate in the writing committee. In this document, approved for publication by the ILTS executive council, we provide an update to the prior guidelines with expert recommendations to guide and advance POPH management. Recommendations in these guidelines are based on expert opinion and available evidence and were agreed upon by consensus.