Citations

Abstract Background Long-acting injectable buprenorphine (LAIB) has been positioned as a potentially transformative option for opioid use disorder (OUD), in part because patient experiences reported in qualitative studies emphasize reduced daily burden, increased “freedom,” reduced stigma, and fewer pressures related to diversion—while also noting barriers such as insufficient information, early adverse experiences, and concerns about coercion. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional online survey of adults recruited from the Behavioral Health Research Panel (BHRP). Eligibility included age ≥18, English literacy, and OUD diagnosis or problematic opioid use within the past 5 years. Survey content assessed buprenorphine experience, knowledge and attitudes toward LAIB, attribute preferences, and open-text feedback. Descriptive statistics were generated; analyses were stratified by buprenorphine experience (experienced vs naïve). Results Among 105 participants, 82.9% reported prior buprenorphine use, and 17.1% were buprenorphine-naïve. Overall, 53.3% preferred a long-acting injection regimen (weekly/monthly/3-monthly) versus 46.7% preferring a daily oral tablet/film. Convenience and adherence-related themes (e.g., not missing doses, fewer visits) drove LAIB preference, while oral-route preference and concerns about side effects and safety were prominent among those favoring oral formulations. Conclusions In this national convenience sample, preferences were nearly evenly split between daily oral and long-acting injectable buprenorphine regimens, with a slight overall preference for LAIB. Findings align with the qualitative literature, emphasizing the practical and psychosocial benefits of LAIB, alongside persistent needs for improved education, shared decision-making, and attention to tolerability, safety perceptions, and cost/coverage barriers.

Abstract Background Long-acting injectable buprenorphine (LAI-BUP) is safe and effective, however is dramatically underutilized in comparison to oral formulations. Little is known regarding how buprenorphine prescribers view LAI-BUP, and which medication attributes they prioritize when selecting treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). Methods A secondary analysis of a national, cross-sectional online survey of U.S. physicians who prescribe buprenorphine for OUD was conducted. Respondents reported OUD caseload, LAI-BUP use, and the importance of medication attributes relevant to treatment selection (e.g., efficacy, safety, ease of administration, ease of prescribing, and administrative requirements). Providers were categorized as no LAI-BUP use or, among LAI-BUP prescribers, Low vs High use based on a median split. Group comparisons used chi-square (or Fisher’s exact) tests for categorical variables and Jonckheere–Terpstra tests for ordinal responses. Results Among 125 respondents, 39 (31.2%) reported no patients receiving LAI-BUP. The remaining 86 (68.8%) were LAI-BUP prescribers, split evenly into Low and High (n’s=43; 34.4%) groups using a median cut of 23.2%. LAI-BUP use did not differ meaningfully by specialty, region, or practice setting. Greater LAI-BUP use was reported by providers with larger OUD panels. Ratings of key medication attributes were uniformly high. Conclusions LAI-BUP remains underused, with uptake highest among clinicians managing larger OUD caseloads. Measured attitudes toward medication attributes did not explain these differences. Future work should assess clinic workflow, staffing, reimbursement, and REMS burden, testing targeted implementation strategies using mixed-methods trials. Identifying what shifts clinicians from no use to low and high use may guide scalable implementation interventions.

Abstract Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, and despite advances in treatment, immune suppression remains an obstacle to effective therapy. Effector CD4+ T cells (CD4+ Teff) are critical for antitumor immunity, but their function is often inhibited by regulatory T cells (Treg), which accumulate in lung tumors and mediate suppressive functions through multiple mechanisms. This suppression leads to tumor progression and poor patient outcomes. However, the mechanisms underlying Treg-mediated suppression are not fully understood. Herein, we identify the extracellular adenosine 5-triphosphate receptor P2RX7 as a key regulator of Treg function in lung tumors. In a murine lung cancer model induced by Lewis lung carcinoma cells, we found that P2RX7 enhanced the suppressive capacity of tumor-infiltrating Tregs, promoting tumor growth. In T cell–specific P2RX7-knockout (P2RX7-KO) mice, reduced Treg infiltration was accompanied by increased CD4+ Teff accumulation and improved tumor control. Treg-specific P2RX7-KO mice exhibited reduced tumor growth, confirming a Treg-intrinsic role of P2RX7. Suppression assays revealed that tumor-infiltrating wild-type Tregs had greater suppressive activity compared with P2RX7-KO Tregs, which failed to inhibit type 1 and follicular helper T–like responses. This was associated with increased tumor-specific IgG production by lung B cells in P2RX7-KO mice. We also observed that wild-type Tregs expressed higher levels of the immunosuppressive molecule CTLA-4 when compared with P2RX7-KO Tregs. Thus, we conclude that P2RX7 expression on Tregs is essential for their suppressive function in lung cancer and targeting P2RX7 may constitute a strategy to improve lung cancer treatment by alleviating Treg-mediated immune suppression.

Introduction: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) plays an important role in lung transplant (LT) outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a novel sleep positioning device (SPD) on lung function in LT recipients with GERD. Methods: In this single-center cohort study, LT recipients (2014 to 2019) with GERD who were prescribed an SPD within 2 years of LT were included. A historical control group of LT recipients with GERD on PPI only (2011 to 2013) was selected to compare forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) as a marker of lung function. Results: Twenty LT recipients using SPD (cases) and 54 patients in the historical control group with proven GERD were included. Mean (SD) interval between LT and SPD prescription was 8.6 (5.7) months. Mean % predicted FEV1 was higher in SPD users than controls post-LT at 6 months (80% vs. 69%) and 1 year (80% vs. 71%), respectively. Among SPD users, post-SPD FEV1 was higher than pre-SPD FEV1 (82% vs. 70%). Conclusion: Use of a novel SPD can stabilize or improve pulmonary function in patients with GERD after LT. SPD may be a safe and cost-effective adjunctive therapy for the management of GERD after LT.

Abstract Isolated/idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) is a usually prodromal manifestation of neurodegenerative disorders with α-synuclein pathology: Parkinson’s disease (PD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and multiple system atrophy (MSA). Clinical trials in the iRBD population face substantial barriers: limited access to well-characterized cohorts, inconsistent assessment protocols across centers, and the absence of validated biomarkers of disease burden. The North American Prodromal Synucleinopathy (NAPS) Consortium was established to address these challenges and facilitate clinical trials for neuroprotective therapies targeting synucleinopathy at the earliest known stages. In this multi-site, longitudinal, observational study, nine academic centers across North America will enroll and follow over 500 individuals with iRBD from existing sleep centers. Sixty control participants, matched for age, sex, and race will also be recruited. A harmonized protocol—including a standardized clinical battery assessing motor, cognitive, autonomic, psychiatric, sensory, and sleep function; structured diagnostic adjudication; biospecimen collection; and centralized analysis of both polysomnography and neuroimaging data—is outlined herein and reflects NAPS Stage 2. Each participants completes these assessments annually, and are replaced in the event of phenoconversion. By unifying assessments and expanding geographic reach, NAPS lays the groundwork for efficient, well-powered clinical trials designed to delay or prevent progression of iRBD to overt PD, DLB, or MSA—ultimately enabling earlier, more effective therapeutic intervention for neurodegenerative disease. Registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05826457).

Background. Although solid organ transplant prolongs survival in end-stage disease, recipients face high symptom burden and complex decisions at multiple junctures. Palliative care (PC) may address these needs, but referrals in transplant programs are infrequent, often reactive, and the benefits remain unclear. Methods. We retrospectively studied 12 676 heart, liver, lung, and kidney transplants across 3 Mayo Clinic sites (2018–2024). PC encounters were classified as pretransplant (≤1 y before admission), peritransplant (during hospitalization), or posttransplant (≤1 y after discharge). Results. Only 8.3% engaged PC, with patterns varying by organ and timing. Heart programs demonstrated the highest overall engagement, primarily pre- and peritransplant, whereas lung and kidney referrals occurred more often after discharge. Earlier timing coincided with longer survival, whereas peri- and posttransplant encounters occurred closer to death. In heart transplantation, pre- and peritransplant PC were observed in recipients with lower procedural volume and fewer short-term readmissions. Liver and lung cohorts displayed variable patterns. Kidney referrals occurred infrequently and were concentrated among recipients with higher morbidity. Timing of inpatient consultation showed a strong positive correlation with hospital length of stay, and pretransplant PC coincided with higher rates of goals-of-care discussions and fewer hospital interventions. Adapting screening criteria to focus on high-risk recipients, PC was associated with fewer short-term readmissions for heart and lung recipients. Conclusions. PC among solid organ transplant was infrequent and varied. Referral timing often aligned with patient morbidity and mortality. Structured, prospective validation of screening methods may identify patients most likely to benefit from palliative involvement.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate differences in utilization of diagnostic imaging between the adult and pediatric trauma teams when caring for adolescent trauma patients. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study from 2015 to 2019 comparing pediatric trauma team activations for patients ages 12 to 14 and adult trauma team activations for patients ages 15 to 17 at a single institution verified as both a level I adult and a level I pediatric trauma center. Data were collected from a prospective trauma registry and manual chart review of the electronic medical records. The primary outcome was the frequency of whole body computed tomography (WBCT) and computed tomography (CT) imaging of individual body regions. Results: We identified 191 adult and 100 pediatric trauma team cases, with similar proportions transferred from outside hospitals (40% vs. 43%). Among patients presenting directly from the scene, WBCT use was significantly higher in the adult trauma team group (64% vs. 12%; RR: 5.21; 95% CI: 2.57-10.58), as was CT of all individual body regions. For transferred patients, the adult trauma team more often performed WBCT and individual CT scans, excluding head CT. CT imaging rates before transfer did not differ between groups. No significant differences were observed in injury severity scores, altered mental status, length of stay, or missed injuries. Conclusions: Among adolescents with similar injury severity, the adult trauma team more frequently utilizes WBCT and regional CT than the pediatric team. However, CT use before transfer from outside hospitals without dedicated pediatric trauma teams was similar across age groups.

Summary In adults with classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), metabolic tumour volume (MTV) is valuable for risk stratification. This systematic review explored the role of volumetric parameters in children, adolescents and young adults (CAYA) with cHL. This systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) method. Five databases were searched on 16 October 2024. Eligible studies were peer‐reviewed manuscripts, written in English, published since database inception that included patients ≤21 years of age with a diagnosis of cHL treated with chemotherapy ± radiotherapy with a baseline 18 F‐Fluorodeoxyglucose (F‐FDG) PET/CT scan for MTV quantification. The search strategy identified 3669 studies, of which 35 were eligible for inclusion. Fifteen studies (43%) evaluated a cohort exclusively ≤21 years of age. All eight studies that explored the association of baseline PET parameters with known risk factors identified a significant correlation. Nine of 12 papers (75%) demonstrated a statistically significant correlation with disease response to therapy on PET/CT. Fifteen of 20 papers (75%) demonstrated an independent statistically significant correlation with clinical outcomes. In the CAYAHL population, volumetric PET parameters are valuable for risk stratification despite heterogeneity in results. Future harmonization of the segmentation approach will facilitate incorporation of MTV into clinical practice.

163 Background: Being physically inactive is an independent predictor of poor outcomes in patients with stage III colon cancer. Whether physical activity can mitigate the oncologic risk of postoperative MRD is unknown. Methods: We concluded a post hoc analysis of a phase III trial evaluating celecoxib vs. placebo and 3 vs. 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resected stage III colon cancer. Self-reported physical activity was assessed in standardized measures of metabolic equivalent hours per week (MET-h/wk) at 2 timepoints: 1) midway through and 2) 6 months after completing adjuvant chemotherapy, modeled as a time-weighted average. MRD was determined via a clinically validated, tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assay (Signatera, Natera, Inc.). Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using flexible parametric survival models. Results: Among 763 patients (median follow-up 6.0 years), 24% were highly active (≥18 MET-h/wk) and 32% were inactive (<3 MET-h/wk); 18% were ctDNA positive. Adjusting for covariates, DFS improved in patients who were ctDNA negative and moderately active (Ref: inactive; 3-17.9 MET-h/wk; HR=0.62, 95% CI [0.40-0.97]) or highly active (HR = 0.53 [0.30-0.94]). No benefit was seen among patients who were ctDNA positive (Ref: inactive; moderately active: HR = 1.20 [0.75-1.92]; highly active: HR=0.83 [0.45-1.54]). The interaction was not significant (Pint=0.269). Physical activity did not impact OS regardless of ctDNA status. The interaction of physical activity and adjuvant celecoxib use is shown in Table. Conclusions: Among patients who were ctDNA negative, physical activity was associated with improved DFS, and may demonstrate increased survival benefit alongside adjuvant celecoxib. The additive effects of both interventions were inconclusive among those who were ctDNA positive. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org; Natera, Pfizer; NCT01150045. Disease-free survival by physical activity level and celecoxib use, stratified by ctDNA status. 3-yr event # at risk Adjusted HR (95% CI) P-value Pint ctDNA Negative 0.258 Inactive + placebo 23 182 Ref Active + placebo 17 132 0.74 (0.43-1.28) 0.283 Inactive + celecoxib 23 167 0.92 (0.57-1.48) 0.720 Active + celecoxib 10 146 0.40 (0.22-0.79) 0.007 ctDNA Positive 0.221 Inactive + placebo 26 33 Ref Active + placebo 15 20 0.96 (0.50-1.84) 0.903 Inactive + celecoxib 34 54 0.62 (0.37-1.05) 0.076 Active + celecoxib 14 29 0.34 (0.18-0.64) 0.001 ctDNA, circulating tumor DNA; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval. Active = ≥9 MET-h/week, inactive = <9 MET-h/week. Celecoxib use defined by assignment in CALGB/SWOG 80702. Models adjusted by T and N stage, age, sex, race, assigned cycles of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin, KRAS and BRAF status, BMI, and Western diet.