Citations

Abstract Approximately 15% of genetic screens for mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 identify Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS). Primarily missense mutations, VUS are often difficult to interpret, leading to either uncertainty in how to properly counsel a patient or an unnecessary prophylactic surgery. Given the paucity of data for which missenses are classified as truly pathogenic, computational deleterious missense prediction (DMP) algorithms are used to predict whether a mutation is likely deleterious or neutral. Accuracy of DMPs can vary considerably and have only been calibrated on a relatively small number of missense mutations of demonstrable effect on protein function. In this study, the performance of 41 different DMPs was compared to functional data from 455 functionally characterized missense variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2. New optimized thresholds for classifying missense mutations as deleterious are presented for several existing models as well as a newly derived naïve voting method (NVM). The areas under the curve estimates for the NVM approach are between 0.889-0.922, much higher than previous methods. We estimate that the overall pathogenic potential of missense variants to be 6.8% for BRCA1 and 3.2% of BRCA2, but can be as high as 50% depending on protein location. Overall these results provide key insights into how to predict deleterious missense mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Citation Format: Hart SN, Hoskin T, Shimelis H, Feng B, Lindor NM, Monteiro A, Iversen E, Goldgar DE, Suman V, Couch FJ. Optimized prediction of deleterious missense mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-02-03.

Key Points Depletion of CD123-redirected CAR T cells with monoclonal antibodies preserves leukemia remission in human AML xenograft models. AML CAR T-cell depletion enhances feasibility of subsequent allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

On‐board magnetic resonance (MR) image guidance during radiation therapy offers the potential for more accurate treatment delivery. To utilize the real‐time image information, a crucial prerequisite is the ability to successfully segment and track regions of interest (ROI). The purpose of this work is to evaluate the performance of different segmentation algorithms using motion images (4 frames per second) acquired using a MR image‐guided radiotherapy (MR‐IGRT) system. Manual contours of the kidney, bladder, duodenum, and a liver tumor by an experienced radiation oncologist were used as the ground truth for performance evaluation. Besides the manual segmentation, images were automatically segmented using thresholding, fuzzy k‐means (FKM), k‐harmonic means (KHM), and reaction‐diffusion level set evolution (RD‐LSE) algorithms, as well as the tissue tracking algorithm provided by the ViewRay treatment planning and delivery system (VR‐TPDS). The performance of the five algorithms was evaluated quantitatively by comparing with the manual segmentation using the Dice coefficient and target registration error (TRE) measured as the distance between the centroid of the manual ROI and the centroid of the automatically segmented ROI. All methods were able to successfully segment the bladder and the kidney, but only FKM, KHM, and VR‐TPDS were able to segment the liver tumor and the duodenum. The performance of the thresholding, FKM, KHM, and RD‐LSE algorithms degraded as the local image contrast decreased, whereas the performance of the VP‐TPDS method was nearly independent of local image contrast due to the reference registration algorithm. For segmenting high‐contrast images (i.e., kidney), the thresholding method provided the best speed ( ) with a satisfying accuracy ( ). When the image contrast was low, the VR‐TPDS method had the best automatic contour. Results suggest an image quality determination procedure before segmentation and a combination of different methods for optimal segmentation with the on‐board MR‐IGRT system. PACS number(s): 87.57.nm, 87.57.N‐, 87.61.Tg

9 Background: Prostate cancer molecular subtypes based on ETS gene fusions and SPINK1 were originally identified through outlier gene expression profiling analysis. Such molecular subtypes may have utility in disease stratification and clonality assessment, complementing available purely prognostic tests. Hence, we determined the analytical validity of molecular subtyping in a large sample of PCa treated with radical prostatectomy. Methods: We analyzed Affymetrix Human Exon 1.0ST GeneChip expression profiles for 1,577 patients from 8 radical prostatectomy (RP) cohorts. Multi-feature random forest classifiers and outlier analysis were used to define microarray-based molecular subtypes. Results: A random forest (RF) classifier was trained and validated to predict ERG fusion status using a subset with known ERG rearrangement status defined by FISH, achieving >95% sensitivity and specificity in the validation subset. Less frequent rearrangements involving other ETS genes or SPINK1 over-expression were predicted based on gene expression outlier analysis. Across cohorts, 45%, 9% 8% and 38% of PCa were classified as ERG+, ETS+, SPINK+, and Triple Negative, respectively. Global gene expression analysis shows that the four subtypes could be collapsed into three entities (ERG+, ETS+ and SPINK+/Triple Negative) based on expression patterns and clinical characteristics similarity. A series of multivariable analyses further revealed, ERG+ to be associated with lower pre PSA and Gleason scores but more likely to have EPE and occur in patients with European American ancestry compared to the ETS+, SPINK+/Triple Negative tumors (p<0.001). In contrast, patients with ETS+ were more likely to have SVI compared to both ERG+ and SPINK/Triple Negative (p=0.01), while SPINK+/Triple Negative had higher Gleason scores and were more likely to occur in African Americans (p<0.001). Conclusions: The Decipher platform can accurately determine ERG rearrangement status and PCa molecular subtypes. Inclusion of molecular subtyping, such as m-ERG status, may enable additional precision medicine opportunities in prognostic tests

8 Background: A number of biomarkers related to cell cycle, angiogenesis or apoptosis have been found to be associated with patient outcome in tissue samples from men treated with first line radiation therapy in RTOG clinical trials using immunohistochemical staining and analysis. In a prior study, four biomarkers (Ki-67, MDM2, p16 and Cox-2) and clinical covariates were included in a model of distant metastasis (DM; Pollack et al, Clin Cancer Res, 2014 [epub ahead of print]) risk. The current study tested the hypothesis that these genes are prognostic for DM in men treated primarily with total prostatectomy using RNA expression profiling. Methods: RNA fromprostatectomy samples from Cleveland Clinic (CC, n=182); Mayo Clinic (MC)-I (n = 545) and II (n=235); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC, n=131); Erasmus Medical Center (EMC, n=48) and Thomas Jefferson University (TJU, n=130) were profiled using 1.4 million RNA features. A Cox proportional hazards model was built on the MC-I training set to combine the 4 biomarkers into a prognostic risk score (4BMSig). 4BMSig was subsequently evaluated for its prognostic significance separately and in combination with clinical risk factors (biopsy Gleason Score, cT-category and Preop-PSA) for DM. Results: 4BMSig was found to discriminate DM patients significantly for the MC-II (AUC = 0.66, p < 0.001), CCF (AUC = 0.68, p < 0.001), and MSKCC (AUC = 0.71, p = 0.04) datasets, and achieved borderline significance for EMC (AUC = 0.70, p = 0.06). 4BMSig did not discriminate DM in the TJU dataset (only 10 DM events). Pooled multivariable analysis (n = 726) with clinical covariates revealed that 4BMSig is a strong independent prognostic covariate for DM (p < 0.001) and prostate cancer specific mortality (p = 0.005). Conclusions: The four genes identified previously as being associated with DM in radiotherapy patients were incorporated herein into 4BMSig, which was found to have potential as a pretreatment prognostic DM risk assessment tool for men treated with prostatectomy. Further validation would consist of testing 4BMSig from RNA in diagnostic tissue from prostate cancer patients prior to prostatectomy.

7 Background: Improved prognostic biomarkers are needed for localized prostate cancer. We undertook an unbiased large-scale analysis of genes associated with metastatic progression and validated the prognostic ability of the top candidate gene. Methods: Prostate cancer samples from prostatectomy patients were analyzed for gene expression using a clinical-grade, high-density Affymetrix GeneChip platform, encompassing >1 million genomic loci and assessed in a CLIA-certified laboratory. Nomination of prognostic candidate genes was performed on a discovery cohort (n=545) and validated on 3 independent cohorts (n=463). Multivariate analyses were performed for the primary endpoint of metastasis. The top prostate-specific gene was further evaluated in 208 additional tumor samples with a novel RNA in-situ hybridization (ISH) assay and in urine samples from 230 patients using PCR. Results: Of all known genes, the long noncoding RNA SChLAP1 ranked first for elevated expression in patients with metastatic progression by receiver-operator-curve analyses. Validation in three independent cohorts confirmed the prognostic value of SChLAP1. On multivariate modeling, SChLAP1 expression independently predicted metastasis within 10 years (odds ratio (OR) = 2.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.70 – 3.53), death within 10 years (OR = 1.93, 95% CI 1.31 – 2.85), and biochemical recurrence within 5 years (OR = 1.76, 95% CI 1.28 – 2.41) with ORs comparable to Gleason score. Evaluation of SChLAP1 expression by RNA ISH confirmed a significant association with disease recurrence (OR = 1.99, 95% CI 1.06 – 3.73). Evaluation of urine SChLAP1 levels demonstrated increased expression in patients at higher risk for disease progression. Conclusions: We perform the largest high-throughput, unbiased study of prostate cancer prognostic biomarkers to date and discover SChLAP1 as a top gene predictive of metastatic progression. We validate SChLAP1 extensively with a clinical-grade assay. We show feasibility of a RNA ISH assay and a non-invasive urine test for SChLAP1. Our results, spanning 1,446 patients from 6 independent patient cohorts, suggest that SChLAP1 represents a very promising biomarker for aggressive clinical course.

168 Background: The optimal timing of postoperative radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy (post-RP RT) is unclear. We hypothesized that a genomic classifier (GC) would provide prognostic and predictive insight into the development of clinical metastases in men receiving post-RP RT and inform decision-making. Methods: GC scores were calculated from 188 patients with pT3 or margin positive PCa, who received post-RP RT at Thomas Jefferson University and Mayo Clinic, between 1990 and 2009. The primary endpoint was clinical metastasis. Prognostic accuracy of the models were tested using c-index and decision curve analysis. Cox regression tested the relationship between GC and metastasis. Results: The cumulative incidence of metastasis at 5 years post-RT was 0%, 9%, and 29% for low, average, and high GC scores, respectively (p=0.002). In multivariable analysis, GC and pre-RP PSA were independent predictors of metastasis (both p<0.01). Within the low GC score (<0.4), there were no differences in the cumulative incidence of metastasis comparing those who received adjuvant or salvage RT (p=0.79). However, for patients with higher GC scores (≥0.4) cumulative incidence of metastasis at 5-year was 6% vs. 23% for patients treated with adjuvant vs. salvage RT (p<0.01). Conclusions: In patients treated with post-RP RT, GC is prognostic for the development of clinical metastasis beyond routine clinical/pathologic features. Though preliminary, patients with low GC are best treated with salvage radiation, while those with high GC benefit from adjuvant therapy. These findings provide the first rationale selection of timing of post-RP RT.

3 Background: Previous reports suggested that AAT when combined with salvage RT following RP in patients may improve prostate cancer control outcomes. Methods: Post-RP patients with pT3pN0 or with pT2pN0 and positive margins who had or developed elevated PSA levels from 0.2 to 4.0 ng/ml were randomized on a phase III, double-blind, trial of RT + placebo (64.8 Gy in 36 fractions of 1.8 Gy) vs. RT + AAT (24 months bicalutamide, 150 mg daily) during and after RT. The primary end-point was overall survival. Trial design required 725 patients and provided 80% power to detect a reduction in death rate by at least 28.5% and a 1-sided significance level of 0.046. Results: From 3/98 to 3/03, 761 eligible patients (median age 65) were randomized to RT + AAT (384) or RT + placebo (377). 248 patients (33%) were pT2pN0 and 513 (67%) were pT3pN0. 671 (88%) had a PSA nadir after RP of < 0.5 ng/ml. 649 (85%) had an entry PSA value of <1.6, 112 patients (15%) had an entry PSA of 1.6-4. Median follow up was 12.6 years. Actuarial overall survival at 10 years was 82% for RT plus AAT and 78% for RT + placebo and a hazard ratio of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.58-0.98) with a 1-sided p value of 0.018 (2-sided p = 0.036). The 12-year incidence of PC central-reviewed deaths were 2.3% for RT + AAT and 7.5% for RT + placebo ( p< 0.001).The cumulative incidence of metastatic PC at 12 years was less in the RT + AAT arm, 14% (51 patients), vs. 23% (83 patients) in the RT + placebo arm (p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses of the relative benefits of the addition of AAT to RT are planned and will be presented. Late grade III and IV toxicity were similar in the AAT and placebo arms. The combined grade III and IV toxicities for RT + AAT and RT + placebo were: bladder 7.0% vs. 6.7%, bowel 2.7% vs. 1.6%. Gynecomastia differed significantly by treatment arm, 70% vs. 11%. Conclusions: 24 months of AAT using 150mg bicalutamide daily during and after salvage RT significantly improved long term overall survival and reduced the incidence of metastatic PC and PC death. Support: NCI grants U10CA21661, U10CA180868, U10CA180822, and U10CA37422 and AstraZeneca. Clinical trial information: NCT00002874.

256 Background: B7-H3 (CD276), part of the B7 superfamily, has been shown to play an immunomodulatory role, however its regulation, receptor and mechanism of action remain unclear. Protein levels of B7-H3 have been previously shown to relate to prostate cancer outcomes and currently, humanized monoclonal antibodies are being developed for clinical use (MGA271, Macrogenics). Here we use genomic expression data to examine the relationship of B7-H3 to prostate cancer outcomes and molecular subtypes. Methods: Prostatectomy tissue from 905 patients were profiled using the Affymetrix HuEx 1.0 ST microarray. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to identify significant associations of B7-H3 expression with clinico-pathologic variables, and survival analysis were used to evaluate the prognostic value of B7-H3. Pearson’s correlation analyses were also performed to assess the relationship of B7-H3 expression with molecular subtypes and individual transcripts. Androgen receptor (AR) occupancy of promoter regions was derived in silico from chromosomal immune-precipitation (ChIP) data. Results: B7-H3 expression was positively associated with Gleason score (p < 0.01) and tumor stage (p < 0.01). High B7-H3 expression also correlated with the development of metastasis and prostate cancer specific mortality (HR of 3.4 and 2.4 respectively, p < 0.05 for both), but this was not significant on multi-variable analysis. B7-H3 was positively associated with ERG+ disease (n = 670, r = 0.85, p < 0.05) and AR expression (n = 670, r = 0.46, p < 0.001). B7-H3 was found to be one of the most correlated genes with AR (95th percentile) and ChIP analysis revealed AR binding upstream of B7-H3, suggesting potential androgen dependent regulation. Conclusions: B7-H3 expression correlates with high Gleason grade and advanced prostate cancer stage with higher quartiles of expression portending poor oncologic outcomes in two independent prostatectomy cohorts. B7-H3 expression appears to relate to the androgen receptor.

12 Background: In 3 published randomized trials, adjuvant radiation therapy (ART) for prostate cancer (PCa) resulted in improved progression free survival. However, the impact on metastases and overall survival is unclear. To date, there have been no published prospective trials examining the impact of salvage radiation therapy (SRT) in this disease state. Hence, we conducted a retrospective, nonrandomized comparative study of ART, SRT, or no radiation following radical prostatectomy (RP) for men with pT3 disease or positive margins (adverse pathologic features, APF). Methods: 422 PCa men treated at 4 institutions with RP and having APF were analyzed with a primary end point of clinical metastasis. ART (n = 111), early SRT (n = 70) and delayed SRT (n = 83) were defined by PSA levels of < 0.2, 0.2 to 0.5, and ≥ 0.5 ng/mL, respectively, prior to RT initiation. Remaining 157 men who did not receive additional therapy prior to metastatic onset formed the no RT arm. Clinical-genomic risk was assessed by CAPRA-S and Decipher. Cox multivariable (MVA) model was used to evaluate the impact of treatment on outcome. Results: During study follow-up, 37 men developed metastasis with a median follow-up of 8 years. Both CAPRA-S and Decipher had independent predictive value on MVA for metastatic outcome (both p < 0.05). On MVA adjusting for clinical-genomic risk, delayed SRT and no RT had an HR of 4.31 (95%CI, 1.20-15.47) and 5.42 (95% CI, 1.59-18.44) for metastasis compared to ART. No significance difference was observed between early SRT and ART (p = 0.28). Men with low to intermediate CAPRA-S and low Decipher have a low rate of metastatic events regardless of treatment selection. In contrast, men with high CAPRA-S and Decipher benefit from ART, however the cumulative incidence of metastasis remains high. Conclusions: The decision as to the timing and need for additional local therapy following RP is nuanced and requires providers and men to balance risks of morbidity with improved oncologic outcomes. This analysis provides the most robust and accurate quantification of risk for these men. Post-RP treatment can be safely avoided for men who are low risk by clinical-genomic risk, whereas those at high risk should favor enrollment in clinical trials.