Hellmich, Bernhard

Abstract Objectives Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is the second most frequent inflammatory rheumatic disease in older adults, after rheumatoid arthritis. Recommendations for the management of PMR, developed by the German, Austrian and Swiss societies of rheumatology and other organizations were published in 2018. Methods These recommendations are now updated based on a systematic literature search that covered the evidence published between July 2016 and January 2024 on therapeutic interventions and prognostic factors for PMR. The search string followed that used in the original recommendations, with an extension for targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Based on evidence and expert opinions, the task force (12 physicians, two healthcare professionals and two patients from three countries) developed a set of four overarching principles and seven specific recommendations. Results The current update reiterates previous guideline recommendations for glucocorticoids (15–25 mg prednisone equivalents per day) as initial treatment for PMR once diagnosis has been confirmed, with subsequent tapering over 4–12 months (depending on whether a glucocorticoid sparing agent is used), with monitoring of disease activity and treatment-related adverse effects. Interleukin-6 receptor blocking agents should be considered in addition to glucocorticoids in patients with relapsing disease and can be considered in patients with new-onset PMR at high risk for glucocorticoid-related adverse events. Methotrexate or rituximab may be alternatives. Older and frail patients should also be offered an individualized exercise program. Conclusion These updated recommendations should serve as an aid to evidence-based decisions ensuring high-quality care for all patients with PMR.

Objective To compare the efficacy of abatacept to placebo for the treatment of relapsing, nonsevere granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA). Methods In this multicenter trial, eligible patients with relapsing, nonsevere GPA were randomized to receive abatacept 125 mg subcutaneously once a week or placebo, both together with prednisone 30 mg/day (or equivalent), tapered and discontinued at week 12. Patients already taking methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate, or leflunomide continued this medication at a stable dose. Patients achieving remission remained on their randomized assignment until relapse, early termination, or the common close date 12 months after enrollment of the last patient. Those who had a nonsevere relapse, had nonsevere worsening, or were not in remission by month 6 had the option to receive open‐label abatacept. The primary end point was the rate of treatment failure, defined as relapse, disease worsening, or failure to achieve a Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score for Wegener's Granulomatosis (BVAS/WG) of 0 or 1 by six months. Results Sixty‐five patients were randomized; 34 received abatacept and 31 received placebo. No statistical difference in the treatment failure rate was found between those who received abatacept and those who received placebo ( P = 0.853). Treatment with abatacept did not demonstrate any statistical difference from placebo in key secondary end points, including time to full remission (BVAS/WG = 0), duration of glucocorticoid‐free remission, relapse severity, prevention of damage, and patient‐reported quality‐of‐life outcomes. There was no difference in the frequency or severity of adverse events between treatment arms, including infection. Conclusion In patients with relapsing, nonsevere GPA, abatacept did not reduce the risk of relapse, severe worsening, or failure to achieve remission.

Abstract An international consensus on antineutrophil cytoplasm antibodies (ANCA) testing in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is presented. ANCA, specific for myeloperoxidase (MPO), can be detected in 30–35% of patients with EGPA. MPO-ANCA should be tested with antigen-specific immunoassays in any patient with eosinophilic asthma and clinical features suggesting EGPA, including constitutional symptoms; purpura; polyneuropathy; unexplained heart, gastrointestinal, or kidney disease; and/or pulmonary infiltrates or hemorrhage. A positive MPO-ANCA result contributes to the diagnostic workup for EGPA. Patients with MPO-ANCA–associated EGPA have vasculitis features, such as glomerulonephritis, neuropathy, and skin manifestations, more frequently than patients with ANCA-negative EGPA. However, the presence of MPO-ANCA is neither sensitive nor specific enough to identify whether a patient should be subclassified as having “vasculitic” or “eosinophilic” EGPA. At present, ANCA status cannot guide treatment decisions, that is, whether cyclophosphamide, rituximab, or mepolizumab should be added to conventional glucocorticoid treatment. In EGPA, monitoring of ANCA is only useful when MPO-ANCA was tested positive at disease onset.