Citations

ImportanceProgressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy can occur in the context of systemic sarcoidosis (S-PML) in the absence of therapeutic immune suppression and can initially be mistaken for neurosarcoidosis or other complications of sarcoidosis. Earlier recognition of S-PML could lead to more effective treatment of the disease.ObjectiveTo describe characteristics of patients with S-PML.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsFor this case series, records from 8 academic medical centers in the United States were reviewed from 2004 to 2022. A systematic review of literature from 1955 to 2022 yielded data for additional patients. Included were patients with S-PML who were not receiving therapeutic immune suppression. The median follow-up time for patients who survived the acute range of illness was 19 months (range, 2-99). Data were analyzed in February 2023.ExposuresSarcoidosis without active therapeutic immune suppression.Main Outcomes and MeasuresClinical, laboratory, and radiographic features of patients with S-PML.ResultsTwenty-one patients with S-PML not receiving therapeutic immune suppression were included in this study, and data for 37 patients were collected from literature review. The median age of the 21 study patients was 56 years (range, 33-72), 4 patients (19%) were female, and 17 (81%) were male. The median age of the literature review patients was 49 years (range, 21-74); 12 of 34 patients (33%) with reported sex were female, and 22 (67%) were male. Nine of 21 study patients (43%) and 18 of 31 literature review patients (58%) had simultaneous presentation of systemic sarcoidosis and PML. Six of 14 study patients (43%) and 11 of 19 literature review patients (58%) had a CD4+ T-cell count greater than 200/μL. In 2 study patients, a systemic flare of sarcoidosis closely preceded S-PML development. Ten of 17 study patients (59%) and 21 of 35 literature review patients (60%) died during the acute phase of illness. No meaningful predictive differences were found between patients who survived S-PML and those who did not.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this case series, patients with sarcoidosis developed PML in the absence of therapeutic immune suppression, and peripheral blood proxies of immune function were often only mildly abnormal. Systemic sarcoidosis flares may rarely herald the onset of S-PML. Clinicians should consider PML in any patient with sarcoidosis and new white matter lesions on brain magnetic resonance imaging.

Abstract Background/Aims Flares following COVID-19 vaccination are an emerging concern among patients with rare rheumatic disease like idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IIMs), whereas data and understanding of this is rather limited. We aimed to study the prevalence, characteristics and determinants of IIM flares following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods CoVAD (COVID-19 Vaccination In Autoimmune Diseases) surveys are global patient self-reported e-surveys from 109 countries conducted in 2021 and 2022. Flares of IIM were defined by 4 definitions; a. patient self-reported, b. physician and immunosuppression (IS) denoted, c. sign directed (new erythematous rash, or worsening myositis or arthritis), d. MCID worsening of PROMISPF10a score between the patients who had taken both surveys. Descriptive statistics and multivariate regression were used to describe the predictors of flare. Cox-regression analysis was used to differentiate flares by IIM subtypes. Results Among the 1,278 IIM patients, aged 63 (50-71) years, 276 (21.5%) were dermatomyositis, 237 (18.5%) IBM, 899 (70.3%) were female and most were Caucasian (80.8%). Flares of IIM were seen in 123/1278 (9.6%), 163/1278 (12.7%), 112/1278 (8.7%), and 16/96 (19.6%) by definitions a-d respectively with median time to flare being 71.5 (10.7-235) days. Muscle weakness (69.1%), and fatigue (56.9%) were the most common symptoms of flare. The predictors of self-reported flare were: inactive/disease in remission prior to first dose of vaccine (OR = 4.3, 95%CI=2.4-7.6), and anxiety disorder (OR = 2.2, 95%CI=1.1-4.7). Rituximab use (OR = 0.3, 95%CI=0.1-0.7) and IBM (OR = 0.3, 95%CI=0.1-0.7) were protective. Physician defined flares were seen more often in females, mixed ethnicity, and those with asthma, ILD, and anxiety disorder (OR ranging 1.6-7.0, all p < 0.05). Notably, overlap myositis (OM) had higher HR for flare compared to polymyositis (HR = 2.3, 95%CI=1.2-4.4, p = 0.010). Conclusion Nearly one in ten individuals with IIM develop flares after vaccination, more so among women, those with overlap myositis, and inactive disease prior to vaccination. Formal definition of flares in IIM is needed. Disclosure L. Gupta: None. N. R: None. Z. Griger: None. V. Agarwal: None. P. Sen: None. M. Joshi: None. S. Saha: None. K. Jagtap: None. O. Distler: Honoraria; Abbvie, Acceleron, Alcimed, Amgen, AnaMar, Arxx, Baecon, Blade, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, ChemomAb, Corbus, CSL Behring, Galapagos, Glenmark, GSK, Horizon (Curzion), Inventiva, iQvia, Kymera, Lupin, Medac, Medscape, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Novartis, Roche, Roivant, Sanofi, Serodapharm, Topadur and UCB. E. Nikiphorou: Honoraria; Celltrion, Pfizer, Sanofi, Gilead, Galapagos, AbbVie, and Lilly. Grants/research support; Pfizer and Lilly. A. Tan: Honoraria; Abbvie, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. S. Shinjo: None. N. Ziade: Honoraria; Pfizer, Roche, Abbvie, Eli Lilly, NewBridge, Sanofi-Aventis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, and Pierre Fabre. M. Milchert: None. I. Parodis: Honoraria; Amgen, AstraZeneca, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, Elli Lilly and Company, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Novartis and F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG. M. Kuwana: None. A. Makol: None. J. Pauling: None. C. Wincup: None. J. Lilleker: Honoraria; Sanofi Genzyme, Roche, and Biogen. A. Nune: None. J. Day: Grants/research support; CSL Limited. H. Chinoy: Consultancies; Novartis, Eli Lilly, Orphazyme, Astra Zeneca. Honoraria; UCB, and Biogen. Grants/research support; Eli Lilly and UCB. V. Agarwal: None. R. Aggarwal: Consultancies; Bristol Myers-Squibb, Pfizer, Genentech, Octapharma, CSL Behring, Mallinckrodt, AstraZeneca, Corbus, Kezar, Abbvie, Janssen, Alexion, Argenx, Q32, EMD-Serono, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Roivant.

Abstract Background/Aims Post COVID-19 syndrome (PCS) is an emerging cause of morbidity and poor quality of life in COVID-19 survivors. We aimed to assess the prevalence, risk factors, outcomes, and association with disease flares of PCS in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs) and non-rheumatic autoimmune diseases (nrAIDs), both vulnerable groups understudied in the current literature using data from the 2nd COVID-19 Vaccination in Autoimmune Diseases (COVAD) global multicentre patient self-reported e-survey. Methods The survey was circulated from February to July 2022 by the international COVAD Study Group (157 collaborators from 106 countries), and demographics, comorbidities, AIRD/nrAID status, COVID-19 history, vaccination details, and PROMIS physical and mental function were recorded. PCS was defined as symptom resolution time >90 days following acute COVID-19. Predictors of PCS were analysed using regression models for the different groups. Results 7666 total respondents completed the survey. Of these, 2650 respondents with complete responses had positive COVID-19 infection, and 1677 (45.0% AIRDs, 12.5% nrAIDs, 42.5% HCs) completed the survey >90 days post acute COVID-19. Of these, 136 (8.1%) had PCS. Prevalence of PCS was higher in AIRDs (10.8%) than healthy controls HCs (5.3%) (OR: 2.1; 95%CI: 1.4-3.1, p = 0.002). Across the entire cohort, a higher risk of PCS was seen in women (OR: 2.9; 95%CI: 1.1-7.7, p = 0.037), patients with long duration of AIRDs/nrAIDs (OR 1.01; 95%CI: 1.0-1.02, p = 0.016), those with comorbidities (OR: 2.8; 95%CI: 1.4-5.7, p = 0.005), and patients requiring oxygen supplementation for severe acute COVID-19 (OR: 3.8; 95%CI: 1.1-13.6, p = 0.039). Among patients with AIRDs, comorbidities (OR 2.0; 95%CI: 1.08-3.6, p = 0.026), and advanced treatment (OR: 1.9; 95%CI: 1.08-3.3, p = 0.024), or intensive care (OR: 3.8; 95%CI: 1.01-14.4, p = 0.047) for severe COVID-19 were risk factors for PCS. Notably, patients who developed PCS had poorer PROMIS global physical [15 (12-17) vs 12 (9-15)] and mental health [14 (11-16) vs 11 (8-14)] scores than those without PCS. Conclusion Individuals with AIRDs have a greater risk of PCS than HCs. Associated comorbid conditions, and advanced treatment or intensive care unit admission for severe COVID-19 confer a higher risk of PCS. It is imperative to identify risk factors for PCS for immediate multidisciplinary management in anticipation of poor physical and mental health. Disclosure L. Gupta: None. P. Sen: None. N. R: None. M. Joshi: None. S. Saha: None. K. Jagtap: None. V. Agarwal: None. O. Distler: Consultancies; Abbvie, Acceleron, Alcimed, Amgen, AnaMar, Arxx, Baecon, Blade, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, ChemomAb, Corbus, CSL Behring, Galapagos, Glenmark, GSK, Horizon (Curzion), Inventiva, iQvia, Kymera, Lupin, Medac, Medscape, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Novartis, Roche, Roivant, Sanofi, Serodapharm, Topadur and UCB. E. Nikiphorou: Honoraria; Celltrion, Pfizer, Sanofi, Gilead, Galapagos, AbbVie, and Lilly. Grants/research support; Pfizer and Lilly. A. Tan: Honoraria; Abbvie, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. S. Shinjo: None. N. Ziade: Honoraria; Pfizer, Roche, Abbvie, Eli Lilly, NewBridge, Sanofi-Aventis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, and Pierre Fabre. M. Milchert: None. I. Parodis: Honoraria; Amgen, AstraZeneca, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, Elli Lilly and Company, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Novartis and F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG. M. Kuwana: None. A. Makol: None. J.D. Pauling: None. C. Wincup: None. J. Lilleker: Honoraria; Sanofi Genzyme, Roche, and Biogen. A. Nune: None. J. Day: Grants/research support; CSL Limited. H. Chinoy: Consultancies; Novartis, Eli Lilly, Orphazyme, Astra Zeneca. Honoraria; UCB, and Biogen. Grants/research support; Eli Lilly and UCB. V. Agarwal: None. R. Aggarwal: Consultancies; Bristol Myers-Squibb, Pfizer, Genentech, Octapharma, CSL Behring, Mallinckrodt, AstraZeneca, Corbus, Kezar, Abbvie, Janssen, Alexion, Argenx, Q32, EMD-Serono, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Roivant.

Abstract Objectives Disease flares in the post–coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination period represent a prominent concern, though risk factors are poorly understood. We studied these flares among patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) and other autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs). Methods The COVAD-1 and -2 global surveys were circulated in early 2021 and 2022, respectively, and we captured demographics, comorbidities, AIRDs details, COVID-19 infection history and vaccination details. Flares of IIMs were defined as (a) patient self-reported, (b) immunosuppression (IS) denoted, (c) clinical sign directed and (d) with >7.9-point minimal clinically significant improvement difference worsening of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) PROMISPF10a score. Risk factors of flares were analysed using regression models. Results Of 15 165 total respondents, 1278 IIMs (age 63 years, 70.3% female, 80.8% Caucasians) and 3453 AIRDs were included. Flares of IIM were seen in 9.6%, 12.7%, 8.7% and 19.6% patients by definitions (a) to (d), respectively, with a median time to flare of 71.5 (10.7–235) days, similar to AIRDs. Patients with active IIMs pre-vaccination (OR 1.2; 95% CI 1.03, 1.6, P = 0.025) were prone to flares, while those receiving rituximab (OR 0.3; 95% CI 0.1, 0.7, P = 0.010) and AZA (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1, 0.8, P = 0.016) were at lower risk. Female gender and comorbidities predisposed to flares requiring changes in IS. Asthma (OR 1.62; 95% CI 1.05, 2.50, P = 0.028) and higher pain visual analogue score (OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.11, 1.27, P < 0.001) were associated with disparity between self-reported and IS-denoted flares. Conclusion A diagnosis of IIMs confers an equal risk of flares in the post–COVID-19 vaccination period to AIRDs, with active disease, female gender and comorbidities conferring a higher risk. Disparity between patient- and physician-reported outcomes represents a future avenue for exploration.

Background: Tuina has gained widespread attention and utilization for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP). However, evidence-based guidance for choosing accurate and appropriate outcome measures of Tuina is lacking. The objective of this study is to systematically synthesize the existing outcome measures reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating Tuina therapy in CNLBP. Methods: Electronic literature searches were conducted in multiple English and Chinese databases from their inception to May 2022. RCTs were included if they involved clinical outcome measures in Tuina treatment for patients with CNLBP. Outcome instruments for each study were extracted and analyzed. Evidence from included studies were assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Results: Of the 735 identified articles, 17 articles with 1628 participants were included. Measurement domains in these RCTs were mainly reported in terms of pain (94%) and physical activity (71%), followed by safety (41%), Chinese medicine outcome (35%), and quality of life (12%). Moreover, several limitations with existing outcomes were reported, including lack of emphasis on the evaluation of quality of life, inadequate safety monitoring, as well as insufficient and vague Chinese medicine outcome measures. All trials were deemed to be of poor methodological quality. Conclusion: Pain and physical disability were the most frequently studied outcome domains in CNLBP treated by Tuina therapy. More rigorous and high-quality trials with appropriately selected outcome measures are needed in the future.

Background: Recognition of the causes of early mortality after atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation is essential for the improvement of patient safety. This study sought to determine the causes of early mortality (≤90 days) after AF ablation. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of AF ablation from January 1, 2013, to December 1, 2021 at the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Phoenix, and Jacksonville). Causes of death were identified through a comprehensive chart review of the electronic health record from within the Mayo Clinic system and outside records when available. Results: A total of 6723 patients were included in the study. The 90-day all-cause mortality rate was 0.22% (n=15). Among all 90-day deaths, majority of the deaths (73.3%) did not have a direct relationship with the procedure. Sudden death was the most common cause of early death (20%), followed by peri-procedural stroke (13%), respiratory failure (13%), atrioesophageal fistula (13%), infection (7%), heart failure (7%), and traumatic brain injury (7%). The 90-day mortality rate directly due to AF ablation procedural complications was 0.06% (n=4). Conclusions: AF ablation procedure has a 90-day mortality of 0.22%, and the most common cause of early mortality was sudden death. The majority (73.3%) of early mortality was not directly associated with a procedural complication, and the mortality rate due to complications associated with the AF ablation procedure was low at 0.06%. Further studies are required to investigate causes and risk factors associated with sudden death in this patient population.

AbstractIt has been challenging to target mutant KRAS (mKRAS) in colorectal cancer (CRC) and other malignancies. Recent efforts have focused on developing inhibitors blocking molecules essential for KRAS activity. In this regard, SOS1 inhibition has arisen as an attractive approach for mKRAS CRC given its essential role as a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for this GTPase. Here, we demonstrated the translational value of SOS1 blockade in mKRAS CRC. We used CRC patient‐derived organoids (PDOs) as preclinical models to evaluate their sensitivity to SOS1 inhibitor BI3406. A combination of in silico analyses and wet lab techniques was utilized to define potential predictive markers for SOS1 sensitivity and potential mechanisms of resistance in CRC. RNA‐seq analysis of CRC PDOs revealed two groups of CRC PDOs with differential sensitivities to SOS1 inhibitor BI3406. The resistant group was enriched in gene sets involving cholesterol homeostasis, epithelial−mesenchymal transition, and TNF‐α/NFκB signaling. Expression analysis identified a significant correlation between SOS1 and SOS2 mRNA levels (Spearman's ρ 0.56, p < 0.001). SOS1/2 protein expression was universally present with heterogeneous patterns in CRC cells but only minimal to none in surrounding nonmalignant cells. Only SOS1 protein expression was associated with worse survival in patients with RAS/RAF mutant CRC (p = 0.04). We also found that SOS1/SOS2 protein expression ratio >1 by immunohistochemistry (p = 0.03) instead of KRAS mutation (p = 1) was a better predictive marker to BI3406 sensitivity of CRC PDOs, concordant with the significant positive correlation between SOS1/SOS2 protein expression ratio and SOS1 dependency. Finally, we showed that GTP‐bound RAS level underwent rebound even in BI3406‐sensitive PDOs with no change of KRAS downstream effector genes, thus suggesting upregulation of guanine nucleotide exchange factor as potential cellular adaptation mechanisms to SOS1 inhibition. Taken together, our results show that high SOS1/SOS2 protein expression ratio predicts sensitivity to SOS1 inhibition and support further clinical development of SOS1‐targeting agents in CRC.

ImportanceChronic hemodynamically significant aortic regurgitation (AR) is associated with excess risk of death, yet data for Asian patients are lacking, and whether Asian patients can abide by Western guidelines as to when aortic valve surgery should be performed is unknown.ObjectiveTo assess AR presentation and cutoffs of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), LV end-systolic dimension index (LVESDi), and LV end-systolic volume index (LVESVi) that are associated with risk of death in Asian patients with AR.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients with chronic, moderately severe to severe AR from 3 tertiary referral centers (2 in Japan and 1 in Taiwan) from June 11, 2008, through November 19, 2020, with follow-up through November 11, 2021.ExposuresAortic regurgitation severity, graded by a comprehensive integrated approach.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was the association between volume-derived LVEF, LVESDi, and LVESVi and all-cause death (ACD). The secondary outcome was the association of these LV indexes with cardiovascular death (CVD). Clinical and echocardiographic data were analyzed retrospectively. A de novo disk-summation method was used to derive LV volumes and volume-derived LVEF.ResultsOf 1259 patients (mean [SD] age, 64 [17] years; 934 [74%] male), 515 (41%) were Japanese and 744 (59%) were Taiwanese. The median follow-up was 4.1 years (IQR, 1.56-7.24 years). The mean (SD) body surface area was 1.67 (0.21) m2; LVEF, 55% (11%); LVESDi, 24.7 (5.7) mm/m2; LVESVi, 50.1 (28.0) mL/m2; and indexed mid–ascending aorta size, 24.7 (5.5) mm/m2. Aortic valve surgery occurred in 483 patients (38%); 240 patients (19%) died during follow-up. Overall mean (SD) 8-year survival was 74% (2%). Separate multivariate models adjusted for covariates demonstrated independent associations of LVEF, LVESDi, and LVESVi with ACD (LVEF: hazard ratio [HR] per 10%, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70-0.92; P = .002; LVESDi: HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.06; P = .002; LVESVi: HR per 10 mL/m2, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.05-1.17; P &amp;lt; .001) and CVD (LVEF: HR per 10%, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56-0.85; P &amp;lt; .001; LVESDi: HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.09; P = .01; LVESVi per 10 mL/m2: HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06-1.24; P &amp;lt; .001). In the total cohort, spline curves showed that mortality started to increase for an LVEF of 53% or less, LVESDi of 22 mm/m2 or greater, and LVESVi of 46 mL/m2 or greater for both ACD and CVD. Early surgery was beneficial in 3 strata of LVESDi (&amp;lt;20, 20 to &amp;lt;25, and ≥25 mm/m2) and 2 strata of LVESVi (&amp;lt;46 and ≥46 mL/m2).Conclusions and RelevanceThis multicenter cohort study of Asian patients with hemodynamically significant AR found cutoff values of LVEF, LVESDi, and LVESVi that were associated with increased risk of death. These findings suggest that Western guidelines seem applicable in Asian patients and, most importantly, that indexed LV parameters with a lower cutoff could be used in discriminating patients with excess mortality risk.