Back to Authors

James, Karen

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3783-7317

Mayo Clinic

University of Utah

Citations 9

2021 American College of Rheumatology/Vasculitis Foundation Guideline for the Management of Kawasaki Disease
Gorelik, Mark , Chung, Sharon A. , Ardalan, Kaveh , Friedman, Kevin G. , Hayward, Kristen , Imundo, Lisa F., Lapidus, Sivia , Kim, Susan , Son, Mary Beth F. , Sule, Sangeeta , Mater, Heather Van, Yildirim‐Toruner, Cagri , Langford, Carol A. , Maz, Mehrdad , Abril, Andy , Archer, Amy M., Conn, Doyt L. , Full, Kathy A., Grayson, Peter C. , Ibarra, Maria, Rhee, Rennie L. , Stone, John H. , Vitobaldi, Omar I., Warner, Ann, Byram, Kevin , Husainat, Nedaa , James, Karen , Kalot, Mohamad A. , Lin, Yih Chang, Springer, Jason , Turgunbaev, Marat, Villa‐Forte, Alexandra, Turner, Amy S. , Lapidus, Sivia K , Kim, Susan , Son, Mary Beth , Sule, Sangeeta , Maz, Mehrdad , Conn, Doyt L , Grayson, Peter C , Rhee, Rennie L , Stone, John H , Dua, Anisha B , Husainat, Nedaa M , Turner, Amy S , Mustafa, Reem A , Springer, Jason M , Kalot, Mohamad A , Binstadt, Bryce A. , Tremoulet, Adriana H. , Guyatt, Gordon , Merkel, Peter A. , Seo, Philip , Sundel, Robert P. , Warner, Ann, Dua, Anisha B.

Arthritis Care & Research | March 8, 2022 | Volume: 74 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 538-548

10.1002/acr.24838 Get It

Objective To provide evidence‐based recommendations and expert guidance for the management of Kawasaki disease (KD), focusing on clinical scenarios more commonly addressed by rheumatologists. Methods Sixteen clinical questions regarding diagnostic testing, treatment, and management of KD were developed in the Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes (PICO) question format. Systematic literature reviews were conducted for each PICO question. We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation method to assess the quality of evidence and formulate recommendations. Each recommendation required consensus from at least 70% of the Voting Panel. Results We present 1 good practice statement, 11 recommendations, and 1 ungraded position statement to guide the management of KD and clinical scenarios of suspected KD. These recommendations for KD are focused on situations in which input from rheumatologists may be requested by other managing specialists, such as in cases of treatment‐refractory, severe, or complicated KD. The good practice statement affirms that all patients with KD should receive initial treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). In addition, we developed 7 strong and 4 conditional recommendations for the management of KD or suspected KD. Strong recommendations include prompt treatment of incomplete KD, treatment with aspirin, and obtaining an echocardiogram in the setting of unexplained macrophage activation syndrome or shock. Conditional recommendations include use of IVIG with other adjuvant agents for patients with KD and high‐risk features of IVIG resistance and/or coronary artery aneurysms. These recommendations endorse minimizing risk to the patient by using established therapy promptly at disease onset and identifying situations in which adjunctive therapy may be warranted. Conclusion These recommendations provide guidance regarding diagnostic strategies, use of pharmacologic agents, and use of echocardiography in patients with suspected or confirmed KD.
Kawasaki Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Benefits and Harms of Common Treatments
James, Karen , Kalot, Mohamad A. , Husainat, Nedaa , Dua, Anisha B. , Byram, Kevin , Springer, Jason , Lin, Yih Chang, Turgunbaev, Marat, Villa‐Forte, Alexandra, Gorelik, Mark , Abril, Andy , Langford, Carol A. , Maz, Mehrdad , Husainat, Nedaa M , Springer, Jason M , Mustafa, Reem A , Kalot, Mohamad A , Dua, Anisha B , Chung, Sharon A.

ACR Open Rheumatology | July 27, 2021 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 671-683

10.1002/acr2.11308 Get It

ObjectiveKawasaki disease (KD) is a self‐limited vasculitis affecting medium‐sized vessels with a predilection for the coronary arteries. Although treatment reduces the likelihood of developing of coronary artery aneurysms, 5% of patients still develop aneurysms despite treatment, making KD the leading cause of acquired heart disease in children in the United States. Consequently, there is a great deal of interest in optimizing treatment regimens, particularly for higher‐risk patients, to decrease morbidity. The aim of this systematic review is to support the development of the American College of Rheumatology/Vasculitis Foundation for the diagnosis and management of KD, focusing on the more complex scenarios in which rheumatologists may become involved, such as high‐risk and refractory disease.MethodsEighty‐nine articles were considered for full review in this systematic literature review to address 16 Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome questions related to KD. Data were abstracted in hierarchical fashion. Randomized control trials (RCTs) were considered first; if none were identified or if they contained insufficient information, comparative observational studies were then viewed, followed by single‐arm observational studies/single arms from comparative studies. Only observational studies with more than 10 subjects with vasculitis were included.ResultsEight RCTs and 28 observational studies that addressed the questions were identified. Two questions were addressed by RCTs, seven questions had at least some comparative observational studies, three questions were only addressed by single‐arm data, and four questions had no relevant studies.ConclusionThis systematic review evaluates the benefits and harms of treatments for KD beyond first‐line therapy.
2021 American College of Rheumatology/Vasculitis Foundation Guideline for the Management of Polyarteritis Nodosa
Gorelik, Mark , Langford, Carol A. , Maz, Mehrdad , Abril, Andy , Archer, Amy M., Conn, Doyt L. , Full, Kathy A., Grayson, Peter C. , Ibarra, Maria, Imundo, Lisa F., Kim, Susan , Rhee, Rennie L. , Stone, John H. , Sule, Sangeeta , Vitobaldi, Omar I., Warner, Ann, Byram, Kevin , Dua, Anisha B. , Husainat, Nedaa , James, Karen , Kalot, Mohamad A. , Lin, Yih Chang, Springer, Jason , Turgunbaev, Marat, Villa‐Forte, Alexandra, Turner, Amy S. , Maz, Mehrdad , Conn, Doyt L , Grayson, Peter C , Merkel, Peter A , Rhee, Rennie L , Stone, John H , Sule, Sangeeta , Husainat, Nedaa M , Kalot, Mohamad A , Springer, Jason M , Turner, Amy S , Mustafa, Reem A , Dua, Anisha B , Chung, Sharon A. , Guyatt, Gordon , Merkel, Peter A. , Seo, Philip , Sundel, Robert P. , Warner, Ann

Arthritis Care & Research | July 8, 2021 | Volume: 73 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1061-1070

10.1002/acr.24633 Get It

Objective To provide evidence‐based recommendations and expert guidance for the management of systemic polyarteritis nodosa (PAN). Methods Twenty‐one clinical questions regarding diagnostic testing, treatment, and management were developed in the population, intervention, comparator, and outcome (PICO) format for systemic, non–hepatitis B–related PAN. Systematic literature reviews were conducted for each PICO question. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used to assess the quality of evidence and formulate recommendations. Each recommendation required ≥70% consensus among the Voting Panel. Results We present 16 recommendations and 1 ungraded position statement for PAN. Most recommendations were graded as conditional due to the paucity of evidence. These recommendations support early treatment of severe PAN with cyclophosphamide and glucocorticoids, limiting toxicity through minimizing long‐term exposure to both treatments, and the use of imaging and tissue biopsy for disease diagnosis. These recommendations endorse minimizing risk to the patient by using established therapy at disease onset and identify new areas where adjunctive therapy may be warranted. Conclusion These recommendations provide guidance regarding diagnostic strategies, use of pharmacologic agents, and imaging for patients with PAN.
2021 American College of Rheumatology/Vasculitis Foundation Guideline for the Management of Giant Cell Arteritis and Takayasu Arteritis
Maz, Mehrdad , Abril, Andy , Langford, Carol A. , Gorelik, Mark , Archer, Amy M., Conn, Doyt L. , Full, Kathy A., Grayson, Peter C. , Ibarra, Maria, Imundo, Lisa F., Kim, Susan , Rhee, Rennie L. , Stone, John H. , Sule, Sangeeta , Vitobaldi, Omar I., Warner, Ann, Byram, Kevin , Dua, Anisha B. , Husainat, Nedaa , James, Karen , Kalot, Mohamad A. , Lin, Yih Chang, Springer, Jason , Turgunbaev, Marat, Villa‐Forte, Alexandra, Turner, Amy S. , Conn, Doyt L , Grayson, Peter C , Merkel, Peter A , Rhee, Rennie L , Stone, John H , Sule, Sangeeta , Husainat, Nedaa M , Kalot, Mohamad A , Springer, Jason M , Turner, Amy S , Mustafa, Reem A , Maz, Mehrdad , Dua, Anisha B , Chung, Sharon A. , Guyatt, Gordon , Merkel, Peter A. , Seo, Philip , Sundel, Robert P. , Warner, Ann

Arthritis & Rheumatology | July 8, 2021 | Volume: 73 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1349-1365

10.1002/art.41774 Get It

Objective To provide evidence‐based recommendations and expert guidance for the management of giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu arteritis (TAK) as exemplars of large vessel vasculitis. Methods Clinical questions regarding diagnostic testing, treatment, and management were developed in the population, intervention, comparator, and outcome (PICO) format for GCA and TAK (27 for GCA, 27 for TAK). Systematic literature reviews were conducted for each PICO question. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used to rate the quality of the evidence. Recommendations were developed by the Voting Panel, comprising adult and pediatric rheumatologists and patients. Each recommendation required ≥70% consensus among the Voting Panel. Results We present 22 recommendations and 2 ungraded position statements for GCA, and 20 recommendations and 1 ungraded position statement for TAK. These recommendations and statements address clinical questions relating to the use of diagnostic testing, including imaging, treatments, and surgical interventions in GCA and TAK. Recommendations for GCA include support for the use of glucocorticoid‐sparing immunosuppressive agents and the use of imaging to identify large vessel involvement. Recommendations for TAK include the use of nonglucocorticoid immunosuppressive agents with glucocorticoids as initial therapy. There were only 2 strong recommendations; the remaining recommendations were conditional due to the low quality of evidence available for most PICO questions. Conclusion These recommendations provide guidance regarding the evaluation and management of patients with GCA and TAK, including diagnostic strategies, use of pharmacologic agents, and surgical interventions.
2021 American College of Rheumatology/Vasculitis Foundation Guideline for the Management of Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody–Associated Vasculitis
Langford, Carol A. , Maz, Mehrdad , Abril, Andy , Gorelik, Mark , Archer, Amy M., Conn, Doyt L. , Full, Kathy A., Grayson, Peter C. , Ibarra, Maria, Imundo, Lisa F., Kim, Susan , Rhee, Rennie L. , Stone, John H. , Sule, Sangeeta , Vitobaldi, Omar I., Warner, Ann, Byram, Kevin , Dua, Anisha B. , Husainat, Nedaa , James, Karen , Kalot, Mohamad A. , Lin, Yih Chang, Springer, Jason , Turgunbaev, Marat, Villa‐Forte, Alexandra, Turner, Amy S. , Maz, Mehrdad , Conn, Doyt L , Grayson, Peter C , Merkel, Peter A , Rhee, Rennie L , Stone, John H , Sule, Sangeeta , Husainat, Nedaa M , Kalot, Mohamad A , Springer, Jason M , Turner, Amy S , Mustafa, Reem A , Dua, Anisha B , Chung, Sharon A. , Guyatt, Gordon , Merkel, Peter A. , Seo, Philip , Sundel, Robert P. , Warner, Ann

Arthritis & Rheumatology | July 8, 2021 | Volume: 73 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1366-1383

10.1002/art.41773 Get It

Objective To provide evidence‐based recommendations and expert guidance for the management of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody–associated vasculitis (AAV), including granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA). Methods Clinical questions regarding the treatment and management of AAV were developed in the population, intervention, comparator, and outcome (PICO) format (47 for GPA/MPA, 34 for EGPA). Systematic literature reviews were conducted for each PICO question. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used to assess the quality of evidence and formulate recommendations. Each recommendation required ≥70% consensus among the Voting Panel. Results We present 26 recommendations and 5 ungraded position statements for GPA/MPA, and 15 recommendations and 5 ungraded position statements for EGPA. This guideline provides recommendations for remission induction and maintenance therapy as well as adjunctive treatment strategies in GPA, MPA, and EGPA. These recommendations include the use of rituximab for remission induction and maintenance in severe GPA and MPA and the use of mepolizumab in nonsevere EGPA. All recommendations are conditional due in part to the lack of multiple randomized controlled trials and/or low‐quality evidence supporting the recommendations. Conclusion This guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and the Vasculitis Foundation for the management of AAV and provides guidance to health care professionals on how to treat these diseases.
Giant Cell Arteritis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Test Accuracy and Benefits and Harms of Common Treatments
Dua, Anisha B. , Husainat, Nedaa , Kalot, Mohamad A. , Byram, Kevin , Springer, Jason , James, Karen , Lin, Yih Chang, Turgunbaev, Marat, Villa‐Forte, Alexandra, Abril, Andy , Langford, Carol A. , Maz, Mehrdad , Husainat, Nedaa M , Springer, Jason M , Mustafa, Reem A , Kalot, Mohamad A , Dua, Anisha B , Chung, Sharon A.

ACR Open Rheumatology | April 3, 2021 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 429-441

10.1002/acr2.11226 Get It

This systematic review compares treatment options for patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) and evaluates the test accuracy of studies used in diagnosing and monitoring GCA. These studies were used to inform evidence‐based recommendations for the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/Vasculitis Foundation (VF) vasculitis management guidelines. A systematic review and search of articles in English in Ovid Medline, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted. Articles were screened for suitability, and studies presenting the highest level of evidence were given preference. Three hundred ninety‐nine full‐text articles addressing GCA questions were reviewed to inform 27 Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome questions. No benefit was found with intravenous glucocorticoids (GCs) compared with high‐dose oral GCs in patients with cranial ischemic symptoms (27.4% vs 12.3%; odds ratio [OR] 2.39 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75‐7.62], [very low certainty of evidence]). Weekly tocilizumab with a 26‐week GC taper was superior to a 52‐week GC taper in patients achieving remission (risk ratio 4.00 [95% CI 1.97‐8.12], [low certainty of evidence]). Non‐GC immunosuppressive therapies with GCs compared with GCs alone showed no statistically significant in relapse at 1 year (OR 0.87 [95% CI 0.73‐1.04], [moderate certainty of evidence]) or serious adverse events (OR 0.81 [95% CI 0.54‐1.20]; [moderate certainty of evidence]). Temporal artery biopsy has a sensitivity of 61% (95% CI 38%‐79%) and a specificity of 98% (95% CI 95%‐99%) in patients with a clinical diagnosis of suspected GCA. This comprehensive systematic review synthesizes and evaluates the benefits and harms of different treatment options and the accuracy of commonly used tests for the diagnosis and monitoring of GCA.
Takayasu Arteritis: a Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Test Accuracy and Benefits and Harms of Common Treatments
Dua, Anisha B. , Kalot, Mohamad A. , Husainat, Nedaa , Byram, Kevin , Springer, Jason , James, Karen , Lin, Yih Chang, Turgunbaev, Marat, Villa‐Forte, Alexandra, Abril, Andy , Langford, Carol A. , Maz, Mehrdad , Husainat, Nedaa M , Springer, Jason M , Kalot, Mohamad A , Dua, Anisha B , Chung, Sharon A. , Mustafa, Reem A

ACR Open Rheumatology | January 29, 2021 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 80-90

10.1002/acr2.11186 Get It

ObjectiveTakayasu’s arteritis (TAK) is a granulomatous large‐vessel vasculitis primarily affecting the aorta and its proximal branches. TAK can be a difficult disease to diagnose and manage given the rarity of the disease as well as current limitations in biomarkers, imperfect imaging modalities, and few randomized controlled trials.MethodsIn developing the American College of Rheumatology/Vasculitis Foundation guideline for the management of TAK, we performed an extensive systematic literature review to guide our recommendations. We included RCTs first. When RCTs were not available, we included observational studies that reported on patient‐important outcomes for the intervention and comparison. When studies with comparative data were not available, we included case series that present patient‐important outcomes for either the intervention or the comparison.ResultsThree hundred forty‐seven articles were included for full review to answer 27 population, intervention, comparison, and outcome questions related to TAK. Ten studies were evaluated that addressed the use of glucocorticoids (GCs), non‐GC nonbiologic therapies, as well as biologics in treating TAK. A total of 33 studies, including 8 comparative studies, were included to determine the test accuracy of commonly available diagnostic tests for TAK.ConclusionThis comprehensive systematic review synthesizes and evaluates the benefits and harms of different treatment options and the accuracy of commonly used tests for the management of TAK.
Polyarteritis Nodosa: A Systematic Review of Test Accuracy and Benefits and Harms of Common Treatments
Lin, Yih Chang, Kalot, Mohamad A. , Husainat, Nedaa , Byram, Kevin , Dua, Anisha B. , James, Karen , Springer, Jason , Turgunbaev, Marat, Villa‐Forte, Alexandra, Abril, Andy , Langford, Carol A. , Maz, Mehrdad , Husainat, Nedaa M , Springer, Jason M , Mustafa, Reem A , Kalot, Mohamad A , Dua, Anisha B , Chung, Sharon A.

ACR Open Rheumatology | January 29, 2021 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 91-100

10.1002/acr2.11189 Get It

ObjectiveThe object of this study was to analyze the benefits and harms of different treatment options and to analyze test accuracy used in the evaluation of patients with primary systemic polyarteritis nodosa (PAN).MethodsA systematic search of published English‐language literature was performed in Ovid Medline, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from the inception of each database through August 2019. Articles were screened for suitability in addressing patient, intervention, comparison, and outcome questions, with studies presenting the highest level of evidence given preference.ResultsOf 137 articles selected for data abstraction, we analyzed 21 observational studies and seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The results showed indirect evidence that a deep skin biopsy provides good diagnostic accuracy. A combined nerve and muscle biopsy should be obtained for patients with PAN with peripheral neuropathy. Cyclophosphamide with high‐dose glucocorticoids (GCs) is effective as an induction treatment for newly diagnosed active and severe PAN. GC monotherapy is adequate in the majority of patients with nonsevere PAN, although it has a high relapse rate with GC taper. There was insufficient data in determining the optimal duration of non‐GC and GC maintenance therapy. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors are effective treatment for patients with deficiency of adenosine deaminase 2 (DADA2) with stroke and vasculitis manifestations.ConclusionThis comprehensive systematic review synthesizes and evaluates the harms and benefits of different treatment options and the accuracy of commonly used tests for the diagnosis of systemic PAN. Data for diagnosis and management of PAN and DADA2 are mostly limited to observational studies. More high‐quality RCTs are needed.
Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Test Accuracy and Benefits and Harms of Common Treatments
Springer, Jason , Kalot, Mohamad A. , Husainat, Nedaa , Byram, Kevin , Dua, Anisha B. , James, Karen , Lin, Yih Chang, Turgunbaev, Marat, Villa‐Forte, Alexandra, Abril, Andy , Langford, Carol A. , Maz, Mehrdad , Springer, Jason M , Husainat, Nedaa M , Byram, Kevin W , Mustafa, Reem A , Kalot, Mohamad A , Dua, Anisha B , Chung, Sharon A.

ACR Open Rheumatology | January 29, 2021 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 101-110

10.1002/acr2.11194 Get It

ObjectiveEosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is part of a group of vasculitides commonly referred to as antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)–associated vasculitis (AAV), in addition to granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), and renal‐limited vasculitis. Patients with EGPA characteristically have asthma and marked peripheral eosinophilia with only approximately 30% to 35% of patients being myeloperoxidase (MPO)‐ANCA positive, distinguishing it from other forms of AAV (1,2). The aim of this systematic review is to support the development of the American College of Rheumatology/Vasculitis Foundation guideline for the management of EGPA.MethodsA systematic review was conducted of the literature for seven forms of primary systemic vasculitis (GPA, MPA, EGPA, polyarteritis nodosa, Kawasaki disease, giant cell arteritis, and Takayasu arteritis). The search was done for articles in English using Ovid Medline, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Articles were screened for suitability in addressing population/patients, intervention, comparator, and outcomes (PICO) questions, with studies presenting the highest level of evidence given preference. Two independent reviewers conducted a title/abstract screen and full‐text review for each eligible study.ResultsThe initial search, conducted in August 2019, included 13 800 articles, of which 2596 full‐text articles were reviewed. There were 190 articles (addressing 34 PICO questions) reporting on the diagnosis and management of EGPA.ConclusionThis comprehensive systematic review synthesizes and evaluates the accuracy of commonly used tests for EGPA as well as benefits and toxicities of different treatment options.