Oesterle, Tyler S

Abstract Background Long-acting injectable buprenorphine (LAIB) has been positioned as a potentially transformative option for opioid use disorder (OUD), in part because patient experiences reported in qualitative studies emphasize reduced daily burden, increased “freedom,” reduced stigma, and fewer pressures related to diversion—while also noting barriers such as insufficient information, early adverse experiences, and concerns about coercion. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional online survey of adults recruited from the Behavioral Health Research Panel (BHRP). Eligibility included age ≥18, English literacy, and OUD diagnosis or problematic opioid use within the past 5 years. Survey content assessed buprenorphine experience, knowledge and attitudes toward LAIB, attribute preferences, and open-text feedback. Descriptive statistics were generated; analyses were stratified by buprenorphine experience (experienced vs naïve). Results Among 105 participants, 82.9% reported prior buprenorphine use, and 17.1% were buprenorphine-naïve. Overall, 53.3% preferred a long-acting injection regimen (weekly/monthly/3-monthly) versus 46.7% preferring a daily oral tablet/film. Convenience and adherence-related themes (e.g., not missing doses, fewer visits) drove LAIB preference, while oral-route preference and concerns about side effects and safety were prominent among those favoring oral formulations. Conclusions In this national convenience sample, preferences were nearly evenly split between daily oral and long-acting injectable buprenorphine regimens, with a slight overall preference for LAIB. Findings align with the qualitative literature, emphasizing the practical and psychosocial benefits of LAIB, alongside persistent needs for improved education, shared decision-making, and attention to tolerability, safety perceptions, and cost/coverage barriers.

Abstract Background Long-acting injectable buprenorphine (LAI-BUP) is safe and effective, however is dramatically underutilized in comparison to oral formulations. Little is known regarding how buprenorphine prescribers view LAI-BUP, and which medication attributes they prioritize when selecting treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). Methods A secondary analysis of a national, cross-sectional online survey of U.S. physicians who prescribe buprenorphine for OUD was conducted. Respondents reported OUD caseload, LAI-BUP use, and the importance of medication attributes relevant to treatment selection (e.g., efficacy, safety, ease of administration, ease of prescribing, and administrative requirements). Providers were categorized as no LAI-BUP use or, among LAI-BUP prescribers, Low vs High use based on a median split. Group comparisons used chi-square (or Fisher’s exact) tests for categorical variables and Jonckheere–Terpstra tests for ordinal responses. Results Among 125 respondents, 39 (31.2%) reported no patients receiving LAI-BUP. The remaining 86 (68.8%) were LAI-BUP prescribers, split evenly into Low and High (n’s=43; 34.4%) groups using a median cut of 23.2%. LAI-BUP use did not differ meaningfully by specialty, region, or practice setting. Greater LAI-BUP use was reported by providers with larger OUD panels. Ratings of key medication attributes were uniformly high. Conclusions LAI-BUP remains underused, with uptake highest among clinicians managing larger OUD caseloads. Measured attitudes toward medication attributes did not explain these differences. Future work should assess clinic workflow, staffing, reimbursement, and REMS burden, testing targeted implementation strategies using mixed-methods trials. Identifying what shifts clinicians from no use to low and high use may guide scalable implementation interventions.

Abstract Background and Objectives Implementation of screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) for substance use in primary care remains challenging. Care coordination (CC) may strengthen SBIRT by supporting brief interventions, improving referral follow‐through, and enhancing continuity. CC models and outcomes vary, however, and no prior scoping review has synthesized these. Methods A comprehensive search of 10 resources, including Embase, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO, was conducted on 4/15/2025. Eligible studies described outpatient SBIRT models adding CC for any age group. Articles were excluded if they lacked CC, presented no original data, or were not in English. Relevant implementation and patient‐level outcomes were extracted to describe CC models and their impact. Results Of 737 abstracts and 50 full texts reviewed, 15 met the inclusion criteria. Studies spanned primary care, specialty care, and age ranges. CC models included embedded behavioral health providers, centralized linkage managers, and remote coordinators using phone or digital platforms. CC was associated with higher screening completion, brief intervention delivery, referral initiation, and treatment engagement. Successful integration incorporated structured communication, follow‐up protocols, and accessible technology. Barriers included limited billing infrastructure, weak electronic record integration, and unclear roles. Discussion and Conclusions CC appears to enhance SBIRT implementation and treatment engagement across outpatient settings. Embedded approaches offer relational benefits, while remote and digital strategies show promise for scalability. Comparative studies are needed to assess effectiveness, cost, and contextual fit. Scientific Significance Provides the first review of CC models within SBIRT, highlighting their implementation impact and guiding future optimization.

Background: Substance use disorders (SUDs) are highly prevalent, affecting over 48.5 million Americans. Available treatments for SUD remain insufficient, and many patients do not respond to existing interventions despite adequate adherence to treatments. While novel therapies for SUD are urgently needed, the use of psychedelic drugs for the treatment of SUDs has shown promise. Objectives: This overview of systematic reviews summarizes existing evidence on hallucinogens—serotonergic psychedelics and ketamine—for the treatment of SUD. Methods: A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted to identify relevant evidence for using serotonergic and non-serotonergic psychedelics for the treatment of SUDs. After initial screening (n = 468 studies), 62 studies were retrieved and assessed for eligibility, and a total of 16 systematic reviews were included. Conclusions: Although preliminary, evidence suggests that the use of serotonergic and non-serotonergic psychedelics for the treatment of SUD may provide advantages over traditional therapeutics, and these compounds may eventually become part of the next generation of treatments for SUD under specific circumstances. Research with these drugs has faced significant challenges, though, and caution when interpreting results is warranted, given high risk of bias and several other methodological limitations from the studies to date. Furthermore, risks associated with these drugs are not negligible. For now, the use of psychedelic drugs for the treatment of SUDs remains experimental, and existing evidence is insufficient to support its use in clinical practice.

Background: Invasive and non-invasive neuromodulation in psychiatry represents a burgeoning field that leverages advanced neuromodulation techniques to address substance use disorders (SUDs). Aims: This narrative review synthesizes findings from multiple reviews to evaluate the efficacy of neuromodulation in treating SUDs. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted between December 2024 and April 2025, focusing on systematic reviews and meta-analyses that examined various neuromodulation modalities, including repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), and deep brain stimulation (DBS). The selected reviews were analyzed to identify common themes, outcomes, and gaps in the current understanding of these treatments for SUDs. Results: 11 reviews met the final inclusion criteria; 5 focused on non-invasive neuromodulation (rTMS, tDCS) and 6 on invasive neuromodulation (DBS). Non-invasive neurostimulation was associated with modest improvements in craving and cognitive dysfunction in individuals with SUDs. Similarly, invasive neuromodulation (DBS), through high-frequency stimulation of the bilateral nucleus accumbens, appeared to reduce cravings and improve comorbid psychiatric symptoms in both preclinical and human studies. Importantly, small sample sizes, heterogeneity in targets and stimulation protocols, and short follow-up periods significantly limit the generalizability of current findings from both non-invasive and invasive neuromodulation studies. Conclusions: As novel and more effective therapies for the treatment of SUD are desperately needed, procedural interventional psychiatry holds promise. However, despite encouraging results, existing evidence is still preliminary, and larger, rigorously designed studies are warranted to further establish the safety and efficacy of neuromodulatory interventions for SUD treatment.

Background/Objectives: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), which were originally developed for managing type 2 diabetes by enhancing insulin secretion and reducing appetite, have emerged as promising candidates in alcohol use disorder (AUD). These medications offer a dual mechanism of action that aligns with the multifaceted nature of addiction by targeting both peripheral metabolic and central reward pathways. This review focused on the current clinical trials and real-world evidence regarding the effects of GLP-1RAs as novel therapeutics for AUD. We also discussed early but encouraging results from clinical trials in AUD, observational and real-world evidence, safety profiles, psychiatric considerations, and future directions leading beyond GLP-1RAs. Methods: A comprehensive English-language literature search was conducted per PRISMA guidelines across PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and trial registries. Using targeted keywords, we identified relevant clinical and observational studies on GLP-1RAs for alcohol use disorder, excluding off-topic or non-English works and assessing all studies for eligibility. Results: Out of 1080 records identified, seven studies met the inclusion criteria. The findings from recent clinical trials, large-scale observational studies, and real-world evidence suggest that GLP-1RAs may significantly reduce alcohol consumption, cravings, and alcohol-related hospitalizations. Their central effect on reward processing, coupled with a generally favorable safety profile, supports their potential therapeutic role beyond metabolic disorders. Conclusions: Emerging evidence positions GLP-1RAs as a promising new pharmacologic approach for managing AUD. Ongoing and future research should prioritize larger, longer-duration randomized controlled trials that include diverse populations, with specific attention to treatment motivation, co-occurring psychiatric conditions, and long-term outcomes.

Abstract Introduction: Opioid use disorder constitutes a significant health crisis in the United States, contributing to high rates of opioid overdose-related deaths. A major driver of these fatalities is fentanyl, a potent synthetic opioid with both sedative and analgesic properties. These properties that make fentanyl clinically effective also increase its addictive potential. Early in opioid addiction, abnormal increases in extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) reinforce excessive drug-seeking behaviors which can lead to fatal respiratory depression. Given this mechanism, we investigated whether high frequency stimulation (HFS), mimicking human deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral tegmental area (VTA) could block NAc dopamine increase following an acute lethal dose of fentanyl. We hypothesized that VTA DBS would mitigate these dopaminergic responses and prevent fentanyl-induced respiratory failure. Methods: Multiple cyclic square wave voltammetry (M-CSWV), was applied via a carbon fiber microelectrode in the NAc of urethane-anesthetized male Sprague-Dawley rats. Dopamine levels were recorded at baseline and following acute fentanyl (30 µg/kg, i.v.). HFS (130 Hz frequency, 200 µsec pulse width, and 0.2 mA amplitude) was administered to the VTA before and during fentanyl exposure. Results: Acute fentanyl administration resulted in a 178.2% increase in NAc dopamine levels from baseline, accompanied by a decline in respiratory rates to critically low levels (45 breaths per minute vs. 102 bpm), eventually resulting in 100% mortality. HFS of the VTA did not significantly alter baseline tonic dopamine levels or prevent fentanyl-induced dopamine increase in the NAc but was able to fully rescue fentanyl-induced respiratory failure.

AbstractBackgroundWorkforce engagement can provide structure, income, feelings of accomplishment, and personal contacts, growing an individual's recovery capital (RC). Employed individuals are also more likely to complete addiction treatment. We sought to investigate whether changes in employment status from alcohol treatment admission to discharge correlated with changes in alcohol use frequency over those time points.MethodsThe Treatment Episode Dataset—Discharges (2017–2021) provided the data. Employment status (full‐time, part‐time, unemployed, and not in labor force) and alcohol use frequency (daily use, some use, and no use in past month) were assessed at treatment admission and discharge. Changes in alcohol use frequency during treatment were recorded as Reduction or No reduction. Logistic regression using reduced alcohol use frequency as the dependent variable included employment status at admission and discharge separately. A second analysis included employment status at both admission and discharge and their interaction term. An adjusted model included all covariates (race, ethnicity, age, education, and referral source), with its results being used to derive the marginal probabilities of reduced alcohol use frequency.ResultsThere were 856,085 alcohol treatment admissions over the 5 years, with 221,724 (25.9%) first admissions. Transitioning from not in the labor force or unemployed to full‐time saw the largest percentage of encounters decreasing alcohol use frequency: 71.9% (95% CI: 70.0–73.7) and 69.3% (95% CI: 68.1–70.5), respectively. Those remaining unemployed had the lowest reduction at 26.7% (95% CI: 26.3–27.1), with a sample reduction of 42.7% (95% CI: 42.5–42.9) overall. Far more people (60.4%) completed treatment within the Reduction group than in the No reduction group (30.2%).ConclusionsFindings suggest that improving employment status may be relevant for reducing alcohol use frequency. This aligns with past work showing overall improved health outcomes with lower unemployment levels. Incorporating vocational training and workforce engagement activities into outpatient treatment may help augment traditional approaches to improve an individual's RC.

ABSTRACTOpioid use disorder is a persistent epidemic despite several FDA‐approved medications for its treatment. While the pathogenesis of opioid use disorder has been classically attributed to dopamine pathways in the brain, there is emerging evidence and interest surrounding the role of inflammation and inflammatory signaling in its development and treatment. Buprenorphine has become the most prescribed medication for opioid use disorder, largely due to its ease of access and tolerability. This review aimed to better characterize contemporary knowledge of how buprenorphine modulates the human immune system and inflammatory functions in this population. A comprehensive review was conducted using 11 key databases, including Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov. This review captured 8177 records, and 14 studies were ultimately selected for inclusion and discussion in this review. Notably, all 14 clinical studies evaluated buprenorphine's effect on the peripheral immune system, and the majority of the studies supported the notion that initiation and maintenance of buprenorphine restore immune suppression caused by opioid use disorder. In addition, we discuss how recent and ongoing work utilizing advanced imaging and cellular technologies is advancing the understanding of how buprenorphine affects the immune and inflammatory signaling in the brain.