Citations

Abstract Background: Bria-IMT™ is an allogeneic whole cell immunotherapy expressing tumor associated antigens and GM-CSF, designed to stimulate adaptive and innate immune responses. The ongoing multicenter phase 3 Bria-ABC trial (NCT06072612) evaluates Bria-IMT + Retifanlimab vs physician’s choice in pts with metastatic breast cancer who have exhausted standard therapies. Quality of life characterization in this advanced disease setting is clinically relevant yet underreported. Methods: QOL was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QOL Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) at baseline (BL) and treatment visits. Raw item responses (scale: 1 - 4 for functional/symptom items; 1 - 7 for global health ; lower scores = better functional/symptom outcomes; higher scores = better global health) were aggregated into domain scores. Changes from BL were quantified as absolute point differences on response scales and domain level scores are the median of constituent items. Changes from BL assessed using Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank tests. ECOG status assessed at BL and each treatment visit. TEAEs graded per CTCAE. Missing QOL data handled using observed cases approach. We report QoL outcomes at visits (V) BL, 3, 6, and 9 to characterize pt experience during treatment. Results: As of data cut date, 235 pts have been screened, 169 randomized,129 treated. Median age: 60. 74% Caucasian; 18% other; 8% not reported; median 6 prior lines (2-15); ECOG 2: 7%, intracranial mets: 11%. 51% of pts HR+, 37% TNBC, 10% HER2+, 2% not reported. mPFS 2.9 mo (95% CI, 2.3 - 3.7), median of 5 QoL assessments per pt. Of 127 pts who completed ≥2 EORTC QLQ-C30 assessments, 67 (52%), 21 (17%), and 7 (6%) had paired data available at V3, 6, and 9, respectively. Global health status remained stable (median: BL 5.0, V3 5.0, V6 5.0, V9 4.5; 63% of pts reported maintenance or improvement at V3 [p=0.7], V6: 62%, V9: 71%). Functional domains: physical (median: BL 1.0, V3 2.0, V6 2.0, V9 2.0; 68.7% , 47.6% [p=0.03], 71.4% maintenance), role (BL 1.5, V3 2.0, V6 2.0, V9 2.0; 62.7% [p=0.02], 52.4%, 71.4% maintenance), emotional (BL 1.5, V3 1.5, V6 1.5, V9 1.5; 75.8% [p=0.9], 81.0%, 85.7% maintenance), cognitive (BL 1.5, V3 1.5, V6 1.5, V9 1.5; 63.6% [p=0.2], 61.9%, 85.7% maintenance), and social functioning (BL 1.5, V3 1.5, V6 2.0, V9 2.5; 58.5% [p=0.06], 75.0%, 57.1% maintenance). Symptoms: fatigue (median 2.0 at all timepoints; 61%, 67%, 71% maintenance), nausea/vomiting (1.0 throughout; 73% maintenance at V3 [p=0.8], V6 86% , V9 86%), and pain (1.5 at BL and V3, increasing to 2.0 at V6 and V9, w/ 57% maintenance at V3 [p=0.03], V6 62% [p=0.9], and V9 86%. ECOG status remained stable in 78% (n = 99) of pts during treatment. Most common TEAEs were fatigue, nausea, anemia, and constipation; w/ 45% Grade 3 or 4; 84% < grade 3. QoL trends consistent w/ observed ECOG status and AE profiles. Conclusion: Heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer pts demonstrated stability in overall health status and key functional domains during treatment. These findings are encouraging w/ a meaningful QOL in a population with advanced disease and limited therapeutic options. These observations and AE profile support decentralized clinical trial initiatives including home self-administration. Ongoing follow up will further characterize the durability of pt reported outcomes and their relationship w/ clinical status. Citation Format: Saranya Chumsri, Chaitali Nangia, Adriana Kahn, Lawrence Negret, Carmen Calfa, Blaise Bayer, Giuseppe Del Priore, Tamar Aghajanian, William Williams, Kelly McCann. QOL outcomes in Bria-ABC late stage metastatic phase 3 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT137.

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the inter‐ and intra‐observer reliability of Kellgren–Lawrence (KL) grading versus minimum joint space width (mJSW) measurement on knee radiographs, and to examine the influence of rater type, radiographic view and atlas‐based training. Methods A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science was conducted through July 2025 following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies reporting inter‐ and/or intra‐observer reliability for KL or mJSW on standard knee radiographs were included. Extracted data included kappa ( κ ) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values, rater expertise, radiographic view and atlas usage. Raters were categorized as expert, trainee/non‐expert or artificial intelligence (AI)‐assisted/automated. Results Twenty‐four studies (10,394 radiographs) met the inclusion criteria. Inter‐observer reliability was generally higher for mJSW (mean ICC = 0.82 ± 0.17) compared with KL (mean k = 0.72 ± 0.17), with similar trends observed for intra‐observer reliability. Experts and AI‐assisted systems outperformed trainees/non‐experts for both metrics. Reliability improved with semiflexed posteroanterior/Rosenberg views and atlas‐guided training. Conclusion This systematic review demonstrates that mJSW measurement generally shows higher reproducibility than KL grading. Reliability improved with expertise, standardized imaging and structured training, and AI‐assisted approaches performed comparably to expert raters. Quantitative mJSW should complement KL grading, particularly when combined with alignment measures, to enhance consistency and clinical relevance of radiographic assessment. Level of Evidence Level III.

We examined outcomes of a quality improvement (QI) culture implemented through Mayo Clinic Quality Academy by retrospectively reviewing data from QI projects credited from 2019 to 2024. Data analyzed included roles, member count, region, project details, priorities, financial outcomes, methodologies, and lessons learned. During the study period, Mayo Clinic Quality Academy credited 1106 projects involving 10 063 members (median, 8 members per project). Physicians participated in 52.4% of projects, allied health professionals in 83.6%, and nurses in 55.2%. Among all projects, teamwork (54.0%) and efficiency (52.8%) were the most common organizational priorities; among National Academy of Medicine priorities, efficiency was the most common (32.2%), followed by safety (20.7%) and patient-centeredness (18.9%). Model for improvement was the most prevalent QI methodology (29.2%). Most participants (93%) believed the QI project changed the way they work. Cultivating a QI culture influences health care delivery by emphasizing efficiency, teamwork, operational performance, patient outcomes, satisfaction, and financial benefits.

Abstract Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer among female adolescents and young adults (AYAs; 15-39 years). While advances in treatment have improved survival, cardiovascular disease (CVD) can result from systemic therapies, and CVD is a leading cause of death in AYA cancer survivors. AYAs with BC face nearly a four-fold increased risk of CVD compared to their peers without cancer. However, data on the effects of systemic treatment on CVD in this population remains limited. We estimated risk of CVD in AYAs diagnosed with invasive BC (2006-2020), who survived ≥2 years, and were diagnosed and treated in the Kaiser Permanente (KP) Northern and Southern California. Patients were categorized by receipt of anthracycline-, alkylating-, HER2-, platinum-, and taxane-based therapies within 2 years of diagnosis. We examined the cumulative incidence of CVD starting 2 years post-diagnosis and used Cox proportional hazards regression to determine factors associated with CVD. Among 3,071 AYAs, 35.1% were non-Hispanic (NH) White, 31.6% were Hispanic, 18.3% were NH Asian, and 8.2% were NH Black. Most received systemic therapy (90.6%), including anthracycline- and alkylator without HER2-targeted therapy (41.9%) and HER2-targeted therapy without anthracycline (20.9%). Fewer AYAs received a taxane and alkylator (13.0%) or anthracycline with alkylator and taxane along with a HER2-targeting agent (6.4%). Mean follow-up after cancer diagnosis was 7.2 years (range: 2.0-17.5). The 10-year cumulative incidence of CVD was highest among AYAs who received anthracycline/alkylator/taxane/HER2-targeting therapy (19.6%), intermediate for those with anthracycline/alkylator without HER2-targeting therapy (13.0%) and those who received HER2-targeted therapy without anthracycline (14.6%), and lowest for those who received taxane/alkylator (7.3%). In the multivariable model adjusted for demographic factors and radiation, compared to taxane/alkylator, anthracycline/alkylator/taxane/HER2-targeting therapy (hazard ratio (HR)=2.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.56-4.43); anthracycline/alkylator without HER2-targeting therapy (HR=1.75, CI 1.13-2.71); and HER2-targeting therapy without anthracycline (HR=2.13, CI 1.11-4.09) were associated with an increased risk of CVD. CVD risk was similar for taxane/alkylator and no systemic therapy. Other factors associated with higher risk of CVD included NH Black race/ethnicity (HR=1.90, CI 1.32-2.73 vs. NH White) and public health insurance (HR=1.67, CI 1.00-2.78 vs private). This study identifies AYA BC survivors at higher risk of CVD based on treatment regimens received, with highest risks found for those receiving anthracycline/alkylator/taxane/HER2 treatment combinations. In addition, AYAs of Black race/ethnicity and those with public health insurance experienced more CVD, underscoring the need for targeted interventions to mitigate these disparities. Citation Format: Theresa H. M. Keegan, Candice A. Sauder, Ann M. Brunson, Renata Abrahao, Anne C. Kirchhoff, Eric Haupt, Mallory Casperson, Ted Wun, Chun R. Chao, Andrew B. Smitherman, Hazel B. Nichols, Jessica Chubak, Erin E. Hahn, Lawrence H. Kushi, Kathryn J. Ruddy. Systemic therapy and cardiovascular disease in adolescent and young adult breast cancer survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 5219.

Abstract Objectives Patients referred for specialized care often arrive with outside medical records (OMRs) compiled into multi-report PDFs that include imaging, pathology, and clinical notes in unstructured formats. Reviewing these records is time consuming and mentally taxing, increasing the risk of delayed care, clinician frustration, and missed information affecting quality of care. This study aimed to automate the segmentation, classification, and date extraction of scanned OMRs, with a focus on records relevant to breast cancer care. Materials and Methods We used optical character recognition (OCR) to extract machine-readable text from 1303 scanned PDF documents from 116 distinct external institutions. Gemini 1.5, a large language model (LLM), was then used to segment multi-report files into individual documents, classify them into clinically meaningful categories such as mammograms and pathology reports, and extract study dates to build diagnostic timelines. Document categories were informed by clinical workflows in a breast cancer center. Results The system achieved an F1 score of 0.95 for segmentation, 0.96 for classification, and 0.90 for date extraction. In a pilot of 45 records reviewed by clinicians, only 2 classification errors and 1 date error were reported. Clinicians estimated that the tool reduced OMR review time by 40%, improved workflow efficiency, and increased satisfaction. Discussion Our findings demonstrate that combining OCR with LLMs can significantly enhance the processing of unstructured medical records, reducing manual burden and supporting timely clinical decision-making. Conclusion This study demonstrates the successful application of OCR and LLMs for organizing scanned OMRs within a specialty clinic. By automating a previously manual process, the approach supports scalable review of incoming outside records and has potential for adaptation to other clinical workflows. Future work will focus on evaluating the system across additional specialties and institutions.

Several reports show a shortage of primary care physicians in the US, and it seems likely to worsen as the population continues to grow and age. Therefore, it is critical to train the next generation of physicians and healthcare providers to effectively meet the needs of the US population. Alongside this structural challenge, the medical profession is also confronting a cultural one—an erosion of professionalism characterized by declining responsibility, integrity, and communication (Foster, 2019). In teaching and training resident physicians and medical students, some of these skills can be taught, but these skills are usually better “caught” than taught. This chapter presents two physicians' personal experiences in medical education. It discusses the significance of role modeling and best practices for effectively transmitting professionalism, competence, and communication to the next generation of resident physicians, medical students, and healthcare providers.