Citations

Background: Quadriceps muscle atrophy remains a limiting factor in returning to activity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Blood flow restriction (BFR) therapy may accelerate quadriceps strengthening in the perioperative period. Purpose: To evaluate postoperative isometric quadriceps strength in patients who underwent ACLR with a perioperative BFR program. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: Patients indicated for ACLR were randomized into 2 groups, BFR and control, at their initial clinic visit. All patients underwent 2 weeks of prehabilitation preoperatively, with the BFR group performing exercises with a pneumatic cuff set to 80% limb occlusion pressure placed over the proximal thigh. All patients also underwent a standardized postoperative 12-week physical therapy protocol, with the BFR group using pneumatic cuffs during exercise. Quadriceps strength was measured as peak and mean torque during seated leg extension and presented as quadriceps index (percentage vs healthy limb). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), knee range of motion, and quadriceps circumference were also gathered at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively, and adverse effects were recorded. Results: Included were 46 patients, 22 in the BFR group (mean age, 25.4 ± 10.6 years) and 24 in the control group (mean age, 27.5 ± 12.0 years). At 6 weeks postoperatively, the BFR group demonstrated significantly greater strength compared with the controls (quadriceps index: 57% ± 24% vs 40% ± 18%; P = .029), and the BFR group had significantly better Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System–Physical Function (42.69 ± 5.64 vs 39.20 ± 5.51; P = .001) and International Knee Documentation Committee (58.22 ± 7.64 vs 47.05 ± 13.50; P = .011) scores. At 6 weeks postoperatively, controls demonstrated a significant drop in the peak torque generation of the operative versus nonoperative leg. There were no significant differences in strength or PROs at 3 or 6 months postoperatively. Three patients elected to drop out of the BFR group secondary to cuff intolerance during exercise; otherwise, no other severe adverse events were reported. Conclusion: Integrating BFR into perioperative physical therapy protocols led to improved strength and increased PROs at 6 weeks after ACLR. No differences in strength or PROs were found at 3 and 6 months between the 2 groups. Registration: NCT04374968 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Abstract Background Several randomized controlled trials (RCT) have shown that short-course (∼7 days) antibiotic treatment is non-inferior to longer antibiotic courses (∼14 days) in patients with uncomplicated bloodstream infection (BSI) with mostly susceptible Gram-negative bacteria. Here, we evaluate short-course therapy in ceftriaxone-resistant E. coli BSI. Methods In a prospective cohort of 300 patients with E. coli BSI at 14 United States hospitals between November 2020 and April 2021, each patient with ceftriaxone-R E. coli BSI, and the next consecutive patient with a ceftriaxone-S E. coli BSI was included. Patients who received 5-8 days (“short”) or 9-21 days (“long”) of antibiotics were included in this analysis. Patients who died before day 9 were excluded. Primary outcome was a Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR, Table 1) based on disposition at day 30 after collection of the index blood culture. Ceftriaxone susceptibility was centrally determined using broth microdilution for all bacterial isolates. Desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) categories Results Of 300 patients in the original cohort, 227 were included; 44 patients (24 ceftriaxone-S, 20 ceftriaxone-R) received short (median 8 days, range 5-8 days), and 183 patients (96 ceftriaxone-S, 87 ceftriaxone-R) received long duration (median 15 days, range 9-21 days). Age (median 68 years, IQR 57-77 years), sex (125/227 [55%] female), and Charlson comorbidity index (median 2, IQR 1-4) were similar between groups. Notably, almost all patients (18/19, 95%) with solid organ or stem cell transplant were in the long duration group. The median Pitt bacteremia score was 2 (IQR 1-3) in the short duration group vs. 1 (IQR 0-3) in the long duration group (Wilcoxon Rank Sum p=0.07). DOOR outcomes were similar in both groups (Figure and Table 2). Numerically more patients in the ceftriaxone-resistant group on short treatment were in category 3; 4/20 (20%) vs 5/87 (6%) in the long duration group. These 4 patients all had unsuccessful discharge combined with renal failure (n=2), and/or lack of clinical response (n=3). Desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) analysesFigure.DOOR outcomes Shown are the percentages of patients in each group with a specific DOOR category outcome. Conclusion Short duration of therapy was less frequently used than long duration of therapy in this prospective cohort of E. coli BSI. Further studies are needed to determine whether short-course therapy is appropriate for ceftriaxone-R E. coli BSI. Disclosures Yohei Doi, MD, PHD, bioMerieux: Advisor/Consultant|FujiFilm: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead: Honoraria|GSK: Advisor/Consultant|Meiji Seika Pharma: Advisor/Consultant|Moderna: Advisor/Consultant|Moderna: Honoraria|MSD: Advisor/Consultant|MSD: Honoraria|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Honoraria Owen Albin, MD, Charles River Laboratories: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant Elie Saade, MD, MPH, FIDSA, Envision Pharma: Speaker, Presenter|Johnson and Johnson: Speaker, Travel, Lodging|Protein Sciences Corp: Grant/Research Support|Sanofi Pasteur: Speaker, Travel and Lodging Loren G. Miller, MD MPH, ContraFect: Grant/Research Support|GSK: Grant/Research Support|Medline: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Paratek: Grant/Research Support Michael J. Satlin, MD, AbbVie: IDMC member|Biomerieux: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant|SNIPRBiome: Grant/Research Support Martin Krsak, MD, MSc, FASAM, AbbVie: Grant/Research Support|Melinta: Honoraria W. Charles Huskins, MD, MSc, ADMA Biologics: Advisor/Consultant|Bristol Myers Squibb: Stocks/Bonds|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Stocks/Bonds|Zimmer Biomet: Stocks/Bonds Robin Patel, MD, Abbott Laboratories: Advisor/Consultant|Adaptive Phage Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Adaptive Phage Therapeutics: Mayo Clinic has a royalty-bearing know-how agreement and equity in Adaptive Phage Therapeutics.|BIOFIRE: Grant/Research Support|CARB-X: Advisor/Consultant|ContraFect: Grant/Research Support|Day Zero Diagnostics: Advisor/Consultant|HealthTrackRx: Advisor/Consultant|Mammoth Biosciences: Advisor/Consultant|Netflix: Advisor/Consultant|Oxford Nanopore Technologies: Advisor/Consultant|PhAST: Advisor/Consultant|See details: Patent on Bordetella pertussis/parapertussis PCR issued, a patent on a device/method for sonication with royalties paid by Samsung to Mayo Clinic|See details: continued, patent on an anti-biofilm substance issued|TenNor Therapeutics Limited: Grant/Research Support|Torus Biosystems: Advisor/Consultant|Trellis Bioscience, Inc.: Advisor/Consultant Vance G. Fowler, MD, MHS, Amphliphi Biosciences, Integrated Biotherapeutics; C3J, Armata, Valanbio; Akagera, Aridis, Roche, Astra Zeneca: Advisor/Consultant|Genentech, Regeneron, Deep Blue, Basilea, Janssen;: Grant/Research Support|Infectious Diseases Society of America: Honoraria|MedImmune, Allergan, Pfizer, Advanced Liquid Logics, Theravance, Novartis, Merck; Medical Biosurfaces; Locus; Affinergy; Contrafect; Karius;: Grant/Research Support|Novartis, Debiopharm, Genentech, Achaogen, Affinium, Medicines Co., MedImmune, Bayer, Basilea, Affinergy, Janssen, Contrafect, Regeneron, Destiny,: Advisor/Consultant|Sepsis diagnostic: Patent pending|UpToDate: Royalties|Valanbio and ArcBio: Stock Options David van Duin, MD, PhD, Entasis: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Honoraria|Qpex: Advisor/Consultant|Roche: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Grant/Research Support|Union: Advisor/Consultant|Utility: Advisor/Consultant

The HIF‐1 and β‐catenin protective pathways represent the two most significant cellular responses that are activated in response to acute kidney injury. We previously reported that murine Mucin 1 (Muc1) protects kidney function and morphology in a mouse model of ischemia‐reperfusion injury (IRI) by stabilizing HIF‐1α, enhancing HIF‐1 downstream signaling and thereby preventing metabolic stress (Pastor‐Soler et al. 2015 Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 308, F1452‐F1462). We asked if Muc1 regulates the β‐catenin protective pathway during IRI as published data indicate that (i) β‐catenin is found in co‐immunoprecipitates with human MUC1 in extracts of both cultured cells and tissues, (ii) β‐catenin nuclear targeting is MUC1‐dependent in cultured human cells, and (iii) MUC1 prevents β‐catenin phosphorylation by glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3b) and thereby β‐catenin degradation. Using our same mouse model of IRI, and by using immunohistochemistry and immunoblotting of kidney tissue, we found that levels of active GSK3β were significantly lower in kidneys of control mice compared to Muc1 KO mice. Consequently, β‐catenin was significantly increased at 24 and 72 h recovery and appeared in the nuclear fraction at 72 h in control mouse kidneys. Both β‐catenin induction and nuclear targeting were absent in Muc1 KO mice. In accord with these data, we also found downstream induction of β‐catenin pro‐survival factors (activated Akt, survivin, transcription factor TCF4 and its downstream target cyclin D1) and repression of pro‐apoptotic factors (p53, active Bax and cleaved caspase 3) in control mouse kidneys that were absent or aberrant in kidneys of Muc1 KO mice. Altogether, the data clearly indicate that Muc1 protection during AKI proceeds by enhancing both the HIF‐1 and β‐catenin protective pathways. Support or Funding Information This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants DK‐099345 (to T. A. Sutton), DK‐084184 (to N. M. Pastor‐Soler), CA‐64389 (to S. J. Gendler), DK‐62277, DK‐100287, and DK‐095498 (to S. P. Monga), DK‐097889 (to M. M. Al‐bataineh), DK107632, DK‐079307 (Pilot Project) and Samuel and Emma Winters Foundation grant (to R. P. Hughey), and P30‐DK079307 (to the Microscopy Core N. M. Pastor‐Soler and S. Bastacky).

Goals: We aim to describe the weight loss outcomes of patients with celiac disease (CeD) taking antiobesity medications (AOMs) and compare it with the weight loss outcomes of patients without CeD taking AOMs. Background: Increasing rates of obesity and obesity-associated comorbidities have been previously reported in patients with CeD on a gluten-free diet. The effectiveness of AOMs in this population has not been previously described. Methods: In our retrospective cohort study, we matched 39 patients with treated CeD to 78 patients without CeD based on sex and AOM. We assessed the weight loss outcomes at 3, 6, and 12 months after starting the AOM in both cohorts and analyzed if there was a differential response when comparing by type of AOM [injectable glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists vs. oral non-GLP-1 AOMs]. Results: Both cohorts had similar baseline demographic and anthropometric characteristics. At 12 months, the CeD cohort had a nonsignificantly inferior total body weight loss percentage compared with the cohort without CeD (6.5% vs. 9.5%, P=0.13). The CeD cohort had a similar proportion of patients achieving a total body weight loss percentage of ≥5% than the cohort without CeD (72.7% vs. 72.1%, P=1.00). No significant difference was observed when comparing the weight loss outcomes of injectables (GLP-1 receptor agonists) to oral AOMs. The proportion of patients reporting side effects was similar for both groups, regardless of the type of AOM. Conclusion: Patients with CeD taking AOMs had similar weight loss outcomes to patients without CeD. Hence, AOMs can be a safe and effective therapy for weight management in patients with CeD.

Purpose To compare 3 separate blood flow restriction (BFR) systems in their capacity to reduce repetitions to failure, impact perceptual responses, and cause adverse events during a low‐load free‐flow exercise. Methods The study included healthy subjects aged 18 years or older who presented to an ambulatory‐care sports medicine clinic. On day 1, participants’ demographic characteristics and anthropomorphic measurements were recorded. Each participant performed dumbbell biceps curl repetitions to failure using 20% of his or her 1‐repetition maximum weight with each arm. Participants were exposed to 3 different tourniquet systems for familiarization. On day 2, each participant’s arm was randomized to a cuff system, and the participant performed 2 sets of biceps curl repetitions to failure with the cuff inflated. Repetitions to failure, rating of perceived effort (RPE), rating of perceived discomfort, and pulse oxygenation levels were recorded after each set. On day 3, participants completed a survey of their perceived delayed‐onset muscle soreness. Results The final analysis was performed on 42 arms, with 14 limbs per system. The study population had a mean age of 28.7 ± 2.4 years and a mean body mass index of 24.9 ± 4.3. All 3 systems successfully reduced repetitions to failure compared with unrestricted low‐load exercise from baseline to BFR set 1 and from baseline to BFR set 2. There were no significant between‐group differences among BFR systems regarding the number of repetitions to failure performed at baseline versus BFR set 1 or BFR set 2. The Delfi Personalized Tourniquet System (PTS) cohort had the greatest reductions in repetitions to failure from BFR set 1 to BFR set 2 ( P = .002) and reported the highest RPE after set 2 ( P = .025). Conclusions The Delfi PTS, SmartCuffs Pro, and BStrong BFR systems were each safe and were able to significantly reduce repetitions to failure compared with a low‐load free‐flow condition when used in a BFR exercise protocol. The Delfi PTS system may produce a higher RPE with prolonged use in comparison to the other systems. Level of Evidence Level II, prospective cohort study.

Abstract Background Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is a critical supportive therapy in cardiovascular surgery (CVS). Donor selection and testing have reduced the risk of transfusion-transmitted infections; however, risks remain from bacteria, emerging viruses, pathogens for which testing is not performed and from residual donor leukocytes. Amustaline (S-303)/glutathione (GSH) treatment pathogen reduction technology is designed to inactivate a broad spectrum of infectious agents and leucocytes in RBC concentrates. The ReCePI study is a Phase 3 clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pathogen reduced RBCs transfused for acute anemia in CVS compared to conventional RBCs, and to assess the clinical significance of treatment-emergent RBC antibodies. Methods ReCePI is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, active-controlled, paralleldesign, non-inferiority study. Eligible subjects will be randomized up to 7 days before surgery to receive either leukoreduced Test (pathogen reduced) or Control (conventional) RBCs from surgery up to Day 7 post-surgery. The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of patients transfused with at least one study transfusion with an acute kidney injury (AKI) diagnosis defined as any increased serum creatinine (sCr) level ≥0.3 mg/dL (or 26.5 µmol/L) from presurgery baseline within 48±4 hours of the end of surgery. The primary safety endpoints are the proportion of patients with any treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) related to study RBC transfusion through 28 days, and the proportion of patients with treatment-emergent antibodies with confirmed specificity to pathogen reduced RBCs through 75 days after the last study transfusion. With ≥292 evaluable, transfused patients (>146 per arm), the study has 80% power to demonstrate non-inferiority, defined as a Test group AKI incidence increase of no more than 50% of the Control group rate, assuming a Control incidence of 30%. Discussion RBCs are transfused to prevent tissue hypoxia caused by surgery-induced bleeding and anemia. AKI is a sensitive indicator of renal hypoxia and a novel endpoint for assessing RBC efficacy. The ReCePI study is intended to demonstrate the non-inferiority of pathogen reduced RBCs to conventional RBCs in the support of renal tissue oxygenation due to acute anemia and to characterize the incidence of treatment-related antibodies to RBC.

In a period when the budding field of neurosurgery was believed to have little promise, Dr Alfred Washington Adson founded and led the first neurosurgical department at Mayo Clinic. He was not without reservations—surgical intervention for neurological conditions was rarely pursued because of poor outcomes and high complication rates, and Dr Adson acknowledged his early concerns about the future of neurosurgery in his memoirs. However, his education, mentorship, his training, and his first neurosurgical cases helped to shape the impact he ultimately had on the field and his legacy as a neurosurgeon. Dr Adson trained with several renowned Mayo general surgeons, notably his mentor Dr Emil Beckman, whose desire for operative precision shaped Dr Adson's drive to develop his own skills as a surgeon. Two years into his residency, he became the youngest staff surgeon and was tasked with managing the neurosurgical cases at Mayo. The five neurosurgical cases overseen by Dr Adson in the next year illuminated the opportunity for neurosurgery to drastically improve the lives of patients. Dr Adson, given the option of continuing as either a general surgeon or a neurosurgeon, ultimately chose to pursue neurosurgery. This article seeks to provide a historical perspective on the neurosurgeon Dr Alfred Washington Adson using primary and secondary accounts from the Mayo archives, highlighting his contributions to the early understanding of intracranial pathology and how his early experiences as a trainee developed into a personal passion for self-improvement, education, and advocacy for health care in America.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain malignancy in adults. Standard of care (SOC) for suspected GBM begins with maximal safe resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy and temozolomide, and maintenance temozolomide. Imvax has developed the Goldspire™ platform to create IGV-001, an autologous biologic-device combination product for the treatment of newly diagnosed GBM (ndGBM). IGV-001 consists of autologous GBM tumor cells and an antisense oligonucleotide against IGF-1R mRNA (IMV-001), irradiated and administered via biodiffusion chambers implanted in the abdomen. Together, these components stimulate immunogenic cell death and antigen release. IGV-001 was well tolerated and multiple efficacy signals were observed in a Phase 1b study in patients with ndGBM, including significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS), radiographic evidence of tumor response, and changes in immune response biomarkers. A Phase 2b randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study has been initiated to assess the safety and efficacy of IGV-001 in patients with ndGBM (NCT04485949). After surgical resection, patients will be treated with IGV-001 or placebo followed by SOC. 25 US sites have been selected with a target enrollment of 93 patients (2:1 randomization) and the study is open to enrollment. Key inclusion criteria are 18 to 70 years of age, Karnofsky performance status score ≥ 70, diagnosis of GBM based on the treating neurosurgeon's best clinical judgement, confirmed measurable disease pre-operatively, tumor located in the supratentorial compartment, and adequate bone marrow and organ function. Key exclusion criteria include bihemispheric disease, multicentric disease, or treatment with Tumor Treating Fields prior to documented progression. The primary outcome is PFS, defined as the time from randomization to first progression, as determined by blinded central radiology review, or death. Secondary outcomes include overall survival, defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause, and safety.

Abstract RTOG 9402 demonstrated procarbazine (P), lomustine (CCNU/C), and vincristine (V), collectively PCV, added to radiation therapy significantly improved survival for patients with newly diagnosed anaplastic oligodendroglial tumors. The improvement was most pronounced in 1p19q codeleted cases, and to a lesser extent, IDH-mutant cases, with no survival benefit in cases with neither biomarker. Analogous results were observed in other phase III trials. However, vincristine (V) can cause substantial toxicity and requires intravenous administration, both negatively affecting quality of life, with debatable contribution to PCV efficacy. As a randomized trial comparing PCV to PC is unlikely to be conducted, we explored correlations between survival and V-dosing in patients randomized to PCV in RTOG 9402. We performed post-hoc analyses of all evaluable participants (n = 143) randomized to PCV on RTOG 9402, supplemented by restricting the analyses to the chemosensitive molecular subsets (IDH-mutant and/or 1p/19q codeleted, n = 118). Total V dose by quartile (Q) was calculated. Survival from six months post-randomization was compared among V dose groups, adjusting for age, extent of resection (EOR), and Karnofsky Performances Status (KPS) in a Cox proportional hazards model. Higher V dose received correlated with longer survival in multivariate analyses (n = 134, median-Q3 vs. < Q1, HR 0.40 (0.22, 0.73), p = 0.003; ≥Q3 vs. < Q1, HR 0.39 (0.22, 0.72), p = 0.002). Excluding chemoresistant cases (IDH wild-type/not codeleted), survival was also significantly longer in evaluable participants receiving the highest doses of vincristine (≥Q3 vs. < Q1 HR 0.42 (0.21,0.81), p = 0.01). In this post-hoc analysis, higher overall V-dose received correlated with longer survival in evaluable patients with anaplastic oligodendroglial tumors receiving PCV chemotherapy in RTOG 9402. Of note, as vincristine dosing was not assigned by randomization, confounding due to differences in patient characteristics among V dose groups cannot be ruled out. Caution should be exercised when considering discarding V from the PCV regimen.

Abstract BACKGROUND Preclinical studies have demonstrated that IDH1-mutant (IDHmt) gliomas harbor a BRCAness phenotype with a defect in homologous recombination that confers PARP inhibitor sensitivity. METHODS The phase II component of ABTC 1801 examined the efficacy of the combination of pamiparib (BeiGene BGB-290) with low dose metronomic temozolomide in recurrent IDHmt grade 2 and 3 gliomas. In this two-stage design, Arm A enrolled patients who had failed two lines and Arm B a single line of alkylator therapy. Pamiparib and temozolomide doses based on phase I results was 60 mg BID and 20 mg daily. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS 39 patients (Arm A 15, Arm B 24) enrolled in the phase II. Median age was 45 (range: 25-69), 56% male, and median KPS 90. 72% of tumors were MGMT methylated. There were no confirmed responses in Arm A and one in Arm B; neither arm met the threshold for additional accrual. One-third of subjects discontinued treatment for reasons other than progressive disease. Estimated median PFS was 5.8 months in Arm A and 11.3 months in Arm B. Seven subjects (Arm A 3, Arm B 4) developed DLT during treatment. Grade 3+ toxicity was principally hematologic; 9 patients had grade 3 anemia, 7 grade 3 and 3 grade 4 neutropenia, and 3 grade 3 thrombocytopenia. In enhancing and non-enhancing tumors from 8 surgical arm patients, median unbound drug tumor/plasma ratios were 0.98 and 0.92, respectively; and median unbound pamiparib tumor concentrations were 209 and 188 nmol/L (or nmol/kg), respectively, which were >20-fold the in vitro IC50 for PARP inhibition. CONCLUSIONS While pamiparib appeared to achieve sufficient pharmacologically active concentrations in both enhancing and non-enhancing tumors, combination with temozolomide did not produce a meaningful ORR in IDHmt recurrent gliomas. Cumulative hematologic toxicity was substantial.