Calandra, Gary

Abstract Introduction: We previously reported that plerixafor + G-CSF was as safe as and more effective than placebo + G-CSF in mobilizing hematopoietic stem cell for autologous transplant in patients with non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL) through 100 days follow-up (DiPersio ASH 2007). We report herein the 12 months data. Methods: This was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. NHL patients requiring an autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant were eligible. Patients received G-CSF (10 μg/kg) subcutaneously daily for up to 8 days. Beginning on evening of Day 4 and continuing daily for up to 4 days, patients received either plerixafor (240 μg/kg) or placebo subcutaneously. Starting on morning of Day 5, patients began daily apheresis for up to 4 days or until ≥ 5 x 106 CD34+cells/kg were collected. We report herein the 12 months graft durability and hematology data. Results: As reported previously, 89/150 (59%) patients in the plerixafor group and 29/148 (20%) patients in the placebo group met the primary endpoint of collecting ≥ 5 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg in ≤ 4 days of apheresis, p < 0.001. 135 patients (90%) in plerixafor group and 82 patients (55%) in placebo group underwent transplantation. Median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was similar in both groups. There were no differences in graft durability through 12 months follow-up between the two groups. Two plerixa for treated patients had graft failure (one had pre-existing MDS and one developed AML). One plerixafor-treated patient had delayed platelet engraftment. The hematology profiles were similar between the two groups through 12 months follow-up, except that patients in the plerixafor group had significantly higher platelet count at 12 months than patients in the placebo group (p=0.026) (Table 1). During the 12 months follow-up, 14/135 (10.4%) patients in plerixafor group and 10/82 (12.2%) patients in the placebo group died. 7/14 in the plerixafor group and 5/10 in the placebo group died of disease progression. Plerixafor + G-CSF Placebo + G-CSF Hematology data presented as mean ± SD and n= number of patients with available data aAll patients who underwent transplantation bAll patients who underwent transplantation and had laboratory data at the study visit cP values were NS for all variables at all time points between groups except for platelet count at 12 months (p=0.026) Graft durability (n, %) 100 daysa 128/135 (94.8%) 78/82 (95.1%) 6 monthsb 120/123 (97.6%) 77/78 (98.7%) 12 monthsb 110/112 (98.2%) 65/65 (100.0%) Platelet (x 109/L) 100 days 183 ± 83 (n= 113) 169 ± 81 (n=63) 6 months 190 ± 78 (n=100) 180 ± 77 (n=64) 12 monthsc 209 ± 81 (n=50) 170 ± 78 (n=37) Neutrophils (x 109/L) 100 days 3.1 ± 1.7 (n=107) 3.2 ± 2.1 (n=61) 6 months 3.3 ± 1.4 (n=98) 3.8 ± 2.6 (n=64) 12 months 3.5 ± 1.4 (n=50) 4.2 ± 2.7 (n=38) Hemogloblin (mg/dL) 100 days 12.3 ± 1.5 (n=112) 12.3 ± 1.5 (n=63) 6 months 12.5 ± 1.5 (n=100) 12.4 ± 1.5 (n=64) 12 months 13.0 ± 1.4 (n=50) 12.7 ± 1.6 (n=37) Conclusions: The addition of plerixafor to G-CSF resulted in higher CD34+ cell collection in fewer days of apheresis and higher proportion of patients proceeding to transplant than G-CSF alone. Importantly, this 12 months report showed that transplants with cells collected with plerixafor resulted in graft durability rates that were similar to cells collected with G-CSF alone.

Abstract CXCR4, the chemokine receptor for stromal derived factor-1 (SDF-1) plays an important role in the homing and migration of hematopoietic stem cells. Selective inhibition of the binding of the CXCR4 receptor by the molecule AMD3100 leads to the mobilization of hematopoietic progenitors, including CD34+ cells into the circulation, even in the steady state. Preliminary studies have indicated that AMD3100 given 10–11 hours before each apheresis along with standard doses of G-CSF mobilizes more CD34+ cells per kilogram than does G-CSF alone. A Phase II study of this combination in patients with NHL and myeloma is underway. G-CSF at 10μg/kg/day for a duration of up to 9 days is administered with AMD3100 at 240 μg/kg/day starting on the evening of day 4 of G-CSF therapy, (10–11 hours prior to first and subsequent daily aphereses) until 5 x 106 CD34/kg are collected, or for a maximum of 5 days of a standard 3 blood volume apheresis. Both agents are administered subcutaneously. To date 20 patients (myeloma-6, NHL-14) have been enrolled and analyzed. Of these 20, 14 are considered to have been ‘heavily pre-treated’ using standard definitions (≥ 10 cycles of chemotherapy, platinum based salvage chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy to bone marrow sites). Blood CD34 assays (cells/μl) were performed before and after each AMD 3100 dose and on each apheresis product. After the first dose of AMD3100 there was a 2.6 fold increase in CD34/μl in blood (23 → 60 CD34+ cells/μl). The median number of apheresis performed was 2 (range 1–5); the median total CD34 collected for all 20 patients was 5.7 x 106/kg (range 2.32–14.58 x 106/kg). All patients had collections of > 2.0 x106 CD34/kg, and in 12 of 20 the 5 x 106 CD34/kg cell dose goal was collected, including 8 of 14 in the heavily pre-treated group. In fact in 6, the 5 x 106 CD34/kg cell dose was collected in a single apheresis. The median CD34/kg cell dose collected for the 14 heavily pre-treated patients was 5.7 x 106/kg (2.32–6.48 x 106/kg). There were no serious AE’s related to the use of AMD3100. Transient GI toxicity (mostly diarrhea) occurred in 10 of 20 patients shortly after the injections of AMD3100, but only 3 required therapy. Engraftment data is available for the first 12 patients treated. Time to ANC >500/μl and platelets > 20,000/μl was 9 (range 8–10) and 12 (range 9–19) days respectively. This novel combination of AMD3100 and G-CSF appears to be effective in mobilizing large numbers of CD34+ cells, even in patients considered to be heavily pre-treated, and is an effective alternative to chemotherapy/cytokine mobilization. Compared to studies of G-CSF alone, this combination may reduce the number of apheresis procedures needed to collect an adequate graft for rapid hematopoietic engraftment. The study is ongoing with accrual to date of 40 patients.

Abstract Introduction: We previously reported that plerixafor + G-CSF was as safe as and more effective than placebo + G-CSF in mobilizing hematopoietic stem cell for autologous transplant in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) through 100 days follow-up (DiPersio ASH 2007). We report herein the 12 months data. Methods: This is a phase 3, multi-center, randomized (1:1), double-blind, placebocontrolled study. Multiple myeloma patients requiring an autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant, in first or second complete or partial remission were eligible. Patients received G-CSF (10μg/kg/day) subcutaneously for up to 8 days. Beginning on evening of Day 4 and continuing daily for up to 4 days, patients received either plerixafor (240μg/kg) or placebo subcutaneously. Starting on Day 5, patients began daily apheresis for up to 4 days or until ≥ 6 x 106 CD34+cells/kg were collected. We report herein the 12 months graft durability and hematology data. Results: As reported previously, the primary endpoint of collecting ≥ 6 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg in ≤ 2 days of apheresis was met in 106/148 (71.6%) patients in the plerixafor group and 53/154 (34.4%) patients in the placebo group, p<0.001. 142 (96%) patients in plerixafor group and 136 (88%) patients in placebo group underwent transplantation. Median time to PMN and PLT engraftment was similar in both groups. Through 12 months follow-up, there were no differences in graft durability and hematology profiles between groups (Table 1). Over the 12 months, 6/142 (4.2%) patients in the plerixafor group and 5/136 (3.7%) patients in the placebo group died. Of the patients who died, 2 patients in the plerixafor group and 2 patients in the placebo grouped died due to disease progression. Plerixafor + G-CSF Placebo + G-CSF Hematology data presented as mean ± SD and n=number of patients with available data P values were NS for all variables at all time points between groups aAll patients who underwent transplantation bAll patients who underwent transplantation and had laboratory data at the study visit Graft durability (n, %) 100 daysa 140/142 (98.6%) 133/136 (97.8%) 6 monthsb 133/135 (98.5%) 125/127 (98.4%) 12 monthsb 127/128 (99.2%) 119/120 (99.2%) Platelet (x 109/L) 100 days 226 ± 80 (n=90) 210 ± 88 (n=87) 6 months 218 ± 67 (n=95) 209 ± 89 (n=93) 12 months 204 ± 69 (n=53) 205 ± 80 (n=54) Neutrophils (x 109/L) 100 days 3.3 ± 2.3 (n=88) 3.0 ± 1.7 (n=80) 6 months 3.4 ± 1.6 (n=90) 3.5 ± 1.8 (n=88) 12 months 3.1 ± 1.1 (n=52) 3.6 ± 2.1 (n=52) Hemoglobin (mg/dL) 100 days 12.5 ± 1.5 (n=89) 12.6 ± 1.3 (n=86) 6 months 12.7 ± 1.4 (n=94) 12.7 ± 1.6 (n=92) 12 months 12.9 ± 1.8 (n=53) 13.1 ± 1.5 (n=54) Conclusions: The addition of plerixafor to G-CSF resulted in higher CD34+ cell collection in fewer days of apheresis than G-CSF alone. Importantly, this 12 months report showed that transplants with cells collected with plerixafor resulted in graft durability rates that were similar to cells collected with G-CSF alone.

Abstract Abstract 3230 Poster Board III-167 Background Pre-apheresis peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cells of < 20 cells/μl is a significant risk factor for poor hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) mobilization and collection in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) undergoing autologous HSC transplantation (auto-HSCT). PB CD34+ cells are routinely monitored to optimize the timing and success of HSC collection after mobilization with cytokines ± chemotherapy. This analysis was designed to compare the efficacy of plerixafor + G-CSF to placebo + G-CSF for mobilization in patients with MM who had pre-apheresis PB CD34+ cell counts < 20 cells/μl. We hypothesized that the addition of plerixafor to G-CSF would improve the stem cell yield in these patients with baseline CD34+ cells < 20 cells/μl. Methods Data were obtained from a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial that compared the safety and efficacy of plerixafor (0.24 mg/kg/day SC) + G-CSF (10 μg/kg/day) to placebo + G-CSF for mobilization and auto-HSCT in patients with MM. PB CD34+ cell count was measured on Day 4, prior to first plerixafor/placebo dose, and on Day 5, 10-11 hours post study treatment. The proportion of patients achieving the minimal (≥2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg) or optimal (≥6 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg) cell doses in 2 apheresis days, apheresis yields, and time to engraftment were compared between the plerixafor and placebo groups for PB CD34+ cell count <10 cells/μl (PB<10) and <20 cells/μl (PB<20). Results In the plerixafor group (n=148), 27 (18%) and 56 (38%) patients had Day 4 PB CD34+ cells/μl <10 and <20 which was as expected identical to the 30 (19%) and 60 (39%) patients in the placebo group, respectively (n=154). Patient characteristics were similar in both groups. Plerixafor + G-CSF resulted in a statistically significant increase in the absolute PB CD34+ cells/ml on Day 5 compared to placebo + G-CSF (p<0.001; Table 1). For patients with PB <10, the median fold increase in PB CD34+ cells in the plerixafor (n = 27) vs. placebo (n = 30) groups was 9.6 vs. 2 (p<0.001). Similarly, for patients with PB <20 the median fold increase in PB CD34+ cells in the plerixafor (n = 56) vs. placebo (n = 60) groups was 6.6 vs. 2 (p<0.001).The median CD34+ cell yield after 2 aphereses was significantly higher in the plerixafor vs. placebo group: 5.44 vs.1.68 × 106 cells/kg (p<0.001; PB<10) and 7.06 vs. 3.27 × 106 cells/kg (p<0.001; PB <20). The proportion of patients achieving ≥2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg in 2 aphereses was significantly higher in the plerixafor group compared to the placebo group: 92.6% vs. 43.3 % in patients with PB<10 (p<0.001), and 94.6% vs. 66.7% in patients with PB<20 (p<0.001). Similarly, the proportion of patients achieving ≥6 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg in 2 apheresis days was significantly higher in the plerixafor vs. placebo group: 40.7% vs. 3.3 % in patients with PB<10 (p<0.001), and 55.4% vs. 15% in patients with PB<20 (p<0.001). The median time to platelet (19-20 days) and neutrophil (11 days) engraftment was similar in both groups. Conclusions These data demonstrate that in patients with MM who are predicted to fail mobilization based on low PB CD34+ cell count, the addition of plerixafor to G-CSF allows for 2-day collection of the minimal and optimal cell dose in a greater proportion of patients compared to G-CSF alone. Thus, addition of plerixafor to G-CSF can decrease the risk of poor mobilization in patients with MM who have PB CD34+ cell counts < 20 or even < 10 cells/μl. Disclosures Nademanee: Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Stadtmauer:Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Micallef:Genzyme Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Stiff:Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Marulkar:Genzyme Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Calandra:Genzyme Corporation: Consultancy, Equity Ownership. DiPersio:Genzyme: Honoraria.

Abstract Abstract 33 Background: Circulating levels of peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cells/μl are a strong predictor of hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) yields in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) undergoing autologous HSC transplantation (auto-HSCT), and are routinely monitored to optimize the timing and success of HSC collection after cytokine ± chemotherapy mobilization. The threshold PB CD34+ cell count to initiate apheresis varies from 5-20 cells/μl, depending on the institution. This analysis compared the efficacy of plerixafor + G-CSF to placebo + G-CSF for HSC mobilization in NHL patients with pre-apheresis PB CD34+ cells/μl <10. Methods: Data were obtained from a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial comparing the safety and efficacy of plerixafor (0.24 mg/kg/day SC) + G-CSF (10 μg/kg/day) to placebo + G-CSF for mobilization and auto-HSCT in NHL patients. PB CD34+ cell count was measured on Day 4, before the first plerixafor/placebo dose, and on Day 5, 10-11 hours post study drug treatment. The proportion of patients collecting ≥2 × 106 (minimal) or ≥5 × 106 (optimal) CD34+ cells/kg, apheresis yields, and time to engraftment were compared between the plerixafor and placebo groups for patients with PB CD34+ cells/μl <10. Results: 77/150 (51%) patients and 73/148 (49%) patients in the plerixafor and placebo groups, respectively, had PB CD34+ cells/μl <10 on Day 4, prior to the first dose of study drug. Patient characteristics were similar between both groups. As shown in Table 1, addition of plerixafor to G-CSF resulted in a statistically significant increase in the absolute PB CD34+ cells/μl on Day 5 compared to G-CSF alone (p<0.001). The median fold increase in PB CD34+ cells from Day 4 to Day 5 was significantly higher in plerixafor-treated patients vs. placebo-treated patients: 6.0-fold vs. 1.6-fold (p<0.001). In these hard to mobilize patients, the median CD34+ cell yield after 2 days was significantly higher with plerixafor + G-CSF compared to placebo + G-CSF: 2.92 vs.0.94 × 106 cells/kg (p<0.001), respectively. The median CD34+ cell yield after 4 days was also significantly higher in the plerixafor vs. placebo groups: 3.96 vs.1.25 × 106 cells/kg (p<0.001). Plerixafor + G-CSF allowed a significantly greater proportion of patients with PB CD34+ cells/μl <10 to collect the minimal cell dose in 4 apheresis days: 77.9% vs. 34.2 % patients in the plerixafor and placebo group, respectively collected ≥2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg in 4 days (p<0.001). The success rate of collecting the ≥5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg in 4 days was 40.3% with plerixafor + G-CSF compared to only 9.6% with placebo + G-CSF (p<0.001). The proportion of patients collecting the optimal or minimal cell dose in 2 days was also significantly higher in the plerixafor vs. placebo group (p<0.001). The median time to platelet (19-21 days) and neutrophil (10-11 days) engraftment was similar in both groups. Similar, statistically significant increases in PB CD34+ cell collections were obtained when the efficacy of plerixafor + G-CSF was compared to placebo + G-CSF, in patients with a Day 4 PB CD34 cells/μl<20 (data not shown). Conclusions: Plerixafor + G-CSF allowed collection of the minimal transplantable cell dose in 78% patients with PB CD34+ cells/μl <10. These data show that adding plerixafor to G-CSF substantially reduces the risk of mobilization failure in patients with NHL predicted to be poor mobilizers based on low PB CD34+ cell counts. Thus, mobilization with plerixafor + G-CSF in patients with PB CD34+ cells/μl <10 increases stem cell collection efficiency allowing patients to pursue auto-HSCT with more optimal cell doses. Disclosures: Maziarz: Genzyme Corp.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Micallef:Genzyme Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Stiff:Genzyme Corp.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Bolwell:Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Marulkar:Genzyme Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Calandra:Genzyme Corporation: Consultancy, Equity Ownership. DiPersio:Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria.

Abstract AMD3100, Plerixafor (A)+G-CSF (G) have safely and effectively allowed aHSC mobilization in Phase I and II studies. This Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study compared the safety and efficacy of A+G versus Placebo (P)+G to mobilize and transplant patients with NHL. Methods: Adult NHL patients requiring an aHSC transplant, in first or second CR or PR were eligible to participate. Patients received G (10μg/kg/day) subcutaneously (SQ) for 4 days. On the evening of Day 4, patients received either A (240μg/kg SQ) or P. Patients underwent apheresis on Day 5 after an AM dose of G and 10–11 hours after administration of study treatment. Patients continued to receive the evening dose of study treatment, followed by AM dose of G and apheresis for up to a total of 4 aphereses or until ≥5 x 106 CD34+cells/kg were collected. Only study cells were used for transplant. Patients who failed to mobilize ≥2 x 106 CD34+cells/kg could enter into a rescue arm of A+G, without unblinding of randomized treatment. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who achieved ≥5 x 106 CD34+cells/kg in 4 or less aphereses days. All patients will be followed for ≥12 months post-transplant. Results: 298 patients were enrolled and randomized. All patients have completed 100 days follow-up and are included in this intent-to-treat analysis. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The primary endpoint was met in 89/150 (59%) patients in the A+G group and 29/148 (20%) patients in the P+G group, p<0.0001. 130/150 (87%) patients in the A+G group and 70/148 (47%) patients in the P+G group collected ≥2 x 106 CD34+cells/kg in 4 or less aphereses days, p<0.0001. Kaplan-Meir Estimates of Time to Trget Collection of ≥ × 106 CD34 + cells/kg Kaplan-Meir Estimates of Time to Trget Collection of ≥ × 106 CD34 + cells/kg The figure shows that more patients in the A+G group reached target after 1 day of apheresis than patients in the P+G group after 4 days of apheresis. A+G rescue was successful in 33/52 rescue patients in the P+G group and 4/10 rescue patients in the A+G group. 135 patients (90%) in A+G group and 82 patients (55%) in P+G group underwent transplantation. Median time to engraftment was Day 10 for PMN and Day 20 for platelets in both groups. Through 100 days, grafts were durable in all but 2 A+G (133/135) patients and in all P+G (82) patients. A+G patients experienced a higher incidence of GI effects (mild to moderate) and injection site erythema than P+G patients. There were 2 drug related serious adverse events in the A+G group and 1 in the P+G group. Conclusions: In this study, the addition of AMD3100 to G-CSF is generally safe and well tolerated and is superior to G-CSF alone for aHSC mobilization in NHL patients. A+G patients were statistically significantly more likely to achieve target cell collection quicker and to achieve sufficient cells for successful transplant than P+G patients.

Abstract AMD3100, Plerixafor (A)+G-CSF (G) have effectively allowed aHSC mobilization in Phase I and II studies. This Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study compares the safety and efficacy of A+G Vs. placebo (P)+G to mobilize and transplant patients with MM. Methods: Adult MM patients requiring an aHSC transplant, in first or second CR or PR were eligible to participate. Patients were declared for single or tandem transplant with the second transplant occurring within 6 months from the first. Patients received G (10μg/kg/day) subcutaneously (SQ) for 4 days; on the evening of Day 4 they received either A (240μg/kg SQ) or P. Patients underwent apheresis on Day 5 after an AM dose of G and 10–11 hours after administration of study treatment. Patients continued to receive the evening dose of study treatment followed by AM dose of G and apheresis for up to a total of 4 apheresis or until ≥6 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg were collected. Patients who failed to collect ≥2 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg were eligible for rescue therapy with A+G, without unblinding of randomized treatment. Only study cells were used for transplant. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who achieved ≥6 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg in 2 or less apheresis days. All patients will be followed for ≥12 months post-transplant. Results: 302 patients were enrolled and randomized into the study. All have completed 100 days follow-up and are included in this intent-to-treat analysis. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The primary endpoint was met in 106/128 (72%) patients in the A+G group and 53/154 (34%) patients in the P+G group, p<0.0001. The figure shows that 54% of A+G patients reached target after 1 day of apheresis but 56% P+G patients required up to 4 days of apheresis to reach target. 7 patients in the P+G group required rescue therapy and all collected ≥2 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg after A+G rescue. 142 patients (96%) in A+G group and 136 patients (88%) in the P+G group underwent transplant. Tandem transplants were performed in 32 and 28 patients in A+G and P+G groups, respectively. Median time to engraftment was Day 11 for PMN and Day 18 for platelets in both groups. Grafts were durable in all patients in both group at ≥100 days post-transplant. Patients in the A+G group experienced more GI effects and injection site erythema than patients in the P+G group. These adverse events were generally mild. There were no drug related serious adverse events in either group. Conclusions: In this study, the addition of AMD3100 to G-CSF is generally safe and well tolerated and is superior to G-CSF alone for aHSC mobilization in MM patients. A+G patients were statistically significantly more likely to achieve target earlier than P+G patients and had successful transplant. Figure Figure

Abstract Background: AMD3100 (plerixafor)+G-CSF (A+G) was generally safe and more effective in mobilizing CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells compared to placebo+G-CSF (P+G) in a Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study conducted in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). In the intent-to-treat analysis, 78/148 (53%) patients in the P+G group and 20/150 (13%) patients in the A+G group failed to mobilize ≥ 2 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg, p<0.0001. Of these failure patients, 52 in the P+G group and 10 in the A+G group consented to enter into the rescue arm of the study. This abstract reports the outcomes of these rescue patients. Methods: Patients enrolled in the Phase III study who failed to mobilize ≥2 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg could enter into the rescue arm of the study and receive A+G. The patient’s treatment assignment in the study remained blinded. Following a rest period of ≥7 days, patients were given G (10 μg/kg/day) subcutaneously (SQ) for 4 days. In the evening around 10PM on Day 4, patients were given a dose of A (240 μg/kg SQ). On Day 5, all patients returned to clinic to receive a morning dose of G before apheresis. Patients continued to receive the evening dose of A followed by morning dose of G and apheresis the next day for up to a total of 4 aphereses or until ≥5 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg were collected. Pooled cells were allowed for transplantation. Results: After rescue therapy, 33/52 (63%) patients who previously failed P+G and 4/10 (40%) patients who previously failed A+G collected ≥2 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg. Seven of the 33 patients who previously failed with P+G collected ≥ 5 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg. Six of the ten A+G patients and 46/52 P+G patients were transplanted. Median time to PMN engraftment was Day 10 and Day 11 for the A+G and P+G groups, respectively. Median time to platelet engraftment was Day 22 and Day 20 for the A+G and P+G groups, respectively. One patient in the P+G group never had platelet counts > 50,000 and was counted as a failure to engraft, even though the patient was clinically stable through 6 months post-transplant. In the re-mobilized group, 9 patients died (2 patients were never transplanted and 7 patients had disease progression). Grafts were durable for ≥100 days in all 6 rescued A+G patients and all 41 rescued P+G patients who engrafted. The predominant adverse events were mild gastrointestinal effects (diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain) and injection site reactions. There were no drug-related serious adverse events reported in these re-mobilized patients. Conclusions: The addition of AMD3100 to G-CSF successfully mobilized sufficient stem cells for transplant in 63% of NHL patients who previously failed mobilization with G-CSF alone. The high success rate is consistent with the Compassionate Use Protocol experience. AMD3100 was generally well tolerated. The 40% success rate in the patients who previously failed AMD3100+G-CSF suggests that re-mobilization with the same combination is a potentially useful strategy for similar patients.

Abstract This phase 3, multicenter, randomized (1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the safety and efficacy of plerixafor with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in mobilizing hematopoietic stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma. Patients received G-CSF (10 μg/kg) subcutaneously daily for up to 8 days. Beginning on day 4 and continuing daily for up to 4 days, patients received either plerixafor (240 μg/kg) or placebo subcutaneously. Starting on day 5, patients began daily apheresis for up to 4 days or until more than or equal to 6 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg were collected. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who collected more than or equal to 6 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg in less than or equal to 2 aphereses. A total of 106 of 148 (71.6%) patients in the plerixafor group and 53 of 154 (34.4%) patients in the placebo group met the primary endpoint (P < .001). A total of 54% of plerixafor-treated patients reached target after one apheresis, whereas 56% of the placebo-treated patients required 4 aphereses to reach target. The most common adverse events related to plerixafor were gastrointestinal disorders and injection site reactions. Plerixafor and G-CSF were well tolerated, and significantly more patients collected the optimal CD34+ cell/kg target for transplantation earlier compared with G-CSF alone. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00103662.