Citations

Abstract Introduction Echocardiography is the recommended modality for non-invasive assessment of pulmonary pressures. However, in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR), the reliability of echocardiographically derived systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) is questioned. Limited data exists on the correlation between echocardiography and right heart catheterization (RHC) in selected group of patients with severe TR. Purpose To evaluate the correlation between echocardiographic and RHC measurements for sPAP in patients with varying TR severity. Method Patients who underwent echocardiography and RHC within three days at a large single referral center were retrospectively included. Exclusion criteria included incomplete echocardiographic and RHC data, ≥moderate pulmonary stenosis, low-quality images, and pregnancy. Echocardiographic sPAP was calculated using simplified Bernoulli equation. Echocardiographic right atrial pressure (RAP) was assessed by evaluating inferior vena cava (IVC) dimension and collapsibility. A difference of ≥10 mmHg between the two modalities for sPAP was considered clinically significant. Results Of 3696 patients included, mean age was 64±14 years, 1689 (46%) were females, 1659 (45%) had systemic hypertension, and 582 (16%) had atrial fibrillation. TR was <moderate in 2475 (67%) patients, moderate in 499 (14%), moderate-severe in 277 (7%), and severe in 445 (12%). Pulmonary hypertension (PH) was diagnosed in 3079 subjects (83%). A good correlation was found between sPAP derived by echocardiographic and RHC in the whole cohort (correlation coefficient (LCC) 0.79, CI 0.78-0.80), in severe TR subgroup (LCC 0.78, CI 0.75-0.82), and in severe TR with PH subgroup (LCC 0.76, CI 0.71-0.79). The mean echocardiographic misestimation for sPAP in severe TR was 3.97 mmHg (CI -5.24 to -2.71). The correlation between the two modalities for RAP was moderate in the whole cohort (LCC 0.59, CI 0.57-0.61) and fair in severe TR (LCC 0.35, CI 0.27-0.42). A clinically significant difference between the two modalities for sPAP was found in 1504 patients (41%), predominantly due to the right ventricle-right atrium gradient misestimation, rather than RAP misestimation, in patients with no PH (67% vs 33%), patients with mild-moderate PH (mean Pulmonary Artery Pressure (mPAP) 21-34 mmHg) (67% vs 33%) and severe PH (mPAP ≥35 mmHg) (76% vs 24%). Conclusion The correlation between echocardiographic and RHC measurements is good for sPAP, even in severe TR patients, while it is only fair to moderate for RAP. A clinically significant difference between echocardiographic and RHC sPAP is more commonly observed in patients with PH, with right ventricle-right atrium gradient misestimation being the most common cause.

Aims: Alterations of mitochondrial bioenergetics and arginine metabolism are universally present and mechanistically linked to pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), but there is little knowledge of arginine metabolism and mitochondrial functions across the different pulmonary hypertension (PH) groups. We hypothesize that abnormalities in mitochondrial functions are present across all PH groups and associated with clinical phenotypes. We test the hypothesis in PH patients and healthy controls from the Pulmonary Vascular Disease Phenomics Program cohort, who had comprehensive clinical phenotyping and follow-up for at least 4 years for death or transplant status. Mitochondrial transmembrane potential, superoxide production, and mass were measured by flow cytometry in fresh platelets. Metabolomics analysis was performed on plasma samples. Global arginine bioavailability was calculated as the ratio of arginine/(ornithine+citrulline). Results: Global arginine bioavailability is consistently lower than controls in all PH groups. Although the mitochondrial mass is similar across all PH groups and controls, superoxide production and transmembrane potential vary across groups. Mitochondrial superoxide is higher in group 1 PAH and lowest in group 3 compared with other groups, while transmembrane potential is lower in group 1 PAH than controls or group 3. The alterations in mitochondrial functions of group 1 PAH are associated with changes in fatty acid metabolism. Mitochondrial transmembrane potential in group 1 PAH is associated with transplant-free survival. Conclusion: While alterations in mitochondrial function are found in all PH groups, group 1 PAH has a unique mitochondrial phenotype with greater superoxide and lower transmembrane potential linked to fatty acid metabolism, and clinically to survival. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 42, 361–377.

AbstractMacitentan is a dual endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) approved for treating pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). SOPRANO evaluated the efficacy and safety of macitentan versus placebo in pulmonary hypertension (PH) patients after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. SOPRANO was a phase 2, multicenter, double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group study. Patients with an LVAD implanted within the prior 90 days who had persistent PH (i.e., mean pulmonary arterial pressure ≥25 mmHg, pulmonary artery wedge pressure [PAWP] ≤18 mmHg, and pulmonary vascular resistance [PVR] >3 Wood units [WU]) were randomized (1:1) to macitentan 10 mg or placebo once daily for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in PVR. Secondary endpoints included change in right‐heart catheterization hemodynamic variables, N‐terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide levels, World Health Organization functional class, and safety/tolerability. Fifty‐seven patients were randomized to macitentan (n = 28) or placebo (n = 29). A statistically significant reduction in PVR from baseline to Week 12 was observed with macitentan versus placebo (placebo‐corrected geometric mean ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.58–0.94; p = .0158). No statistically significant differences were observed in secondary endpoints. In a post‐hoc analysis, 66.7% of patients receiving macitentan achieved PVR <3 WU versus 40.0% receiving placebo (p = .0383). Macitentan was generally well tolerated; adverse events were consistent with those in previous PAH studies with macitentan. In conclusion, macitentan showed promising tolerability and significantly reduced PVR in PH patients with persistently elevated PVR after LVAD implantation. ClinicalTrials. gov identifier: NCT02554903.

Background: Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) is commonly considered to reflect opposition to lung blood flow caused by the arteries (PVRa), but downstream venous resistance (PVRv) may also contribute to pulmonary hypertension (PH) associated with left heart diseases (PH-LHD). In patients referred for right heart catheterization, we investigated PVR distribution and its pathophysiologic implications in PH-LHD and other forms of PH. Methods: Patients with PH-LHD (n=292), pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD, n=10), chronic thromboembolic PH (CTEPH, n=36) and controls without PH (Ctrl, n=28) were included. Pulmonary capillary pressure (Pc) was calculated using the pulmonary artery occlusion technique. PVR was partitioned into PVRa ((mPAP-Pc)/CO) and PVRv ((Pc-PAWP)/CO) with each expressed as % of PVR. PH-LHD was divided into isolated post-capillary PH (IpcPH) and combined post- and pre-capillary PH (CpcPH). Further, PH-LHD was categorized as heart failure with preserved (HFpEF, EF≥50%) or reduced (HFrEF, EF<50%) ejection fraction or left valvular heart disease (L-VHD). In subsets, functional tests (n=71-81) and histological pulmonary venous (PV) remodeling (autopsy, n=15) were performed to investigate correlations with PVR distribution. Results: PVR distribution showed an arterial predominance in Ctrl and CTEPH, and increasing venous contribution in PH-LHD (both IpcPH and CpcPH) and PVOD (Figure A-F). In PH-LHD, patients with HFpEF had proportionately greater venous contribution to PVR than HFrEF and L-VHD (Figure G-I), though not to the extent observed in PVOD. In subsets, PVRv was more strongly correlated with E/e’, extravascular lung water estimated by sonographic B-lines, arterial PO 2 , pulmonary dead space fraction (VD/VT), DLCO, and, among the autopsy series, PV intimal thickness as compared to PVRa (Figure J-O). Conclusions: Pulmonary venous contributions to PVR are amplified in patients with PH-LHD, which is correlated with greater lung congestion, ventilatory and gas exchange abnormalities, and histological venous remodeling. Further study is required to determine the molecular mechanism and novel therapeutics of pulmonary venous disease in PH-LHD.

BACKGROUND: Defining qualitative grades of echocardiographic metrics of right heart chamber size and function is critical for screening, clinical assessment, and measurement of therapeutic response in individuals with pulmonary vascular disease (PVD). In a population enriched for PVD, we sought to establish qualitative grades and prognostic value of right heart chamber size and function. METHODS: We investigated 1053 study participants in PVDOMICS (Redefining Pulmonary Hypertension Through the PVD Phenomics Program) to determine clinical and echocardiographic differences associated with increasing pulmonary vascular resistance severity. Right heart chamber size and function were qualitatively assessed using a percentile-based approach above the median values to create a clinical grading system for right heart adaptation. The relationship between echocardiographic categories and all-cause mortality was examined using survival analyses adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: A stepwise increase in adverse right heart remodeling was observed with a concomitant decrease in functional parameters by pulmonary vascular resistance strata ( P <0.001 for all). Mild, moderate, and severe categories of right heart chamber size and dysfunction were defined using a percentile-based approach across the spectrum of PVD. During a median follow-up of 2.07 years (interquartile range, 1.23–3.01 years), 130 participants died (11.4%). Progressive pulmonary vascular resistance increase and 2DE evidence of right heart dysfunction inclusive of fractional area change, and right ventricular global longitudinal strain were independently associated with increased all-cause mortality risk in multivariate analysis adjusted for age, disease duration, and male sex. CONCLUSIONS: In this well-characterized sample of adults with diverse etiologies and varying PVD severity, we define categories of abnormal right heart chamber size and function. Further, we demonstrate a stepwise relationship between these categories of abnormal morphology and function and all-cause mortality. Defining grades of right ventricular dysfunction in individuals with known PVD has important clinical implications for monitoring disease progression and response to therapies.

Abstract Aims The clinical utility of pulmonary hypertension (PH) risk scores in non-group 1 PH with pulmonary vascular disease (PVD) remains unresolved. Methods and results We utilized the prospective multicenter PVDOMICS cohort with group 2, 3, 4 or 5 PH-related PVD and calculated group 1 PH risk scores (REVEAL 2.0, REVEAL Lite 2, French registry score and COMPERA 2). The c-statistic to predict death was compared separately in (i) pre-capillary PH groups 3/4/5, and (ii) combined post- and pre-capillary PH group 2. Exercise right heart catheterization reserve, ventricular interdependence and right ventricular–pulmonary artery (RV-PA) coupling were compared across risk categories. Among 449 individuals with group 3/4/5 PH, the REVEAL 2.0 risk score had the highest c-statistic for predicting death (0.699, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.660–0.737, p &lt; 0.0001) with comparable performance using the simpler REVEAL Lite 2 score (0.695, 95% CI 0.656–0.734, p &lt; 0.0001). The French and COMPERA 2 risk scores were also predictive of mortality, but performance of both was statistically inferior to REVEAL 2.0 (c-statistic difference −0.072, 95% CI −0.123 to −0.020, p = 0.006, and −0.043, 95% CI −0.067 to −0.018, p = 0.0007, respectively). RV function and RV-PA coupling measures were prognostic in isolation, but did not add incremental value to REVEAL (p &gt; 0.50 for all). Findings were similar in patients with group 2 PH (n = 239). Stratification by the REVEAL Lite 2 score non-invasively identified non-group 1 PH with more advanced PVD with worse exercise capacity, RV-PA uncoupling, ventricular interdependence and impaired cardiac output reserve (p &lt; 0.05 for all). Conclusions Non-invasive REVEAL risk predicts mortality in non-group 1 PH without incremental prognostic value from detailed RV function or RV-PA coupling assessment. Baseline REVEAL Lite 2 risk stratification non-invasively identifies greater pulmonary vascular dysfunction and right heart-related exercise limitation, which may help guide patient selection for targeted pulmonary vascular therapies in non-group 1 PH.

Axillary artery intra-aortic balloon pump (axIABP) placement has been implemented as a bridging solution before heart transplantation. This study evaluates complications associated with axIABP support and describes an approach to minimize adverse events. We previously described a percutaneous approach for axIABP placement. However, patients receiving axIABP between September 1, 2017, and September 26, 2019 (n = 32) demonstrated a high rate of balloon pump malfunction (8/32; 25%) and other complications (totaling 15/32; 47%). Sixty-four patients were sequentially treated under a revised protocol. Compared to the initial cohort, no significant differences in demographics were noted. A significant reduction in rate of balloon malfunction (8/32, 25% vs. 1/64, 2%; p < 0.001) and total complications (15/32, 47% vs. 10/64, 16%; p = 0.0025) during the period of support were noted after intervention. Subsequent analysis of total complications per device size (40 vs. ≤ 34 ml balloon) revealed significantly reduced complications in patients with smaller devices (40% vs. 13%, respectively; p = 0.0022). This study provides guidelines to limit complications in patients supported with axIABP, facilitating a protracted period of bridging support.

Abstract Aims Patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) are grouped based upon clinical and haemodynamic characteristics. Groups 2 (G2, left heart disease [LHD]) and 3 (G3, lung disease or hypoxaemia) are most common. Many patients display overlapping characteristics of heart and lung disease (G2–3), but this group is not well-characterized. Methods and results Patients with PH enrolled in the prospective, NHLBI-sponsored PVDOMICS network underwent intensive clinical, biomarker, imaging, gas exchange and exercise phenotyping. Patients with pure G2, pure G3, or overlapping G2–3 PH were compared across multiple phenotypic domains. Of all patients with predominant G2 (n = 136), 66 (49%) were deemed to have secondary lung disease/hypoxaemia contributors (G2/3), and of all patients categorized as predominant G3 (n = 172), 41 (24%) were judged to have a component of secondary LHD (G3/2), such that 107 had G2–3 (combined G2/3 and G3/2). As compared with G3, patients with G2 and G2–3 were more obese and had greater prevalence of hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and coronary disease. Patients with G2 and G2–3 were more anaemic, with poorer kidney function, more cardiac dysfunction, and higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide than G3. Lung diffusion was more impaired in G3 and G2–3, but commonly abnormal even in G2. Exercise capacity was severely and similarly impaired across all groups, with no differences in 6-min walk distance or peak oxygen consumption, and pulmonary vasoreactivity to nitric oxide did not differ. In a multivariable Cox regression model, patients with G2 had lower risk of death or transplant compared with G3 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30–0.86), and patients with G2–3 also displayed lower risk compared with G3 (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38–0.86). Conclusions Overlap is common in patients with a pulmonary or cardiac basis for PH. While lung structure/function is clearly more impaired in G3 and G2–3 than G2, pulmonary abnormalities are common in G2, even when clinically judged as isolated LHD. Further study is required to identify optimal systematic evaluations to guide therapeutic innovation for PH associated with combined heart and lung disease. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02980887.