Kalantar-Zadeh, Kamyar

Key Points Among US preemptively waitlisted patients with CKD, deceased donor transplants increased for Black and Hispanic patients, comparable with White patients. Dialysis initiation was higher for waitlisted Asian, Black, and Hispanic patients compared with White patients, mirroring lower living donor transplants. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network wait time credit and Increasing Organ Transplant Access metric could expand preemptive transplantation. Background Preemptive kidney transplantation (before dialysis initiation) is the optimal therapy for most transplant-eligible advanced patients with CKD. Although prior research has documented racial and ethnic disparities in preemptive referrals, less is known about distinct outcomes after preemptive waitlisting. This study examines the association between race and ethnicity and outcomes for preemptively waitlisted patients. Methods We conducted a secondary analysis of a prospectively maintained US cohort using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. The study population included 98,863 adult first-time kidney transplant candidates who were preemptively waitlisted from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2020, and followed through December 31, 2024. The exposure of interest was race and ethnicity. The primary outcome was 3-year preemptive deceased donor kidney transplantation, living donor kidney transplantation, or dialysis initiation. We used competing risk models to estimate adjusted subdistribution hazard ratios (aSHRs). Data were stratified into 3-year intervals (2009–2011, 2012–2014, 2015–2017, and 2018–2020). Results Black and Hispanic patients received preemptive deceased donor kidney transplants as often as White patients (era 2018–2020, aSHRs [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.99 [95% CI, 0.92 to 1.07] and 1.02 [95% CI, 0.93 to 1.12], respectively), while Asian patients had lower rates (0.78 [95% CI, 0.69 to 0.88]). However, Asian, Black, and Hispanic patients were more likely to initiate dialysis (aSHRs: 1.50 [95% CI, 1.39 to 1.61]; 1.41 [95% CI, 1.34 to 1.49]; and 1.21 [95% CI, 1.14 to 1.29], respectively) and were less likely to receive preemptive living donor kidney transplants than White patients (era 2018–2020, aSHRs: 0.49 [95% CI, 0.44 to 0.54]; 0.31 [95% CI, 0.29 to 0.34]; and 0.61 [95% CI, 0.56 to 0.66], respectively). Conclusions Among waitlisted patients with CKD in the United States between 2009 and 2020, rates of preemptive deceased donor kidney transplantation improved for Black and Hispanic patients and became comparable with White patients. However, Asian, Black, and Hispanic patients experienced higher rates of dialysis initiation and lower rates of preemptive living donor kidney transplantation.

Abstract The term sarcopenia was introduced in 1988. The original definition was a “muscle loss” of the appendicular muscle mass in the older people as measured by dual energy x‐ray absorptiometry (DXA). In 2010, the definition was altered to be low muscle mass together with low muscle function and this was agreed upon as reported in a number of consensus papers. The Society of Sarcopenia, Cachexia and Wasting Disorders supports the recommendations of more recent consensus conferences, i.e. that rapid screening, such as with the SARC‐F questionnaire, should be utilized with a formal diagnosis being made by measuring grip strength or chair stand together with DXA estimation of appendicular muscle mass (indexed for height2). Assessments of the utility of ultrasound and creatine dilution techniques are ongoing. Use of ultrasound may not be easily reproducible. Primary sarcopenia is aging associated (mediated) loss of muscle mass. Secondary sarcopenia (or disease‐related sarcopenia) has predominantly focused on loss of muscle mass without the emphasis on muscle function. Diseases that can cause muscle wasting (i.e. secondary sarcopenia) include malignant cancer, COPD, heart failure, and renal failure and others. Management of sarcopenia should consist of resistance exercise in combination with a protein intake of 1 to 1.5 g/kg/day. There is insufficient evidence that vitamin D and anabolic steroids are beneficial. These recommendations apply to both primary (age‐related) sarcopenia and secondary (disease related) sarcopenia. Secondary sarcopenia also needs appropriate treatment of the underlying disease. It is important that primary care health professionals become aware of and make the diagnosis of age‐related and disease‐related sarcopenia. It is important to address the risk factors for sarcopenia, particularly low physical activity and sedentary behavior in the general population, using a life‐long approach. There is a need for more clinical research into the appropriate measurement for muscle mass and the management of sarcopenia. Accordingly, this position statement provides recommendations on the management of sarcopenia and how to progress the knowledge and recognition of sarcopenia.