Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

795 citation(s) found for "I Wi, Chung".

The PATHFINDER Study: Assessment of the Implementation of an Investigational Multi-Cancer Early Detection Test into Clinical Practice
Nadauld, Lincoln , McDonnell, Charles H. , Beer, Tomasz M. , Liu, Minetta C. , Klein, Eric A. , Hudnut, Andrew , Whittington, Richard, Oxnard, Geoffrey R. , Lipson, Jafi A. , Lopatin, Margarita , Shaknovich, Rita , Chung, Karen , Fung, Eric T. , Marinac, Catherine R. , Lipson, Jafi , Chung, Karen C , Marinac, Catherine R , Klein, Eric A , Beer, Tomasz M , Taylor, Bruce , Schrag, Deborah

Cancers | July 13, 2021 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 14 | Pages: 3501

10.3390/cancers13143501 | PMID 34298717 Get It

To examine the extent of the evaluation required to achieve diagnostic resolution and the test performance characteristics of a targeted methylation cell-free DNA (cfDNA)-based multi-cancer early detection (MCED) test, ~6200 participants ≥50 years with (cohort A) or without (cohort B) ≥1 of 3 additional specific cancer risk factors will be enrolled in PATHFINDER (NCT04241796), a prospective, longitudinal, interventional, multi-center study. Plasma cfDNA from blood samples will be analyzed to detect abnormally methylated DNA associated with cancer (i.e., cancer “signal”) and a cancer signal origin (i.e., tissue of origin). Participants with a “signal detected” will undergo further diagnostic evaluation per guiding physician discretion; those with a “signal not detected” will be advised to continue guideline-recommended screening. The primary objective will be to assess the number and types of subsequent diagnostic tests needed for diagnostic resolution. Based on microsimulations (using estimates of cancer incidence and dwell times) of the typical risk profiles of anticipated participants, the median (95% CI) number of participants with a “signal detected” result is expected to be 106 (87–128). Subsequent diagnostic evaluation is expected to detect 52 (39–67) cancers. The positive predictive value of the MCED test is expected to be 49% (39–58%). PATHFINDER will evaluate the integration of a cfDNA-based MCED test into existing clinical cancer diagnostic pathways. The study design of PATHFINDER is described here.
Management of Congenital Long-QT Syndrome: Commentary From the Experts
Kaufman, Elizabeth S. , Eckhardt, Lee L. , Ackerman, Michael J. , Aziz, Peter F. , Behr, Elijah R. , Cerrone, Marina , Chung, Mina K. , Cutler, Michael J. , Etheridge, Susan P. , Krahn, Andrew D. , Lubitz, Steven A. , Priori, Silvia G. , Roberts, Jason D. , Roden, Dan M. , Schulze‐Bahr, Eric , Shoemaker, M. Benjamin , Sy, Raymond W. , Towbin, Jeffrey A. , Wilde, Arthur A.M. , Zaręba, Wojciech , Behr, Elijah Raphael , Eckhardt, Lee L , Krahn, Andrew D , Lubitz, Steven A , Cerrone, Marina , Zareba, Wojciech , Priori, Silvia , Pérez, Marco , Roden, Dan M. , Schwartz, Peter J. , Shimizu, Wataru , Viskin, Sami

Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology | July 9, 2021 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 7 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circep.120.009726 | PMID 34238011 Get It

While published guidelines are useful in the care of patients with long-QT syndrome, it can be difficult to decide how to apply the guidelines to individual patients, particularly those with intermediate risk. We explored the diversity of opinion among 24 clinicians with expertise in long-QT syndrome. Experts from various regions and institutions were presented with 4 challenging clinical scenarios and asked to provide commentary emphasizing why they would make their treatment recommendations. All 24 authors were asked to vote on case-specific questions so as to demonstrate the degree of consensus or divergence of opinion. Of 24 authors, 23 voted and 1 abstained. Details of voting results with commentary are presented. There was consensus on several key points, particularly on the importance of the diagnostic evaluation and of β-blocker use. There was diversity of opinion about the appropriate use of other therapeutic measures in intermediate-risk individuals. Significant gaps in knowledge were identified.
2021 American College of Rheumatology/Vasculitis Foundation Guideline for the Management of Polyarteritis Nodosa
Gorelik, Mark , Langford, Carol A. , Maz, Mehrdad , Abril, Andy , Archer, Amy M., Conn, Doyt L. , Full, Kathy A., Grayson, Peter C. , Ibarra, Maria, Imundo, Lisa F., Kim, Susan , Rhee, Rennie L. , Stone, John H. , Sule, Sangeeta , Vitobaldi, Omar I., Warner, Ann, Byram, Kevin , Dua, Anisha B. , Husainat, Nedaa , James, Karen , Kalot, Mohamad A. , Lin, Yih Chang, Springer, Jason , Turgunbaev, Marat, Villa‐Forte, Alexandra, Turner, Amy S. , Maz, Mehrdad , Conn, Doyt L , Grayson, Peter C , Merkel, Peter A , Rhee, Rennie L , Stone, John H , Sule, Sangeeta , Husainat, Nedaa M , Kalot, Mohamad A , Springer, Jason M , Turner, Amy S , Mustafa, Reem A , Dua, Anisha B , Chung, Sharon A. , Guyatt, Gordon , Merkel, Peter A. , Seo, Philip , Sundel, Robert P. , Warner, Ann

Arthritis Care & Research | July 8, 2021 | Volume: 73 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1061-1070

10.1002/acr.24633 | PMID 34235889 Get It

Objective To provide evidence‐based recommendations and expert guidance for the management of systemic polyarteritis nodosa (PAN). Methods Twenty‐one clinical questions regarding diagnostic testing, treatment, and management were developed in the population, intervention, comparator, and outcome (PICO) format for systemic, non–hepatitis B–related PAN. Systematic literature reviews were conducted for each PICO question. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used to assess the quality of evidence and formulate recommendations. Each recommendation required ≥70% consensus among the Voting Panel. Results We present 16 recommendations and 1 ungraded position statement for PAN. Most recommendations were graded as conditional due to the paucity of evidence. These recommendations support early treatment of severe PAN with cyclophosphamide and glucocorticoids, limiting toxicity through minimizing long‐term exposure to both treatments, and the use of imaging and tissue biopsy for disease diagnosis. These recommendations endorse minimizing risk to the patient by using established therapy at disease onset and identify new areas where adjunctive therapy may be warranted. Conclusion These recommendations provide guidance regarding diagnostic strategies, use of pharmacologic agents, and imaging for patients with PAN.
2021 American College of Rheumatology/Vasculitis Foundation Guideline for the Management of Giant Cell Arteritis and Takayasu Arteritis
Maz, Mehrdad , Abril, Andy , Langford, Carol A. , Gorelik, Mark , Archer, Amy M., Conn, Doyt L. , Full, Kathy A., Grayson, Peter C. , Ibarra, Maria, Imundo, Lisa F., Kim, Susan , Rhee, Rennie L. , Stone, John H. , Sule, Sangeeta , Vitobaldi, Omar I., Warner, Ann, Byram, Kevin , Dua, Anisha B. , Husainat, Nedaa , Kalot, Mohamad A. , Lin, Yih Chang, Springer, Jason , Turgunbaev, Marat, Villa‐Forte, Alexandra, Turner, Amy S. , Conn, Doyt L , Grayson, Peter C , Merkel, Peter A , Rhee, Rennie L , Stone, John H , Sule, Sangeeta , Husainat, Nedaa M , Kalot, Mohamad A , Springer, Jason M , Turner, Amy S , Mustafa, Reem A , Maz, Mehrdad , Dua, Anisha B , Chung, Sharon A. , Guyatt, Gordon , Merkel, Peter A. , Seo, Philip , Sundel, Robert P. , Warner, Ann, James, Karen E.

Arthritis Care & Research | July 8, 2021 | Volume: 73 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1071-1087

10.1002/acr.24632 | PMID 34235871 Get It

Objective To provide evidence‐based recommendations and expert guidance for the management of giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu arteritis (TAK) as exemplars of large vessel vasculitis. Methods Clinical questions regarding diagnostic testing, treatment, and management were developed in the population, intervention, comparator, and outcome (PICO) format for GCA and TAK (27 for GCA, 27 for TAK). Systematic literature reviews were conducted for each PICO question. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used to rate the quality of the evidence. Recommendations were developed by the Voting Panel, comprising adult and pediatric rheumatologists and patients. Each recommendation required ≥70% consensus among the Voting Panel. Results We present 22 recommendations and 2 ungraded position statements for GCA, and 20 recommendations and 1 ungraded position statement for TAK. These recommendations and statements address clinical questions relating to the use of diagnostic testing, including imaging, treatments, and surgical interventions in GCA and TAK. Recommendations for GCA include support for the use of glucocorticoid‐sparing immunosuppressive agents and the use of imaging to identify large vessel involvement. Recommendations for TAK include the use of nonglucocorticoid immunosuppressive agents with glucocorticoids as initial therapy. There were only 2 strong recommendations; the remaining recommendations were conditional due to the low quality of evidence available for most PICO questions. Conclusion These recommendations provide guidance regarding the evaluation and management of patients with GCA and TAK, including diagnostic strategies, use of pharmacologic agents, and surgical interventions.
2021 American College of Rheumatology/Vasculitis Foundation Guideline for the Management of Polyarteritis Nodosa
Gorelik, Mark , Langford, Carol A. , Maz, Mehrdad , Abril, Andy , Archer, Amy M., Conn, Doyt L. , Full, Kathy A., Grayson, Peter C. , Ibarra, Maria, Imundo, Lisa F., Kim, Susan , Rhee, Rennie L. , Stone, John H. , Sule, Sangeeta , Vitobaldi, Omar I., Warner, Ann, Byram, Kevin , Husainat, Nedaa , Kalot, Mohamad A. , Lin, Yih Chang, Springer, Jason , Turgunbaev, Marat, Villa‐Forte, Alexandra, Turner, Amy S. , Maz, Mehrdad , Conn, Doyt L , Grayson, Peter C , Merkel, Peter A , Rhee, Rennie L , Stone, John H , Sule, Sangeeta , Husainat, Nedaa M , Kalot, Mohamad A , Springer, Jason M , Turner, Amy S , Mustafa, Reem A , Chung, Sharon A. , Guyatt, Gordon , Merkel, Peter A. , Seo, Philip , Sundel, Robert P. , Warner, Ann, Dua, Anisha B. , James, Karen E.

Arthritis & Rheumatology | July 8, 2021 | Volume: 73 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1384-1393

10.1002/art.41776 | PMID 34235883 Get It

Objective To provide evidence‐based recommendations and expert guidance for the management of systemic polyarteritis nodosa (PAN). Methods Twenty‐one clinical questions regarding diagnostic testing, treatment, and management were developed in the population, intervention, comparator, and outcome (PICO) format for systemic, non–hepatitis B–related PAN. Systematic literature reviews were conducted for each PICO question. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used to assess the quality of evidence and formulate recommendations. Each recommendation required ≥70% consensus among the Voting Panel. Results We present 16 recommendations and 1 ungraded position statement for PAN. Most recommendations were graded as conditional due to the paucity of evidence. These recommendations support early treatment of severe PAN with cyclophosphamide and glucocorticoids, limiting toxicity through minimizing long‐term exposure to both treatments, and the use of imaging and tissue biopsy for disease diagnosis. These recommendations endorse minimizing risk to the patient by using established therapy at disease onset and identify new areas where adjunctive therapy may be warranted. Conclusion These recommendations provide guidance regarding diagnostic strategies, use of pharmacologic agents, and imaging for patients with PAN.
2021 American College of Rheumatology/Vasculitis Foundation Guideline for the Management of Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody–Associated Vasculitis
Langford, Carol A. , Maz, Mehrdad , Abril, Andy , Gorelik, Mark , Archer, Amy M., Conn, Doyt L. , Full, Kathy A., Grayson, Peter C. , Ibarra, Maria, Imundo, Lisa F., Kim, Susan , Rhee, Rennie L. , Stone, John H. , Sule, Sangeeta , Vitobaldi, Omar I., Warner, Ann, Byram, Kevin , Husainat, Nedaa , Kalot, Mohamad A. , Lin, Yih Chang, Springer, Jason , Turgunbaev, Marat, Villa‐Forte, Alexandra, Turner, Amy S. , Maz, Mehrdad , Conn, Doyt L , Grayson, Peter C , Merkel, Peter A , Rhee, Rennie L , Stone, John H , Sule, Sangeeta , Husainat, Nedaa M , Kalot, Mohamad A , Springer, Jason M , Turner, Amy S , Mustafa, Reem A , Chung, Sharon A. , Guyatt, Gordon , Merkel, Peter A. , Seo, Philip , Sundel, Robert P. , Warner, Ann, Dua, Anisha B. , James, Karen E.

Arthritis Care & Research | July 8, 2021 | Volume: 73 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1088-1105

10.1002/acr.24634 | PMID 34235880 Get It

Objective To provide evidence‐based recommendations and expert guidance for the management of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody–associated vasculitis (AAV), including granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA). Methods Clinical questions regarding the treatment and management of AAV were developed in the population, intervention, comparator, and outcome (PICO) format (47 for GPA/MPA, 34 for EGPA). Systematic literature reviews were conducted for each PICO question. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used to assess the quality of evidence and formulate recommendations. Each recommendation required ≥70% consensus among the Voting Panel. Results We present 26 recommendations and 5 ungraded position statements for GPA/MPA, and 15 recommendations and 5 ungraded position statements for EGPA. This guideline provides recommendations for remission induction and maintenance therapy as well as adjunctive treatment strategies in GPA, MPA, and EGPA. These recommendations include the use of rituximab for remission induction and maintenance in severe GPA and MPA and the use of mepolizumab in nonsevere EGPA. All recommendations are conditional due in part to the lack of multiple randomized controlled trials and/or low‐quality evidence supporting the recommendations. Conclusion This guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and the Vasculitis Foundation for the management of AAV and provides guidance to health care professionals on how to treat these diseases.
2021 American College of Rheumatology/Vasculitis Foundation Guideline for the Management of Giant Cell Arteritis and Takayasu Arteritis
Maz, Mehrdad , Abril, Andy , Langford, Carol A. , Gorelik, Mark , Archer, Amy M., Conn, Doyt L. , Full, Kathy A., Grayson, Peter C. , Ibarra, Maria, Imundo, Lisa F., Kim, Susan , Rhee, Rennie L. , Stone, John H. , Sule, Sangeeta , Vitobaldi, Omar I., Warner, Ann, Byram, Kevin , Dua, Anisha B. , Husainat, Nedaa , James, Karen , Kalot, Mohamad A. , Lin, Yih Chang, Springer, Jason , Turgunbaev, Marat, Villa‐Forte, Alexandra, Turner, Amy S. , Conn, Doyt L , Grayson, Peter C , Merkel, Peter A , Rhee, Rennie L , Stone, John H , Sule, Sangeeta , Husainat, Nedaa M , Kalot, Mohamad A , Springer, Jason M , Turner, Amy S , Mustafa, Reem A , Maz, Mehrdad , Dua, Anisha B , Chung, Sharon A. , Guyatt, Gordon , Merkel, Peter A. , Seo, Philip , Sundel, Robert P. , Warner, Ann

Arthritis & Rheumatology | July 8, 2021 | Volume: 73 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1349-1365

10.1002/art.41774 | PMID 34235884 Get It

Objective To provide evidence‐based recommendations and expert guidance for the management of giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu arteritis (TAK) as exemplars of large vessel vasculitis. Methods Clinical questions regarding diagnostic testing, treatment, and management were developed in the population, intervention, comparator, and outcome (PICO) format for GCA and TAK (27 for GCA, 27 for TAK). Systematic literature reviews were conducted for each PICO question. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used to rate the quality of the evidence. Recommendations were developed by the Voting Panel, comprising adult and pediatric rheumatologists and patients. Each recommendation required ≥70% consensus among the Voting Panel. Results We present 22 recommendations and 2 ungraded position statements for GCA, and 20 recommendations and 1 ungraded position statement for TAK. These recommendations and statements address clinical questions relating to the use of diagnostic testing, including imaging, treatments, and surgical interventions in GCA and TAK. Recommendations for GCA include support for the use of glucocorticoid‐sparing immunosuppressive agents and the use of imaging to identify large vessel involvement. Recommendations for TAK include the use of nonglucocorticoid immunosuppressive agents with glucocorticoids as initial therapy. There were only 2 strong recommendations; the remaining recommendations were conditional due to the low quality of evidence available for most PICO questions. Conclusion These recommendations provide guidance regarding the evaluation and management of patients with GCA and TAK, including diagnostic strategies, use of pharmacologic agents, and surgical interventions.
2021 American College of Rheumatology/Vasculitis Foundation Guideline for the Management of Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody–Associated Vasculitis
Langford, Carol A. , Maz, Mehrdad , Abril, Andy , Gorelik, Mark , Archer, Amy M., Conn, Doyt L. , Full, Kathy A., Grayson, Peter C. , Ibarra, Maria, Imundo, Lisa F., Kim, Susan , Rhee, Rennie L. , Stone, John H. , Sule, Sangeeta , Vitobaldi, Omar I., Warner, Ann, Byram, Kevin , Dua, Anisha B. , Husainat, Nedaa , James, Karen , Kalot, Mohamad A. , Lin, Yih Chang, Springer, Jason , Turgunbaev, Marat, Villa‐Forte, Alexandra, Turner, Amy S. , Maz, Mehrdad , Conn, Doyt L , Grayson, Peter C , Merkel, Peter A , Rhee, Rennie L , Stone, John H , Sule, Sangeeta , Husainat, Nedaa M , Kalot, Mohamad A , Springer, Jason M , Turner, Amy S , Mustafa, Reem A , Dua, Anisha B , Chung, Sharon A. , Guyatt, Gordon , Merkel, Peter A. , Seo, Philip , Sundel, Robert P. , Warner, Ann

Arthritis & Rheumatology | July 8, 2021 | Volume: 73 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1366-1383

10.1002/art.41773 | PMID 34235894 Get It

Objective To provide evidence‐based recommendations and expert guidance for the management of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody–associated vasculitis (AAV), including granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA). Methods Clinical questions regarding the treatment and management of AAV were developed in the population, intervention, comparator, and outcome (PICO) format (47 for GPA/MPA, 34 for EGPA). Systematic literature reviews were conducted for each PICO question. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used to assess the quality of evidence and formulate recommendations. Each recommendation required ≥70% consensus among the Voting Panel. Results We present 26 recommendations and 5 ungraded position statements for GPA/MPA, and 15 recommendations and 5 ungraded position statements for EGPA. This guideline provides recommendations for remission induction and maintenance therapy as well as adjunctive treatment strategies in GPA, MPA, and EGPA. These recommendations include the use of rituximab for remission induction and maintenance in severe GPA and MPA and the use of mepolizumab in nonsevere EGPA. All recommendations are conditional due in part to the lack of multiple randomized controlled trials and/or low‐quality evidence supporting the recommendations. Conclusion This guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and the Vasculitis Foundation for the management of AAV and provides guidance to health care professionals on how to treat these diseases.
The safety of COVID‐19 convalescent plasma donation: A multi‐institutional donor hemovigilance study
Cho, Joseph H. , Rajbhandary, Srijana , Buren, Nancy L. Van , Al‐Ghafry, Maha , Fridey, Joy, Dy, Beth A., Ziman, Alyssa , Schreiber, George B. , Gammon, Richard R. , Reik, Rita A., Stubbs, James R. , Buskirk, Camille M. van , Kamel, Hany , Townsend, Mary , Zeller, Michelle P. , Gottschall, Jerome L. , van Buren, Nancy L , Fung, Mark K , Ziman, Alyssa , Schreiber, George B , Gammon, Richard R , Stubbs, James R , van Buskirk, Camille M, Townsend, Mary J

Transfusion | July 6, 2021 | Volume: 61 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 2668-2676

10.1111/trf.16572 | PMID 34227689 Get It

AbstractBackgroundAlthough the safety and therapeutic efficacy of COVID‐19 convalescent plasma (CCP) has been extensively evaluated, the safety of CCP donation has not been explored in a multi‐institutional context.Study design and methodsNine blood collection organizations (BCOs) participated in a multi‐institutional donor hemovigilance effort to assess the safety of CCP donation. Donor adverse events (DAEs) were defined according to the Standard for Surveillance of Complications Related to Blood Donation, and severity was assessed using the severity grading tool. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine attributes associated with DAE severity.ResultsThe overall DAE rate was 37.7 per 1000 donations. Repeat apheresis and apheresis‐naïve donors experienced adverse event rates of 19.9 and 49.8 per 1000 donations, respectively. Female donors contributed 51.9% of CCP donations with a DAE rate of 49.4 per 1000 donations. The DAE rate for male donors was 27.4 per 1000 donations. Vasovagal reactions accounted for over half of all reported DAEs (51.1%). After adjustment, volume of CCP donated was associated with vasovagal reaction severity (odds ratio [OR] 6.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.5–17.1). Donor age and donation history were also associated with DAE severity. Considerable differences in DAE types and rates were observed across the participating BCOs despite the use of standardized hemovigilance definitions.ConclusionThe safety of CCP donation appears comparable to that of conventional apheresis plasma donation with similar associated risk factors for DAE types and severity.
Abstract 12754: Infused CD34 Cell Dose, not Bone Marrow CD34+ Cell Content, Improves Clinical Outcomes and LVEF in Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction post STEMI: Results of the PreSERVE-AMI Trial
Kereiakes, Dean J. , Shavelle, David M. , Henry, Timothy D. , Toma, Catalin , Barsness, Gregory W. , Frohwein, Steve, Schatz, Richartd A, Cohen, Martin, Davidson, Charles J., Klapholz, Marc, Schaer, Gary L. , Moss, Thomas J. , Kanakaraj, AnnaMaria, Druker, Vitaly , Harper, Ken, Chung, Amy M. , Junge, Candice, Preti, Robert A., Smith, Robin L., Mazzo, David J., Pecora, Andrew L. , Quyyumi, Arshed A. , Abdel‐Latif, Ahmed , Schatz, R A, Dib, Nabil , Vásquez, Alejandro Arias , Kanakaraj, Anna Maria, Harper, Ken, Chung, Amy, Mazzo, David J., Losordo, Douglas W.

Circulation | July 3, 2021 | Volume: 132 | Issue: suppl_3 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circ.132.suppl_3.12754 Get It

Background: Prior studies suggest an association between naturally high circulating levels of CD34+ cells (CD34) and better outcomes following ischemic events. Pts in the treatment arm of the PreSERVE-AMI study were infused with all CD34 yielded from their bone marrow harvest, resulting in pts with naturally higher CD34 cell counts being infused with a higher cell dose. To determine whether selection bias may have influenced results, we performed an analysis of the relationship between BM CD34 content and outcomes in PreSERVE-AMI. Methods: PreSERVE-AMI is a Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of autologous, BM derived CD34 (CLBS10) in pts with LV dysfunction (LVEF ≤48% by MRI) ≥4 days post-STEMI. All pts underwent mini BM harvest and were randomized 1:1 to intracoronary infusion of CD34 (minimum dose 10M±20% cells) or placebo (cell diluent). Primary safety endpoints included AEs, SAEs and MACE (CV mortality, HF hospitalization, reinfarction, revascularization). Secondary endpoints included LVEF change from baseline. Regression analyses were performed to assess the influence of BM CD34 content on outcomes. Results: 161 patients were randomized and received intracoronary infusion (Jan 2013-Dec 2014). Mean age was 57±10 and 82% were men. Mean follow-up time was 18 mo, and safety data are accruing. BM CD34 content was not associated with differences in baseline characteristics with the exception of diabetes prevalence being higher in those with higher BM CD34 count (p=0.03). In controls, regression analyses showed no association of BM CD34 content with rates of MACE (p=0.2), SAEs (p=0.4), or change in LVEF (p=0.9). However, in CD34 treated pts, there was a dose-dependent improvement in LV function (p=0.045) and dose-dependent trends in MACE and SAE reduction compared to controls. As previously reported SPECT perfusion improved to a similar degree in control and treated pts. Conclusions: These data suggest that intracoronary infusion of CD34 cells, rather than BM CD34 cell content, is responsible for the benefit observed in the CD34 treatment group. The finding of a dose-response relationship is an important advance for defining the CD34 as an active agent for tissue repair. Future studies will further define CD34 dosimetry.