Citations

511 Background: Clinicopathological and molecular features, including estrogen receptor (ER) status and PAM50 subtypes, have shown an association with immunogenicity and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) levels in breast cancer (BC). To investigate the complexity of the immune response in HER2+ BC, we explored the association of T- and B-cell receptor (TCR and BCR) repertoires with clinicopathological characteristics, PAM50 subtypes and outcome in the NeoALTTO phase III trial. Methods: RNA sequencing (RNAseq) data from baseline tumor biopsies were available for 254 out of the 455 patients enrolled. TCR and BCR repertoires were extracted from RNAseq data using the MiXCR software. Repertoire and diversity measures (read counts, number of clones, evenness, Gini index, Shannon entropy, length of the complementarity-determining region 3 [CDR3], top and second top clone proportions) were estimated. PAM50 subtypes were computed from RNAseq data. Univariate and multivariate (adjusted for clinicopathological characteristics, TIL levels dichotomized using the median value of 12.5% and treatment arm) Cox proportional hazard models were used for survival analysis, while logistic regressions were used for pathological complete response (pCR), defined as ypT0/is. All results reported had a false discovery rate (FDR) <0.05. Results: Higher BCR read counts, number of clones and Gini index were significantly associated with ER-negative as well as grade 3 tumors. Among the PAM50 subtypes, HER2-enriched (HER2-E) showed significantly higher BCR read counts, number of clones and Gini index along with lower evenness compared to luminal A and B, as well as higher length of CDR3 than luminal A. Of note, basal-like showed similar BCR diversity measures to HER2-E. No significant differences were noted for TCR diversity measures. In multivariate analyses, neither TCR nor BCR features were associated with pCR, while BCR evenness (HR 1.5; 95%CI 1.1-2.1) and Gini index (HR 0.66; 95%CI 0.5-0.88) were associated with event-free survival. Conclusions: BCR repertoire measures suggest a clonal expansion in HER2-E and basal-like PAM50 subtypes. Furthermore, the implementation of BCR-derived biomarkers can help to identify patients with an improved clinical outcome after neoadjuvant anti-HER2 treatment. Our findings highlight the heterogeneity of the immune response within HER2+ BC and provide support for biomarker-driven treatment strategies including immunotherapy in this BC subtype. Further validation is required. Clinical trial information: NCT00553358 .

Abstract Background: BRCA1/2 genes play a central role in DNA repair. Therefore, pts harboring gBRCA1/2m treated with chemotherapy might be at higher risk of acute hematological toxicities due to the lower level of functional BRCA1/2 protein potentially resulting in more toxicity. Published results are discordant, further data are needed. Methods: Pts with early TNBC and known gBRCA1/2m treated with anthracycline-taxane based NACT in the GeparQuinto (n=487), GeparSixto (n=291) and GeparOcto (n=393) studies were included. Primary G-CSF prophylaxis was foreseen only for the iddETC arm in GeparOcto. Primary objective was the rate of neutropenia grade (G)3-4 after cycle 1; secondary objectives were the rate of other hematological toxicities G3-4 and the overall toxicity rate after cycle 1 as well as hematological toxicities in gBRCA1/2 pts during the taxane part of chemotherapy. Results: 209/1171 evaluated pts (17.8%) had a gBRCA1/2m (177 gBRCA1m, 33 gBRCA2m). Median age was 48yrs [21-78]. The rate of neutropenia G3-4 after cycle 1 in gBRCA1/2 wildtype (wt) pts was 35.7% vs 37.4% in gBRCA1/2m (p=0.683), 35.9% in gBRCA1m (p=1.000), 44.8% in gBRCA2m (p=0.330). gBRCA1/2 mutational status did not predict neutropenia G3-4 at univariate (OR=1.08, 95%CI 0.78-1.48 p=0.658) or multivariate analysis adjusted for age, BMI and treatment (OR=1.26, 95%CI 0.87-1.82 p=0.226). The overall rate and the rates of other hematological toxicities are shown in the table. gBRCA1/2 mutational status did also not predict for any other hematological toxicities G3-4 (univariate OR=0.94, 95%CI 0.64-1.40 p=0.773; multivariate OR=0.94, 95%CI 0.62-1.43 p=0.779). gBRCA1/2 mutational status predicted for hematological toxicities G3-4 under taxane treatment (univariate OR=1.94, 95%CI 1.35-2.77 p&lt;0.001; multivariate OR=2.91, 95%CI 1.55-5.45 p=0.001). During taxane treatment, the overall rate of hematological toxicities G3-4 in wt pts was 43.1% (n=270) vs 59.5% (n=91) in gBRCA1/2m, p&lt;0.001; anemia G3-4 2.6% (n=16) vs 3.3% (n=5), p=0.584; leucopenia G3-4 32.7% (n=203) vs 47.1% (n=72), p=0.001; neutropenia G3-4 35.8% (n=219) vs 49.3% (n=73), p=0.003; thrombopenia G3-4 1.4% (n=9) vs 4.6% (n=7), p=0.024; febrile neutropenia 5.9% (n=37) vs 4.6% (n=7), p=0.696. Conclusions: Overall, gBRCA1/2 mutation is not associated with a significantly higher risk of severe hematological toxicities. Under taxane therapy, pts with gBRCA1/2 demonstrate a higher rate of hematological toxicities G3-4, especially neutropenia, compared to wildtype pts, and should therefore be carefully monitored. Hematological toxicities after cycle 1wildtypegBRCA1/2mp-valuegBRCA1mp-valuegBRCA2mp-valueN%N%N%N%neutropenia G3-432635.77437.40.6836135.91.0001344.80.330febrile neutropenia171.831.41.00010.60.33726.10.130leucopenia G3-424425.83818.20.0212815.80.0041030.30.548anemia G3-420.200.01.00000.01.00000.01.000thrombopenia G3-4111.210.50.70510.60.70400.01.000any hematological toxicities G1-477782.617081.70.76314180.10.4533090.90.344any hematological toxicities G3-442846.38843.60.5337241.90.3171651.60.587 Citation Format: Jenny Furlanetto, Volker Möbus, Andreas Schneeweiss, Kerstin Rhiem, Hans Tesch, Jens-Uwe Blohmer, Kristina Lübbe, Michael Untch, Christoph Salat, Jens Huober, Peter Klare, Rita Schmutzler, Fergus J Couch, Bianca Lederer, Bernd Gerber, Dirk-Michael Zahm, Ingo Bauerfeind, Valentina Nekljudova, Claus Hanusch, Christian Jackisch, Theresa Link, Sibylle Loibl, Peter A Fasching. Germline (g)BRCA1/2 mutations (m) and hematological toxicities in patients (pts) with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-10-03.

Abstract Background: Abemaciclib plus nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors (AI) demonstrated efficacy with a tolerable safety profile as initial treatment for postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2− advanced breast cancer in the MONARCH 3 trial. In the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, the updated progression-free survival (PFS) with 12 months of additional follow-up was 28.2 versus 14.8 months (HR [95% CI]: 0.525 [0.415, 0.665]; p&lt;.0001) in the abemaciclib plus AI versus placebo plus AI arms, respectively. Here we report data from the additional 12 months of follow-up on tumor response for the ITT population and exploratory subgroups previously identified as significantly prognostic (Di Leo et al. 2018). Methods: In MONARCH 3, a randomized, double-blind, phase III trial, 493 postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2− advanced breast cancer and no prior systemic therapy in the advanced setting, received an AI (anastrozole or letrozole) plus abemaciclib or placebo. From the October 31, 2018 cutoff, secondary endpoints including objective response rate ([ORR], complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]), time to response (TTR), and duration of response ([DoR], time from a confirmed CR or PR until disease progression or death) were assessed in the ITT population and exploratory subgroups previously reported as significantly prognostic. Waterfall plots will be used to illustrate the magnitude of change in tumor size for each subgroup (to be presented). Results: In patients with measurable disease, the ORR was 62.5% (95% CI: 56.7, 68.2) in the abemaciclib plus AI arm and 44.7% (95% CI: 36.2, 53.2) in the placebo plus AI arm (p≤.001). Additional follow-up confirmed that all prognostic subgroups received benefit from the addition of abemaciclib to AI, consistent with the ITT population, as evidenced by change in ORR, with the largest effects observed in subgroups of patients with liver metastases, progesterone receptor-negative tumors, high grade tumors, or treatment-free interval of &lt;36 months (Table). Median TTR was similar between the two treatment arms (abemaciclib plus AI: 3.62 months; placebo plus AI: 3.65 months), and this was generally consistent across subgroups. Responses were more durable in the abemaciclib plus AI arm (median DoR: 32.71 months; 95% CI: 25.74, -) versus the placebo plus AI arm (median DoR: 17.49 months; 95% CI: 11.61, 22.19), including in poor prognostic subgroups. Conclusions: Extended follow-up in the MONARCH 3 trial further confirmed that the addition of abemaciclib to AI is associated with durable tumor responses, including those in patients with clinically poor prognostic characteristics. References: Di Leo A et al. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2018;4:41. Clinical trial information: NCT02246621 This study was funded by Eli Lilly and Company Table: Objective Response RateAbemaciclib + AIPlacebo + AIORR ChangeNn (%)Nn (%)%Measurable disease population269168 (62.5)13259 (44.7)17.8Liver metastasesYes4727 (57.45)306 (20.00)37.45No222141 (63.51)10253 (51.96)11.55Progesterone receptor statusNegative6137 (60.66)298 (27.59)33.07Positive206130 (63.11)10351 (49.51)13.60Treatment-free interval&lt;36 months3117 (54.84)225 (22.73)32.11≥36 months7442 (56.76)3216 (50.00)6.76Tumor gradeHigh5739 (68.42)2811 (39.29)29.13Intermediate/ Low13992 (66.19)7535 (46.67)19.52ECOG PS111275 (66.96)5022 (44.00)22.96015793 (59.24)8237 (45.12)14.12Bone-only diseaseNo256162 (63.28)12253 (43.44)19.84YesNA*NA*NA*NA*NA*N= total number of patients in each subgroup; n= number of responder patients; NA=not applicable*Response rate not reported for bone-only disease because majority of lesions were not measurable Citation Format: Joyce O’Shaughnessy, Stephen Johnston, Miguel Martin, Jens Huober, Masakazu Toi, Valerie AnneMarie Andre, Holly Rene Martin, Molly Catherine Hardebeck, Angelo Di Leo, Matthew Philip Goetz. Updated subgroup tumor response of abemaciclib plus aromatase inhibitor for hormone receptor positive (HR+), HER2 negative advanced breast cancer (MONARCH 3) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-19-09.

Abstract The term sarcopenia was introduced in 1988. The original definition was a “muscle loss” of the appendicular muscle mass in the older people as measured by dual energy x‐ray absorptiometry (DXA). In 2010, the definition was altered to be low muscle mass together with low muscle function and this was agreed upon as reported in a number of consensus papers. The Society of Sarcopenia, Cachexia and Wasting Disorders supports the recommendations of more recent consensus conferences, i.e. that rapid screening, such as with the SARC‐F questionnaire, should be utilized with a formal diagnosis being made by measuring grip strength or chair stand together with DXA estimation of appendicular muscle mass (indexed for height2). Assessments of the utility of ultrasound and creatine dilution techniques are ongoing. Use of ultrasound may not be easily reproducible. Primary sarcopenia is aging associated (mediated) loss of muscle mass. Secondary sarcopenia (or disease‐related sarcopenia) has predominantly focused on loss of muscle mass without the emphasis on muscle function. Diseases that can cause muscle wasting (i.e. secondary sarcopenia) include malignant cancer, COPD, heart failure, and renal failure and others. Management of sarcopenia should consist of resistance exercise in combination with a protein intake of 1 to 1.5 g/kg/day. There is insufficient evidence that vitamin D and anabolic steroids are beneficial. These recommendations apply to both primary (age‐related) sarcopenia and secondary (disease related) sarcopenia. Secondary sarcopenia also needs appropriate treatment of the underlying disease. It is important that primary care health professionals become aware of and make the diagnosis of age‐related and disease‐related sarcopenia. It is important to address the risk factors for sarcopenia, particularly low physical activity and sedentary behavior in the general population, using a life‐long approach. There is a need for more clinical research into the appropriate measurement for muscle mass and the management of sarcopenia. Accordingly, this position statement provides recommendations on the management of sarcopenia and how to progress the knowledge and recognition of sarcopenia.

Abstract Background: The level of immune suppression in an individual breast cancer (BC) patient is relevant for having a major benefit from treatments that act via or are directed to the immune response, such as anti-HER2 agents and immune checkpoint molecules, respectively. The link(s) between the tumor immune microenvironment and treatment responses has been investigated in HER2-positive BC. This study analyzed the association between baseline expression of genes regulating T cell activities (PD1, CTLA4, LAG3, TIM3, PDL1, PDL2, FOXP3, IL10, TGFβ (1-3), FOXP1 and other related genes) and pathologic complete response (pCR) rates in the NeoALTTO trial. Methods: NeoALTTO randomized early-stage HER2-positive BC patients to neoadjuvant trastuzumab (T), lapatinib (L) or T+L for 6 weeks followed by 12 weeks of concurrent paclitaxel. Anthracyclines were given after surgery (FEC). Patients with RNA sequencing data from their baseline tumor samples (N=254 patients out of 455 from the original cohort) were included in the current study. The primary endpoint, pCR, was defined as ypT0/is ypN0. Logistic regression was used for analysis of pCR. Cox regression univariate and multivariate (adjusted for clinicopathological parameters and treatment arms) analyses were performed. Results: In the total cohort analyzed, high PD1 (odds ratio, OR: 1.4, P=0.03), PDL2 (OR: 1.4, P=0.04), CTLA4 (OR: 1.4, P=0.03) and TGFβ3 (OR: 1.4, P=0.02) expression was associated with an increased probability of achieving pCR at the multivariate analysis. ERBB2 (HER2) expression was associated with pCR in the three arms (T: OR: 2.7, P=0.02; L: OR: 2.3, P=0.01; T+L: OR: 5, P&lt;0.001). Additionally in the T+L arm, PAM50 HER2-enriched subtype (OR: 2.9, P=0.03), as well as immune genes PD1 (OR: 2.1, P=0.01), PDL1 (OR: 1.8, P=0.03) and CTLA4 (OR: 2; P=0.01), were also associated with pCR. Conclusions: In the NeoALTTO population examined, PD1, PDL2, CTLA-4 and TGFβ3 expression at diagnosis were all associated with improved pCR rates after anti-HER2 treatment. The effect of these treatments seemed to be dependent on HER2 expression levels, which was particularly relevant in the T+L arm. These observations confirm previous findings that link immune infiltrates to higher pCR rates, demonstrate the clinical significance of the PD-1 pathway and additionally show that CTLA-4 and TGFβ3 could also be important in early stage HER2-positive BC. The association of tumors linked with immune regulatory gene expression with positive responses to neoadjuvant anti-HER2 agents suggests that they act in a way that reinvigorates the antitumor immunity in the face of tumor-mediated suppression. Patients whose tumors highly express these genes may be good candidates for immunotherapy before the start or after the neoadjuvant treatment when residual disease is detected at surgery, although these hypotheses require further confirmation. Citation Format: Cinzia Solinas, Pushpamali De Silva, David Venet, Soizic Garaud, Chunyan Gu-Trantien, Florentine Hilbers, Evandro de Azambuja, Olena Werner, Lorena De la Peña, Amylou Dueck, Serena Di Cosimo, Istvan Lang, Jens Huober, Sherko Küemmel, Carsten Denkert, Roberto Salgado, Christos Sotiriou, Martine Piccart-Gebhart, Debora Fumagalli, Karen Willard-Gallo. Immune regulatory gene expression and clinical outcome in the NeoALTTO trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3132.

Background:Despite advances in the treatment of lymphoma in recent years, unmet medical needs remain, particularly for patients with R/R disease and rarer subtypes of non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The alkylating deacetylase inhibitor tinostamustine (EDO‐S101) is a novel multi‐action therapy that is designed to improve drug access to DNA strands, and at the same time induce DNA damage and counteract its repair in cancer cells.Aims:Here we report findings from the dose‐escalation stage of a Phase I first‐in‐human study to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics, and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended Phase II dose (RP2D), of tinostamustine in patients with R/R lymphoid malignancies (NCT02576496).Methods:Patients were recruited using a standard 3+3 design, with the first cohort receiving 20 mg/m2 tinostamustine administered iv over 60 minutes, with six ascending cohorts, to a maximum dose of 120 mg/m2. Dose‐limiting toxicities (DLT) were defined as: any Grade (G) 3 or 4 non‐haematological toxicity (excluding alopecia and easily correctable electrolyte abnormalities); nausea, vomiting or diarrhoea ≥10 days despite aggressive symptomatic treatment; G4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia for ≥7 days; any G2 or more toxicity for >3 weeks; any toxicity resulting in a delay of the next dose administration (Cycle 2 Day 1 ≥14).Results:A total of 27 patients with lymphoid malignancies were enrolled into the study, 10 of these patients were diagnosed with R/R Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and 17 with NHL, including peripheral T‐cell lymphoma and diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma. The MTD of tinostamustine was determined to be 100 mg/m2; shorter infusion times were evaluated in three cohorts of patients, but the recommended infusion time was confirmed as 60 minutes. Safety findings for each dose cohort for HL and NHL patients were mainly haematological toxicities: G3/4 thrombocytopenia, neutropenia and leucopenia, with incidence increasing with increasing dose. One patient experienced a G3 allergic reaction. Signals of efficacy were observed among the 27 patients with lymphoma (overall response rate [ORR] 41% [11 patients]; clinical benefit rate [CBR] 67% [18 patients]). The best response, as determined by the Investigator, was complete response (CR; 3/27 patients [11%]), which was observed in one patient with HL and two with NHL; partial response (PR; 8/27 patients [30%]) and stable disease (SD; 7/27 patients [26%]) were also observed. Nine of the 27 patients (33%) had disease progression.Summary/Conclusion:Administration of tinostamustine on Day 1 of a 21‐day cycle was well tolerated with signals of efficacy in patients with both HL and NHL, including rare forms of NHL such as peripheral T‐cell lymphoma. The RP2D for tinostamustine in lymphoid malignancies, depending on patient platelet count at treatment initiation, was determined as 80 mg/m2 for those with >100 x 109/l platelets, and 100 mg/m2 for those with ≥200 x 109/l platelets. This will be applied in the second phase of this study, where patients will be recruited into one of five different cohorts.