Jowsey-Gregoire, Sheila G

Under the auspices of the International Society of Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation (ISVCA), a section of the Transplantation Society (TTS) that promotes and encourages research and training in the field of vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA), the 4th Chauvet Workshop was convened in conjunction with the biennial meeting of the ISVCA from 27–29th June 2025 in Helsinki, Finland. The Chauvet workgroup recognizes the importance of psychological evaluation and management in VCA and works to provide an interdisciplinary platform for the development of psychosocial guidelines for the field. For the first time this workshop was conducted jointly with the ISVCA biennial congress, facilitating wider attendance, and discussions between different units and across disciplines. Three main areas were discussed; outcomes and lessons learned, qualitative research approaches and patient reported outcome measures (PROMS), and the role of team science in complex care models. We also heard an update from patient advocate Vasyly Rohovyy, on the progress being made to develop a VCA patient support and advocacy community. Here we summarize these discussions.

AbstractBackgroundResilience represents the capacity to adapt to adversity. Resilience can improve following behavioral interventions. We examined lung transplant candidates’ resilience as a novel predictor using the Connor‐Davidson Resilience Scale (RISC‐10).MethodsWaitlisted candidates at six centers were mailed questionnaires from 9/16/2015 to 10/1/2019. Follow‐up surveys were collected annually and post‐transplant. Outcomes were recorded through February 17, 2020. Primary outcome was pre‐transplant death/delisting. Analyses included t test or chi‐square for group comparisons, Pearson's correlation coefficients for strength of relationships, and Cox proportional‐hazard models to evaluate associations with outcomes, adjusting for age, sex, and mood.ResultsParticipation was 55.3% (N = 199). Baseline RISC‐10 averaged 32.0 ± 5.6 and did not differ by demographics, primary transplant diagnosis, or disease severity markers. RISC‐10 did not correlate to the commonly utilized Psychosocial Assessment of Candidates for Transplant [PACT] or Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation [SIPAT] tools. Scores < 26.3 (representing > 1 standard deviation below population average) occurred in 16% and were associated with pre‐transplant death or delisting, adjusted Hazard Ratio of 2.60 (95% Confidence Interval 1.23‐5.77; P = .01).ConclusionOne in six lung candidates had low resilience, predicting increased pre‐transplant death/delisting. RISC‐10 did not correlate with PACT or SIPAT; resilience may represent a novel risk factor.