Citations

Abstract Background and Aims Patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) are at risk for potentially life-threatening arrhythmic events (AEs) even while treated with β-blockers. The aim was to develop a model for individualized prediction of AEs in patients with RYR2-mediated CPVT on β-blocker monotherapy. Methods The derivation and independent validation cohorts included 743 and 129 patients, respectively. AEs were defined as arrhythmic syncope, appropriate implantable cardioverter–defibrillator shock, sudden cardiac arrest (SCA), and sudden cardiac death. Near-fatal or fatal AEs (nf/fAEs) included all AEs except for arrhythmic syncope. Prediction models using Cox regression were developed and internally and externally validated. Results A total of 102 (13.7%) patients in the derivation cohort and 24 (18.6%) patients in the validation cohort experienced ≥1 AE over a median follow-up of 5.1 [interquartile range (IQR), 7.7] and 2.4 (IQR, 4.4) years, respectively. Predictors of AE were arrhythmic syncope or SCA prior to diagnosis and age at β-blocker initiation. In the derivation and validation cohorts, the optimism-corrected C-indices of the models for AE were 0.67 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62–0.72] and 0.59 (95% CI 0.48–0.71), respectively. For nf/fAEs, ventricular arrhythmia severity before β-blocker initiation was a fourth independent predictor, and C-indices of the models in the derivation and validation cohorts were 0.74 (95% CI 0.68–0.80) and 0.60 (95% CI 0.47–0.72), respectively. In the derivation cohort, calibration slopes were 1.00 (95% CI 0.59–1.41) for AE and 1.00 (95% CI 0.69–1.32) for nf/fAE. Conclusions These externally validated risk prediction models using clinical parameters accurately distinguished CPVT patients on β-blocker monotherapy at low and high risk for future AEs while treated with β-blockers. These models provide guidance for implementation of clinical management therapies to prevent AEs in patients with CPVT.

Abstract Key unanswered questions in biology center on the causes, consequences, and maintenance of sexual reproduction (“sex”). Genome-driven processes are central to the evolutionary and genetic mechanisms inherent to sex, making genomic resources a fundamental part of answering these questions. We present the first genome assembly for a species that is uniquely well-suited for the study of (a)sex in nature, Potamopyrgus antipodarum. This New Zealand snail is unusual in featuring multiple separate transitions from obligately sexual to obligately asexual reproduction, leading to the coexistence of phenotypically similar sexual and asexual forms, a feature that is required to directly study the maintenance of sex. These separately derived asexual lineages constitute separate evolutionary experiments, providing a powerful means of characterizing how the absence of sex affects genome evolution. Our genome assembly provides critical steps toward understanding the causes and consequences of sex in this system and important resources for the rapidly growing P. antipodarum and molluscan genomics research community. In characterizing this genome, we uncovered unexpected evidence for a recent whole-genome duplication (WGD) in P. antipodarum. This discovery sets the stage for using P. antipodarum to evaluate processes of rediploidization following WGD and to assess whether WGD might drive transitions to asexuality.

Abstract Background Elevated left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) is associated with an increased risk of heart failure and mortality. Pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) is considered the gold standard for assessing LVFP. Recently, we validated an artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) to assess LV diastolic function (LVDF) and LVFP. Herein, we compare AI-ECG with PAWP in predicting long-term mortality. Methods We included adults who had comprehensive echocardiography with available ECG within 14-days and right-heart-catheterization (RHC) within 30-days of echocardiography. Elevated-LVFP was defined as PAWP>15 mmHg by RHC, grades 2-3 LVDF by echocardiography, or as adjudicated by the AI-ECG algorithm. Prognosis by AI-ECG was compared to that by echocardiography and PAWP. Results Among 4,168 patients (median age 64 years, 47.7% female), 1,841 had normal-LVFP, and 2,327 had elevated-LVFP by RHC. Echocardiography classified 1,502 patients as normal-LVFP, 1,643 as elevated-LVFP, and 1,023 as indeterminate-LVFP. AI-ECG demonstrated an area-under-the-curve of 0.879 (95%-confidence-interval 0.867-0.891) for predicting elevated-LVFP as determined by echocardiography and 0.742 (95%-confidence-interval 0.724-0.759) for predicting elevated-LVFP as determined by RHC. Over a median follow-up of 7.7 years, 2,735 (34.4%) patients died. In multivariable models, elevated-LVFP by any modality was associated with an increased risk of death (AI-ECG: adjusted-hazard-ratio 1.80, 95% confidence-interval 1.55-2.09; echocardiography: adjusted-hazard-ratio 1.74, 95% confidence-interval 1.51-2.02; PAWP: adjusted-hazard-ratio 1.26, 95% confidence-interval 1.11-1.43). AI-ECG-derived LVFP provided incremental prognostic discrimination compared to echocardiography- or RHC-derived LVFP. Conclusions AI-ECG-derived LVFP offers an accessible, affordable, and noninvasive alternative for detecting elevated LVFP, with potential independent prognostic value beyond traditional echocardiographic and invasive assessments.Survival across LVFP concordance

BACKGROUND: Elevated blood pressure (BP) is a major contributor to coronary artery disease. We explored the impact of life-course BP on later-life normalized stress myocardial blood flow (sMBF N ) and myocardial perfusion reserve by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). METHODS: MyoFit46 prospectively recruited ≈500 National Survey of Health and Development 1946 birth cohort participants, aged ≈77 years, to undergo stress perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement CMR. Systolic (SBPs) and diastolic BPs were recorded at 36, 43, 53, 63, 69, and 77 years. For each participant, the annual rates of BP change (steepness of BP increase) and area under the BP trajectory curve (cumulative life-course BP burden) were derived using mixed-effects models. The associations between BP measures and CMR metrics were tested using generalized linear and additive models, adjusted for antihypertensive use, demographics, lifestyle choices, and comorbidities. Cross-sectional associations between CMR metrics and major adverse cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure) were also tested. Mediation analyses explored the mechanistic pathways linking life-course BPs, myocardial perfusion, and myocardial fibrosis. RESULTS: Among 459 included MyoFit46 participants, each 10 mm Hg higher SBP at 36 to 69 years was associated with 3% to 6% lower sMBF N by CMR at 77 years. At 43 to 63 years, as SBPs rose from 120 to 140 mm Hg, sMBF N was 18% to 24% lower. Having a sustained higher SBP by 10 mm Hg from 36 to 77 years was associated with 11% (95% CI, 8–14) lower sMBF N at 77 years. Each 1 mm Hg/y steeper SBP rise during age intervals 36 to 43, 43 to 53, 53 to 63, and 63 to 69 years was associated with 2% to 6% lower sMBF N at 77 years, associations not conditional on baseline or final BPs in each age interval. Associations may be clinically relevant as each 1% lower sMBF N was associated with 3% higher odds of major adverse cardiovascular events. sMBF N mediated ≈20% to ≈40% of the associations between life-course SBPs and late gadolinium enhancement at 77 years. Results were similar for diastolic BP, myocardial perfusion reserve, or sMBF (not normalized). CONCLUSIONS: Higher life-course BPs, steeper increases, and greater cumulative BP burden associate with lower myocardial perfusion by CMR at 77 years, which can be linked with higher odds of major adverse cardiovascular events and greater myocardial fibrosis burden. This underscores the importance of early life BP screening and guiding hyperetension treatment based on longitudinal BP trajectories (rather than relying solely on cross-sectional BPs). REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT05455125.

Abstract Background The associations between different types of diabetes, characterized by distinct pathophysiology and genetic architecture, and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) risk are not understood. Methods We investigated associations of genetic susceptibility to type 2 diabetes (T2D), 8 T2D mechanistic clusters, type 1 diabetes (T1D), and maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) with PDAC risk. We used genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary-level statistics for T2D (242 283 cases, 1 569 734 controls), T1D (18 942 cases, 501 638 controls), and PDAC (10 244 cases and 360 535 controls) in individuals of European ancestry. Results Two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) using the Robust Adjusted Profile Score (MR-RAPS) method indicated that genetically predicted T2D was associated with PDAC risk (OR = 1.10; 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.15), particularly the T2D obesity (OR = 1.28; 95% CI = 1.15 to 1.42) and lipodystrophy (OR = 1.25; 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.51) clusters. No association was observed for T1D with PDAC risk (OR = 1.01; 95% CI = 0.99 to 1.02). Pathway/gene-set analysis using the summary-based Adaptive Rank Truncated Product (sARTP) method revealed a significant association between the MODY gene-sets and PDAC risk (P = 1.5 × 10−8), which remained after excluding 20 known PDAC GWAS loci (P = 7.6 × 10−4). HNF1A, FOXA3, and HNF4A were the top contributing genes after excluding the previously identified GWAS loci regions. Conclusions Our results from this genetic association study support that T2D, particularly the obesity and lipodystrophy mechanistic clusters, and MODY genomic susceptibility regions play a role in the etiology of PDAC.

Purpose: There are reported barriers to implementation of esophageal screening during the videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) completed by the speech-language pathologist (SLP). Often, patients referred to the SLP for a VFSS have an esophageal component that may explain their complaint. In this article, authors explore roadblocks to esophageal screening and potential roadmaps to improve patient care through standardization of esophageal screening procedures. Conclusions: A strong body of literature supports physiologic, anatomic, and disease state relationships of the oropharynx and esophagus. Despite this, the assessment of the oropharynx and esophagus is dichotomized. There remain billing limitations for same-day esophagram and VFSS, and the well-documented esophageal screen provides a view of bolus flow in an upright, typical eating position with consideration of oropharyngeal function to provide a comprehensive view of the continuous process of swallowing from mouth to stomach. The continued practice of evaluating the oropharynx without consideration of the esophagus poses a threat to patient safety and may delay care. A collaborative, multidisciplinary effort among healthcare professionals to create streamlined practice parameters, update position statements, and enhance education parameters will allow for cohesive practices among professionals. Assessment of the swallow mechanism is incomplete without consideration of the entire continuum.

Background Robotic-assisted TKA may allow for more reproducible balancing and implant positioning. However, few RCTs have directly compared modern robotic-assisted TKA to conventional TKA. Questions/purposes (1) Do patients undergoing robotic-assisted TKA perform better on the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test and Stair Climb test (SCT) than patients undergoing conventional TKA at 1 and 6 months after surgery? (2) Do patients undergoing robotic-assisted TKA demonstrate better patient-reported outcomes, including Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), EQ-5D, and VAS scores, than patients undergoing conventional TKA at 1 and 6 months after surgery? (3) Do patients undergoing robotic-assisted TKA demonstrate better radiographic alignment and position than patients undergoing conventional TKA? Methods In this double-blind RCT, 60 patients were randomized to robotic-assisted TKA (n = 30) or conventional TKA (n = 30) without the use of a tensioning device. All care was otherwise standardized, using mechanical alignment guides. The primary outcome measures were the TUG and SCT tests; results were collected by a blinded observer at 6 months postoperatively. These time points were chosen based on the maximal early improvement in patient-reported outcomes and bimodal distribution of the TUG and SCT tests, worsening in the immediate postoperative period, and improving within the first 6 months. Secondary outcome measures were KOOS, EQ-5D, and VAS scores; radiographic measurements; and operative time. Standard bivariate statistical analysis was conducted. The mean ± SD age of the cohort was 66 ± 7 years, with no differences between groups (p = 0.21). Ninety-three percent (28 of 30) of patients in the robotic-assisted group were White versus 97% (29 of 30) in the conventional TKA group (p > 0.99). Women made up 57% (17) of the robotic-assisted cohort and 60% (18) of the conventional TKA cohort. No differences were noted between the robotic-assisted and conventional TKA groups in BMI, Charlson comorbidity index, or American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification. Results Patients undergoing robotic-assisted TKA did not perform better than those who underwent conventional TKA on the TUG (11 versus 11 seconds; p = 0.88) or SCT (15 versus 15 seconds; p = 0.93) tests. Patients undergoing robotic-assisted TKA did not demonstrate better mean ± SD scores on the KOOS pain subscale than patients undergoing conventional TKA (86 ± 14 versus 80 ± 17; p = 0.15). Patients undergoing robotic-assisted TKA did not demonstrate better radiographic alignment and position than patients undergoing conventional TKA based on hip-knee-ankle angle (178° versus 178°; p = 0.89). No differences between the two groups were noted at the 1-month follow-up in TUG and SCT test results. Conclusion In this study, patients who underwent robotically assisted TKA did no better in terms of function, patient-reported outcomes, or radiographic measures than did patients who underwent conventional TKA. Until or unless future studies demonstrate benefits of robotically assisted TKA that are large enough for patients to perceive, we recommend against its use. Level of Evidence Level I, therapeutic study.

Objective To provide evidence‐based and expert guidance for the treatment and management of non‐renal systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); treatment and management of lupus nephritis are addressed in a separate guideline. Methods Clinical questions for treatment and management of SLE were developed in the PICO format (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome). Systematic literature reviews were developed for each PICO question, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess evidence quality and formulate recommendations. The Voting Panel achieved a consensus of ≥70% agreement on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of each recommendation. Results We present recommendations and ungraded, consensus‐based good practice statements for the treatment and management of SLE that are applicable to pediatric and adult patients. Recommendations emphasize uniform treatment with hydroxychloroquine, limiting duration of glucocorticoid use, and early introduction of conventional and/or biologic immunosuppressive therapies to achieve and maintain control of SLE inflammation (remission or a low level of disease activity), reduce SLE‐related morbidity and mortality, and minimize medication‐related toxicities. Conclusion This guideline presents direction regarding treatment and management of SLE and provides a foundation for well‐informed, shared clinician–patient decision‐making. These recommendations should not be used to limit or deny access to therapies, as treatment decisions may vary due to the unique clinical situation and personal preferences of each person with SLE.

Objective To provide evidence‐based and expert guidance for the treatment and management of non‐renal systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); treatment and management of lupus nephritis are addressed in a separate guideline. Methods Clinical questions for treatment and management of SLE were developed in the PICO format (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome). Systematic literature reviews were developed for each PICO question, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess evidence quality and formulate recommendations. The Voting Panel achieved a consensus of ≥70% agreement on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of each recommendation. Results We present recommendations and ungraded, consensus‐based good practice statements for the treatment and management of SLE that are applicable to pediatric and adult patients. Recommendations emphasize uniform treatment with hydroxychloroquine, limiting duration of glucocorticoid use, and early introduction of conventional and/or biologic immunosuppressive therapies to achieve and maintain control of SLE inflammation (remission or a low level of disease activity), reduce SLE‐related morbidity and mortality, and minimize medication‐related toxicities. Conclusion This guideline presents direction regarding treatment and management of SLE and provides a foundation for well‐informed, shared clinician–patient decision‐making. These recommendations should not be used to limit or deny access to therapies, as treatment decisions may vary due to the unique clinical situation and personal preferences of each person with SLE.