Citations

BackgroundThe cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers amyloid β (Aβ)‐42, total‐tau (T‐tau), and phosphorylated‐tau (P‐tau) demonstrate good diagnostic accuracy for Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, there are large variations in biomarker measurements between studies, and between and within laboratories. The Alzheimer's Association has initiated a global quality control program to estimate and monitor variability of measurements, quantify batch‐to‐batch assay variations, and identify sources of variability. In this article, we present the results from the first two rounds of the program.MethodsThe program is open for laboratories using commercially available kits for Aβ, T‐tau, or P‐tau. CSF samples (aliquots of pooled CSF) are sent for analysis several times a year from the Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory at the Mölndal campus of the University of Gothenburg, Sweden. Each round consists of three quality control samples.ResultsForty laboratories participated. Twenty‐six used INNOTEST enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay kits, 14 used Luminex xMAP with the INNO‐BIA AlzBio3 kit (both measure Aβ‐(1‐42), P‐tau(181P), and T‐tau), and 5 used Meso Scale Discovery with the Aβ triplex (AβN‐42, AβN‐40, and AβN‐38) or T‐tau kits. The total coefficients of variation between the laboratories were 13% to 36%. Five laboratories analyzed the samples six times on different occasions. Within‐laboratory precisions differed considerably between biomarkers within individual laboratories.ConclusionsMeasurements of CSF AD biomarkers show large between‐laboratory variability, likely caused by factors related to analytical procedures and the analytical kits. Standardization of laboratory procedures and efforts by kit vendors to increase kit performance might lower variability, and will likely increase the usefulness of CSF AD biomarkers.

Abstract In order to identify novel targets and clinically exploitable vulnerabilities, we performed high-throughput RNA-interference (RNAi) synthetic lethality screening using myeloid cell lines TF-1 and ML-2 in combination with the hypomethylating agent 5-Azacytidine. A custom small interfering RNA (siRNA) library targeting nearly 1000 cancer-associated genes, including the human kinome, was utilized. Bcl-XL emerged as the strongest 5-Azacytidine sensitizing target in the erythroid cell line TF-1 but not in ML-2 cells. Additional siRNA sequences targeting Bcl-XL were transfected into a panel of myeloid cell lines and tested in drug dose response experiments using a ten-point serial dilution of 5-Azacytidine. The erythroid differentiated myeloid cell lines TF-1 and HEL both exhibited a 3 to 4-fold reduction in the IC50 of 5-Azacytidine upon knockdown of Bcl-XL, whereas IC50 values for non-erythroid, myeloid cell lines ML-2, THP-1 and MDS-L were unchanged. Furthermore, we tested lentiviral delivery of short-hairpin RNA (shRNA) targeting Bcl-XL in additional cell lines. Lentiviral knockdown of Bcl-XL confirmed 2 to 3-fold 5-Azacytidine sensitization in TF-1 and HEL cells while U937, HL-60, ML-2, THP-1 and MDS-L were not sensitized by Bcl-XL knockdown. Interestingly, while Bcl-XL knockdown with shRNA potentiated the effects of 5-Azacytidine in TF-1 and HEL, Bcl-XL knockdown alone resulted in considerable reductions in cell viability in TF-1 and HEL cells. These results demonstrate erythroid lineage-specific responses to Bcl-XL knockdown and suggest that Bcl-XL may represent an erythroid lineage-specific therapeutic vulnerability. To begin to explore this possibility we examined the putative BH3 mimetics Gossypol, Obatoclax and ABT-737 with 5-Azacytidine drug dose response experiments in myeloid cell lines. Neither Gossypol nor Obatoclax potentiated the effects of 5-Azacytdine. In striking contrast, ABT-737 resulted in a 2 to 4-fold reduction in the IC50 of 5-Azacytidine in all cell lines tested to date (TF-1, HEL, ML-2 and THP-1). ABT-737 sensitization to 5-Azacytidine was dose dependent. Furthermore, Combination Index (CI) values calculated with Calcusyn software demonstrate synergy between ABT-737 and 5-Azacytidine at clinically relevant concentrations. These results suggest that inhibition of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family members with a BH3 mimetic may represent an effective strategy for 5-Azacytidine combination therapy that can be directly translated into design of combination clinical trials in patients with myeloid leukemias. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-128.

Abstract The molecular target(s) cooperating with proteasome inhibition in multiple myeloma (MM) remain unknown. We therefore measured proliferation in MM cells transfected with 13 984 small interfering RNAs in the absence or presence of increasing concentrations of bortezomib. We identified 37 genes, which when silenced, are not directly cytotoxic but do synergistically potentiate the growth inhibitory effects of bortezomib. To focus on bortezomib sensitizers, genes that also sensitized MM to melphalan were excluded. When suppressed, the strongest bortezomib sensitizers were the proteasome subunits PSMA5, PSMB2, PSMB3, and PSMB7 providing internal validation, but others included BAZ1B, CDK5, CDC42SE2, MDM4, NME7, RAB8B, TFE3, TNFAIP3, TNK1, TOP1, VAMP2, and YY1. The strongest hit CDK5 also featured prominently in pathway analysis of primary screen data. Cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (CDK5) is expressed at high levels in MM and neural tissues with relatively low expression in other organs. Viral shRNA knockdown of CDK5 consistently sensitized 5 genetically variable MM cell lines to proteasome inhibitors (bortezomib and carfilzomib). Small-molecule CDK5 inhibitors were demonstrated to synergize with bortezomib to induce cytotoxicity of primary myeloma cells and myeloma cell lines. CDK5 regulation of proteasome subunit PSMB5 was identified as a probable route to sensitization.

AbstractA paucity of validated kinase targets in human multiple myeloma has delayed clinical deployment of kinase inhibitors in treatment strategies. We therefore conducted a kinome-wide small interfering RNA (siRNA) lethality study in myeloma tumor lines bearing common t(4;14), t(14;16), and t(11;14) translocations to identify critically vulnerable kinases in myeloma tumor cells without regard to preconceived mechanistic notions. Fifteen kinases were repeatedly vulnerable in myeloma cells, including AKT1, AK3L1, AURKA, AURKB, CDC2L1, CDK5R2, FES, FLT4, GAK, GRK6, HK1, PKN1, PLK1, SMG1, and TNK2. Whereas several kinases (PLK1, HK1) were equally vulnerable in epithelial cells, others and particularly G protein–coupled receptor kinase, GRK6, appeared selectively vulnerable in myeloma. GRK6 inhibition was lethal to 6 of 7 myeloma tumor lines but was tolerated in 7 of 7 human cell lines. GRK6 exhibits lymphoid-restricted expression, and from coimmunoprecipitation studies we demonstrate that expression in myeloma cells is regulated via direct association with the heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) chaperone. GRK6 silencing causes suppression of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) phosphorylation associated with reduction in MCL1 levels and phosphorylation, illustrating a potent mechanism for the cytotoxicity of GRK6 inhibition in multiple myeloma (MM) tumor cells. As mice that lack GRK6 are healthy, inhibition of GRK6 represents a uniquely targeted novel therapeutic strategy in human multiple myeloma.

Hacs1, a SH3 and SAM domain‐containing adaptor protein, is up‐regulated by IL‐4 in activated B cells and strongly expressed in dendritic cells. To elucidate the function of Hacs1 in immune regulation, we generated Hacs1 − / − mice by deletion of the SH3 and SAM domains. Hacs1 − / − mice were viable and fertile and had normal bone marrow B‐cell development and normal splenic T‐ and B‐cell populations. However, adult Hacs1 − / − mice had increased peritoneal Bla cells (IgM + CD5 + ). On immunization with T‐cell‐independent antigen TNP‐Ficoll, Hacs1 − / − mice had increased production of anti‐TNP IgM and IgG3. Purified splenic B cells from Hacs1 − / − mice showed increased cell proliferation on BCR (B‐cell receptor) stimulation. We further demonstrate that the Hacs1 − / − B cells had increased global tyrosine phosphorylation, including tyrosine kinases Lyn and Akt. Both T‐helper type 1 (T h 1) and T‐helper type 2 (T h 2) humoral responses were enhanced in Hacs1 − / − mice. In vitro bone marrow‐derived Hacs1 − / − dendritic cells showed increased IL‐12 production on stimulation with ovalbumin (OVA). This study suggests that Hacs1 is an immunoinhibitory adaptor that might be a useful target for immune suppression therapy.—Wang, D., Stewart, A. K., Zhuang, L., Zhu, Y., Wang, Y., Shi, C., Keating, A., Slutsky, A., Zhang, H., Wen, X.‐Y. Enhanced adaptive immunity in mice lacking the immunoinhibitory adaptor Hacs1. FASEBJ. 24, 947–956 (20l0). www.fasebj.org

Abstract Agonists of TLR have been explored as vaccine adjuvants for tumor immunotherapy. However, their immunological consequences are not fully understood. Although TLR signaling increases the functional potential of dendritic cells (DCs) for priming T cells, coinduction of potentially negative immunoregulatory capacities may impair effector T cell generation. We examined the expression and function of B7 family costimulatory molecules on DCs after activation with the TLR3 agonist, polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid. We demonstrated that polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid consistently up-regulated both B7-2 and B7-H1 molecules on resident, migratory DCs from spleen and lymph nodes. Depletion or blockade of B7-H1 on activated DCs increased the magnitude of effector CD8 T cell expansion. DC-based or protein-based tumor vaccines, in combination with B7-H1 blockade, induced strong effector CD8 T cell responses, resulting in protective immunity against newly established tumors. Our studies suggest that TLR3 signaling has the potential to up-regulate both positive and negative coregulatory molecules on APCs. Selective blockade of negative regulatory molecules in combination with TLR3 agonist may be an effective strategy for increasing the efficacy of tumor vaccines.