Citations

Abstract Background The incidence of very early onset inflammatory bowel disease (VEOIBD) is increasing, yet the phenotype and natural history of VEOIBD are not well described. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with VEOIBD (6 years of age and younger) between 2008 and 2013 at 25 North American centers. Eligible patients at each center were randomly selected for chart review. We abstracted data at diagnosis and at 1, 3, and 5 years after diagnosis. We compared the clinical features and outcomes with VEOIBD diagnosed younger than 3 years of age with children diagnosed with VEOIBD at age 3 to 6 years. Results The study population included 269 children (105 [39%] Crohn’s disease, 106 [39%] ulcerative colitis, and 58 [22%] IBD unclassified). The median age of diagnosis was 4.2 years (interquartile range 2.9–5.2). Most (94%) Crohn’s disease patients had inflammatory disease behavior (B1). Isolated colitis (L2) was the most common disease location (70% of children diagnosed younger than 3 years vs 43% of children diagnosed 3 years and older; P = 0.10). By the end of follow-up, stricturing/penetrating occurred in 7 (6.6%) children. The risk of any bowel surgery in Crohn’s disease was 3% by 1 year, 12% by 3 years, and 15% by 5 years and did not differ by age at diagnosis. Most ulcerative colitis patients had pancolitis (57% of children diagnosed younger than 3 years vs 45% of children diagnosed 3 years and older; P = 0.18). The risk of colectomy in ulcerative colitis/IBD unclassified was 0% by 1 year, 3% by 3 years, and 14% by 5 years and did not differ by age of diagnosis. Conclusions Very early onset inflammatory bowel disease has a distinct phenotype with predominantly colonic involvement and infrequent stricturing/penetrating disease. The cumulative risk of bowel surgery in children with VEOIBD was approximately 14%–15% by 5 years. These data can be used to provide anticipatory guidance in this emerging patient population.

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) involves the infusion of hematopoietic progenitor cells into patients with hematologic disorders with the goal of re-establishing normal hematopoietic and immune function. HCT is classified as autologous or allogeneic based on the origin of hematopoietic cells. Autologous HCT uses the patient’s own cells while allogeneic HCT uses hematopoietic cells from a human leukocyte antigen-compatible donor. Allogeneic HCT is a potentially curative treatment option for patients with certain types of hematologic malignancies, and autologous HCT is primarily used to support patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy. Advances in HCT methods and supportive care in recent decades have led to improved survival after HCT; however, disease relapse and posttransplant complications still commonly occur in both autologous and allogeneic HCT recipients. Allogeneic HCT recipients may also develop acute and/or chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), which results in immune-mediated cellular injury of several organs. The NCCN Guidelines for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation focus on recommendations for pretransplant recipient evaluation and the management of GVHD in adult patients with malignant disease.

Abstract Up to 85% of adult cancer survivors and 99% of adult survivors of childhood cancer live with an accumulation of chronic conditions, frailty, and/or cognitive impairments resulting from cancer and its treatment. Thus, survivors often show an accelerated development of multiple geriatric syndromes and need therapeutic interventions. To advance progress in this area, the National Cancer Institute convened the second of 2 think tanks under the auspices of the Cancer and Accelerated Aging: Advancing Research for Healthy Survivors initiative. Experts assembled to share evidence of promising strategies to prevent, slow, or reverse the aging consequences of cancer and its treatment. The meeting identified research and resource needs, including geroscience-guided clinical trials; comprehensive assessments of functional, cognitive, and psychosocial vulnerabilities to assess and predict age-related outcomes; preclinical and clinical research to determine the optimal dosing for behavioral (eg, diet, exercise) and pharmacologic (eg, senolytic) therapies; health-care delivery research to evaluate the efficacy of integrated cancer care delivery models; optimization of intervention implementation, delivery, and uptake; and patient and provider education on cancer and treatment-related late and long-term adverse effects. Addressing these needs will expand knowledge of aging-related consequences of cancer and cancer treatment and inform strategies to promote healthy aging of cancer survivors.

Abstract CXCR4, the chemokine receptor for stromal derived factor-1 (SDF-1) plays an important role in the homing and migration of hematopoietic stem cells. Selective inhibition of the binding of the CXCR4 receptor by the molecule AMD3100 leads to the mobilization of hematopoietic progenitors, including CD34+ cells into the circulation, even in the steady state. Preliminary studies have indicated that AMD3100 given 10–11 hours before each apheresis along with standard doses of G-CSF mobilizes more CD34+ cells per kilogram than does G-CSF alone. A Phase II study of this combination in patients with NHL and myeloma is underway. G-CSF at 10μg/kg/day for a duration of up to 9 days is administered with AMD3100 at 240 μg/kg/day starting on the evening of day 4 of G-CSF therapy, (10–11 hours prior to first and subsequent daily aphereses) until 5 x 106 CD34/kg are collected, or for a maximum of 5 days of a standard 3 blood volume apheresis. Both agents are administered subcutaneously. To date 20 patients (myeloma-6, NHL-14) have been enrolled and analyzed. Of these 20, 14 are considered to have been ‘heavily pre-treated’ using standard definitions (≥ 10 cycles of chemotherapy, platinum based salvage chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy to bone marrow sites). Blood CD34 assays (cells/μl) were performed before and after each AMD 3100 dose and on each apheresis product. After the first dose of AMD3100 there was a 2.6 fold increase in CD34/μl in blood (23 → 60 CD34+ cells/μl). The median number of apheresis performed was 2 (range 1–5); the median total CD34 collected for all 20 patients was 5.7 x 106/kg (range 2.32–14.58 x 106/kg). All patients had collections of > 2.0 x106 CD34/kg, and in 12 of 20 the 5 x 106 CD34/kg cell dose goal was collected, including 8 of 14 in the heavily pre-treated group. In fact in 6, the 5 x 106 CD34/kg cell dose was collected in a single apheresis. The median CD34/kg cell dose collected for the 14 heavily pre-treated patients was 5.7 x 106/kg (2.32–6.48 x 106/kg). There were no serious AE’s related to the use of AMD3100. Transient GI toxicity (mostly diarrhea) occurred in 10 of 20 patients shortly after the injections of AMD3100, but only 3 required therapy. Engraftment data is available for the first 12 patients treated. Time to ANC >500/μl and platelets > 20,000/μl was 9 (range 8–10) and 12 (range 9–19) days respectively. This novel combination of AMD3100 and G-CSF appears to be effective in mobilizing large numbers of CD34+ cells, even in patients considered to be heavily pre-treated, and is an effective alternative to chemotherapy/cytokine mobilization. Compared to studies of G-CSF alone, this combination may reduce the number of apheresis procedures needed to collect an adequate graft for rapid hematopoietic engraftment. The study is ongoing with accrual to date of 40 patients.

We examined the impact of a group-based self-empowerment intervention among diabetes patients, which uses multidisciplinary education, collaborative learning, peer support, and development of diabetes-specific social capital to improve glycemic control and weight management. Thirty-five patients who had primary care established at the Prisma Health Upstate, Internal Medicine Resident clinic and held the diagnosis of diabetes for longer than one year were recruited for our single-arm pilot intervention. Each group intervention session involved one to two internal medicine resident physician facilitators, a clinical diabetic educator, and 5–10 patients. Each session had a framework facilitated by the resident, with most of the discussion being patient-led, aiming to provide a collaborative learning environment and create a support group atmosphere to encourage self-empowerment. Patients’ hemoglobin A1c level and body mass index (BMI) before the intervention and 3 to 6 months after completion were collected from the laboratory results obtained in the participants’ routine clinic visits. All graduates from this three-week intervention were invited to attend monthly maintenance sessions, and we tracked the HgbA1c measures of 29 JUMP graduates one year after the intervention, even though 13 of the 29 chose not to participate in the monthly maintenance sessions. The pre-intervention HgbA1c level averaged 8.84%, whereas the post-intervention HgbA1c level averaged 7.81%. A paired t test showed that this pre–post difference of 1.03 percentage points was statistically significant (p = 0.0007). For BMI, there was an average decline of 0.78 from the pre-intervention mean value of 40.56 to the post-intervention mean value of 39.78 (p = 0.03). Among the 29 participants who agreed to participate in our follow-up measure of their HgbA1c status one year after the intervention, a paired t test showed that there was no significant difference between the post-JUMP measure and the follow-up measure (p = 0.808). There was no statistically significant difference between the HgbA1c level of those participating in the maintenance program and that of those not participating (post-intervention t test of between-group difference: p = 0.271; follow-up t test of between-group difference: p = 0.457). Our single-arm, pilot study of the three-week group intervention of self-empowerment shows promising results in glycemic control and weight loss. The short duration and small number of sessions expected could make it more feasible for implementation and dissemination as compared with popular intervention protocols that require much longer periods of attendance, if the effectiveness of this patient group-based self-empowerment approach can be further established by randomized controlled studies in the future.

11085 Background: The College of American Pathologists (CAP), the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC), and the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) jointly initiated an effort to establish evidence-based recommendations for the molecular analysis of lung cancers required to guide EGFR- and ALK-directed therapies, addressing which patients and samples should be tested, and when and how testing should be performed. Methods: Three co-chairs without relevant conflicts of interest were selected, one from each of the sponsoring societies: CAP (P.T.C.), IASLC (M.L.), and AMP (N.I.L.). Writing and advisory panels were formed from additional experts from these societies. Unbiased literature searches were performed to capture articles up to February 2012, yielding 1,533 articles whose abstracts were screened to identify 521 pertinent articles that were then reviewed in detail for relevance. Evidence was formally graded for each of the recommendations first formulated by the co-chairs and panel members at a public meeting. Each guideline section was assigned to at least two panelists. Successive drafts were circulated for comments to the writing panel, the advisory panel, the public (online posting), and the three professional societies. Results: We generated 37 guideline items addressing 14 areas of EGFR and ALK testing. The major, evidence-based recommendations are to test for EGFR mutations and ALK fusions in all patients with advanced stage adenocarcinoma, regardless of sex, race, or smoking history, and to prioritize EGFR and ALK testing over other molecular predictive tests. Recommendations and expert consensus opinions were generated for all other key aspects of EGFR and ALK testing in lung cancer related to oncology and pathology practice and technical issues in molecular testing. Conclusions: As scientific discoveries and clinical practice outpace the completion of randomized clinical trials, evidence-based guidelines developed by expert practitioners are vital for communicating emerging clinical standards and thereby improving patient outcomes.

e14555 Background: This study was done to assess the toxicity and efficacy of IMRT for anal cancer in a multi-institutional setting. Methods: Records of 152 total patients (pts) were reviewed retrospectively. Data on disease control and toxicity were collected as well as pt and treatment characteristics. Acute (<6 months) and late (>6 months) severe toxicity (grade >3) were recorded at each institution. Four were excluded for either presence of metastatic disease (2) or stage TX (2). There was data for late toxicity on 120 pts. Results: T stage was T1 in 28, T2 in 79, T3 in 29 and T4 in 12 pts. N stage was N0 in 77, N1 in 40, N2 in 19 and N3 in 12 pts. The median age was 56 yrs and median follow-up was 26.8 months. Cumulative IMRT dose was 51.25 Gy (median) (range: 4.32-61.2 Gy) in a median of 28 fractions (2-34). Chemotherapy was given in all but 2 pts and the most common regimen was 5- fluorouracil plus mitomycin-C. The median total elapsed treatment time was 40 days. Local control at 3 yrs was 87% and was significantly worse for patients with T3-4 disease (79% vs 90% at 3 years; p=0.04). There was no correlation between dose and local control. Regional control, distant control and overall survival were 97%, 91%, and 87% at 3 yrs, respectively. Nodal status was associated with regional and distal control as well as overall survival (p<0.01 for each). The most common acute severe toxicity was hematologic (41%). Severe acute GI, skin or other toxicity was 11%, 20% and 1% respectively. There were two grade 5 toxicities (hematologic and GI). Severe late toxicity was limited to skin (1%) and GI (3%). Conclusions: IMRT resulted in excellent local control in this multi-institutional cohort of pts. Although T stage did predict for worse local control, most pts with T3-4 disease were controlled with IMRT. Nodal status predicts for regional and distal control as well as overall survival. Severe toxicity was acceptable with this technique.

1006 Background: Patients (pts) with ER-/PR- MBC do not benefit from endocrine treatment (tx). Doane et al (Oncogene 2006;25:3994) described a subset of ER-/PR- BC with a gene expression profile similar to ER+ BC but characterized by AR expression and AR-dependent growth in vitro. Hence, we conducted a multicenter phase II trial (NCT00468715) of the AR antagonist, bicalutamide (B) for pts with AR+ ER-/PR- MBC. Methods: Pts with ER-/PR- (IHC <10%) MBC were consented to AR testing, confirmed centrally at MSKCC. If AR+ (DAKO IHC ≥10%), pts were eligible for tx if ECOG performance status (PS) <2 and normal organ function. No limit on prior tx except prior trastuzumab required if HER2+. Eligible AR+ pts who consented to tx received B 150mg orally daily in 28-day cycles (C). Toxicity assessed q4wks, response q12wks. Primary endpoint = clinical benefit rate (CBR): CR + PR + stable disease (ds) >6mo (SD). B would be considered worthy of further study if ≥4/28 pts have clinical benefit. Results: As of 12/21/11,436 pts consented for AR testing. 24 were ineligible, 12 await testing. 47/400 tested were AR+ (12%). 26 received tx with B (6 ineligible for tx, 15 are eligible for tx with B at progression (POD) if clinically appropriate and study slots remains). Two AR+ pts treated with B were ER+ and removed from study. Three have received tx <12wks. Treated pt characteristics (n=24): median(med)age 64 (41-83), PS 0 (0-1), HER2+ 1, visceral metastases 17. Prior chemotherapy: neo/adjuvant 16; med # regimens for MBC 1 (0-8). Med C# 3 (2-49+). Best response: (21 evaluable pts): CBR 19% (95% CI 5-42%), SD>6mo 4, CR/PR 0, SD<6mo 3, POD 14. Conclusions: ~12% of ER-/PR- MBC pts are AR+. For these pts, AR-inhibition with B is feasible, well tolerated, and has activity based on pre-specified criteria. This study has closed to accrual for AR testing as of 1/2012. These results of the primary endpoint are not expected to change by accrual of the 2 remaining pts. Supported by TBCRC/Breast Cancer Alliance/AstraZeneca. [Table: see text]

605 Background: Pre-clinical and nonrandomized clinical data support synergy of the combination of bevacizumab and trastuzumab. We conducted a randomized double-blinded phase III trial of chemotherapy/trastuzumab ± bevacizumab to evaluate efficacy (PFS after treatment initiation) of the addition of bevacizumab in first-line treatment of HER2+ MBC. Methods: Days 1, 8 and 15 paclitaxel ± carboplatin were administered with trastuzumab and either placebo or bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks for a total of 6 months. Antibody therapy was then continued without chemo every 3 weeks, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Disease assessments were performed every 3 months. Results: Ninety-six of the planned 489 analyzable patients (pts) were accrued between 2007 and 2009, at which time the study terminated due to poor accrual. Seventy % of pts were post-menopausal, 60% had ER+/HER2+ BC. Median age was 55 years (28-80). Outcomes and toxicities are summarized on the tables below. Median follow-up was 30 months. Conclusions: The combination of chemotherapy, trastuzumab, and bevacizumab did not significantly increased toxicity, and was overall safe and well tolerated. No significant differences in clinical benefit were observed between both treatment arms. Data on CTCs and Quality of Life will be presented at the meeting. This study was conducted by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (Robert L. Comis, MD, Chair) and supported in part by Public Health Service Grants CA23318, CA66636, CA21115, CA32291, CA31946, CA49957, CA27525, CA14548, CA17145, CA32102, CA25224, CA49. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]