Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

1479 citation(s) found for "Ma, Khan".

A phase II study of ibrutinib in combination with ixazomib in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinaemia
Parrondo, Ricardo , Dutta, Navnita , LaPlant, Betsy, Elliott, Jamie, Fernandez, Andre, Zimmerman, Ashley, Cicco, Gina, Han, Bing , Heslop, Keisha, Chapin, Dustin, Sher, Taimur , Rasheed, Ahsan , Das, Saurav , Chanan‐Khan, Asher , Paulus, Aneel , Parrondo, Ricardo D , LaPlant, Betsy R, Das, Saurav , Chanan-Khan, Asher , Ailawadhi, Sikander , Paulus, Aneel , Cicco, Gina, Roy, Vivek , Ailawadhi, Sikander

British Journal of Haematology | January 30, 2024 | Volume: 204 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1825-1829

10.1111/bjh.19320 | PMID 38286472 Get It

SummaryThis phase II study evaluated time‐limited (24 cycles) treatment with ibrutinib and ixazomib in newly diagnosed (NDWM; n = 9) and relapsed/refractory (RRWM; n = 12) Waldenström macroglobulinaemia (WM). The overall response rate (ORR) was 76.2% (n = 16) in 21 evaluable patients with no patient achieving a complete response (CR). The median duration of treatment was 15.6 months, and after a median follow‐up time of 25.7 months, the median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 22.9 months. While the primary end‐point was not met (CR rate at any time) and 28.5% discontinued treatment due to toxicity, ibrutinib plus ixazomib led to a clinically meaningful ORR and PFS. Combined Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) and proteasome inhibition merits further evaluation in WM.
Secondary primary malignancies among patients with GU cancer.
Tripathi, Nikita , Ayaz, Ahsan , Naqvi, Syed Arsalan Ahmed , Saxena, Akshat , Bibi, Arifa, Channar, Aneeta , Tyson, Mark D. , Cobran, Ewan K. , Abdul‐Muhsin, Haidar , Khan, Muhammad Ali , Riaz, Irbaz Bin , Bryce, Alan H. , Singh, Parminder Pal

Journal of Clinical Oncology | January 29, 2024 | Volume: 42 | Issue: 4_suppl | Pages: 98-98

10.1200/jco.2024.42.4_suppl.98 Get It

98 Background: The risk of secondary primary malignancies (SPM) among the survivors of GU cancer is not well-established. In this study, we attempt to describe the patterns of SPMs in patients diagnosed with GU cancers. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (SEER*Stat 8.4.2) was searched to obtain data on the incidence of SPM in adult patients (age >18 years) diagnosed with GU cancers, including prostate, renal, and bladder cancer. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. SIR was defined as the observed SPMS from each category divided by the expected number of SPMs in the age-matched US population for the same period. The data was further stratified by age (<50y, 50-70y, >70y), race (White, Black, Asian/Pacific Islander), ethnicity (Hispanic, non-Hispanic), chemotherapy, and radiotherapy exposure. Results: A total of 1,041,217 patients were included in this analysis. In patients diagnosed with GU cancer, the incidence of overall SPM was 11%. Particularly, patients with GU cancers were observed to have a high incidence of Endocrine system SPM (1.52; 1.45-1.59), and urinary system SPM (1.51; 1.49-1.53) These results were consistent by different sociodemographic groups. In patients diagnosed with prostate cancer, the incidence of thyroid SPM was increased (1.31; 1.23-1.39). Particularly, prostate cancer patients treated with radiation therapy had increased incidence rates of SPM in the peritoneum, omentum and mesentery (1.57; 0.79-2.81) and urinary bladder (1.36;1.32-1.40) was higher as compared to those with no exposure to radiation therapy (1.11;1.08-1.13 and 1.03;1-1.06 respectively). Bladder cancer patients had an overall increased incidence of SPM in the esophagus (1.21; 1.08-1.35), lung, bronchus, trachea, and other respiratory organs (1.97;1.92-2.01), prostate (3.50;3.4-3.6) and kidney (1.86;1.76-1.97). A higher incidence of renal pelvis, ureter and other urinary organ SPM (11.08;10.48-11.07) was also notable in this population. Similarly, kidney cancer patients had a higher incidence of the endocrine system (3.00;2.74-3.27), prostate (1.24;1.2-1.29) and bladder 1.78;1.68-1.79 SPMs. Conclusions: This population-based study shows an increased risk of SPM development in GU cancer survivors compared to the general population. Clinicians should keep a high index of suspicion for SPMs and initiate appropriate workups at early warning signs.
A cost-effectiveness analysis assessing systemic treatments in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) by volume of disease.
Naqvi, Syed Arsalan Ahmed , Faisal, Kunwer Sufyan , Khakwani, Kaneez Zahra Rubab, Houten, Holly K. Van , Sharma, Vidit , Boorjian, Stephen A. , Humphreys, Mitchell R. , Cobran, Ewan K. , Khan, Muhammad Ali , Moriarty, James P. , Borah, Bijan J. , Singh, Parminder Pal , Childs, Daniel S. , Sartor, Oliver , Riaz, Irbaz Bin , Bryce, Alan H.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | January 29, 2024 | Volume: 42 | Issue: 4_suppl | Pages: 93-93

10.1200/jco.2024.42.4_suppl.93 Get It

93 Background: The treatment paradigm for mCSPC patients has rapidly evolved over the last few years with the emergence of triplet therapy and prognostication by volume of disease. However, the health economic implications of triplet therapy by disease volume remain unclear. Methods: A Markov model where patients transitioned between the progression-free, progression and death states was developed. State utilities were derived from the LATITUDE trial. Point probabilities for overall survival, progression-free survival, grade ≥ 3 and 5 toxicities were obtained from the eligible mCSPC phase III clinical trials. Medicare Advantage and commercial total paid amounts (2022 US$) of treatments were obtained from OptumLabs Data Warehouse. Costs and disutilities of adverse events were derived from published literature. Half-cycle corrected costs and utilities were accrued monthly over a 20-year lifetime horizon and were discounted at 3%. Monte Carlo simulation was used to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). A willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of US$100,000 was used. Results: In terms of Medicare Advantage payer’s perspective (Table), docetaxel (D)+ADT was observed to provide additional 0.068 QALYs compared to ADT at an ICER of US$16,544 per QALY in high volume disease. Compared to D+ADT, abiraterone (AAP) triplet provided additional 1.03 QALYs at US$56,641 per QALY. Compared to AAP triplet, apalutamide (APA)+ADT provided additional 0.048 QALYs at US$5,846,248 per QALY in high volume disease. In low volume disease, D+ADT provided 0.45 more QALYs at US$20,690 per QALY compared to ADT alone. Compared to D+ADT, AAP triplet provided an additional 1.51 QALYS at US$44,267 per QALY. In terms of total paid commercial costs, AAP triplet provided an additional 1.19 QALYs compared to ADT at US$91,952 per QALY in high volume disease. In low volume, D+ADT provided additional 0.38 QALYs at US$22,058 per QALY compared to ADT. Compared to D+ADT, AAP triplet provided a 0.97 QALY gain at US$105,958 per QALY. Compared to AAP triplet, darolutamide (DARO) triplet provided a 0.47 QALY at US$689,196 per QALY. Compared to DARO triplet, APA+ADT provided an additional 0.49 QALYs at an ICER of US$971,389 per QALY. All other treatments (not reported here) were dominated. Conclusions: At the selected WTP of US$100,000 per QALY, AAP triplet therapy was most likely the cost-effective strategy in overall mCSPC population particularly in patients with high volume disease. However, these results should be interpreted with careful accounting for timing of metastases. [Table: see text]
Clinical efficacy of enfortumab-pembrolizumab combination therapy in locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC): A real-world experience.
Tripathi, Nikita , Naqvi, Syed Arsalan Ahmed , Ballouz, Tara, Saxena, Akshat , Bibi, Arifa, Channar, Aneeta , Tyson, Mark D. , Ballouz, Tara, Khan, Muhammad Ali , Riaz, Irbaz Bin , Bryce, Alan H. , Singh, Parminder Pal

Journal of Clinical Oncology | January 29, 2024 | Volume: 42 | Issue: 4_suppl | Pages: 643-643

10.1200/jco.2024.42.4_suppl.643 Get It

643 Background: The FDA approval of enfortumab (EV) and pembrolizumab (Pembro) combination therapy as a first-line treatment for cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) was based on the EV-103 trial. We aim to assess the clinical response rate of this combination therapy in our institution's patients with locally advanced and metastatic UC. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 20 patients diagnosed with locally advanced/metastatic UC(la/mUC) who were treated with EV-Pembro combination for at least 2 cycles, from June 2022 to August 2023 at the Mayo Clinic. Patients who were treatment naïve or who progressed one or more lines of therapy were included in the study cohort. Main outcome of interest included imaging-based best overall response rate in terms of complete (CR) and partial (PR) response, stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD). Results: Out of 20 patients, the number of males and females were 16 (80%) and 4 (20%) respectively; the median age was 77 years (IQR: 51-92). 3 (15%) of patients had involvement of upper urinary tract disease along with bladder cancer. The common sites of visceral metastasis at the time of initial presentation include liver 2(10%), lung 6(30%) and lymph nodes12(60%). Common toxicities of this regimen included rash, pruritis, peripheral neuropathy, fatigue, transaminitis, dysgeusia, and diarrhea. The treatment was stopped in 10 (50%) patients due to completion of planned therapy (achieved CR or proceeded with resection of residual disease) (30%), 5 patients due to progression (50%), 1 patient due to therapy side effects (10%) and in 1 patient due to death (10%). The objective response was 45% (N =9); 5 (25%) had PR, and 4 (20%) had CR. A total of 2 (10%) had SD while 2 (10%) experienced PD. Histological correlation with clinical benefit is shown in the table. Conclusions: EV-Pembro combination therapy shows promising responses in patients who have progressed after previous lines of therapy, consistent with previously published data on EV 201 in small cohorts. However, ongoing expansion of this cohort and data from larger studies will help further elucidate survival benefits and their correlation with genetic testing. [Table: see text]
A meta-analysis assessing objective response rates with first-line systemic treatment options in locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma.
Saxena, Akshat , Naqvi, Syed Arsalan Ahmed , Tripathi, Nikita , Bibi, Arifa, Ballouz, Tara, Abdul-Muhsin, Haidar , Tyson, Mark D. , Khan, Muhammad Ali , Riaz, Irbaz Bin , Bryce, Alan H. , Singh, Parminder Pal

Journal of Clinical Oncology | January 29, 2024 | Volume: 42 | Issue: 4_suppl | Pages: 639-639

10.1200/jco.2024.42.4_suppl.639 Get It

639 Background: Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (IO/C) as the first-line management of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (LA/mUC) has been investigated in multiple trials with conflicting outcomes. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of available trials to compare objective response rates (ORR) of this combination regimen, both in overall and in cisplatin-ineligible populations. Methods: EMABSE and MEDLINE were searched from 2000 through July 20th, 2023, to identify phase II and III clinical trials assessing IO, C or both in LA/mUC. Main outcome of interest was objective response rates (ORR) as defined in the included trials. An inverse variance random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate pooled ORR using the restricted maximum likelihood estimation method. Subgroup differences were assessed among IO/C, IO alone, and C alone. The threshold for statistical significance was established at 0.1. Results: Of 5975 citations identified, a total of 26 trials with a total of 4,628 participants were included in this systematic review. In the overall group, the ORR in IO/C trials (5 trials, 1,236 patients) was 44.70% (95% CI: 21.88%- 70.0%). In IO trials (7 trials, 2,189 patients), ORR was 23.68% (19.55%- 28.36%) and in C trials (26 trials, 4,628 patients) was 43.46% (37.43%-49.68%]). In the cisplatin-ineligible group, the ORR in IO/C trials (2 trials, 240 patients) was 60.06% (33.38%-81.86%), in IO trials (6 trials, 1,103 patients) was 26.15% (23.01%; 29.56%), and in C trials (8 trials, 767 patients) was 42.45% (35.67%-49.52%). In terms of subgroup differences, the difference in ORR was statistically significant between IO/C and IO trials (p= 0.0844) and between IO and chemotherapy trials (p< 0.0001) in the overall population. Similarly, we found a statistically significant difference in ORR between IO/C and IO (p= 0.0108) and between IO and chemotherapy trials (p< 0.0001) in the cisplatin-ineligible population. No statistically significant differences were observed between IO/C and C alone. Conclusions: First-line IO/C may achieve a better objective response compared to IO alone in patients diagnosed with locally advanced/metastatic UC. Although, there appears to be a trend of greater benefit with IO/C compared to C alone, the difference was not statistically significant. The results will be updated as soon data from new trials (CheckMate 901 and EV 302) becomes available which could offer new insights. [Table: see text]
First-line PARP inhibitors (PARPi) with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPi) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Naqvi, Syed Arsalan Ahmed , Imran, Manal , Channar, Aneeta , Saxena, Akshat , Raina, Ammad, Khakwani, Kaneez Zahra Rubab, Riaz, Zaryab Bin, Kase, Adam M. , Humphreys, Mitchell R. , Moore, Cassandra N., Orme, Jacob J. , Palmer, Jeanne , Khan, Muhammad Ali , Childs, Daniel S. , Singh, Parminder Pal , Bryce, Alan H. , Riaz, Irbaz Bin

Journal of Clinical Oncology | January 29, 2024 | Volume: 42 | Issue: 4_suppl | Pages: 173-173

10.1200/jco.2024.42.4_suppl.173 Get It

173 Background: The data for combining PARPi and ARPi in mCRPC have shown conflicting results. Here, we report a quantitative summary of benefits by clinically meaningful subgroups (HRR mutation status, BRCA mutation status) to guide the use of PARPi and ARPi combination in mCRPC setting. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were systematically searched from each database’s inception through September 7, 2023. Phase III studies comparing PARPi + ARPi with ARPi + placebo in mCRPC were included. Radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS) in patient subgroups based on HRR and BRCA mutation status were assessed. Hazard ratios for rPFS and OS with 95% CI were collected at the level of each trial, and a random-effects meta-analysis was conducted using an inverse variance approach. Subgroup differences were assessed and p-value of interaction <0.1 was considered statistically significant. Results: The literature search identified 4976 studies from which 3 trials (11 references) – TALAPRO2, PROpel and MAGNITUDE met the inclusion criteria. A total of 2254 participants were eligible for analysis. PARPi + ARPi prolonged rPFS in patients with HRR mutations (HR: 0.55, 95%CI: 0.38-0.78) as well as in patients without HRR mutations (HR: 0.74, 95%CI: 0.63-0.88). There is no evidence of treatment interaction by HRR mutation status (p = 0.14). In patients harboring HRR mutations, improved rPFS was observed in those with BRCA mutations (HR: 0.28, 95%CI: 0.13-0.62) as well as those without BRCA mutations (HR: 0.72, 95%CI: 0.59-0.87). However, there is evidence that patients with BRCA mutations derived greater rPFS benefit as compared to patients without BRCA mutations (p =0.02). PARPi + ARPi showed no significant improvement in overall survival either in patients with HRR mutations (HR: 0.79, 95%CI: 0.59-1.05) or in patients without HRR mutations (HR: 0.92, 95%CI: 0.74-1.14). Conclusions: Genomic testing for HRR genes is mandatory to guide clinical decision making in mCRPC patients. Patients harboring BRCA mutations are most likely to derive clinically meaningful benefit from combination PARPi + ARPi treatment. [Table: see text]
Protein–Protein interactive networks identified in bronchoalveolar lavage of severe compared to nonsevere asthma
Hastie, Annette T. , Bishop, Andrew C. , Bleecker, Eugene R. , Denlinger, Loren C. , Erzurum, Serpil C. , Fahy, John V. , Israel, Elliot , Mauger, David T. , Meyers, Deborah A. , Moore, Wendy C. , Ortega, Victor E. , Peters, Stephen P. , Wenzel, Sally E. , Steele, Chad , Wenzel, Sally E , Khan, Mohammad Sharif , Castro, Mario , Levy, Bruce David , Wenzel, Sally E.

Clinical & Experimental Allergy | January 23, 2024 | Volume: 54 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 265-277

10.1111/cea.14447 | PMID 38253462 Get It

AbstractIntroductionPrevious bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) proteomic analysis has evaluated limited numbers of subjects for only a few proteins of interest, which may differ between asthma and normal controls. Our objective was to examine a more comprehensive inflammatory biomarker panel in quantitative proteomic analysis for a large asthma cohort to identify molecular phenotypes distinguishing severe from nonsevere asthma.MethodsBronchoalveolar lavage fluid from 48 severe and 77 nonsevere adult asthma subjects were assessed for 75 inflammatory proteins, normalized to BALF total protein concentration. Validation of BALF differences was sought through equivalent protein analysis of autologous sputum. Subjects' data, stratified by asthma severity, were analysed by standard statistical tests, principal component analysis and 5 machine learning algorithms.ResultsThe severe group had lower lung function and greater health care utilization. Significantly increased BALF proteins for severe asthma compared to nonsevere asthma were fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2), TGFα, IL1Ra, IL2, IL4, CCL8, CCL13 and CXCL7 and significantly decreased were platelet‐derived growth factor a‐a dimer (PDGFaa), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), interleukin 5 (IL5), CCL17, CCL22, CXCL9 and CXCL10. Four protein differences were replicated in sputum. FGF2, PDGFaa and CXCL7 were independently identified by 5 machine learning algorithms as the most important variables for discriminating severe and nonsevere asthma. Increased and decreased proteins identified for the severe cluster showed significant protein–protein interactions for chemokine and cytokine signalling, growth factor activity, and eosinophil and neutrophil chemotaxis differing between subjects with severe and nonsevere asthma.ConclusionThese inflammatory protein results confirm altered airway remodelling and cytokine/chemokine activity recruiting leukocytes into the airways of severe compared to nonsevere asthma as important processes even in stable status.
Proceedings of the 28th Annual Congress of the International Liver Transplantation Society
Mathew, Johns Shaji , Shingina, Alexandra , Khan, Mohammad Qasim , Wilson, Elizabeth A. , Alconchel, Felipe , Hakeem, Abdul , Shankar, Sadhana , Patel, Dhupal , Keskin, Onur , Mazzola, Alessandra , Tanaka, Tomohiro , Victor, David W. , Yoon, Uzung , Vinaixa, Carmen , Kirchner, Varvara A. , Martin, Eléonora De , Ghobrial, R. Mark , Wilson, Elizabeth , Rammohan, Ashwin , Alconchel, Felipe , Hakeem, Abdul Rahman , Shankar, Sadhana , Patel, Dhupal , Keskin, Onur , Nasralla, David , Mazzola, Alessandra , Tanaka, Tomohiro , Victor, David , Yoon, Uzung , Yoon, Young-In , Vinaixa, Carmen , Kirchner, Varvara , De Martin, Eleonora , Ghobrial, Mark , Chadha, Ryan , Syn, Nicholas L. X. , Liu, Jiang , Patel, Madhukar S. , Chadha, Ryan , Khan, Mohammad Qasim

Liver Transplantation | January 19, 2024 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 544-554

10.1097/lvt.0000000000000330 | PMID 38240602 Get It

The 2023 Joint International Congress of the International Liver Transplantation Society (ILTS), the European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association (ELITA), and the Liver Intensive Care Group of Europe (LICAGE) held in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, marked a significant recovery milestone for the liver transplant community after COVID-19. With 1159 participants and a surge in abstract submissions, the event focused on “Liver Disorders and Transplantation: Innovations and Evolving Indications.” This conference report provides a comprehensive overview of the key themes discussed during the event, encompassing Hepatology, Anesthesia and Critical Care, Acute Liver Failure, Infectious Disease, Immunosuppression, Pediatric Liver Transplantation, Living Donor Liver Transplantation, Transplant Oncology, Surgical Approaches, and Machine Perfusion. The congress provided a platform for extensive discussions on a wide range of topics, reflecting the continuous advancements and collaborative efforts within the liver transplant community.
Image‐based multiplex immune profiling of cancer tissues: translational implications. A report of the International Immuno‐oncology Biomarker Working Group on Breast Cancer
Jahangir, Chowdhury Arif , Page, David B. , Broeckx, Glenn , Gonzalez, Claudia Aura, Burke, Caoimbhe, Murphy, Clodagh, Reis‐Filho, Jorge S. , Gupta, Rajarsi , Vieth, Michael, Hida, Akira I. , Kahila, Mohamed M. , Kos, Zuzana , Verbandt, Sara , Thagaard, Jeppe , Khiroya, Reena, Haab, Gabriela Acosta , Ács, Balázs , Alvarado‐Cabrero, Isabel , Baharun, Nurkhairul Bariyah, Bellolio, Enrique , Bheemaraju, Vydehi, Blenman, Kim RM, Fujimoto, Luciana Botinelly Mendonça , Burgues, Octavio, Cheang, Maggie C.U. , Ciompi, Francesco , Cooper, Lee , Coosemans, An , Corredor, Germán, Portela, Flávio Luis Dantas , Deman, Frederik , Dudgeon, Sarah , Elghazawy, Mahmoud , Fernandez‐Martín, Claudio , Fineberg, Susan , Gnjatic, Sacha , Halama, Niels , Hanna, Matthew G, Harbhajanka, Aparna , Hartman, Johan , Hewitt, Stephen M. , Husain, Zaheed, Irshad, Sheeba , Kataoka, Tatsuki R. , Kawaguchi, Kosuke, Khramtsov, Andrey , Kirtani, Pawan , Korski, Konstanty, Scott, Ely, Lænkholm, Anne‐Vibeke , Lang‐Schwarz, Corinna , Larsimont, Denis , Lennerz, Jochen K. , Li, Xiaoxian , Maley, Sai, Narasimhamurthy, Vidya Manur, Marks, Douglas K. , Mehrotra, Ravi , Durga, Kharidehal, Mittal, Shachi , Mushtaq, Shamim , Hussain, Nighat , Papathomas, Thomas , Perera, Rashindrie , Pinard, Christopher J. , Pinto‐Cardenas, Juan Carlos , Rau, Tilman T. , Ribeiro, Joana , Hytopoulos, Evangelos, Mahon, Sarah, Siziopikou, Kalliopi P. , Sotiriou, Christos, Stenzinger, Albrecht , Symmans, Fraser, Tanaka, Sunao , Taxter, Timothy , Tejpar, Sabine , Thompson, E. Aubrey , Tramm, Trine , Tran, William T, Verghese, Gregory , Viale, Giuseppe , Wahab, Noorul , Walter, Thomas , Waumans, Yannick , Wen, Hannah Y. , Yang, Wentao , Bartlett, John M.S. , Loibl, Sibylle , Loi, Sherene , Stovgaard, Elisabeth Specht , Salgado, Roberto , Gupta, Rajarsi R , Chardas, Alexandros , Dantas Portela, Flavio Luis , Elghazawy, Mahmoud , Gonzalez-Ericsson, Paula I , Grigoriadis, Anita , Hart, Steven N , Hartman, Johan , Kataoka, Tatsuki R , Rau, Tilman T , Rimm, David , Verghese, Gregory E , Wahab, Noorul , Gnjatic, Sacha , Broeckx, Glenn , Cheang, Maggie Chon U , Lennerz, Jochen , Loi, Sherene , Reis-Filho, Jorge S , Acs, Balazs , Walter, Thomas , Irshad, Sheeba , McDonald, Elizabeth S. , Ly, Amy , Harms, Paul W. , Diest, P. J. van , AbdulJabbar, Khalid , Adams, Sylvia , Almeida, Jonas S. , Ardalan, Farid Azmoudeh , Badve, Sunil , Hardas, Alexandros , Corredor, Germán , Demaria, Sandra , Fox, Stephen B. , Giltnane, Jennifer Margaret , González-Ericsson, Paula I. , Hart, Steven N. , Horlings, Hugo , Janssen, Emiel A. M. , Kawaguchi, Kosuke , Kiraz, Umay , Kodach, Liudmila L. , Aktürk, Güray , Kovács, Anikó , Lerousseau, Marvin , Madabhushi, Anant , Michiels, Stefan , Minhas, Fayyaz , Moore, David , Penault-Llorca, Frederique Madeleine , Pruneri, Giancarlo , Pusztai, Lajos , Rajpoot, Nasir , Rapoport, Bernardo L. , Rimm, David L. , Vincent‐Salomon, Anne , Saltz, Joel , Sayed, Shahin , Sughayer, Maher A. , Sur, Daniel Genel , Symmans, W. Fraser , Teuwen, Jonas , Tran, William T, Laak, Jeroen van der , Yuan, Yinyin , Denkert, Carsten , Savas, Peter Stephen , Gallagher, William M. , Rahman, Arman

The Journal of Pathology | January 17, 2024 | Volume: 262 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 271-288

10.1002/path.6238 | PMID 38230434 Get It

Abstract Recent advances in the field of immuno‐oncology have brought transformative changes in the management of cancer patients. The immune profile of tumours has been found to have key value in predicting disease prognosis and treatment response in various cancers. Multiplex immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence have emerged as potent tools for the simultaneous detection of multiple protein biomarkers in a single tissue section, thereby expanding opportunities for molecular and immune profiling while preserving tissue samples. By establishing the phenotype of individual tumour cells when distributed within a mixed cell population, the identification of clinically relevant biomarkers with high‐throughput multiplex immunophenotyping of tumour samples has great potential to guide appropriate treatment choices. Moreover, the emergence of novel multi‐marker imaging approaches can now provide unprecedented insights into the tumour microenvironment, including the potential interplay between various cell types. However, there are significant challenges to widespread integration of these technologies in daily research and clinical practice. This review addresses the challenges and potential solutions within a structured framework of action from a regulatory and clinical trial perspective. New developments within the field of immunophenotyping using multiplexed tissue imaging platforms and associated digital pathology are also described, with a specific focus on translational implications across different subtypes of cancer. © 2024 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Race, Gene Expression Signatures, and Clinical Outcomes of Patients With High-Risk Early Breast Cancer
Kyalwazi, Beverly , Campbell, Michael J. , Chien, A. Jo , Forero-Torres, Andres , Ellis, Erin D. , Albain, Kathy S. , Haley, Barbara , Clark, Amy S. , Nanda, Rita , Yung, Rachel L. , Tripathy, Debasish , Edmiston, Kristen K., Viscusi, Rebecca K., Northfelt, Donald W. , Khan, Qamar J. , Asare, Smita , Wilson, Amy , Hirst, Gillian L. , Lu, Ruixiao , Symmans, W. Fraser , Yee, Douglas , Veer, Laura van ‘t , Esserman, Laura J. , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. , Tripathy, Debu , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I , Symmans, W Fraser , Esserman, Laura J , Hirst, Gillian L , Yee, Douglas , Yau, Christina , Yoshimatsu, Toshio F. , Wallace, Anne M. , Pusztai, Lajos , Blaes, Anne , Boughey, Judy C. , Elias, Anthony , Isaacs, Claudine , Han, Hyo S , DeMichele, Angela , Veer, Laura J. van’t

JAMA Network Open | December 28, 2023 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 12 | Pages: e2349646

10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.49646 | PMID 38153734 Get It

ImportanceThere has been little consideration of genomic risk of recurrence by breast cancer subtype despite evidence of racial disparities in breast cancer outcomes.ObjectiveTo evaluate associations between clinical trial end points, namely pathologic complete response (pCR) and distant recurrence–free survival (DRFS), and race and examine whether gene expression signatures are associated with outcomes by race.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis retrospective cohort study used data from the Investigation of Serial Studies to Predict Your Therapeutic Response With Imaging and Molecular Analysis 2 (I-SPY 2) multicenter clinical trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with novel agents and combinations for patients with previously untreated stage II/III breast cancer. Analyses were conducted of associations between race and short- and long-term outcomes, overall and by receptor subtypes, and their association with 28 expression biomarkers. The trial enrolled 990 female patients between March 30, 2010, and November 5, 2016, with a primary tumor size of 2.5 cm or greater and clinical or molecular high risk based on MammaPrint or hormone receptor (HR)-negative/ERBB2 (formerly HER2 or HER2/neu)–positive subtyping across 9 arms. This data analysis was performed between June 10, 2021, and October 20, 2022.ExposureRace, tumor receptor subtypes, and genomic biomarker expression of early breast cancer.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcomes were pCR and DRFS assessed by race, overall, and by tumor subtype using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression models. The interaction between 28 expression biomarkers and race, considering pCR and DRFS overall and within subtypes, was also evaluated.ResultsThe analytic sample included 974 participants (excluding 16 self-reporting as American Indian or Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, or multiple races due to small sample sizes), including 68 Asian (7%), 120 Black (12%), and 786 White (81%) patients. Median (range) age at diagnosis was 47 (25-71) years for Asian, 49 (25-77) for Black, and 49 (23-73) years for White patients. The pCR rates were 32% (n = 22) for Asian, 30% for Black (n = 36), and 32% for White (n = 255) patients (P = .87). Black patients with HR-positive/ERBB2-negative tumors not achieving pCR had significantly worse DRFS than their White counterparts (hazard ratio, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.24-4.21; P = .01), with 5-year DRFS rates of 55% (n = 32) and 77% (n = 247), respectively. Black patients with HR-positive/ERBB2-negative tumors, compared with White patients, had higher expression of an interferon signature (mean [SD], 0.39 [0.87] and −0.10 [0.99]; P = .007) and, compared with Asian patients, had a higher mitotic score (mean [SD], 0.07 [1.08] and −0.69 [1.06]; P = .01) and lower estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor signature (mean [SD], 0.31 [0.90] and 1.08 [0.95]; P = .008). A transforming growth factor β signature had a significant association with race relative to pCR and DRFS, with a higher signature associated with lower pCR and worse DRFS outcomes among Black patients only.Conclusions and RelevanceThe findings show that women with early high-risk breast cancer who achieve pCR have similarly good outcomes regardless of race, but Black women with HR-positive/ERBB2-negative tumors without pCR may have worse DRFS than White women, highlighting the need to develop and test novel biomarker-informed therapies in diverse populations.