Bourdin, Arnaud

Abstract Rationale: The 1-year double-blind period of the MANDARA trial (NCT04157348) demonstrated non-inferiority of benralizumab to mepolizumab for achieving remission, in adults with relapsing/refractory eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA). Here, we report the 2-year combined double-blind and ongoing open-label extension (OLE) data. Methods: On completion of the double-blind period (n=136/140) comparing benralizumab 1x30mg versus mepolizumab 3x100mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks, patients were invited to enter the OLE where they continued benralizumab (benra/benra) or switched from mepolizumab to benralizumab (mepo/benra). Endpoints included remission (Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score=0 and oral glucocorticoid [OGC[ dose ≤4 mg/day), OGC use, relapse, blood eosinophil count (bEOS), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-6), pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (pre-BD FEV1), and safety. Results: In total, 128 patients entered the OLE (n=66 benra/benra, n=62 mepo/benra; mean age 52.8 years; 60.2% female), and 119 completed OLE Year 1. Baseline characteristics of those entering the OLE were similar to the double-blind period. At Week 104, over 60% in both groups (41 [62.1%] benra/benra and 42 [67.7%] mepo/benra patients) achieved remission. During the OLE, 51 (77.3%) benra/benra and 42 (67.7%) mepo/benra patients had no relapses. The percentage of benra/benra patients who discontinued OGCs was similar at Weeks 49-52 (27 [40.9%]) and Weeks 101-104 (29 [43.9%]), while the percentage increased for mepo/benra patients between Weeks 49-52 (16 [25.8%]) and Weeks 101-104 (27 [43.5%]; Figure). The median (IQR) OGC dose at Weeks 101-104 was 0.5 (0,5) in benra/benra and 1.36 (0,5) mg/day in mepo/benra patients. The median (IQR) bEOS in benra/benra patients was 20 (10,40) cells/µL at both Weeks 52 and 100; bEOS were depleted in mepo/benra patients from 70 (40,90) cells/µL to 20 (10,50) cells/µL by 4 weeks after switching. Mean (SD) ACQ-6 scores were 0.64 (0.78) in benra/benra patients and 0.60 (0.76) in mepo/benra patients at Week 104 compared with 1.39 (1.18) and 1.11 (0.95) at baseline. Mean (SD) pre-BD FEV1 was 2.59 (0.90) L versus 2.62 (0.84) L in benra/benra versus mepo/benra patients at Week 52, and 2.61 (0.90) versus 2.63 (0.81) L, at Week 100. Safety of mepolizumab and benralizumab was consistent with their known profiles. Conclusions: In patients with EGPA receiving benralizumab, remission rates, OGC discontinuation, and bEOS depletion were durable over 104 weeks with low relapse rates, and without loss of asthma control or lung function decline. Additional bEOS depletion and OGC sparing was observed in patients switching from mepolizumab to benralizumab.

Abstract Rationale The diagnostic concordance between transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC)—versus surgical lung biopsy (SLB) as the current gold standard—in interstitial lung disease (ILD) cases requiring histology remains controversial. Objectives To assess diagnostic concordance between TBLC and SLB sequentially performed in the same patients, the diagnostic yield of both techniques, and subsequent changes in multidisciplinary assessment (MDA) decisions. Methods A two-center prospective study included patients with ILD with a nondefinite usual interstitial pneumonia pattern (on high-resolution computed tomography scan) confirmed at a first MDA. Patients underwent TBLC immediately followed by video-assisted thoracoscopy for SLB at the same anatomical locations. After open reading of both sample types by local pathologists and final diagnosis at a second MDA (MDA2), anonymized TBLC and SLB slides were blindly assessed by an external expert pathologist (T.V.C.). Kappa-concordance coefficients and percentage agreement were computed for: TBLC versus SLB, MDA2 versus TBLC, MDA2 versus SLB, and blinded pathology versus routine pathology. Measurements and Main Results Twenty-one patients were included. The median TBLC biopsy size (longest axis) was 7 mm (interquartile range, 5–8 mm). SLB biopsy sizes averaged 46.1 ± 13.8 mm. Concordance coefficients and percentage agreement were: TBLC versus SLB: κ = 0.22 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01–0.44), percentage agreement = 38% (95% CI, 18–62%); MDA2 versus TBLC: κ = 0.31 (95% CI, 0.06–0.56), percentage agreement = 48% (95% CI, 26–70)%; MDA2 versus SLB: κ = 0.51 (95% CI, 0.27–0.75), percentage agreement = 62% (95% CI, 38–82%); two pneumothoraces (9.5%) were recorded during TBLC. TBLC would have led to a different treatment if SLB was not performed in 11 of 21 (52%) of cases. Conclusions Pathological results from TBLC and SLB were poorly concordant in the assessment of ILD. SLBs were more frequently concordant with the final diagnosis retained at MDA.