Citations

Abstract BACKGROUND Awake craniotomy with speech mapping remains a gold standard for achieving maximal safe resection of diffuse gliomas located in eloquent cortex. Significant practice variability exists with regards to patient selection, speech mapping paradigms, aggressiveness of resection, and use of other adjuncts. We report our experience with speech mapping procedures for patients with diffuse gliomas, comparing cases performed with and without intraoperative MRI. METHODS A single-surgeon retrospective review of 148 consecutive awake craniotomy procedures, from 2008-2024, was performed. We recorded baseline patient characteristics, speech mapping findings, post-operative course, and volumetric extents of resection. Multivariate regression analyses were performed for factors predictive of permanent aphasia and residual tumor volume. RESULTS Speech mapping was performed in 95% of cases, with positive speech areas found in 49% of cases. Intraoperative MRI cases (75% of total) had significantly greater extent of resection (87.4% vs. 78.6%, p=0.03) despite equivalent pre-operative volumes. Post-operative new/worsened aphasia was 15% for mild and 5% for moderate symptoms, and this was associated with reduced rates of return to work (54% vs 78%, p=0.04). Predictors of recovery from aphasia were extent of resection (OR 1.1, p=0.006) and 90-day disease progression (OR 0.06, p=0.04). Predictors of residual tumor volume were pre-operative tumor volume (β 0.3, p<0.001), identification of after-discharge potentials during speech mapping (β -9.7, p<0.001), and pre-operative functional status (β -0.3, p=0.02). Overall survival was impacted by presence of contrast enhancement (p=0.0002), tissue diagnosis (p<0.0001), and WHO grade (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Awake craniotomy with speech mapping remains a valuable strategy for achieving maximal safe resection of diffuse gliomas, with the majority of patients returning to baseline level of functioning. New/worsened aphasia is the biggest risk of surgery, which significantly impacts patient quality of life. Intraoperative MRI can be considered as an adjunctive tool for awake speech mapping during glioma surgery.

Abstract BACKGROUND The IDH inhibitor vorasidenib was FDA-approved for treatment of IDH-mutant grade 2 gliomas in August 2024. We evaluated vorasidenib in patients with grade 3 and 4 IDH-mutant gliomas who would not have been eligible for the INDIGO trial. METHODS Retrospective review of patients with grade 3 or 4 IDH-mutant gliomas treated with vorasidenib between 9/1/24 and 5/31/25. Prior treatments, radiographic response, adverse events and seizure control were collected for each patient. RESULTS Thirty-two patients (median age 39.5, 46.9% female) met inclusion criteria. Tumor types included grade 3 oligodendroglioma (11, 34.4%), grade 3 astrocytoma (13, 40.6%) and grade 4 astrocytoma (8, 25%). Thirty patients had contrast-enhancement; 2 patients had non-enhancing tumor. Prior treatments included surgical resection (30, 93.8%), radiation (27, 84.4%), cytotoxic chemotherapy (25, 78.1%), bevacizumab (5, 15.6%), pembrolizumab (3, 9.4%), and ivosidenib (8, 25%). Four patients (12.5%) were naïve to systemic treatment at the time of vorasidenib initiation. Median duration of vorasidenib was 101.5 days (range 18-255) with 19 patients still on vorasidenib at the time of last follow-up. Seventeen patients (53.1%) had stable disease, 11 (34.4%) had progressive disease, 2 (6.3%) did not yet have response assessment, and 2 (6.3%) died. Grade 1 transaminitis occurred in 12 patients with no high grade transaminitis. Two patients developed lymphopenia; both were heavily pre-treated with multiple alkylating agents; no other hematologic toxicity was noted. One patient developed myalgias leading to vorasidenib discontinuation. Nine patients had fatigue, 4 headaches, 2 nausea, 2 decreased appetite. In patients with a history of epilepsy, there were no reported seizures. CONCLUSIONS Vorasidenib was well-tolerated in this heavily pre-treated cohort of grade 3–4 IDH-mutant gliomas, with low-grade transaminitis and fatigue being the most common toxicities. Preliminary results show disease stability in 53.1% of patients after a median of 3.5 months. Conclusions are limited by short-interval follow-up.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive brain tumor with poor outcomes due to resistance to radiation and temozolomide (TMZ). Death receptor 5 (DR5), a proapoptotic receptor, induces tumor-selective apoptosis upon activation, is expressed in GBM, and can be upregulated by radiation/TMZ. Ozekibart (INBRX-109), a tetravalent DR5 agonist antibody, has demonstrated tolerability and clinical benefit as monotherapy in chondrosarcoma (PMID: 37265425), prompting a phase 2 trial (NCT04950075), and in combination with irinotecan and TMZ in Ewing’s sarcoma. INBRX-109 was evaluated in GBM using in vitro and in vivo models. DR5 expression in cell lines was determined by flow cytometry and drug sensitivity was measured using CellTiter-Glo®. Efficacy of INBRX-109 as a single agent and in treatment combinations was evaluated in intracranial U87-MG and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models with activity assessed by survival and tumor imaging. Pharmacodynamic activity was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for cleaved caspase-3 and PARP. TMZ upregulated DR5 and sensitized U87-MG cells to INBRX-109. GBM cell lines (n=33) exhibited variable sensitivity to INBRX-109 and TMZ as single agents, but a majority showed enhanced sensitivity to combination treatment. In the U87-MG model, combination therapy improved tumor control and survival versus TMZ alone (tumor volume fold increase over baseline 1.1 vs 7.4; median survival 44 vs 36d). IHC staining of tumors indicated INBRX-109 crosses the blood brain barrier and is pharmacologically active. In three PDX models, INBRX-109 improved survival as monotherapy (survival ratios 1.38, 1.47, 1.50). In two models, combination therapy improved survival vs TMZ (survival ratios 1.76 vs 0.93, 2.47 vs 1.94). In summary, TMZ upregulates DR5 and enhances INBRX-109 activity in intracranial GBM models. This combinatorial activity and potential for synergy with radiation/TMZ support clinical evaluation of INBRX-109 in GBM. Moreover, the established clinical safety and activity of INBRX-109 in solid tumors support its development in this indication.

Abstract High-grade gliomas (HGGs) are aggressive, infiltrative brain tumors with poor survival outcomes and limited therapeutic options. Their spatial and molecular heterogeneity necessitates large, well-curated datasets integrating imaging, clinical, and genomic information to enable precision medicine and drive novel treatment development. Using the Medtronic StealthStation neuronavigation system, we collected over 1,000 spatially localized intraoperative biopsy samples from more than 250 patients undergoing resection for glioma at Mayo Clinic and partnering sites. Each biopsy site was recorded with 3D coordinates, labeled in real time, flash-frozen, and annotated with metadata including collection time, anatomical location, and surgical plan. Samples were processed and entered into a secure database along with the corresponding sampling coordinates, frozen pathology, whole-exome and RNA sequencing data, 5-ALA fluorescence status, patient demographics, and T1, T1Gd, T2, and T2-FLAIR MRI. This multimodal dataset supports radiogenomic research by enabling precise mapping of imaging features to molecular characteristics. A subset of this data, including 268 biopsies from 52 patients (25 male, 27 female) with reported intraoperative 5-ALA fluorescence, was used to develop a radiomics model predicting locoregional patterns of 5-ALA positivity based on preoperative MRI. Image features were extracted from the biopsy sample coordinates across multiple MRI sequences and paired with corresponding 5-ALA fluorescence status to train the model for regional fluorescence prediction. The final model achieved 83% accuracy on the training set and 86% on the validation set using a 70-15-15 data split; this included 208 samples for training and 42 for validation, stratified by patient to ensure no overlap of samples from the same individual across sets. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of predicting 5-ALA fluorescence using radiomic features from standard preoperative MRI, offering a promising noninvasive strategy for improving intraoperative decision-making and enabling more precise, personalized resections in patients with high-grade gliomas.

Abstract BACKGROUND High grade astrocytoma with piloid features (HGAP) is a newly recognized tumor with a distinct DNA methylation profile. Its clinical course, treatment response, and outcomes remain poorly understood. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study across three Mayo Clinic sites including adults with a HGAP diagnosis confirmed by DNA methylation profiling. RESULTS 17 patients were included (median age 38 years, Q1, Q3: 29–59; 9 male). DNA methylation-based tumor classification using the NCI/Bethesda classifier (v2) indicated a match to HGAP with high confidence (calibrated score >0.9) in 14 cases and was suggestive in 3 cases. All had MAPK pathway alterations (NF-1 mutation in 11, FGFR1 mutation in 2, KIAA1549::BRAF fusion in 2, FGFR1 transcript variant suggestive of internal tandem duplication in 1, KANK2::NTRK2 fusion in 1). All tumors also had CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion and 9 lost ATRX expression. Tumors were infratentorial (n=8), supratentorial (n=7), and spinal (n=2) at initial presentation. First line treatment included surgery followed by chemoradiation with temozolomide (n=12), surgery followed by radiation (n=4), radiation alone (n=1), and surgery alone (n=1). Gross total resection was achieved in 3/17, 8/17 had subtotal resection and 5/17 had biopsy. 14/17 received a median RT dose of 5700 cGy (range, 4005–6000) in 30 fractions. The median follow-up duration was 34.9 months. 8 patients experienced disease progression. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 30.3 months (95% CI: 15.4–NR). 6/8 underwent surgery; 3/8 underwent RT. Systemic therapies were administered in 5/8 (lomustine, bevacizumab, pembrolizumab, temozolomide, trametinib, tovorafenib). 3/17 patients died due to progressive disease with an OS of 54.2, 94.6 and 17.4 months, respectively. The mOS for the whole cohort was 54.2 months (95% CI: 54.2-NR). CONCLUSION While the optimal management of this newly recognized entity has yet to be established, our cohort demonstrates a clinical behavior consistent with CNS WHO grade 3, aligning with current WHO interpretations.

Abstract Despite intensive research over the past two decades, all glioblastoma (GBM) Phase 3 drug trials have been negative. The utility of the preclinical studies used to inform development for 10 Phase 3 trials was evaluated by four criteria: 1) drug distribution to the brain, 2) tumor location (flank vs. intracranial), 3) GBM xenograft source (patient-derived (PD) vs. cell line-derived (CD)), and 4) magnitude of survival extension. For the trials evaluated, no preclinical brain:plasma (B/P) data were reported for enzastaurin, cilengitide, nimotuzumab, Depatux-M, or bevacizumab, although IgG typically has a B/P ≈1%. B/P for imatinib was 1-3% and the other four drugs ranged from 25% to 51%. Except for enzastaurin, all drugs were studied in orthotopic tumor survival studies. The best response for each drug compared to relevant control (relative increase in median survival) was 22% (nimotuzumab), 31% (marizomib), 36% (sunitinib CD) / 5% (sunitinib PD), 63% (bevacizumab/temozolomide), 140% (imatinib), 157% (Depatux-M), 220% (veliparib/temozolomide), 300% (cediranib); median survival was not reached for cilengitide. However, only veliparib and sunitinib were studied in orthotopic PD models, and a single CD model (U87 or D54) was used exclusively for four drugs (enzastaurin, nimotuzumab, sunitinib, marizomib). In summary, 6 of 10 drugs had unknown or very poor brain distribution, 8 of 10 drugs were tested exclusively in CD models, which have questionable translational value, and 3 of 10 drugs had nominal activity (<50% survival prolongation) in preclinical survival studies. The stunning lack of clinical progress in GBM is deeply discouraging, but is consistent with underwhelming preclinical testing and the contextual interpretation of those results. Acknowledging multifaceted reasons for failed clinical trials, a more rigorous and critical approach should be used in preclinical studies, coupled with follow-up surgical window of opportunity studies, to identify and promote only the most promising therapies into advanced clinical testing.

Abstract BACKGROUND Cognitive symptoms are common among cancer patients treated with intracranial radiation but inadequately assessed and suboptimally treated, owing in part to the time-consuming and resource-intensive nature of formal neuropsychological testing. Through remote administration of brief cognitive assessments and symptom-directed interventions, decentralization uniquely addresses this problem. METHODS In this single-site phase 2 fully decentralized clinical trial (NCT06377696), patients treated with radiation therapy (RT) for primary or metastatic brain tumors undergo cognitive evaluations with the application, Mayo Test Drive, and the Short Test of Mental Status (STMS; via telehealth or in person), at baseline and every three months for one year. Participants are provided wearable devices for health promotion. Half the participants are randomized to metformin to evaluate this agent’s efficacy in treating RT-related cognitive symptoms. Target enrollment is 100 participants. RESULTS Seventy-three patients (median age 45.5, 46% female) with brain tumors who received RT were enrolled May 2024 to May 2025. In this unplanned interim analysis, we evaluated the impact of decentralization on study participation. Thirty-six participants (49%) reported a primary residence greater than 150 miles from our institution. Seven patients were consented remotely, the remainder in person. Of 380 study-related visits (201 STMS, 179 treatment toxicity checks) 216 (57%) were completed by telehealth. Thirty-two of 336 (9.5%) study-related lab draws were completed at locations outside our institution. Wearable device data was continuously collected, with median 3022 steps tracked per patient per day on study. 190/250 (76%) quality-of-life surveys sent digitally were completed to date. CONCLUSION Decentralization implemented as part of this clinical trial enabled participation despite significant distance from our institution and facilitated study-related assessments through digital solutions, eliminating the need for travel. Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of conducting a fully decentralized supportive care trial in neuro-oncology, which can increase participation and accelerate evaluation of novel therapeutics.

Abstract BACKGROUND Access to in-person evaluations is challenging for patients with glioma due to disease-related disability and distance from specialized neuro-oncology centers. Telehealth is an alternative to in-person evaluations, but acceptability of and therapy compliance with this model has not been prospectively evaluated. METHODS In this single-arm non-randomized pragmatic clinical trial, we compared patient satisfaction with telehealth and in-person assessments among patients with glioma undergoing chemotherapy with temozolomide. Participants acted as their own controls, alternating between telehealth and in-person visits. Patient satisfaction with care delivered was evaluated by Press-Ganey surveys with Likert response scales (1-5, 1=very poor, 5=very good). A digital pill diary (DPD) was implemented to track chemotherapy compliance. RESULTS We accrued 30 patients (median age 59, 38% female) between October 2024 and May 2025. Half of the patients (n=15) reported a primary residence greater than 150 miles from our institution. Surveys from 25 participants were reviewed, with 17/25 completing one or more surveys following an in-person visit, and 21/25 completing one or more surveys following a telehealth visit. Overall average Press-Ganey scores were similar between the two visit modalities with high scores (telehealth=4.8; in-person=4.7). Median scores for specific modalities were similarly highly rated: likelihood of recommending practice to others (telehealth=5.0; in-person=5.0), concern the care provider showed (telehealth=5.0, in-person=4.7), provider’s discussion of treatment options (telehealth=5.0, in-person=5.0), provider effort to include patients in decision-making (telehealth=5.0, in-person=5.0). DPDs used to monitor treatment compliance indicated adherence to all prescribed doses of temozolomide in 75/79 cycles; the other 4 (of 79) treatment cycles were halted per provider instructions. CONCLUSION This interim assessment demonstrates feasibility of treating patients with similar patient satisfaction of care delivered between telehealth and in-person visits. The DPD was effective in tracking chemotherapy administration. Additional results including visit type preference and acute care utilization data are maturing.

Abstract OBJECTIVE Despite advancements in therapy and improved survival rates for patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), the optimal management strategy for recurrent or refractory PCNSL (r/r PCNSL) remains undefined. In such cases, repeat brain biopsy is often performed to confirm disease recurrence, though its diagnostic and therapeutic value is uncertain. This study evaluates whether repeat brain biopsy provides new, actionable diagnostic insights that influence treatment decisions. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with a confirmed diagnosis of PCNSL who underwent repeat brain biopsy for suspected recurrent or refractory disease between 2005 and 2023. Patients with a history of other CNS neoplasms, demyelinating disorders, or active systemic disease were excluded. RESULTS Twenty patients met inclusion criteria (55% female), with a mean age at biopsy of 56 years in the PCNSL group and 61 years in the r/r PCNSL group. While the overall distribution of presenting symptoms did not significantly differ (p = 0.2), gait instability, weakness, and cognitive decline were more common in r/r PCNSL. PCNSL more often presented with single lesions, while r/r PCNSL had predominantly multiple lesions (p < 0.05). Periventricular enhancement was significantly more frequent in r/r PCNSL (p < 0.05), though other radiologic features were comparable. Repeat biopsy confirmed DLBCL in 90% of cases; no infections or alternate malignancies were identified. Diagnostic clarification was the primary indication for repeat biopsy. Chemotherapy regimens were altered in 50% of post-biopsy cases, without a corresponding difference in overall survival (p = 0.79). Procedure-related morbidity was observed in three patients (15%). CONCLUSIONS The second biopsy in most cases reaffirmed the original diagnosis of diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Although biopsy results led to treatment adjustments; these changes did not affect overall survival.