Citations

Abstract Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell (CAR-T) treatment for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) induces high initial response rates, but most patients relapse. Low disease burden (often defined as <5% blasts in the bone marrow) is associated with better outcomes. CAR HEMATOTOX (HT) is a score using prelymphodepletion hematologic and inflammatory parameters to predict outcomes in lymphoma. Here, we assess its prognostic utility in a large multicenter adult B-cell ALL cohort. Patients who received brexucabtagene autoleucel across 33 centers in North America were included as part of the Real-World Outcomes Collaborative of CAR-T in Adult ALL (ROCCA) consortium. An independent cohort of 61 patients with ALL treated with an investigational CD19 CAR-T therapy at 1 center was also described. Among 199 ROCCA consortium patients, 43 (22%) patients with HTlow scores had lower rates of delayed neutrophil recovery than those with HThigh scores (26% vs 52%, P = .002) and fewer severe infections (2.5% vs 18.8%, P = .011). They also had higher response rates, overall survival (OS), and event-free survival (EFS), as well as lower nonrelapse mortality and cumulative incidence of relapse. The survival differences remained significant after multivariable adjustment for disease burden and other covariates. In the investigational cohort of 61 patients, patients with HTlow scores had improved OS and EFS, as well as higher peak CAR-T expansion. In summary, CAR HT score is a prognostic factor independent of disease burden in adult ALL. HTlow score is associated with superior outcomes after CD19 CAR-Ts and higher CAR-T expansion in a single-center cohort. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01044069 and #NCT01860937.

Abstract BACKGROUND Mirdametinib is the first FDA-approved MEK1/2 inhibitor for both adults and children (≥2 years) with NF1 who have symptomatic PN not amenable to complete resection. We report updated results from the LTFU phase of the pivotal, phase 2b ReNeu trial (NCT03962543) evaluating the efficacy and safety of mirdametinib. MATERIALS AND METHODS In ReNeu, mirdametinib capsules or tablets for oral suspension (2 mg/m2 BID, max 4 mg BID) are administered in 3-weeks-on/1-week-off 28-day cycles. Following the 24-cycle (~2 years) treatment phase, patients could continue mirdametinib in an optional LTFU phase. These analyses are inclusive of the treatment and LTFU phases (data cutoff: June 12, 2024; an additional 9 months of cumulative data following the primary analysis). Exploratory analyses reported here included confirmed objective response rate (ORR; proportion of patients with ≥20% reduction of target PN volume from baseline on consecutive MRI scans within 2 to 6 months, assessed by blinded independent central review), duration of response (DoR), change from baseline in target PN volume, and safety. RESULTS Fifty-eight adults and 56 children were dosed with mirdametinib. Median (range) duration of mirdametinib treatment was 21.8 (0.4, 54.4) months in adults and 25.4 (1.6, 48.5) months in children. Among LTFU-eligible patients, 26/31 (84%) adults and 32/37 (86%) children entered the LTFU. Confirmed ORR was 47% (27/58; 95% CI, 33%, 60%) in adults and 55% (31/56; 95% CI, 42%, 69%) in children. Of patients with a confirmed objective response, 18 adults and 19 children achieved a deep response (best target PN volume reduction from baseline of >50%). Median (range) best percentage change from baseline in target PN volume was -41% (-90%, 13%) in adults and -43% (-98%, 48%) in children. Median DoR was not reached. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in ≥25% of patients were dermatitis acneiform, diarrhoea, nausea, and vomiting in adults, and diarrhoea, dermatitis acneiform, and paronychia in children. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 17% of adults and 25% of children. Dose interruptions, dose reductions, and discontinuations due to TRAEs occurred in 9%, 17%, and 22%, respectively, of adults, and in 14%, 14%, and 9%, respectively, of children. CONCLUSIONS An increase in confirmed ORR was observed with longer duration of mirdametinib treatment, with additional deep responses achieved in both adults and children with NF1-PN. Mirdametinib continued to be well tolerated with a manageable safety profile and no new safety signals identified in the LTFU phase. SUPPORTED BY SpringWorks Therapeutics, Inc.

ImportanceStudies suggest that everolimus may reduce the risk of rejection, cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and cytomegalovirus (CMV) after heart transplant. Everolimus use is controversial because of data demonstrating higher infection deaths when everolimus is introduced de novo after transplant. It is unclear whether everolimus is safe and effective when initiated at 6 months posttransplant in children, a population in which median graft survival is limited to 15 years and randomized clinical trials are lacking.ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of everolimus combined with low-dose tacrolimus to prevent major adverse transplant events (MATEs) in children after heart transplant.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsMulticenter, randomized, open-label, clinical trial enrolling 211 patients who were alive 6 months after pediatric heart transplant at 25 US sites from February 2018 to August 2020. The last date of follow-up was April 17, 2023.InterventionsParticipants were randomized to receive everolimus and low-dose tacrolimus (n = 107) or standard-dose tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (n = 104) for 30 months.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary efficacy end point was the MATE-3 score at 30 months, a validated composite ordinal end point including acute cellular rejection, CAV, and CKD. The primary safety end point was the MATE-6 score, encompassing the MATE-3 score plus antibody-mediated rejection, infection, and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder.ResultsAmong 211 children randomized, the mean age was 8.2 (SD, 6.3) years, 97 (46%) underwent transplant for congenital heart disease, and 49 (23%) were treated for rejection before 6 months. At 30 months, the mean MATE-3 score did not differ between the 2 treatment groups (mean difference, −0.32; 95% CI, −0.90 to 0.20; P = .16). The mean MATE-6 score was no higher in the everolimus group than in the mycophenolate group (baseline-adjusted mean difference, −0.40; 95% CI, −1.81 to 0.93), meeting the success criterion for safety (noninferiority margin <3). There were no differences in graft survival, MATE-free survival, or freedom from any individual MATE. Everolimus was associated with greater improvement in estimated glomerular filtration rate at 12 months (mean difference, 10.5 mL/min/1.73 m2; 95% CI, 1.09-19.91 mL/min/1.73 m2) and a lower incidence of CMV infection (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.26-0.93).Conclusions and RelevanceAmong 6-month pediatric heart transplant survivors, everolimus and low-dose tacrolimus did not differ from tacrolimus and mycophenolate in preventing the composite of cellular rejection, CAV, and CKD at 30 months. However, everolimus and low-dose tacrolimus appear to be safe based on the total burden of 6 MATEs and may be associated with improved kidney function and less CMV infection.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03386539

Objective Vacuoles E1 enzyme X‐linked autoinflammatory somatic syndrome (VEXAS) is a recently identified rare genetic disorder associated with somatic mutations in the UBA1 gene. VEXAS presents with a combination of inflammatory and hematologic manifestations, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Methods Given the variability in disease presentation and the limited number of studies to date, no clinical documents currently exist to provide guidance to health care providers about the management of VEXAS. To address this gap, we formed an international multidisciplinary panel of VEXAS experts. Results Through formalized meetings and a voting process, the group developed consensus clinical guidance considerations for the management of VEXAS. These considerations offer practical advice on several key topics: (1) clinical features of VEXAS, (2) UBA1 screening methods, (3) the diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) in patients with VEXAS, and (4) prognosis and management. The aim is to provide expert guidance on which patients to test, how to test for VEXAS, how to approach MDS in the context of VEXAS, and considerations for management. Conclusion This work marks the first formal international consensus guidance for VEXAS and is intended to be used as a resource for clinicians seeking to understand the disease and its management.

Background Patients with advanced cancer experience a substantial amount of existential and emotional distress. Dignity therapy (DT) is a brief, individualized psychotherapy that aims to relieve existential distress and improve the experiences of individuals impacted by serious illness. Aim To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of virtual DT (vDT) among patients with advanced cancer. Methods This pilot study recruited adult patients with advanced cancer and an expected prognosis >6 months. The vDT intervention consisted of 2 sessions of guided interviews focused on life review, discussion, and development of a generativity document (GD). Feasibility and acceptability were assessed quantitatively and with semi-structured interviews. Effectiveness measures (distress, dignity impact scale, quality of life [QOL]) were administered pre/post intervention. Results Thirty-one patients referred from a palliative care clinic were eligible. Twenty-one consented and 15 received a final GD. Patients who completed final assessments (N = 9) reported satisfaction with their experience and would recommend the therapy to others. Patients found the virtual component of the intervention acceptable, and the majority noted an improvement in their dignity. Qualitative analysis revealed themes of study team effectiveness, perspectives on intervention processes, benefits to self, and benefits to loved ones. Conclusion Participation in vDT intervention was feasible and acceptable for patients. Patients appreciated the connection with the interviewer, the process, and the benefit of having a document to share with loved ones. Preliminary effectiveness data suggest vDT improves sense of dignity.

Objective Cognitive impairment is increasingly recognized in patients with cerebral venous congestion (CVC), yet the cognitive tools used are largely adapted from stroke and dementia research. This review examines current literature on cognitive function in CVC, including conditions such as cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST), idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), and dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs). Special emphasis is placed on the limitations of common screening tools like the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Cognitive dysfunction—primarily affecting executive function, processing speed, and attention—is reported in up to 86% of CVC cases, yet only about 20% of studies use validated cognitive testing tools, most of which may lack sensitivity for CVC-specific deficits. Emerging techniques such as ocular motor testing and physiological markers show promise but require further validation. There is an urgent need for standardized, CVC-specific cognitive assessment protocols that reflect the unique pathophysiology of venous disorders. Future research should prioritize the development of targeted cognitive batteries and integrate objective physiological measures to enhance diagnostic accuracy.

Background: Data accessibility remains a significant barrier in healthcare AI due to privacy constraints and logistical challenges. Synthetic data, which mimics real patient information while remaining both realistic and non-identifiable, offers a promising solution. Large Language Models (LLMs) create new opportunities to generate high-fidelity clinical conversations between patients and physicians. However, the value of this synthetic data depends on careful evaluation of its realism, accuracy, and practical relevance. Objective: To assess the performance of four leading LLMs: ChatGPT 4.5, ChatGPT 4o, Claude 3.7 Sonnet, and Gemini Pro 2.5 in generating synthetic transcripts of patient–physician interactions in plastic surgery scenarios. Methods: Each model generated transcripts for ten plastic surgery scenarios. Transcripts were independently evaluated by three clinically trained raters using a seven-criterion rubric: Medical Accuracy, Realism, Persona Consistency, Fidelity, Empathy, Relevancy, and Usability. Raters were blinded to the model identity to reduce bias. Each was rated on a 5-point Likert scale, yielding 840 total evaluations. Descriptive statistics were computed, and a two-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to test for differences across models and metrics. In addition, transcripts were analyzed using automated linguistic and content-based metrics. Results: All models achieved strong performance, with mean ratings exceeding 4.5 across all criteria. Gemini 2.5 Pro received mean scores (5.00 ± 0.00) in Medical Accuracy, Realism, Persona Consistency, Relevancy, and Usability. Claude 3.7 Sonnet matched the scores in Persona Consistency and Relevancy and led in Empathy (4.96 ± 0.18). ChatGPT 4.5 also achieved perfect scores in Relevancy, with high scores in Empathy (4.93 ± 0.25) and Usability (4.96 ± 0.18). ChatGPT 4o demonstrated consistently strong but slightly lower performance across most dimensions. ANOVA revealed no statistically significant differences across models (F(3, 6) = 0.85, p = 0.52). Automated analysis showed substantial variation in transcript length, style, and content richness: Gemini 2.5 Pro generated the longest and most emotionally expressive dialogues, while ChatGPT 4o produced the shortest and most concise outputs. Conclusions: Leading LLMs can generate medically accurate, emotionally appropriate synthetic dialogues suitable for educational and research use. Despite high performance, demographic homogeneity in generated patients highlights the need for improved diversity and bias mitigation in model outputs. These findings support the cautious, context-aware integration of LLM-generated dialogues into medical training, simulation, and research.

Therapeutic clinical trial enrollment does not match glioma incidence across demographics. Traditional statistical methods have identified independent predictors of trial enrollment; however, our understanding of the interactions between these factors remains limited. To test the interactive effects of demographic, socioeconomic, and oncologic variables on trial enrollment, we designed boosted neural networks (BNNs) for all glioma patients ( n = 1042), women ( n = 445, 42.7%), and minorities ( n = 151, 14.5%) and externally validated these models [whole cohort, n = 230; women, n = 89 (38.7%); minority, n = 66 (28.7%)]. For the whole-cohort BNN, the most influential variables on enrollment were oncologic variables, including KPS [total effect (TE), 0.327], chemotherapy (TE, 0.326), tumor location (TE, 0.322), and seizures (TE, 0.239). The women-only BNN exhibited a similar trend. Conversely, for the minority-only BNN, socioeconomic variables [insurance status (TE, 0.213), occupation classification (TE, 0.204), and employment status (TE, 0.150)] were most influential. These results may help prioritize patient-specific initiatives to increase accrual.

Background Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a comprehensive secondary cardiovascular disease program with structured lifestyle interventions to reduce morbidity and mortality. The American Heart Association cardiovascular health (CVH) framework measures health‐promoting behaviors and clinical factors, but it has not been rigorously evaluated in the CR setting. Methods This retrospective cohort study analyzed patients attending CR from January 2018 to September 2020. Patients were evaluated at baseline (pre‐CR) and completion (post‐CR) using 3 clinical factors (blood pressure, cholesterol, and hemoglobin A1c) and 4 health behaviors (smoking, body mass index, physical activity, and diet). CVH score was computed as a composite of each Life's Simple 7 component by assigning 0 points for poor, 1 point for intermediate, or 2 points for ideal (range 0–14 points). CVH scores were further categorized as poor (0–6 points), intermediate (7–8 points), and ideal (9–14 points). Missing data in the analysis were accounted for using a multiple imputation procedure. Results Patients (N=937) were aged 64.0±13.4 years old, 34% women, and attended 11±12 CR sessions. Pre‐CR, 97.2% had poor CVH scores, 2.8% had intermediate scores, and none met ideal CVH criteria. Post‐CR, there was a reduction in poor scores across all metrics except for hemoglobin A1c, which increased (40.6%–43.5%). Younger patients showed improvement in hemoglobin A1c, while older patients improved in body mass index and blood pressure. Conclusions Our study demonstrates the efficacy of CR in improving CVH but underscores the need for better blood glucose management. Tailored interventions based on age and sex may further optimize outcomes for CR participants.