Hauge, Ellen‐Margrethe

Objectives Rheumatoid factor (RF) and anticitrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) are linked to disease activity, severity and cardiovascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Since RA-related inflammation associates with cardiovascular disease, we investigated whether RF and ACPA status influence the relationship between RA activity and event risk. Methods We assessed 3952 cardiovascular disease-free patients with prevalent RA registered in an international observational consortium between 1985 and 2012. Main outcome was a first major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) including myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death. Follow-up accrued from enrolment until first MACE or censoring. Multivariable Cox models stratified by centre risk evaluated disease activity, RF, ACPA and their interactions. Results We recorded 184 first MACE events over 22 981 patient-years. Disease activity associated with MACE (HR 1.18 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.35)), whereas RF (HR 1.26 (0.82 to 1.94)) and ACPA (HR 1.25 (0.85 to 1.83)) did not reach statistical significance, though CIs were wide and a clinically meaningful association cannot be excluded. A three-way interaction between disease activity, RF and ACPA on MACE (p for interaction=0.044) was observed. RA activity associated with MACE in seronegative and double seropositive (p≤0.047), but not single RF-positive or ACPA-positive patients. Among RF-negative participants, RA activity was linked to MACE in ACPA-negative but not positive ones (p for interaction=0.003). Among ACPA-positive patients, disease activity was linked to MACE in RF-positive but not RF-negative ones (p for interaction=0.040). Conclusions Disease activity may better discriminate inflammation-driven cardiovascular risk in seronegative and double seropositive than single RF-positive or ACPA-positive patients. Risk protection through lowering disease activity may be serostatus dependent.

Objectives Female sex and anticitrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) are associated with higher disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Since disease-related inflammation is linked to cardiovascular risk, we explored whether sex and ACPA influenced the association between disease activity at study entry and cardiovascular risk in established RA. Methods We evaluated 4008 patients with prevalent RA from an international observational cohort enrolled between 1985 and 2012. Outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke) and ischaemic cardiovascular events (iCVE: MACE, angina, revascularisation, transient ischaemic attack and peripheral arterial disease). Follow-up accrued from enrolment until the first event or censoring. Multivariable Cox models stratified by centre risk evaluated disease activity, sex, ACPA and their interactions. Results We documented 193 MACE and 299 iCVE. Disease activity and sex were associated with MACE (all p≤0.017) and iCVE (p≤0.005) but ACPA was only associated with MACE (p=0.043). A three-way interaction on MACE (p=0.034) but not iCVE was noted. Among ACPA-negative patients, disease activity was associated with MACE in males (HR 1.57 (95% CI 1.14 to 2.16)) but not females (p-for-interaction=0.022). Among ACPA-positive patients, neither the disease activity x sex interaction (p=0.929), nor main effect of disease activity on MACE (p=0.124) was significant, but male sex was (HR 1.61 (95% CI 1.15 to 2.27)). Among females, neither disease activity x ACPA interaction (p=0.523) nor disease activity (p=0.319) was significant for MACE, but ACPA was (HR 1.57 (95% CI 1.02 to 2.42)). Conclusions The effect of disease activity at enrolment on cardiovascular risk in prevalent RA varies across patient groups with different sex and ACPA characteristics.

Objectives The impact of body mass index (BMI) on cardiovascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is unclear. RA characteristics may influence the association between BMI and risk. Disease activity, which predicts cardiovascular risk, is associated with obesity only among anticitrullinated antibody (ACPA)-positive patients. Biologics alter body composition and mitigate cardiovascular risk in RA. We explored the association of BMI with cardiovascular risk and whether this varied across ACPA status and biologic use. Methods We evaluated 3982 patients from an international observational cohort. Outcomes included (a) first major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) encompassing myocardial infarction, stroke or cardiovascular death; and (b) all events comprising MACE, angina, revascularisation, transient ischaemic attack, peripheral arterial disease and heart failure. Multivariable Cox models stratified by centre risk evaluated the impact of BMI, ACPA, biologics and their two- and three-way interactions on outcomes. Results We recorded 192 MACE and 319 total events. No main effects of BMI, ACPA or biologics were observed. A three-way interaction between them on MACE (p-interaction<0.001) and all events (p-interaction=0.028) was noted. Among ACPA negative patients, BMI was inversely associated with MACE (HR 0.38 (95% CI 0.25 to 0.57)) and all events (HR 0.67 (0.49 to 0.92)) in biologic users but not non-users (p-for-interaction <0.001 and 0.012). Among ACPA-positive patients, BMI was associated with MACE (HR 1.04 [1.01–1.07]) and all events (HR 1.03 (1.00 to 1.06)) independently of biologic use. Conclusions BMI is inversely associated with cardiovascular risk only among ACPA-negative biologic users. In contrast, BMI is associated with cardiovascular risk in ACPA-positive patients independently of biologic use.

Abstract Objectives To explore current management practices for PMR by general practitioners (GPs) and rheumatologists including implications for clinical trial recruitment. Methods An English language questionnaire was constructed by a working group of rheumatologists and GPs from six countries. The questionnaire focused on: 1: Respondent characteristics; 2: Referral practices; 3: Treatment with glucocorticoids; 4: Diagnostics; 5: Comorbidities; and 6: Barriers to research. The questionnaire was distributed to rheumatologists and GPs worldwide via members of the International PMR/Giant Cell Arteritis Study Group. Results In total, 394 GPs and 937 rheumatologists responded to the survey. GPs referred a median of 25% of their suspected PMR patients for diagnosis and 50% of these were returned to their GP for management. In general, 39% of rheumatologists evaluated patients with suspected PMR &gt;2 weeks after referral, and a median of 50% of patients had started prednisolone before rheumatologist evaluation. Direct comparison of initial treatment showed that the percentage prescribing &gt;25 mg prednisolone daily for patients was 30% for GPs and 12% for rheumatologists. Diagnostic imaging was rarely used. More than half (56%) of rheumatologists experienced difficulties recruiting people with PMR to clinical trials. Conclusion This large international survey indicates that a large proportion of people with PMR are not referred for diagnosis, and that the proportion of treatment-naive patients declined with increasing time from referral to assessment. Strategies are needed to change referral and management of people with PMR, to improve clinical practice and facilitate recruitment to clinical trials.