Appenzeller, Simone

Introduction Cognitive symptoms such as ‘brain fog’ are frequent and disabling in patients with SLE. We aimed to develop and validate the Lupus Brain Fog Severity Scale (LBFSS), the first patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for cognitive symptoms in SLE. Methods The LBFSS was developed using a multi-step international approach involving healthcare professionals and patients with SLE. Patients provided free-text descriptions of brain fog, generating candidate domains through thematic analysis (step 1). Domains were rated for relevance (step 2) and those retained converted into self-assessable items (step 3). The pilot LBFSS was iteratively refined (step 4). The finalised LBFSS was validated (step 5) in a large international SLE cohort. Psychometric evaluation included internal consistency, exploratory factor analysis and assessment of construct, convergent, known-groups and criterion-related validity. Results In step 1, 147 SLE participants across 39 countries generated 21 domains for cognitive symptoms, of which 13 were retained in consensus (step 2), converted into self-assessable items (step 3) and iteratively refined using patient and physician feedback. In step 5, validation of the LBFSS instrument in 378 patients from 36 countries demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α=0.95) and a unidimensional structure explaining 62.2% of variance. LBFSS scores were significantly higher in participants reporting brain fog (p<0.0001), confirming known-group validity. Construct validity was supported by significant correlations with functional impact and symptom severity (ρ=0.46–0.65, p<0.0001), strong convergent validity with the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire-20 (ρ=0.84, p<0.0001) while the discriminative performance for presence versus absence of self-reported brain fog was high (area under the curve=0.85). Conclusion The LBFSS is a new, valid and feasible PROM to assess brain fog and cognitive symptoms in SLE.

Objective To develop and validate classification criteria for pediatric chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis (CNO) jointly supported by EULAR and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR). Methods This international initiative had 4 phases: (1) candidate items were proposed in a survey of pediatric rheumatologists, (2) criteria definition and reduction by Delphi and nominal group technique exercises, (3) criteria weighting using multicriteria decision analysis, and (4) refinement of weights and threshold score in a development cohort of 441 patients and validation in another cohort of 514 patients. Results The new EULAR/ACR classification criteria for CNO require typical radiographic or magnetic resonance imaging findings and bone pain as an obligatory entry criterion and exclusion criteria of malignancy, infection, vitamin C deficiency, and hypophosphatasia, followed by additive weighted criteria in 5 clinical (site of bone lesions, pattern of bone lesions, age at onset, coexisting conditions, fever) and 4 pathology/laboratory domains (bone biopsy findings if done, anemia, C‐reactive protein level, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate). A total score ≥55 is required for classification as CNO. The new criteria had a sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 98% in the validation cohort. Conclusion These new classification criteria for pediatric CNO developed with international input reflect current views about CNO, have high specificity and good sensitivity, and provide a key foundation for future CNO research.

Abstract Objective Childhood SjD (cSjD) is a rare disease. There are no widely accepted diagnostic or classification criteria for cSjD. To fill this gap, members from the CARRA Sjögren Disease Workgroup and the International Childhood Sjögren Disease Workgroup created a clinical diagnostic algorithm. This study evaluated the accuracy of this algorithm using an international cohort of participants with clinician-diagnosed cSjD. Methods First, experts developed a cSjD diagnostic algorithm through a series of virtual workgroup meetings. Using the adult classification criteria as a framework, experts modified the algorithm through opinion and literature review. The group discussed and finalized each algorithm step by achieving majority rule. Then, R statistical software was used to evaluate each participant’s disease status in the diagnostic algorithm via an international cohort of 300 cSjD cases. Results The diagnostic algorithm has three distinct clinical pathways representing the key clinical presentation in cSjD: parotitis, extraglandular manifestations, and sicca symptoms. The algorithm showed an overall sensitivity of 75% in the population that had enough data to complete at least one pathway of the algorithm (n = 100 filtered out of 300). The parotitis (70%) and sicca pathways (82%) had the highest sensitivity, and the extraglandular pathway (52%) had the lowest. Conclusion As cSjD lacks a diagnostic strategy, this algorithm provides a clinical tool for evaluating children with cSjD-like symptoms. It performed well in an international cohort of cSjD, supporting the integration of this algorithm into clinical practice; however, its utility may be limited by low utilization of diagnostic testing in this population.

Abstract Objectives To explore current management practices for PMR by general practitioners (GPs) and rheumatologists including implications for clinical trial recruitment. Methods An English language questionnaire was constructed by a working group of rheumatologists and GPs from six countries. The questionnaire focused on: 1: Respondent characteristics; 2: Referral practices; 3: Treatment with glucocorticoids; 4: Diagnostics; 5: Comorbidities; and 6: Barriers to research. The questionnaire was distributed to rheumatologists and GPs worldwide via members of the International PMR/Giant Cell Arteritis Study Group. Results In total, 394 GPs and 937 rheumatologists responded to the survey. GPs referred a median of 25% of their suspected PMR patients for diagnosis and 50% of these were returned to their GP for management. In general, 39% of rheumatologists evaluated patients with suspected PMR &gt;2 weeks after referral, and a median of 50% of patients had started prednisolone before rheumatologist evaluation. Direct comparison of initial treatment showed that the percentage prescribing &gt;25 mg prednisolone daily for patients was 30% for GPs and 12% for rheumatologists. Diagnostic imaging was rarely used. More than half (56%) of rheumatologists experienced difficulties recruiting people with PMR to clinical trials. Conclusion This large international survey indicates that a large proportion of people with PMR are not referred for diagnosis, and that the proportion of treatment-naive patients declined with increasing time from referral to assessment. Strategies are needed to change referral and management of people with PMR, to improve clinical practice and facilitate recruitment to clinical trials.

Abstract Background The literature regarding clinical olfaction, olfactory loss, and olfactory dysfunction has expanded rapidly over the past two decades, with an exponential rise in the past year. There is substantial variability in the quality of this literature and a need to consolidate and critically review the evidence. It is with that aim that we have gathered experts from around the world to produce this International Consensus on Allergy and Rhinology: Olfaction (ICAR:O). Methods Using previously described methodology, specific topics were developed relating to olfaction. Each topic was assigned a literature review, evidence‐based review, or evidence‐based review with recommendations format as dictated by available evidence and scope within the ICAR:O document. Following iterative reviews of each topic, the ICAR:O document was integrated and reviewed by all authors for final consensus. Results The ICAR:O document reviews nearly 100 separate topics within the realm of olfaction, including diagnosis, epidemiology, disease burden, diagnosis, testing, etiology, treatment, and associated pathologies. Conclusion This critical review of the existing clinical olfaction literature provides much needed insight and clarity into the evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with olfactory dysfunction, while also clearly delineating gaps in our knowledge and evidence base that we should investigate further.

Abstract Objective Sjögren syndrome in children is a poorly understood autoimmune disease. We aimed to describe the clinical and diagnostic features of children diagnosed with Sjögren syndrome and explore how the 2016 ACR/EULAR classification criteria apply to this population. Methods An international workgroup retrospectively collected cases of Sjögren syndrome diagnosed under 18 years of age from 23 centres across eight nations. We analysed patterns of symptoms, diagnostic workup, and applied the 2016 ACR/EULAR classification criteria. Results We identified 300 children with Sjögren syndrome. The majority of patients n = 232 (77%) did not meet 2016 ACR/EULAR classification criteria, but n = 110 (37%) did not have sufficient testing done to even possibly achieve the score necessary to meet criteria. Even among those children with all criteria items tested, only 36% met criteria. The most common non-sicca symptoms were arthralgia [n = 161 (54%)] and parotitis [n = 140 (47%)] with parotitis inversely correlating with age. Conclusion Sjögren syndrome in children can present at any age. Recurrent or persistent parotitis and arthralgias are common symptoms that should prompt clinicians to consider the possibility of Sjögren syndrome. The majority of children diagnosed with Sjögren syndromes did not meet 2016 ACR/EULAR classification criteria. Comprehensive diagnostic testing from the 2016 ACR/EULAR criteria are not universally performed. This may lead to under-recognition and emphasizes a need for further research including creation of paediatric-specific classification criteria.