Budev, Marie

Background Medication nonadherence has been associated with poor outcomes in transplant recipients yet identifying these behaviors pre-transplant remains challenging. The simplified medication adherence questionnaire (SMAQ) is a brief, reliable instrument to assess medication adherence. The aim of this study was to perform SMAQ testing on thoracic organ candidates and examine correlations between these scores and individual patient factors predicting medication nonadherence. Methods Consenting waitlisted lung, heart, and heart-lung transplant candidates from six thoracic transplant centers were mailed a survey that included demographic information and the Simplified Medication Adherence Questionnaire (SMAQ). Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess association between pre-transplant medication adherence and demographic characteristics, psychosocial factors, and mortality. Results Among 298 participants, 60.7% were medication nonadherent. Nonadherence was associated with some college education (OR: 1.73; CI: 1.06, 2.81), lower positive affect (OR: 0.95; CI: 0.92, 0.99), and higher uncertainty (OR: 1.02; CI: 1.01, 1.04). Higher positivity ratio predicted adherence. Conclusion Identifiable patient-specific characteristics associated with medication nonadherence can be screened for during thoracic transplant evaluation. Interventions aimed at improving these factors during the pre-transplant period may improve clinical post-transplant outcomes, however, larger studies are needed to validate these findings.

Introduction: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) plays an important role in lung transplant (LT) outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a novel sleep positioning device (SPD) on lung function in LT recipients with GERD. Methods: In this single-center cohort study, LT recipients (2014 to 2019) with GERD who were prescribed an SPD within 2 years of LT were included. A historical control group of LT recipients with GERD on PPI only (2011 to 2013) was selected to compare forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) as a marker of lung function. Results: Twenty LT recipients using SPD (cases) and 54 patients in the historical control group with proven GERD were included. Mean (SD) interval between LT and SPD prescription was 8.6 (5.7) months. Mean % predicted FEV1 was higher in SPD users than controls post-LT at 6 months (80% vs. 69%) and 1 year (80% vs. 71%), respectively. Among SPD users, post-SPD FEV1 was higher than pre-SPD FEV1 (82% vs. 70%). Conclusion: Use of a novel SPD can stabilize or improve pulmonary function in patients with GERD after LT. SPD may be a safe and cost-effective adjunctive therapy for the management of GERD after LT.

AbstractBackgroundResilience represents the capacity to adapt to adversity. Resilience can improve following behavioral interventions. We examined lung transplant candidates’ resilience as a novel predictor using the Connor‐Davidson Resilience Scale (RISC‐10).MethodsWaitlisted candidates at six centers were mailed questionnaires from 9/16/2015 to 10/1/2019. Follow‐up surveys were collected annually and post‐transplant. Outcomes were recorded through February 17, 2020. Primary outcome was pre‐transplant death/delisting. Analyses included t test or chi‐square for group comparisons, Pearson's correlation coefficients for strength of relationships, and Cox proportional‐hazard models to evaluate associations with outcomes, adjusting for age, sex, and mood.ResultsParticipation was 55.3% (N = 199). Baseline RISC‐10 averaged 32.0 ± 5.6 and did not differ by demographics, primary transplant diagnosis, or disease severity markers. RISC‐10 did not correlate to the commonly utilized Psychosocial Assessment of Candidates for Transplant [PACT] or Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation [SIPAT] tools. Scores < 26.3 (representing > 1 standard deviation below population average) occurred in 16% and were associated with pre‐transplant death or delisting, adjusted Hazard Ratio of 2.60 (95% Confidence Interval 1.23‐5.77; P = .01).ConclusionOne in six lung candidates had low resilience, predicting increased pre‐transplant death/delisting. RISC‐10 did not correlate with PACT or SIPAT; resilience may represent a novel risk factor.

Background: We examined the association of adult lung transplant candidates’ self-reported affect with transplant-related outcomes, evaluating whether a positive (vs negative) frame of mind might be protective. Method: Consenting waitlisted candidates from 6 centers completed the questionnaires including the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule annually and posttransplant. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the association of baseline affect with outcomes of death or delisting. Models were subsequently adjusted for age, marital status, and education. Results: Questionnaires were completed by 169 candidates (77.9% participation). Mean positive affect, negative affect, and positive-to-negative affect ratio (positivity ratio) were similar to expected norms. The scores of the questionnaire did not change significantly over time. Fifteen (8.9%) waitlisted participants died. Candidates who died while waiting had lower positivity ratios compared to those who survived (1.82 vs 2.45; P = .02). A more negative affect was associated with increased death on the waiting list (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.10; P = .021). Conversely, a higher positivity ratio was associated with decreased death while waiting (adjusted OR: 0.45; P = .027). Conclusion: Negative affect may represent a novel risk factor for death on the waitlist. Enhancing positive affect may represent a useful target for psychological optimization in lung transplant candidates.