Citations

Abstract Background The number of arthroplasty procedures and infection-related complications, including prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) and surgical site infections (SSIs), continues to rise. Although current guidelines recommend cefazolin or cefuroxime as the first-line perioperative prophylactic antibiotic, substitutions with non-cephalosporins remain common, especially among patients with reported β-lactam allergies. These substitutions may increase infection risk and healthcare costs. Evidence comparing outcomes across antibiotic classes remains variable. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing single-agent cephalosporin versus single-agent non-cephalosporin prophylaxis in adults undergoing primary arthroplasty. Cochrane, Embase, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from database inception through January 2025. Random-effect or fixed-effect models were used to estimate pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Subgroup analyses stratified results by cephalosporin type, study era, and risk of bias. Results Twenty-three studies (7 randomized controlled trials and 16 observational studies) were included, encompassing 191 527 arthroplasties in the cephalosporin arm and 20 058 in the non-cephalosporin arm. The odds of PJI were lower with cephalosporins (OR 0.59; 95% CI, .46–.75). No overall difference was observed for SSI (OR 0.70; 95% CI, .36–1.36), though post-2013 studies and the cefazolin subgroup demonstrated a significant protective effect. Randomized trial estimates were limited and heterogeneous and did not reach statistical significance. Certainty of evidence was graded as moderate. Conclusions Cephalosporins, particularly cefazolin or cefuroxime, remain the preferred prophylactic agents for primary arthroplasty. This quantitative synthesis reinforces their protective association against prosthetic joint infection and supports adherence to guideline-endorsed prophylaxis.

Abstract Background S0221 investigated weekly vs every 2 weeks dosing of doxorubicin (A) and cyclophosphamide (C) followed by paclitaxel in patients with high-risk early breast cancer. After an interim analysis, random assignment to the 2 AC arms was stopped for futility, and the trial was modified to study only the paclitaxel schedules. Methods Between December 2003 and November 2010, a total of 2716 patients were randomly assigned in a 2 × 2 factorial design to 15 weeks of weekly A and daily C vs 6 cycles of every 2 weeks AC; and weekly paclitaxel for 12 weeks vs 6 cycles of every 2 weeks paclitaxel. Between January 2011 and January 2012, an additional 578 patients were assigned to 4 cycles of every 2 weeks AC and randomly assigned to weekly vs every 2 weeks paclitaxel. Updated survival was assessed using log-rank tests and Cox regression models. We compared outcomes by breast cancer subtype as well. Results At a median follow-up of 12.1 years, there were no statistically significant differences among the 4 treatment arms in disease-free survival (DFS) (P = .91) or overall survival (P = .34) in the original protocol. Among the 578 patients assigned AC for 4 cycles and randomly assigned to paclitaxel weekly vs every 2 weeks paclitaxel, there were no overall differences in DFS (P = .32) or overall survival (P = .42). Conclusion As there were no statistically significant outcome differences in DFS or overall survival between the studied schedules of AC and paclitaxel with extended follow-up in the original or revised protocol, either paclitaxel schedule may be recommended, with selection based on toxicity, cost, or patient preference.

IMPORTANCE Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy has high rates of pathologic response and improved prognosis among solid tumors. Its role in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains understudied. OBJECTIVE To summarize the efficacy associated with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy regimens in HNSCC and to compare the efficacy associated with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy vs immunotherapy alone in locoregionally advanced resectable HNSCC prior to definitive surgery. DATA SOURCES A librarian-led systematic review was conducted using multiple electronic databases, including Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Databases were queried from inception to October 2024. STUDY SELECTION Inclusion criteria included prospective interventional trials that have completed accrual, with results published in English. Only trials of resectable, treatment-naive HNSCC were included. Exclusion criteria included lack of reporting on pathologic response or Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 response. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Two investigators independently conducted title, abstract, and full-text reviews per PRISMA guidelines. Primary outcomes extracted were major pathologic response (MPR) and complete pathologic response (CPR) at surgery and complete response (CR) on imaging by RECIST 1.1. Secondary outcomes included 1-year overall survival (OS) and toxic effects. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES A meta-analysis was performed using a binary random-effects model to determine the pooled proportion of primary outcomes in the immunotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy groups. Heterogeneity was reported as I 2 . RESULTS A total of 751 patients (502 [77%] male; age range, 27-87 years) across 23 studies were included in the meta-analysis, including 357 patients (47%) who underwent chemoimmunotherapy, 102 patients (14%) who underwent dual-agent immunotherapy, and 292 patients (39%) who underwent single-agent immunotherapy. Pooled rates of MPR plus CPR were 66% (95% CI, 58%-73%; I 2 = 0.59) for chemoimmunotherapy, 18% (95% CI, 6%-29%; I 2 = 0.65) for dual-agent immunotherapy, and 6% (95% CI, 3%-9%; I 2 < 0.01) for single-agent immunotherapy. Across all groups, 1-year OS rates ranged from 88% to 96% for single-agent immunotherapy, 88% to 96% for dual-agent immunotherapy, and 88% to 100% for chemoimmunotherapy. Grade 3 to 5 adverse events were reported in 61 of 210 patients (29%), 2 of 67 patients (3.0%), and 36 of 210 patients (17%) among the reporting studies in the single-agent immunotherapy, dual-agent immunotherapy, and chemoimmunotherapy groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These findings suggest that neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy regimens were associated with higher pathologic and radiographic response rates compared with immunotherapy alone in locoregionally advanced HNSCC. These results call for phase 3 trials comparing these neoadjuvant regimens head to head.

ABSTRACT Recent advances in the diagnosis and management of reflux disease were the central focus of the inaugural Gatherings in Esophagology (GiE), which convened experts across gastroenterology, surgery, otolaryngology, pulmonology, and basic research. The sessions highlighted innovations in reflux monitoring—including high‐resolution manometry, wireless pH monitoring, and novel salivary biomarkers—while critically evaluating their diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility. Presentations explored the limitations of traditional proton‐pump inhibitor therapy, the emergence of potassium‐competitive acid blockers as a new class of acid suppressants, and the evolving role of adjunctive treatments such as mucosal protectants, reflux reducers, and neuromodulators for refractory symptoms. The discourse extended to advanced interventional procedures, including transoral incisionless fundoplication, magnetic sphincter augmentation, and the RefluxStop device, with discussion of patient selection, efficacy, and complication management. Discussants emphasized the pathophysiology and management of extraesophageal manifestations of reflux, the interplay between reflux and pulmonary disease, and the diagnostic challenges in pediatric populations. The meeting also addressed the integration of behavioral therapies, the role of the microbiome, and the application of artificial intelligence in reflux diagnostics. Collectively, these insights underscore a shift toward precision medicine in reflux disease, emphasizing individualized diagnostic strategies and tailored therapeutic approaches to improve patient outcomes.

Aging is a major risk factor for increased morbidity and mortality following acute respiratory virus infections. To elucidate the immune determinants underlying viral pathogenesis and delayed lung repair in the aged lung, a comprehensive time-course study was conducted. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) and high-dimensional flow cytometry were utilized to compare lungs from young and aged mice infected with influenza A virus (IAV). Aged hosts displayed diminished alveolar macrophage (AM) and dendritic cell (DC) but elevated monocyte-derived macrophage (MoM) and interstitial macrophage (IM) presence following infection. Additionally, enhanced accumulation of adaptive immune cells, including CD4+ tissue-resident helper (TRH) cells, CD8+ tissue-resident memory (TRM) cells, and a B cell subset resembling age-associated B cells, was observed in the memory phase. Pathway analysis revealed that elevated type I and II interferon (IFNα/γ) signaling, especially in MoM/IM subsets, distinguished the aged hosts from the young. Inhibition of IFNα/γ signaling after viral clearance improved long-term respiratory outcomes and reduced both IM and TRH populations in aged mice. These findings highlight the pivotal role of IFNα/γ signaling, likely within MoM/IM subsets, in driving the exuberant persistence of adaptive immune cells and chronic immunopathology in the aged lung following acute viral infection.

Aging is a major risk factor for increased morbidity and mortality following acute respiratory virus infections. To elucidate the immune determinants underlying viral pathogenesis and delayed lung repair in the aged lung, a comprehensive time-course study was conducted. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) and high-dimensional flow cytometry were utilized to compare lungs from young and aged mice infected with influenza A virus (IAV). Aged hosts displayed diminished alveolar macrophage (AM) and dendritic cell (DC) but elevated monocyte-derived macrophage (MoM) and interstitial macrophage (IM) presence following infection. Additionally, enhanced accumulation of adaptive immune cells, including CD4+ tissue-resident helper (TRH) cells, CD8+ tissue-resident memory (TRM) cells, and a B cell subset resembling age-associated B cells, was observed in the memory phase. Pathway analysis revealed that elevated type I and II interferon (IFNα/γ) signaling, especially in MoM/IM subsets, distinguished the aged hosts from the young. Inhibition of IFNα/γ signaling after viral clearance improved long-term respiratory outcomes and reduced both IM and TRH populations in aged mice. These findings highlight the pivotal role of IFNα/γ signaling, likely within MoM/IM subsets, in driving the exuberant persistence of adaptive immune cells and chronic immunopathology in the aged lung following acute viral infection.

Background and Objectives: Genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM), previously known as vulvovaginal atrophy, is a chronic, progressive hypoestrogenic condition affecting vulvovaginal, urinary and sexual health in women. Common symptoms include vaginal dryness, itching, dyspareunia, urinary urgency and recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs). Despite the high prevalence, GSM is underdiagnosed and undertreated, thereby negatively impacting women’s quality of life. To illustrate the practical aspects of GSM diagnosis and provide evidence-based management, we present a case-based narrative review synthesizing recently published, high-quality evidence. Materials and Methods: Evidence was drawn from multiple sources through targeted searches of databases, and included the 2025 AUA/SUFU/AUGS guideline (AUA), the 2024 NICE network meta-analyses (NICE), a 2025 systematic review/meta-analysis in breast-cancer survivors, the 2020 Menopause Society GSM Position Statement, the 2018 NAMS/ISSWSH breast cancer consensus, several primary source citations and other high quality peer-reviewed publications. Results: Five illustrative composite case vignettes of GSM are presented to highlight the evaluation strategy and evidence-supported treatment choices. Nonhormonal options are the first line treatments for mild GSM symptoms, either with or without the addition of vaginal estrogen therapy. For moderate to severe GSM, low-dose vaginal estrogen, vaginal DHEA, and ospemifene are all effective FDA-approved options. In breast cancer survivors, individualized decisions with oncology input are warranted. Maximal caution and a shared decision-making approach is required for women using Aromatase Inhibitors (AIs) for breast cancer risk reduction when choosing treatments for GSM. Conclusions: Treating GSM improves vaginal, sexual and urinary outcomes and quality of life of women. Clinicians need to proactively screen for GSM and offer evidence-based treatment options. The treatment decisions in breast cancer survivors are nuanced, requiring a shared-decision approach.

Purpose: With the increasing prevalence of sleeve gastrectomy, complications and insufficient weight loss have become more common, making conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) a frequent revisional approach. Given the higher risk of revisional surgery, we aimed to compare primary versus conversion RYGB surgery and assess whether robotic assistance impacts outcomes. Method: This retrospective study included 378 patients after 2:1 propensity score matching based on demographic and clinical characteristics, comparing primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (P-RYGB) with sleeve gastrectomy–to–Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (SG-RYGB). The matched cohort included both robotic and laparoscopic cases performed at a single tertiary center between 2012 and 2024. A secondary 2:1 matched sub-analysis of robotic cases ( n = 297) evaluated whether robotic assistance reduced differences between primary and revisional surgery. Weight-loss outcomes were assessed at 6 and 12 months in the full cohort, with an additional sub-analysis limited to SG-RYGB performed for weight-loss indications. Results: In the full cohort ( n = 378), SG-RYGB was associated with longer operative time, greater blood loss ( P < .001), longer hospital stay ( P = .04), and higher late complication rates ( P = .04). In the robotic-only matched analysis ( n = 297), differences in operative time and blood loss were no longer significant, and early and late outcomes were comparable, although length of stay still remained longer for SG-RYGB ( P = .05). Among patients undergoing SG-RYGB for weight loss purposes only, total body weight loss percentage reached 16.5% ± 6.6% at 6 months and 20.4% ± 7.1% at 12 months but remained lower than that observed in the P-RYGB group ( P < .001). Conclusion: SG-RYGB conversion demonstrated favorable outcomes and meaningful weight loss. Robotic assistance was associated with improved operative time, reduced blood loss, and fewer late complications in the SG-RYGB group, further narrowing differences with P-RYGB, supporting its role in complex revisional bariatric surgery at high-volume centers.

Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) and BCL2 inhibitor (BCL2i)–containing regimens significantly improve survival outcomes in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL). Results from randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that time-limited treatment with BCL2i-containing regimens resulted in higher rates of undetectable measurable residual disease (uMRD) than BTKi monotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy (CIT). Pirtobrutinib (a noncovalent BTKi) and lisocabtagene maraleucel (CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy) are newer options for relapsed or refractory disease after prior therapy with BTKi and BCL2i-contining regimens. Histologic transformation of CLL/SLL to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (Richter transformation) is associated with a poor prognosis. Molecular analysis to determine whether there is clonal relationship between CLL/SLL and transformed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is useful to select an appropriate treatment option. These NCCN Guideline Insights highlight significant updates to the NCCN Guidelines for the treatment of CLL/SLL and Richter transformation.

Background: NCCN publishes evidence-based guidelines across the cancer care continuum that are commonly used as the standard for clinical management and policy in cancer care. Our study aimed to assess the content of survivorship recommendations within disease-based NCCN Guidelines. Methods: In January 2024, we downloaded 64 disease-based guidelines from the NCCN website; 10 were excluded. The remaining 54 guidelines were reviewed for survivorship-focused content. Content of the guidelines was systematically categorized across domains of the Quality of Cancer Survivorship Care Framework, and the level of detail was rated as not addressed, briefly addressed, mostly addressed, or fully addressed. Guidelines were re-reviewed for updates in April 2025. Results: Of 54 guidelines reviewed in 2025, 16 (30%) included a dedicated survivorship section with focused content, although sections, titles, and formats varied. Other guidelines included survivorship recommendations in algorithms and/or discussion sections. A total of 18 guidelines (33%) had neither a dedicated section nor reference to the NCCN Survivorship Guidelines. Guidelines with a dedicated section, as well as those referencing the NCCN Survivorship Guidelines (65%), generally provided more detailed survivorship content. Across all guidelines, the surveillance for recurrences/new cancers domain was most commonly included (96%) and typically the most detailed. Information on physical (81%) and psychosocial (72%) effects and health promotion (65%) was often included, but the level of detail varied. Chronic disease management (31%) was seldomly included. Information on care coordination/communication and patient education was present in 50% of the guidelines. Compared with the guidelines reviewed in 2024, the 2025 updates had limited expansion of survivorship content. Conclusions: Cancer survivorship content is inconsistently presented across disease-specific NCCN Guidelines. As these guidelines evolve, there is an opportunity to tailor, expand, and standardize the recommendations, making them easier to find by clearly labeling and integrating them within each guideline to improve accessibility and better support clinicians in delivering patient-centered care.