Terrier, Benjamin

AbstractBackgroundVEXAS syndrome is an autoinflammatory disease caused by somatic UBA1 mutations on the X chromosome, predominantly affecting men.ObjectiveTo characterize VEXAS syndrome in women and to compare the features of VEXAS syndrome between sexes.MethodsWe conducted an international, multicenter study, including 12 women and 301 men with genetically confirmed VEXAS syndrome. Data were collected using a standardized case report form. Bone marrow analyses and molecular investigations were performed locally.ResultsClinical features, age at onset, UBA1 mutation type, variant allele frequency, and mortality were comparable between sexes. Acquired X monosomy was found in 6/8 tested women. Additional clonal mutations were present in 3/5 tested women. Three additional UBA1‐mutated women without typical inflammation are described separately.ConclusionVEXAS syndrome affects women with clinical features similar to men, supporting the need for UBA1 testing in women with compatible presentations. X monosomy is common but not universal, suggesting alternative pathogenic mechanisms.

Objective Vacuoles E1 enzyme X‐linked autoinflammatory somatic syndrome (VEXAS) is a recently identified rare genetic disorder associated with somatic mutations in the UBA1 gene. VEXAS presents with a combination of inflammatory and hematologic manifestations, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Methods Given the variability in disease presentation and the limited number of studies to date, no clinical documents currently exist to provide guidance to health care providers about the management of VEXAS. To address this gap, we formed an international multidisciplinary panel of VEXAS experts. Results Through formalized meetings and a voting process, the group developed consensus clinical guidance considerations for the management of VEXAS. These considerations offer practical advice on several key topics: (1) clinical features of VEXAS, (2) UBA1 screening methods, (3) the diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) in patients with VEXAS, and (4) prognosis and management. The aim is to provide expert guidance on which patients to test, how to test for VEXAS, how to approach MDS in the context of VEXAS, and considerations for management. Conclusion This work marks the first formal international consensus guidance for VEXAS and is intended to be used as a resource for clinicians seeking to understand the disease and its management.

Abstract Rationale: The 1-year double-blind period of the MANDARA trial (NCT04157348) demonstrated non-inferiority of benralizumab to mepolizumab for achieving remission, in adults with relapsing/refractory eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA). Here, we report the 2-year combined double-blind and ongoing open-label extension (OLE) data. Methods: On completion of the double-blind period (n=136/140) comparing benralizumab 1x30mg versus mepolizumab 3x100mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks, patients were invited to enter the OLE where they continued benralizumab (benra/benra) or switched from mepolizumab to benralizumab (mepo/benra). Endpoints included remission (Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score=0 and oral glucocorticoid [OGC[ dose ≤4 mg/day), OGC use, relapse, blood eosinophil count (bEOS), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-6), pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (pre-BD FEV1), and safety. Results: In total, 128 patients entered the OLE (n=66 benra/benra, n=62 mepo/benra; mean age 52.8 years; 60.2% female), and 119 completed OLE Year 1. Baseline characteristics of those entering the OLE were similar to the double-blind period. At Week 104, over 60% in both groups (41 [62.1%] benra/benra and 42 [67.7%] mepo/benra patients) achieved remission. During the OLE, 51 (77.3%) benra/benra and 42 (67.7%) mepo/benra patients had no relapses. The percentage of benra/benra patients who discontinued OGCs was similar at Weeks 49-52 (27 [40.9%]) and Weeks 101-104 (29 [43.9%]), while the percentage increased for mepo/benra patients between Weeks 49-52 (16 [25.8%]) and Weeks 101-104 (27 [43.5%]; Figure). The median (IQR) OGC dose at Weeks 101-104 was 0.5 (0,5) in benra/benra and 1.36 (0,5) mg/day in mepo/benra patients. The median (IQR) bEOS in benra/benra patients was 20 (10,40) cells/µL at both Weeks 52 and 100; bEOS were depleted in mepo/benra patients from 70 (40,90) cells/µL to 20 (10,50) cells/µL by 4 weeks after switching. Mean (SD) ACQ-6 scores were 0.64 (0.78) in benra/benra patients and 0.60 (0.76) in mepo/benra patients at Week 104 compared with 1.39 (1.18) and 1.11 (0.95) at baseline. Mean (SD) pre-BD FEV1 was 2.59 (0.90) L versus 2.62 (0.84) L in benra/benra versus mepo/benra patients at Week 52, and 2.61 (0.90) versus 2.63 (0.81) L, at Week 100. Safety of mepolizumab and benralizumab was consistent with their known profiles. Conclusions: In patients with EGPA receiving benralizumab, remission rates, OGC discontinuation, and bEOS depletion were durable over 104 weeks with low relapse rates, and without loss of asthma control or lung function decline. Additional bEOS depletion and OGC sparing was observed in patients switching from mepolizumab to benralizumab.

Abstract An international consensus on antineutrophil cytoplasm antibodies (ANCA) testing in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is presented. ANCA, specific for myeloperoxidase (MPO), can be detected in 30–35% of patients with EGPA. MPO-ANCA should be tested with antigen-specific immunoassays in any patient with eosinophilic asthma and clinical features suggesting EGPA, including constitutional symptoms; purpura; polyneuropathy; unexplained heart, gastrointestinal, or kidney disease; and/or pulmonary infiltrates or hemorrhage. A positive MPO-ANCA result contributes to the diagnostic workup for EGPA. Patients with MPO-ANCA–associated EGPA have vasculitis features, such as glomerulonephritis, neuropathy, and skin manifestations, more frequently than patients with ANCA-negative EGPA. However, the presence of MPO-ANCA is neither sensitive nor specific enough to identify whether a patient should be subclassified as having “vasculitic” or “eosinophilic” EGPA. At present, ANCA status cannot guide treatment decisions, that is, whether cyclophosphamide, rituximab, or mepolizumab should be added to conventional glucocorticoid treatment. In EGPA, monitoring of ANCA is only useful when MPO-ANCA was tested positive at disease onset.