Nicolalde, Bryan

Introduction: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of mortality worldwide. European population studies have shown a protective effect of high altitude on CVD mortality, but the applicability of these findings to Latin population remains to be explored. We aim to compare the mortality rates from ischemic heart disease (IHD), heart failure (HF), and cardiac arrhythmias between low- and high-altitude regions in Ecuador. Hypothesis: CVD mortality might be influenced by altitude Methods: We collected nationwide mortality data on different CVDs for each canton in Ecuador from 2017 to 2021 by using pre-defined ICD-10 codes. Then, we collected the mean altitude in meters above sea level (ASL) for each specific canton and classified them into low-(<2500 meters ASL) and high-altitude (>2500 meters ASL) cantons. We estimated the aggregated mortality rates per 100.000 persons and 95% confidence interval for high- and low-altitude regions at each timepoint. Results: From 2017 to 2021, 69.002 deaths due to CVDs occurred in Ecuador (IHD: 77.0%, HF:19.8% and cardiac arrhythmias: 3.2%). Mean age at death across different pathologies ranged between 76 and 81 years old, and most participants identified as multi-ethic (Table 1). There was a significantly higher mortality rate for HF and cardiac arrhythmias in high-altitude cantons than in low-altitude cantons at almost all timepoints (Figure 1). The mortality rates for IHD were lower for high-altitude cantons than low-altitude cantons at all timepoints. Conclusions: High-altitude cantons in Ecuador had higher mortality rates for HF and cardiac arrhythmias, but lower mortality rates for IHD when compared to low-altitude cantons.

Goals: We aim to describe the weight loss outcomes of patients with celiac disease (CeD) taking antiobesity medications (AOMs) and compare it with the weight loss outcomes of patients without CeD taking AOMs. Background: Increasing rates of obesity and obesity-associated comorbidities have been previously reported in patients with CeD on a gluten-free diet. The effectiveness of AOMs in this population has not been previously described. Methods: In our retrospective cohort study, we matched 39 patients with treated CeD to 78 patients without CeD based on sex and AOM. We assessed the weight loss outcomes at 3, 6, and 12 months after starting the AOM in both cohorts and analyzed if there was a differential response when comparing by type of AOM [injectable glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists vs. oral non-GLP-1 AOMs]. Results: Both cohorts had similar baseline demographic and anthropometric characteristics. At 12 months, the CeD cohort had a nonsignificantly inferior total body weight loss percentage compared with the cohort without CeD (6.5% vs. 9.5%, P=0.13). The CeD cohort had a similar proportion of patients achieving a total body weight loss percentage of ≥5% than the cohort without CeD (72.7% vs. 72.1%, P=1.00). No significant difference was observed when comparing the weight loss outcomes of injectables (GLP-1 receptor agonists) to oral AOMs. The proportion of patients reporting side effects was similar for both groups, regardless of the type of AOM. Conclusion: Patients with CeD taking AOMs had similar weight loss outcomes to patients without CeD. Hence, AOMs can be a safe and effective therapy for weight management in patients with CeD.

Abstract Disclosure: S. Fansa: None. W. Ghusn: None. E. Tama: None. B. Nicolalde: None. D. Anazco: None. S. D'Andre: None. S. Faubion: None. C. Shufelt: None. A. Acosta: None. M.D. Hurtado: None. Background: Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) block estrogen synthesis and are used as adjuvant treatment for breast cancer. AIs are associated with weight gain that can lead to increased cardiometabolic risk, thereby affecting health and survivorship quality in these patients. The role of anti-obesity medications (AOMs) in patients using AIs has not been studied. We sought to investigate weight loss outcomes to AOMs in patients taking AIs for breast cancer treatment. Methods: This is a matched case-control retrospective cohort study of breast cancer survivors on AI using FDA-approved AOMs (AI/AOM group). We compared their weight loss outcomes with a group of female patients with obesity, without a history of breast cancer or AI use, on AOMs (AOM group). We matched patients by age and body mass index (BMI). Exclusion criteria: AOM initiation prior to AI therapy, ≤3 months of AOM use, history of bariatric surgery, active malignancy, or pregnancy. Primary endpoint: total body weight loss % (TBWL%) at 12 months. Secondary endpoints: TBWL% at 3 and 6 months and % of patients achieving categorical TBWL ≥5%, ≥10% and ≥15% at 12 months. We used Pearson χ2 and unpaired t-test to compare baseline characteristics and outcomes between groups, and univariate analyses to estimate the contribution of variables to TBWL% in the AI/AOM group. We present results as mean ± standard deviation. Results: We included 99 patients: 63 in the AI/AOM group (63.5±10 years, BMI 34.4±7.0 kg/m2) and 36 in the AOM group (60.4±8.7 years, BMI 36.3±6.9 kg/m2). Liraglutide, semaglutide and phentermine were the only AOMs used. There was no difference in the frequency of use of these three AOMs among both groups (p= 0.1). AI/AOM group had a lower TBWL% compared to the AOM group during follow-up: 3.7± 4.3% vs. 5.6 ± 4.1% (p= 0.03) at 3 months, 3.9± 4.3% vs. 9.5± 4.7% (p&lt; 0.0001) at 6 months, and 5.2± 5.3% vs. 10.5± 6.8% (p&lt; 0.0001) at 12 months. Although the AI/AOM group was more likely to use lower doses of AOMs (p= 0.0004), TBWL% differences persisted among groups at 12 months after adjusting for AOM dosing (p&lt; 0.0001). There was no difference in nutritional and behavioral modification sessions among groups (p=0.06 and p=0.9, respectively). At 12 months, the percentage of patients achieving ≥5%, ≥10%, and ≥15% TBWL was greater in the AOM group compared to the AI/AOM group: ≥5% TBWL, 85.7% vs. 50.0% (p&lt; 0.0001); ≥10%, 57.1 vs. 20.0% (p&lt; 0.0001); and ≥15%, 28.6 vs. 5.0% (p&lt; 0.0001); respectively. We found no predictors of TBWL% at 12 months in the AI/AOM group. Conclusion: Weight loss outcomes in breast cancer survivors on AIs taking AOMs are poorer compared to patients without breast cancer history and not taking AIs. Studies are needed to assess the mechanisms behind the different weight loss response to AOMs in women taking AIs, which we hypothesize may relate to AIs’ anti-estrogenic effect on lean and fat mass. Presentation: Friday, June 16, 2023

Abstract Disclosure: S. Fansa: None. W. Ghusn: None. B. Nicolalde: None. D. Anazco: None. E. Tama: None. A. Acosta: None. M.D. Hurtado: None. Introduction: The increasing prevalences of obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D), the “twin epidemics”, have led to the development of drugs targeting both diseases simultaneously. Liraglutide and semaglutide, GLP-1 receptor agonists used for T2DM, are also FDA-approved for weight loss. Tirzepatide, a novel dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist approved for T2D, has shown promising weight loss outcomes in clinical trials. To date, no study has assessed weight loss outcomes of tirzepatide in a real-world setting. Our aim is to assess its efficacy and safety in patients with overweight or obesity. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of adults with overweight or obesity taking weekly subcutaneous tirzepatide for T2D or off-label for weight loss. We excluded patients taking tirzepatide for less than one month, prior bariatric procedure, use of any anti-obesity medications, and active malignancy or pregnancy. The primary outcome was total body weight loss percentage (TBWL%) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included TBWL% at 1 and 2 months; TBWL% difference by T2D status (with and without) and by sex at 3 months; proportion of patients achieving ≥5%, ≥10%, and ≥15% of TBWL% at 3 months; predictors of TBWL% at 3 months; and reported side effects during follow up. We used paired t-test to assess TBWL% compared to baseline, non-paired t-test to compare TBWL% by T2D status and sex, and univariate analyses to estimate the contribution of other variables to TBWL%. Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Results: We included 175 participants (81% female, age 49.8±12.2, 91% white, BMI 38.8±7.3 kg/m2). One third of patients had T2D (n=59, 34%). Most patients were on 5mg (39%) or 7.5mg (22%) of tirzepatide weekly. TBWL% at 1, 2, and 3 months was 3.6±2.5% (n=87), 5.8±3.5% (n=100), and 8.4± 4.3% (n=60), respectively (p &lt;0.0001 compared to baseline at all timepoints). Patients with T2D lost less weight at 3 months compared to patients without T2D: 6.9±4.0% vs. 9.1±4.4% (p= 0.03). At 3 months, TBWL% was greater in females, 9.2±4.3% vs. 5.0±2.5% for males, p&lt;0.0001. Greater baseline weight was associated with greater TBWL% (R=0.32, p&lt;0.0001). At 3 months, 60 patients had documented weights with 81.6% achieving ≥ 5%, 30% achieving ≥10%, and 10% achieving ≥15% TBWL. Forty participants (23%) reported side effects. The most frequent were nausea/vomiting (n=27, 15%), constipation (n=6, 3%), and abdominal pain (n=5, 3%). Eight patients (5%) had to either decrease dosage or discontinue the drug due to side effects. Conclusion: In this retrospective cohort study, tirzepatide led to substantial weight loss at 3 months. Patients with T2DM lost less weight than patients without. Further real-world studies with longer follow-up duration and higher tirzepatide doses are needed to establish the long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability of this drug in this setting. Presentation: Friday, June 16, 2023