Back to Authors

Kindel, Steven J.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8731-6942

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 3

Pediatric heart transplantation
Johnson, Jonathan N., Kindel, Steven J. , Ameduri, Rebecca , Johnson, Jonathan N.

Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation | April 4, 2026 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 167-171

10.1097/mot.0000000000001289 Get It

Purpose of review To summarize important papers published in the pediatric heart transplantation in the last year. Recent findings While advances have been made for pediatric patients who need heart transplantation, considerable challenges remain. Donor availability remains a key challenge, and work to both increase the number of donors and the quality of donor organs is ongoing. The field of pediatric heart transplantation benefits from registries such as the Pediatric Heart Transplant Society (PHTS) and learning networks such as the Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Network (ACTION), allowing for multisite collaboration to optimize survival both before and after transplant, and to share learning about complex cases. Psychosocial evaluations of potential recipients and families can be challenging, and a consensus framework is now available for these evaluations, to provide appropriate oversight and management of a scarce resource. Looking ahead, heart transplant specialists are anticipating advances in xenotransplantation, which has the potential to revolutionize current standards of care. Summary Donor availability and organ scarcity are the dominant challenges we face, with many recent impactful papers addressing this issue either directly or indirectly. It will be critical to maintain the forward progress made in addressing these challenges, while readying the field for big changes to come.
Everolimus and Low-Dose Tacrolimus After Heart Transplant in Children
Almond, Christopher S. , Alejos, Juan , Ameduri, Rebecca , Barkoff, L., Barnes, Aliessa, Butto, Arene , Carlo, Waldemar F. , Chrisant, Maryanne , Dreyer, William J. , Everitt, Melanie D. , Gonzales, S., Hollander, Seth A. , Kindel, Steven J. , Klein, Gloria L., Lamour, Jacqueline M. , Lee, Joanne , Lü, Minmin , Lytrivi, Irene D. , Miyamoto, Shelley D. , Pahl, Elfriede , Peng, David M. , Sutcliffe, David , Ybarra, A., Zangwill, Steven , Rossano, Joseph W. , Investigators, TEAMMATE Trial, Choi, Jua , Wilber, Jared, Sutherland, Scott M. , Feng, Dana, Lagerborg, Kendra, Burns, Julia, Nikolli, Kledja, Twombly, Adrianna, Massey, Linda K., Wartick, Jennifer, Yohannes, Kifle, Gupta, Akanksha , Major, Melissa , Blume, Elizabeth D. , Esteso, Paul , VanderPluym, Christina , Bastardi, Heather , MacLean, Matthew T. , Haschke, Paul, Gibbons, Taylor , Vu, Courtney , Reilly, Sydney, Ha, Lynne, Boyle, Carley, Robie, Sharon L., Ogata, Kay, Knecht, Carlos, Browne, Lorna P. , Malone, LaDonna J. , Gordon, Megyn, Molina, Kimberly , Cabrera, Antonio G. , Lambert, Linda, Fullerton, Chase, Thompson, Kate J., Cardon, Michelle, Timmer, Amanda, Nelson, Michelle , Ramstack, Dani, Heyrend, Carly, Benefield, Emily C., Roberson, Teresa, Butts, Ryan J. , Martinez, Maria , Pottorre, Simi, Burgardt, Laura, Armstrong, Blake, Zamberlan, M. , McCormick, Amanda D. , Bartsch, Jaynee, Mahle, William T. , Burnett, Meilssa, Pietra, Biagio A. , Breault, Leah, Friedland‐Little, Joshua , Prakash, Ranjini, Lee, Anne CC , Brody, Linnea, Huberts, Avery, Noon, Kelli, Guadiz, Donna, Garcia, Allison, Addonizio, Linda J. , Repp, Arielle, Cornelius, C.E. , Abraham, Margaret, Rose-Felker, Kristen, Moninger, Allison, Huston, Allison, Berman, Pamela, Ploutz, Michelle , Wisotzkey, Bethany , Grohall, Stacey, Colon, April, Churosh, Jenny, Cordova, Renee, Smith, Paulette, Kornetsky, Susan , Mitchell, Anna, Alderson, Daniel, Dominguez, R Blanco, Gawlowicz, Kennan, Lipsitz, Stuart R. , Eisen, Howard J. , Jeewa, Aamir , Uber, Patricia A., Thakar, Rahul, Ellsworth, Darrell L. , McCormick, A , Peng, D M , Daly, Kevin P , Albers, Erin L. , Auerbach, Scott R. , Bock, Matthew J. , Castleberry, Chesney , Deshpande, Shriprasad R. , Feingold, Brian , Lal, Ashwin K. , Ryan, Thomas D. , Singh, Tajinder P. , Su, Jennifer A. , Sleeper, Lynn A. , Investigators, TEAMMATE Trial, Wilber, Jared, Nikolli, Kledja, Massey, Linda, Wartick, Jennifer, Major, Melissa, MacLean, Matthew, Lee, JungWoo, Joong, Anna , Reilly, Sydney, Kuhn, Michael, Ogata, Kay, Knecht, Carol, Gordon, Megyn, Hansen, Lisa, May, Lindsay J. , Lambert, Linda, Fullerton, Chase, Thompson, Kate, Timmer, Amanda, Heyrend, Carly, Martinez, Maria, Schumacher, Kurt R. , Lim, Heang M. , Bartsch, Jaynee, Burnett, Meilssa, Prakash, Ranjini, Lee, Anne CC , Brody, Linnea, Huberts, Avery, Noon, Kelli, Guadiz, Donna, Repp, Arielle, Bansal, Neha , Hsu, Daphne T. , Cornelius, Chelsea, Padilla, Luz A. , Churosh, Jenny, Cordova, Renee, Mitchell, Anna, Alderson, Daniel, Dominguez, Robleinscky, KOBASHIGAWA, JON A. , Wightman, Aaron G.

JAMA | September 17, 2025 | Volume: 334 | Issue: 15 | Pages: 1339

10.1001/jama.2025.14338 Get It

ImportanceStudies suggest that everolimus may reduce the risk of rejection, cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and cytomegalovirus (CMV) after heart transplant. Everolimus use is controversial because of data demonstrating higher infection deaths when everolimus is introduced de novo after transplant. It is unclear whether everolimus is safe and effective when initiated at 6 months posttransplant in children, a population in which median graft survival is limited to 15 years and randomized clinical trials are lacking.ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of everolimus combined with low-dose tacrolimus to prevent major adverse transplant events (MATEs) in children after heart transplant.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsMulticenter, randomized, open-label, clinical trial enrolling 211 patients who were alive 6 months after pediatric heart transplant at 25 US sites from February 2018 to August 2020. The last date of follow-up was April 17, 2023.InterventionsParticipants were randomized to receive everolimus and low-dose tacrolimus (n = 107) or standard-dose tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (n = 104) for 30 months.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary efficacy end point was the MATE-3 score at 30 months, a validated composite ordinal end point including acute cellular rejection, CAV, and CKD. The primary safety end point was the MATE-6 score, encompassing the MATE-3 score plus antibody-mediated rejection, infection, and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder.ResultsAmong 211 children randomized, the mean age was 8.2 (SD, 6.3) years, 97 (46%) underwent transplant for congenital heart disease, and 49 (23%) were treated for rejection before 6 months. At 30 months, the mean MATE-3 score did not differ between the 2 treatment groups (mean difference, −0.32; 95% CI, −0.90 to 0.20; P = .16). The mean MATE-6 score was no higher in the everolimus group than in the mycophenolate group (baseline-adjusted mean difference, −0.40; 95% CI, −1.81 to 0.93), meeting the success criterion for safety (noninferiority margin <3). There were no differences in graft survival, MATE-free survival, or freedom from any individual MATE. Everolimus was associated with greater improvement in estimated glomerular filtration rate at 12 months (mean difference, 10.5 mL/min/1.73 m2; 95% CI, 1.09-19.91 mL/min/1.73 m2) and a lower incidence of CMV infection (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.26-0.93).Conclusions and RelevanceAmong 6-month pediatric heart transplant survivors, everolimus and low-dose tacrolimus did not differ from tacrolimus and mycophenolate in preventing the composite of cellular rejection, CAV, and CKD at 30 months. However, everolimus and low-dose tacrolimus appear to be safe based on the total burden of 6 MATEs and may be associated with improved kidney function and less CMV infection.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03386539
Marijuana in pediatric and adult congenital heart disease heart transplant listing: A survey of provider practices and attitudes
Phillips, Kari A. , Thrush, Philip T. , Lal, Ashwin K. , Kindel, Steven J. , Castleberry, Chesney , Sparks, Joshua D. , Johnson, Jonathan N. , Sparks, Joshua , Daly, Kevin P , Johnson, Jonathan

Pediatric Transplantation | January 21, 2020 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1111/petr.13640 Get It

Abstract Despite increasing legalization and use of marijuana, there is no consensus among pediatric heart transplant institutions or providers regarding users' eligibility for cardiac transplant. We sent a survey to pediatric and ACHD transplant providers (physicians, surgeons, transplant coordinators, and pharmacists) assessing their current institution's policies and their personal opinions about marijuana use in patients being considered for heart transplantation. Of the respondents, 84% practice in the United States and Canada. Most providers (80%) care for both pediatric and ACHD patients. Respondents included cardiologists (77%) and surgeons (11%), with the remaining being coordinators and pharmacists. Most providers (73%) reported their institution had no policy regarding marijuana use in heart transplant candidates. Only 20% of respondents' institutions consider mode of consumption, with 87% and 53% approving of oral and transdermal routes, respectively, and only 7% approving of vaporized or smoked routes. While 73% of providers would consider illegal marijuana use an absolute/relative contraindication to heart transplant listing, the number decreases to 57% for legal recreational users and 21% for legal medical users. Most providers personally believe marijuana to be physically and mentally/emotionally harmful to pediatric patients (67% and 72%, respectively). Many institutions lack a policy regarding marijuana use in pediatric and ACHD heart transplant candidates, and there is considerable disagreement among providers on the best practice. With increasing legalization and use of marijuana, each institution will have to address this issue thoughtfully to continue to provide high‐quality, consistent, and equitable care for pediatric and ACHD heart transplant candidates.