Thomas, Charles R.

AbstractRadioenhancing nanoparticles (NPs) are being evaluated in ongoing clinical trials for various cancers including head and neck, lung, esophagus, pancreas, prostate, and soft tissue sarcoma. Supported by decades of preclinical investigation and recent randomized trial data establishing clinical activity, these agents are poised to influence future multimodality treatment paradigms involving radiotherapy. Although the physical interactions between NPs and ionizing radiation are well characterized, less is known about how these agents modify the tumor microenvironment, particularly regarding tumor immunogenicity. In this review, we describe the key multidisciplinary considerations related to radiation, surgery, immunology, and pathology for designing radioenhancing NP clinical trials.This article is categorized under: Therapeutic Approaches and Drug Discovery > Nanomedicine for Oncologic Disease

e14555 Background: This study was done to assess the toxicity and efficacy of IMRT for anal cancer in a multi-institutional setting. Methods: Records of 152 total patients (pts) were reviewed retrospectively. Data on disease control and toxicity were collected as well as pt and treatment characteristics. Acute (<6 months) and late (>6 months) severe toxicity (grade >3) were recorded at each institution. Four were excluded for either presence of metastatic disease (2) or stage TX (2). There was data for late toxicity on 120 pts. Results: T stage was T1 in 28, T2 in 79, T3 in 29 and T4 in 12 pts. N stage was N0 in 77, N1 in 40, N2 in 19 and N3 in 12 pts. The median age was 56 yrs and median follow-up was 26.8 months. Cumulative IMRT dose was 51.25 Gy (median) (range: 4.32-61.2 Gy) in a median of 28 fractions (2-34). Chemotherapy was given in all but 2 pts and the most common regimen was 5- fluorouracil plus mitomycin-C. The median total elapsed treatment time was 40 days. Local control at 3 yrs was 87% and was significantly worse for patients with T3-4 disease (79% vs 90% at 3 years; p=0.04). There was no correlation between dose and local control. Regional control, distant control and overall survival were 97%, 91%, and 87% at 3 yrs, respectively. Nodal status was associated with regional and distal control as well as overall survival (p<0.01 for each). The most common acute severe toxicity was hematologic (41%). Severe acute GI, skin or other toxicity was 11%, 20% and 1% respectively. There were two grade 5 toxicities (hematologic and GI). Severe late toxicity was limited to skin (1%) and GI (3%). Conclusions: IMRT resulted in excellent local control in this multi-institutional cohort of pts. Although T stage did predict for worse local control, most pts with T3-4 disease were controlled with IMRT. Nodal status predicts for regional and distal control as well as overall survival. Severe toxicity was acceptable with this technique.

4009 Background: An ∼65% 5-year disease-free-survival (DFS) rate from 5-FU/mitomycin/radiation for anal carcinoma needs improvement. Methods: A phase III randomized trial compared 5-FU (1,000mg/m2 days 1–4 and 29–32) plus mitomycin (10mg/m2 days 1 and 29) and radiation (45 to 59 Gy) (Arm A) to 5-FU (1,000mg/m2 days 1–4, 29–32, 57–60 and 85–88) plus cisplatin (75mg/m2 on days 1, 29, 57 and 85) and radiation (45 to 59 Gy; start day=57) (Arm B) in anal carcinoma patients. Stratification included gender, clinical N status and tumor diameter. Primary endpoint was DFS. Statistical power was 80% with two-sided test to detect 10% DFS increase for Arm B. Results: Of 682 patients accrued, 598 were analyzable. Most unanalyzed patients’ data are early. Patient characteristics were balanced. Median age was 55 years, women predominated (69%), 27.5% had >5 cm tumor diameter and 26% had clinically N+ cancer. Preliminary 5-year estimated DFS was 56% for Arm A and 48% for Arm B (p=0.28) and 5-year estimated overall survival was 69% for both arms (p=0.24). Men(p=0.04), clinically N+ cancer (p<0.0001) and tumor diameter >5 cm (p=0.005) independently prognosticated DFS in a multivariate analysis. 5-year colostomy rate was 10% for Arm A and 20% for arm B(p=0.12). Grade 3/4 toxicity rates: non-hematologic=76% for Arm A and 75% for Arm B but hematologic=67% for Arm A and 47% for Arm B(p=0.0004). Conclusions: In Intergroup-98–11, induction 5-FU/cisplatin followed by 5-FU/cisplatin/radiation failed to improve DFS compared to the standard treatment, 5-FU/mitomycin/radiation. Supported by RTOG U10 CA21661, CCOP U10 CA37422, Stat U10 CA32115. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Background Platinum and etoposide with thoracic radiation followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation constitute the standard treatment for limited‐stage small cell lung cancer (LS‐SCLC). Many patients with LS‐SCLC are elderly with comorbidities. Methods Individual patient data were collected from 11 phase 2 or 3 trials for LS‐SCLC conducted by the National Clinical Trials Network and activated from 1990 to 2010. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); the secondary endpoints were progression‐free survival (PFS), the rate of severe adverse events, and off‐treatment reasons. The outcomes were compared for patients 70 years old or older (elderly patients) and patients younger than 70 years (younger patients). Results Individual patient data from 1049 younger patients (81%) and 254 elderly patients (19%) were analyzed. In the multivariate model, elderly patients, in comparison with younger patients, had worse OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18‐1.63; median OS for elderly patients, 17.8 months; OS for younger patients, 23.5 months) and worse PFS (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.03‐1.39; median PFS for elderly patients, 10.6 months; median PFS for younger patients, 12.3 months). Elderly patients, in comparison with younger patients, experienced more grade 5 adverse events (8% vs 3%; P < .01) and more grade 3 or higher dyspnea (11% vs 7%; P = .03) but less grade 3 or higher esophagitis/dysphagia (14% vs 19%; P = .04) and less grade 3 or higher vomiting (11% vs 17%; P = .01). Elderly patients completed treatment less often, discontinued treatment because of adverse events and patient refusal more frequently, and died during treatment more frequently. Conclusions Elderly patients with LS‐SCLC have worse PFS and OS and more difficulty in tolerating therapy. Future trials should incorporate assessments of elderly patients, novel monitoring of adverse events, and more tolerable radiation and systemic therapies.

523 Background: This study was done to assess the toxicity and efficacy of IMRT for anal cancer in a multi-institutional setting. Methods: Records of 152 total patients (pts) were reviewed retrospectively. Data on disease control and toxicity were collected as well as pt and treatment characteristics. Acute (<6 months) and late (>=6 months) severe toxicity (grade >=3) were recorded at each institution. Four were excluded for either presence of metastatic disease (2) or stage TX (2). There was data for late toxicity on 120 pts. Results: T stage was T1 in 28, T2 in 79, T3 in 29 and T4 in 12 pts. N stage was N0 in 77, N1 in 40, N2 in 19 and N3 in 12 pts. The median age was 56 yrs and median follow-up was 26.8 months. Cumulative IMRT dose was 51.25 Gy (median) (range: 4.32-61.2 Gy) in a median of 28 fractions (2-34). Chemotherapy was given in all but 2 pts and the most common regimen was 5- fluorouracil plus mitomycin-C. The median total elapsed treatment time was 40 days. Local control at 3 yrs was 87% and was significantly worse for patients with T3-4 disease (79% vs 90% at 3 years; p=0.04). There was no correlation between dose and local control. Regional control, distant control and overall survival were 97%, 91%, and 87% at 3 yrs, respectively. Nodal status was associated with regional and distal control as well as overall survival (p<0.01 for each). The most common acute severe toxicity was hematologic (41%). Severe acute GI, skin or other toxicity was 11%, 20% and 1% respectively. There were two grade 5 toxicities (hematologic and GI). Severe late toxicity was limited to skin (1%) and GI (3%). Conclusions: IMRT resulted in excellent local control in this multi-institutional cohort of pts. Although T stage did predict for worse local control, most pts with T3-4 disease were controlled with IMRT. Nodal status predicts for regional and distal control as well as overall survival. Severe toxicity was acceptable with this technique.

367 Background: On initial publication of GI Intergroup RTOG 98-11, concurrent chemoradiation with 5FU+mitomycin (MMC) decreased colostomy failure (CF) vs induction plus concurrent 5FU+cisplatin (CDDP), but did not significantly impact disease free or overall survival (DFS, OS). The intent of the current analysis is to determine the long-term impact of treatment on survival (DFS, OS, colostomy-free [CFS]), CF and relapse (local-regional [LRF], distant [DM]) in this patient group. Methods: Stratification factors included gender, clinical node status, and primary size. DFS/OS were estimated univariately by Kaplan-Meier method and treatment arms compared by log-rank test. Time to relapse/CF were estimated by cumulative incidence method and treatment arms compared by Gray's test. Multivariate analyses were done with Cox proportional hazard models to test for treatment differences, adjusting for stratification factors. Results: Of 682 patients accrued, 649 were analyzable for outcomes. As seen in the table, 5-yr DFS and OS were statistically better for RT+5FU/MMC vs RT+5FU/CDDP (67.7 v 57.6%, p=.0.0045; 78.2 v 70.5%, p=0.021) with trends toward statistical significance for CFS, LRF, and CF (71.8 v 64.9%, p=0.053; 20 v 26.5%, 11.9 v 17.3%, p=0.092 and 0.075). Similar results were seen in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Concurrent chemoradiation with 5FU-MMC has a statistically significant impact on DFS and OS vs induction + concurrent 5FU-CDDP and borderline significance for CFS, CF and LRF. Therefore, RT+5FU/MMC remains the preferred standard of care. Potential strategies to improve outcomes include treatment intensification and individualized molecular-based treatment. Supported by RTOG grant U10 CA21661 and CCOP grant U10 CA37422 from the National Cancer Institute (NCI). [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

PurposeOn initial publication of GI Intergroup Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 98-11 [A Phase III Randomized Study of 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), Mitomycin, and Radiotherapy Versus 5-Fluorouracil, Cisplatin and Radiotherapy in Carcinoma of the Anal Canal], concurrent chemoradiation (CCR) with fluorouracil (FU) plus mitomycin (MMC) decreased colostomy failure (CF) when compared with induction plus concurrent FU plus cisplatin (CDDP), but did not significantly impact disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS) for anal canal carcinoma. The intent of the updated analysis was to determine the long-term impact of treatment on survival (DFS, OS, colostomy-free survival [CFS]), CF, and relapse (locoregional failure [LRF], distant metastasis) in this patient group.Patients and MethodsStratification factors included sex, clinical node status, and primary size. DFS and OS were estimated univariately by the Kaplan-Meier method, and treatment arms were compared by log-rank test. Time to relapse and CF were estimated by the cumulative incidence method and treatment arms were compared by using Gray's test. Multivariate analyses used Cox proportional hazard models to test for treatment differences after adjusting for stratification factors.ResultsOf 682 patients accrued, 649 were analyzable for outcomes. DFS and OS were statistically better for RT + FU/MMC versus RT + FU/CDDP (5-year DFS, 67.8% v 57.8%; P = .006; 5-year OS, 78.3% v 70.7%; P = .026). There was a trend toward statistical significance for CFS (P = .05), LRF (P = .087), and CF (P = .074). Multivariate analysis was statistically significant for treatment and clinical node status for both DFS and OS, for tumor diameter for DFS, and for sex for OS.ConclusionCCR with FU/MMC has a statistically significant, clinically meaningful impact on DFS and OS versus induction plus concurrent FU/CDDP, and it has borderline significance for CFS, CF, and LRF. Therefore, RT + FU/MMC remains the preferred standard of care.

Purpose The US Gastrointestinal Intergroup Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 98-11 anal carcinoma trial showed that cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy resulted in a significantly higher rate of colostomy compared with mitomycin-based therapy. Established prognostic variables for patients with anal carcinoma include tumor diameter, clinical nodal status, and sex, but pretreatment variables that would predict the likelihood of colostomy are unknown. Methods A secondary analysis was performed by combining patients in the two treatment arms to evaluate whether new predictive and prognostic variables would emerge. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to correlate overall survival (OS), disease-free survival, and time to colostomy (TTC) with pretreatment and treatment variables. Results Of 682 patients enrolled, 644 patients were assessable and analyzed. In the multivariate analysis, tumor-related prognosticators for poorer OS included node-positive cancer (P ≤ .0001), large (> 5 cm) tumor diameter (P = .01), and male sex (P = .016). In the treatment-related categories, cisplatin-based therapy was statistically significantly associated with a higher rate of colostomy (P = .03) than was mitomycin-based therapy. In the pretreatment variables category, only large tumor diameter independently predicted for TTC (P = .008). Similarly, the cumulative 5-year colostomy rate was statistically significantly higher for large tumor diameter than for small tumor diameter (Gray's test; P = .0074). Clinical nodal status and sex were not predictive of TTC. Conclusion The combined analysis of the two arms of RTOG 98-11, representing the largest prospective database, reveals that tumor diameter (irrespective of the nodal status) is the only independent pretreatment variable that predicts TTC and 5-year colostomy rate in patients with anal carcinoma.

Purpose Some patients with colon cancer have a high risk of local recurrence postoperatively. This trial was undertaken to determine whether radiation therapy added to an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen improves outcome in high-risk patients. Patients and Methods Patients with resected colon cancer with tumor adherence or invasion of surrounding structures, or with T3N1 or T3N2 tumors of the ascending or descending colon were randomly assigned to receive fluorouracil and levamisole therapy with or without radiation therapy. Patients who received chemotherapy and radiation therapy (chemoRT) received 45 to 50.4 Gy in 25 to 28 fractions beginning 28 days after starting chemotherapy. Patient enrollment was terminated because of slow accrual after 222 patients enrolled (original goal was 700 patients); 187 patients were assessable. Results Overall 5-year survival was 62% for chemotherapy patients and 58% for chemoRT patients (P > .50); 5-year disease-free survival was 51% for both groups (P > .50). Toxicity (≥ grade 3) occurred in 42% of chemotherapy patients and 54% of chemoRT patients (P = .04). Leukopenia (≥ grade 3) occurred in 10% of chemotherapy patients and 22% of chemoRT patients (P = .02). No significant difference in nonhematologic toxicity (≥ grade 3) was observed between chemoRT and chemotherapy patients (35% v 44%; P = .26). Conclusion Patients who received chemotherapy or chemoRT had similar overall survival and disease-free survival. Toxicity was higher among chemoRT patients. These results must be interpreted with caution because of the high number of ineligible patients and the limited power of the study to detect potentially meaningful differences.