Bolwell, Brian J.

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Obesity is increasingly common in the US and is frequently associated with co-morbid medical conditions that may increase the risk of HCT, often the optimal treatment for AML. HCT risk and outcomes for AML on the basis of body mass index (BMI) have not been well-characterized. Using data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), we have previously shown no significant difference in outcomes for autologous HCT for lymphoma among normal weight, overweight, and obese patients (pts) but worse outcomes for underweight pts (Navarro et al, BBMT 2006, 12(5): 541–51). Here, we compare outcomes by weight groups for AML patients who underwent autologous, related, or unrelated HCT. METHODS: Our final population included patients age ≥ 18 who underwent myeloablative unpurged autologous or allogeneic HCT for AML in 1st or 2nd complete remission, primary induction failure, or 1st relapse reported to the CIBMTR from 1995 to 2004. Cord blood HCTs were excluded. Four weight groups were defined based on BMI (BMI=weight (kg)/ height (m2)): underweight <18; normal=18–25; overweight >25–30; and obese >30. Treatment-related mortality (TRM), relapse, leukemia-free survival (LFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared using multivariable proportional hazards regression analysis accounting for patient, disease and HCT-related variables. RESULTS: We included 373 autologous, 2041 related, and 1801 unrelated transplant recipients. Patient-, disease-, and transplant characteristics were well-matched across weight groups and transplant types. Multivariable analysis examining risks (95% confidence intervals) relative to the normal weight group are: HCT Type Normal Underweight Overweight Obese -- =not done due to insufficient number of pts; NS=not significant; treatment failure = death or recurrence of disease. Autologous n=164 n=5 n=112 n=81 Death -- NS NS Treatment failure -- NS NS Relapse -- NS NS TRM -- NS NS Related Allogeneic n=1161 n=31 n=543 n=268 Death 1.86 (1.24–2.78) NS 1.23 (1.04–1.47) Treatment failure 2.08 (1.37–3.15) NS 1.19 (1.00–1.42) Relapse 2.02 (1.18–3.47) NS NS TRM 2.22 (1.17–4.22) NS 1.32 (1.02–1.70) Unrelated Allogeneic n=846 n=31 n=523 n=368 Death NS NS NS Treatment failure NS NS NS Relapse NS 0.82 (0.68–0.99) 0.76 (0.60–0.96) TRM NS NS NS CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in risk of TRM, LFS, relapse or OS for normal weight, overweight or obese patient groups who received autologous HCT. Obese recipients of related HCT for AML had increased risk of death, treatment failure, and TRM, though the magnitude was small, an effect was not seen in the unrelated HCT group. Underweight patients who received a related, but not unrelated HCT, fared substantially worse than normal weight patients for all outcomes. It may be that the higher risk of the unrelated HCT procedure masks important but less obvious risks associated with being underweight whereas in the related donor HCT setting, such risks become manifest. Small numbers of patients limit the ability to better characterize this finding in underweight patients. Disproportionately, fewer transplants have been reported in underweight patients which suggest they experience disease and patient-related factors that preclude transplantation. No differences were observed for incidence of acute or chronic GVHD for any weight group. Overweight and obesity should not be a barrier to HCT; however, caution should be exercised in selecting underweight patients for HCT.

Abstract Introduction: We previously reported that plerixafor + G-CSF was as safe as and more effective than placebo + G-CSF in mobilizing hematopoietic stem cell for autologous transplant in patients with non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL) through 100 days follow-up (DiPersio ASH 2007). We report herein the 12 months data. Methods: This was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. NHL patients requiring an autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant were eligible. Patients received G-CSF (10 μg/kg) subcutaneously daily for up to 8 days. Beginning on evening of Day 4 and continuing daily for up to 4 days, patients received either plerixafor (240 μg/kg) or placebo subcutaneously. Starting on morning of Day 5, patients began daily apheresis for up to 4 days or until ≥ 5 x 106 CD34+cells/kg were collected. We report herein the 12 months graft durability and hematology data. Results: As reported previously, 89/150 (59%) patients in the plerixafor group and 29/148 (20%) patients in the placebo group met the primary endpoint of collecting ≥ 5 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg in ≤ 4 days of apheresis, p < 0.001. 135 patients (90%) in plerixafor group and 82 patients (55%) in placebo group underwent transplantation. Median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was similar in both groups. There were no differences in graft durability through 12 months follow-up between the two groups. Two plerixa for treated patients had graft failure (one had pre-existing MDS and one developed AML). One plerixafor-treated patient had delayed platelet engraftment. The hematology profiles were similar between the two groups through 12 months follow-up, except that patients in the plerixafor group had significantly higher platelet count at 12 months than patients in the placebo group (p=0.026) (Table 1). During the 12 months follow-up, 14/135 (10.4%) patients in plerixafor group and 10/82 (12.2%) patients in the placebo group died. 7/14 in the plerixafor group and 5/10 in the placebo group died of disease progression. Plerixafor + G-CSF Placebo + G-CSF Hematology data presented as mean ± SD and n= number of patients with available data aAll patients who underwent transplantation bAll patients who underwent transplantation and had laboratory data at the study visit cP values were NS for all variables at all time points between groups except for platelet count at 12 months (p=0.026) Graft durability (n, %) 100 daysa 128/135 (94.8%) 78/82 (95.1%) 6 monthsb 120/123 (97.6%) 77/78 (98.7%) 12 monthsb 110/112 (98.2%) 65/65 (100.0%) Platelet (x 109/L) 100 days 183 ± 83 (n= 113) 169 ± 81 (n=63) 6 months 190 ± 78 (n=100) 180 ± 77 (n=64) 12 monthsc 209 ± 81 (n=50) 170 ± 78 (n=37) Neutrophils (x 109/L) 100 days 3.1 ± 1.7 (n=107) 3.2 ± 2.1 (n=61) 6 months 3.3 ± 1.4 (n=98) 3.8 ± 2.6 (n=64) 12 months 3.5 ± 1.4 (n=50) 4.2 ± 2.7 (n=38) Hemogloblin (mg/dL) 100 days 12.3 ± 1.5 (n=112) 12.3 ± 1.5 (n=63) 6 months 12.5 ± 1.5 (n=100) 12.4 ± 1.5 (n=64) 12 months 13.0 ± 1.4 (n=50) 12.7 ± 1.6 (n=37) Conclusions: The addition of plerixafor to G-CSF resulted in higher CD34+ cell collection in fewer days of apheresis and higher proportion of patients proceeding to transplant than G-CSF alone. Importantly, this 12 months report showed that transplants with cells collected with plerixafor resulted in graft durability rates that were similar to cells collected with G-CSF alone.

Abstract Introduction: The impact of transplanted CD34+ cell dose on clinical outcomes remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between CD34+ cell dose transplanted and platelet, neutrophil, and lymphocyte counts at 100 days, 6, and 12 months following autologous transplantation in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) and multiple myeloma (MM). Methods: Data were obtained from two phase 3 clinical studies that compared the safety and efficacy of plerixafor and G-CSF with placebo and G-CSF in mobilization of hematopoietic blood stem cells for autologous transplantation in NHL patients and in MM patients. The details of the study designs and preliminary safety and efficacy outcomes have been reported (DiPersio, ASH 2007). The following data were obtained from the two clinical study databases: number of CD34+ cells transplanted (first transplant only) as determined by a central laboratory, absolute neutrophil, platelet, red blood cell, and lymphocyte counts at 100 days, 6, and 12 months post-transplant. The proportions of patients who had platelet ≥150 x 109/L or neutrophil ≥2.5 x 109/L or lymphocyte ≥0.5 x 109/L at 100 days, 6, and 12 months were compared among these transplanted CD34+ cell dose categories regardless of mobilization treatment: 2–4 x 106 cells/kg, >4–6 x 106 cells/ kg, and > 6 x 106 cells/kg. Two separate analyses were performed, one for NHL patients and one for MM patients. Results: For the NHL study, 135/150 (90.0%) patients in the plerixafor group underwent transplantation after initial mobilization compared with 82/148 (55.4%) patients in the placebo group, p<0.001. The mean number of CD34+ cells transplanted was 6.06 ± 2.98 x 106 (median 5.41, range 1.79–17.6) for the plerixafor-treated patients and 4.09 ± 1.56 x 106 (median 3.85, range 1.98–8.7) for the placebo-treated patients, p<0.001. For the MM study, 142/148 (95.9%) patients in the plerixafor group and 136/154 (88.3%) patients in the placebo group underwent transplantation. The mean number of CD34+ cells transplanted was 5.84 ± 2.64 x 106 (median 5.34, range 1.9 to 16.7) for the plerixafor-treated patients and 4.37 ± 2.01 x 106 (median 3.98, range 1.8 to 16.9) CD34+ cells/kg for the placebo- treated patients. A significant linear trend with increasing proportion of patients with platelet count ≥150 x 109/L with increasing transplanted cell dose categories was observed at 100 days, 6, and 12 months for NHL patients and at 100 days for MM patients (Table 1). There were no apparent significant relationships between transplanted cell dose categories and other hematopoietic parameters. Table 1: Analysis of percentage of patients reaching a platelet count of ≥ 150 x 109/L by transplanted cell dose categories Transplant Cell Dose (CD34+ cells/kg) 2–4 x 106 ≥ 4–6 x 106 ≥ 6 x 106 P value* NHL Patients N=76 N=75 N=66 100 days 28 (48.3%) 42 (66.7%) 45 (81.8%) <0.001 6 months 31 (56.4%) 36 (66.7%) 42 (76.4%) 0.026 12 months 18 (56.3%) 21 (80.8%) 24 (82.8%) 0.020 MM Patients N=75 N=82 N=64 100 days 41 (68.3%) 57 (90.5%) 47 (88.7%) 0.004 6 months 48 (78.7%) 61 (89.7%) 51 (87.9%) 0.147 12 months 25 (73.5%) 33 (82.5%) 26 (81.3%) 0.435 For all transplanted cell dose categories, the proportions of patients are based on the number of patients with available data at each time point.*p-value for testing linear trend using Mantel-Haenszel Chi-square test Conclusions: Results from these ad hoc analyses confirm previous reports that transplanted cell dose may be associated with better long-term platelet recovery. Due to the small sample size in each transplanted cell dose category and the nature of ad hoc analyses, further studies are warranted to determine if the introduction of plerixafor will allow the mobilization and transplantation of higher quantity of CD34+ cells, which may positively influence long-term hematopoietic recovery.

Abstract Abstract 897 Recent changes in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) including increased use of reduced-intensity conditioning, peripheral blood cells as the graft source (PB) and unrelated donors (URD) warrant re-evaluation of risk factors for acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) and its impact on overall survival (OS). Risk factors for these outcomes were analyzed using more recent data from CIBMTR observational database. Methods: The cohort included adult patients ≥ 20 y transplanted from an HLA-identical sibling (SD) (n=3191) or URD (N=2370) for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL), chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), or myelodsyplastic syndrome (MDS) using a T-cell replete graft from 1999–2005. Six groups were created to evaluate the impact of conditioning [(myeloablative (MA) and reduced-intensity or non-myeloablative (RIC)], total-body irradiation (TBI) and graft source [(bone marrow (BM) or PB] as follows: MA+TBI+PB (group 1), MA+TBI+BM (group 2) MA+ no TBI+PB (group 3), MA+ no-TBI+BM (group 4), RIC+PB (group 5) and RIC+BM (group 6). Separate analyses were performed for SD and URD. IBMTR grade was used to classify aGVHD. A p-value of ≤ 0.01 was considered significant. Results: Among the SD cohort, the probability of aGVHD grade B-D and grade C-D at 100 days was 39% (95% CI, 37–41%) and 16% (95% CI, 14–17%). In multivariate analyses, non-TBI based MA regimens with a BM graft (group 4), RIC conditioning with PB (group 5) and tacrolimus plus methotrexate aGVHD prophylaxis were associated with lower odds ratio of grade B-D aGVHD (Table 1). The probability of OS was 51% (95% CI: 49–53%) at 3 y and 46% (95% CI: 44–49%) at 5 y. In multivariate analyses, grade B-D aGVHD was associated with a higher risk of death. Other independent risk factors for OS are shown in Table 2. Among the URD cohort, the probability of aGVHD grade B-D and C-D at 100 days was 59% (95%, CI 57–61%) and 32% (30-34%). In multivariate analysis, BM with MA (TBI and no TBI) or RIC conditioning (groups 2, 4 and 6) were significantly associated with lower odds ratio of grade B-D aGVHD (Table 1). Other independent risk factors included a diagnosis of CML. HCT from a 7/8 HLA-mismatched URD showed a trend for higher incidence of aGVHD (p=0.02). The probability of OS was 38% (95% CI: 35–40%) at 3 y and 33% (95% CI: 31–35%) at 5 y. In multivariate analysis, grade B-D aGVHD was associated with a higher mortality. Table 2 shows other independent risk factors for OS. Conclusion: Intensity of the conditioning regimen, TBI and the graft source has a combined effect on the risk of aGVHD. In both SD and URD cohorts, BM with MA, non-TBI regimens were associated with lower risk of aGVHD. In URD cohort, BM after a RIC also was associated with a reduced risk of aGVHD. Modulation of these risk factors is needed to reduce acute GVHD incidence and death after allogeneic transplantation. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 3224 Poster Board III-161 Background While most centers use 2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg as the minimal cell dose for autologous hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation (auto-HSCT), infusion of higher CD34+ cell dose is associated with better outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Recent evidence suggests a correlation between CD34+ cell yield on Day 1 of collection and total CD34+ cell yield as well as post-transplant outcomes. This analysis was designed to: 1) compare Day 1 collection between patients with NHL or MM mobilized with plerixafor plus G-CSF or placebo plus G-CSF; and 2) determine whether Day 1 CD34+ cell yields correlated with the total mobilization yield and number of apheresis days. Methods Data were obtained from two prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trials that compared the safety and efficacy of plerixafor (0.24 mg/kg/day SQ) plus G-CSF (10 μg/kg/day) with placebo plus G-CSF for mobilization of HSC for auto-HSCT in patients with NHL (3101 Study) or MM (3102 Study). Pearson correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the association of day 1 CD34+ cell collection with total CD34+ cell yield and the number of days of apheresis. Results In the NHL trial, 150 patients were mobilized with plerixafor plus G-CSF and 148 patients underwent mobilization with placebo plus G-CSF. More than half the patients (55.3%) in the plerixafor group collected ≥2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg on Day 1 of apheresis (Figure 1A). In contrast, 19.6% patients in the placebo group collected ≥ 2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg on Day 1 of apheresis (p< 0.001). In the MM study, 148 patients were mobilized with plerixafor plus G-CSF and 154 patients were mobilized with placebo plus G-CSF. More than half the patients (52.7%) in the plerixafor group collected ≥6 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg on the first day of collection compared to only 16.9% patients in the placebo group (p<0.001; Figure 1B). There was a strong positive correlation between day 1 collection and the total CD34+ cell yield in patients with NHL (r= 0.86, p-value= <0.0001) or MM (r= 0.87, p-value= <0.0001) in both the plerixafor and placebo groups. For NHL patients, the median Day 1 collection was higher in the plerixafor group compared to the placebo group: 2.66 × 106 vs. 0.77 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg (p<0.001) and this translated into higher total CD34+ cell yields in the two groups respectively: 5.69 × 106 vs. 1.98 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg (p<0.001). Similarly, for MM patients, the median CD34+ cells/kg collected on Day 1 was higher in the plerixafor group compared to the placebo group: 7.01 × 106 vs. 2.29 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg (p<0.001) and this translated into better overall collection in the plerixafor vs. placebo groups: 10.96 × 106 vs. 6.18 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg (p<0.001). A negative correlation was observed between CD34+ cells collected on Day 1 and the number of days of apheresis performed in patients with NHL (r= -0.67, p-value=<0.0001) or MM (r= -0.50, p-value= <0.0001) in both the plerixafor and placebo groups. Consequently, better Day 1 collection in plerixafor-treated NHL or MM patients translated into significantly fewer apheresis days to achieve the target collection compared to placebo treated patients. Conclusions These data support previous reports demonstrating a strong correlation between day 1 CD34+ cell collection and total CD34+ cell yield and apheresis days. These data also demonstrate that addition of plerixafor to G-CSF allows significantly more patients to achieve the target cell collection within 1 day of apheresis compared to G-CSF alone. These findings support the observation that mobilization with plerixafor plus G-CSF reduces the number of apheresis days required to achieve the minimal or optimal cell dose to proceed to transplantation. Disclosures Bolwell: Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Nademanee:Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Stiff:Genzyme Corp.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Stadtmauer:Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Maziarz:Genzyme Corp.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Micallef:Genzyme Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Marulkar:Genzyme Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gandhi:Genzyme Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. DiPersio:Genzyme: Honoraria.

Abstract Abstract 33 Background: Circulating levels of peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cells/μl are a strong predictor of hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) yields in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) undergoing autologous HSC transplantation (auto-HSCT), and are routinely monitored to optimize the timing and success of HSC collection after cytokine ± chemotherapy mobilization. The threshold PB CD34+ cell count to initiate apheresis varies from 5-20 cells/μl, depending on the institution. This analysis compared the efficacy of plerixafor + G-CSF to placebo + G-CSF for HSC mobilization in NHL patients with pre-apheresis PB CD34+ cells/μl <10. Methods: Data were obtained from a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial comparing the safety and efficacy of plerixafor (0.24 mg/kg/day SC) + G-CSF (10 μg/kg/day) to placebo + G-CSF for mobilization and auto-HSCT in NHL patients. PB CD34+ cell count was measured on Day 4, before the first plerixafor/placebo dose, and on Day 5, 10-11 hours post study drug treatment. The proportion of patients collecting ≥2 × 106 (minimal) or ≥5 × 106 (optimal) CD34+ cells/kg, apheresis yields, and time to engraftment were compared between the plerixafor and placebo groups for patients with PB CD34+ cells/μl <10. Results: 77/150 (51%) patients and 73/148 (49%) patients in the plerixafor and placebo groups, respectively, had PB CD34+ cells/μl <10 on Day 4, prior to the first dose of study drug. Patient characteristics were similar between both groups. As shown in Table 1, addition of plerixafor to G-CSF resulted in a statistically significant increase in the absolute PB CD34+ cells/μl on Day 5 compared to G-CSF alone (p<0.001). The median fold increase in PB CD34+ cells from Day 4 to Day 5 was significantly higher in plerixafor-treated patients vs. placebo-treated patients: 6.0-fold vs. 1.6-fold (p<0.001). In these hard to mobilize patients, the median CD34+ cell yield after 2 days was significantly higher with plerixafor + G-CSF compared to placebo + G-CSF: 2.92 vs.0.94 × 106 cells/kg (p<0.001), respectively. The median CD34+ cell yield after 4 days was also significantly higher in the plerixafor vs. placebo groups: 3.96 vs.1.25 × 106 cells/kg (p<0.001). Plerixafor + G-CSF allowed a significantly greater proportion of patients with PB CD34+ cells/μl <10 to collect the minimal cell dose in 4 apheresis days: 77.9% vs. 34.2 % patients in the plerixafor and placebo group, respectively collected ≥2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg in 4 days (p<0.001). The success rate of collecting the ≥5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg in 4 days was 40.3% with plerixafor + G-CSF compared to only 9.6% with placebo + G-CSF (p<0.001). The proportion of patients collecting the optimal or minimal cell dose in 2 days was also significantly higher in the plerixafor vs. placebo group (p<0.001). The median time to platelet (19-21 days) and neutrophil (10-11 days) engraftment was similar in both groups. Similar, statistically significant increases in PB CD34+ cell collections were obtained when the efficacy of plerixafor + G-CSF was compared to placebo + G-CSF, in patients with a Day 4 PB CD34 cells/μl<20 (data not shown). Conclusions: Plerixafor + G-CSF allowed collection of the minimal transplantable cell dose in 78% patients with PB CD34+ cells/μl <10. These data show that adding plerixafor to G-CSF substantially reduces the risk of mobilization failure in patients with NHL predicted to be poor mobilizers based on low PB CD34+ cell counts. Thus, mobilization with plerixafor + G-CSF in patients with PB CD34+ cells/μl <10 increases stem cell collection efficiency allowing patients to pursue auto-HSCT with more optimal cell doses. Disclosures: Maziarz: Genzyme Corp.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Micallef:Genzyme Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Stiff:Genzyme Corp.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Bolwell:Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Marulkar:Genzyme Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Calandra:Genzyme Corporation: Consultancy, Equity Ownership. DiPersio:Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria.

Abstract AMD3100, Plerixafor (A)+G-CSF (G) have safely and effectively allowed aHSC mobilization in Phase I and II studies. This Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study compared the safety and efficacy of A+G versus Placebo (P)+G to mobilize and transplant patients with NHL. Methods: Adult NHL patients requiring an aHSC transplant, in first or second CR or PR were eligible to participate. Patients received G (10μg/kg/day) subcutaneously (SQ) for 4 days. On the evening of Day 4, patients received either A (240μg/kg SQ) or P. Patients underwent apheresis on Day 5 after an AM dose of G and 10–11 hours after administration of study treatment. Patients continued to receive the evening dose of study treatment, followed by AM dose of G and apheresis for up to a total of 4 aphereses or until ≥5 x 106 CD34+cells/kg were collected. Only study cells were used for transplant. Patients who failed to mobilize ≥2 x 106 CD34+cells/kg could enter into a rescue arm of A+G, without unblinding of randomized treatment. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who achieved ≥5 x 106 CD34+cells/kg in 4 or less aphereses days. All patients will be followed for ≥12 months post-transplant. Results: 298 patients were enrolled and randomized. All patients have completed 100 days follow-up and are included in this intent-to-treat analysis. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The primary endpoint was met in 89/150 (59%) patients in the A+G group and 29/148 (20%) patients in the P+G group, p<0.0001. 130/150 (87%) patients in the A+G group and 70/148 (47%) patients in the P+G group collected ≥2 x 106 CD34+cells/kg in 4 or less aphereses days, p<0.0001. Kaplan-Meir Estimates of Time to Trget Collection of ≥ × 106 CD34 + cells/kg Kaplan-Meir Estimates of Time to Trget Collection of ≥ × 106 CD34 + cells/kg The figure shows that more patients in the A+G group reached target after 1 day of apheresis than patients in the P+G group after 4 days of apheresis. A+G rescue was successful in 33/52 rescue patients in the P+G group and 4/10 rescue patients in the A+G group. 135 patients (90%) in A+G group and 82 patients (55%) in P+G group underwent transplantation. Median time to engraftment was Day 10 for PMN and Day 20 for platelets in both groups. Through 100 days, grafts were durable in all but 2 A+G (133/135) patients and in all P+G (82) patients. A+G patients experienced a higher incidence of GI effects (mild to moderate) and injection site erythema than P+G patients. There were 2 drug related serious adverse events in the A+G group and 1 in the P+G group. Conclusions: In this study, the addition of AMD3100 to G-CSF is generally safe and well tolerated and is superior to G-CSF alone for aHSC mobilization in NHL patients. A+G patients were statistically significantly more likely to achieve target cell collection quicker and to achieve sufficient cells for successful transplant than P+G patients.

Abstract Abstract 2319 Poster Board II-296 Background: Data from two phase 3 clinical trials indicate that plerixafor plus G-CSF is safe and more effective than G-CSF alone in mobilizing CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) for autologous HSC transplantation (auto-HSCT) in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or multiple myeloma (MM). Herein we report 1-year overall survival in patients with NHL or MM who have undergone auto-HSCT with cells mobilized with plerixafor plus G-CSF compared to placebo plus G-CSF. Furthermore, we also report 1-year overall survival in patients with NHL who failed mobilization on either arm and entered a rescue protocol. Methods: Data were obtained from two prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trials that compared the safety and efficacy of plerixafor (0.24 mg/kg/day SQ) plus G-CSF (10 mg/kg/day) with placebo plus G-CSF for mobilization of HSC for autologous HSCT in patients with NHL or MM. In the NHL study, patients in either study arm who failed mobilization (&0.8 ×106 CD34+ cells/kg in 2 days or &2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg in 4 days) were eligible to enter the rescue protocol and received plerixafor + G-CSF mobilization. Overall survival in patients was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: In the NHL study, 135/150 (90.0%) patients in the plerixafor group compared with 82/148 (55.4%) patients in the placebo group, underwent transplantation (p&0.001) with a median (range) of 5.41 (1.95-17.6) and 3.85 (1.98-8.74) × 106 CD34+ cells/kg, respectively (p&0.001). A total of 62 patients (10 from the plerixafor arm and 52 from the placebo arm) failed mobilization and proceeded to rescue mobilization with plerixafor + G-CSF. Of these, 52 patients (84%) proceeded to transplantation with a median (range) of 3.8 (1.1-10.5) x 106 CD34+ cells/kg. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 1-year overall survival for patients in the plerixafor and placebo groups in the primary ITT population (rescue patients were censored as of consent date for rescue) were 76.0% and 64.7%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier estimate of 1-year overall survival in the rescue group was 83.7%. The Log rank p-value comparing all 3 survival estimates (plerixafor, placebo and rescue) was 0.765 (Figure 1A). In the MM study, 142/148 (95.9%) patients in the plerixafor group and 136/154 (88.3%) patients in the placebo group underwent transplantation (p=0.014) with a median (range) of 5.40 (1.20-16.74) and 3.96 (1.76-16.88) × 106 CD34+ cells/kg, respectively (p&0.001). In this trial, Kaplan-Meier estimates of 1-year overall survival in the plerixafor and placebo groups were 93.6% and 95.8%, respectively (Log-rank p-value=0.771; Figure 1B). Conclusions: These data suggest that overall survival at 1 year is similar between patients with MM or NHL mobilized with plerixafor plus G-CSF compared to placebo plus G-CSF. Furthermore, in the NHL study, patient survival in the rescue protocol was similar to that seen in the phase III trial. Collection of follow-up data on overall survival is ongoing. Disclosures: Micallef: Genzyme Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Stiff:Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Stadtmauer:Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Bolwell:Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Marulkar:Genzyme Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hsu:Genzyme Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. DiPersio:Genzyme: Honoraria.

Key Points In combination with cyclophosphamide, intravenous busulfan is associated with better leukemia-free and overall survival in AML than TBI.

The efficacy and safety of plerixafor + G‐CSF in enhancing hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and collection has been demonstrated in two phase III studies involving patients with NHL or MM. In these pivotal studies, plerixafor + G‐CSF significantly increased the proportion of patients achieving target stem cell yields, compared to placebo + G‐CSF. In this analysis, we compare the efficacy and safety of plerixafor + G‐CSF versus placebo + G‐CSF in patients enrolled in the two phase III studies, stratified by age: ≥60 years of age and <60 years of age. The proportion of older patients who achieved target stem cell yields was significantly higher in the plerixafor group than in placebo group (NHL: 50.9 vs. 25.4%, P < 0.001; MM: 69.6 vs. 23.7%, P < 0.001). In this older cohort, the median times to neutrophil and to platelet engraftment following autologous stem cell transplant were comparable between the plerixafor and placebo groups. Similar efficacy findings were observed in the younger age group. The most common adverse events (all grades) reported among older patients in the plerixafor group included diarrhea (41.3%), nausea (38.9%), fatigue (30.2%), and injection‐site reaction (29.4%). The frequency of adverse events was similar between the older and the younger age groups. Taken together, our subanalysis demonstrate that plerixafor + G‐CSF can be safely and effectively used in adult patients of all ages, including those ≥60 years, to support optimal stem cell mobilization for autologous stem cell transplantation. Am. J. Hematol. 88:1017–1023, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.