Ardalan, Kaveh

RELA-related disease is a rare, autosomal-dominant condition presenting with immune dysregulation and immunodeficiency. RELA encodes the p65 subunit, a component of the canonical NFκB pathway. The underlying pathogenesis, at least in part, involves impaired NFκB activation, increased susceptibility to TNFα-induced apoptosis, and hyperinflammation. To date, only a modest number of cases have been documented worldwide, and the full clinical and functional spectrum of disease remains incompletely defined. This study represents a large global cohort identified with RELA variants, comprising 40 patients from 30 institutions, expanding our previous report of a single large kindred (1). The clinical spectrum includes arthritis, mucocutaneous ulcers, uveitis, dermatitis, irritable bowel disease, recurrent infections, lymphopenia, hypogammaglobulinemia, recurrent fevers, and susceptibility to neoplasia. The patients represent 36 kindreds with 28 unique RELA variants, of which 15 are missense, 7 nonsense, and 6 frameshift variants. Fifteen are in the Rel homology domain, 7 in the transcriptional activation domain, and 6 in the C-terminal region proximal to TAD (Fig. 1). Functional studies assessed the canonical NFκB pathway in 27% of the cohort (n = 11; healthy controls = 40). Patient peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were used to quantify total and phosphorylated p65 (ph-p65, Ser529) by flow cytometry after stimulation with PMA (100 ng/ml) and ionomycin (1 uM). In 8 patients, we assessed the kinetics of IκBα degradation, required for p65 phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of p65/p50. All patients tested had decreased total p65, while 64% had decreased ph-p65 with altered phosphorylation kinetics. Nearly 45% had impaired IκBα degradation. One patient (P4) demonstrated increased IκBα degradation and ph-p65, while a related proband (P1) had decreased ph-p65. Additionally, P4 did not have the same mucocutaneous clinical phenotype as P1 despite sharing the same RELA variant. This could reflect the effect of other genetic modifiers, epigenetic, environmental, or stochastic variations, which could lead to variable expressivity and/or incomplete penetrance. All patients appeared to have haploinsufficiency, as none had normal levels of p65. This study expands the clinical and genetic spectrum of RELA-related disease and provides mechanistic insights into the impact of these variants on p65 phosphorylation and downstream function, resulting in variable expressivity. Figure 1. RelA protein structure. Represents unique variant locations and categories, key domains, and phosphorylation sites. Source: UniProt. Adapted from (2). BioRender.

Objective To provide evidence‐based recommendations and expert guidance for the management of Kawasaki disease (KD), focusing on clinical scenarios more commonly addressed by rheumatologists. Methods Sixteen clinical questions regarding diagnostic testing, treatment, and management of KD were developed in the Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes (PICO) question format. Systematic literature reviews were conducted for each PICO question. We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation method to assess the quality of evidence and formulate recommendations. Each recommendation required consensus from at least 70% of the Voting Panel. Results We present 1 good practice statement, 11 recommendations, and 1 ungraded position statement to guide the management of KD and clinical scenarios of suspected KD. These recommendations for KD are focused on situations in which input from rheumatologists may be requested by other managing specialists, such as in cases of treatment‐refractory, severe, or complicated KD. The good practice statement affirms that all patients with KD should receive initial treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). In addition, we developed 7 strong and 4 conditional recommendations for the management of KD or suspected KD. Strong recommendations include prompt treatment of incomplete KD, treatment with aspirin, and obtaining an echocardiogram in the setting of unexplained macrophage activation syndrome or shock. Conditional recommendations include use of IVIG with other adjuvant agents for patients with KD and high‐risk features of IVIG resistance and/or coronary artery aneurysms. These recommendations endorse minimizing risk to the patient by using established therapy promptly at disease onset and identifying situations in which adjunctive therapy may be warranted. Conclusion These recommendations provide guidance regarding diagnostic strategies, use of pharmacologic agents, and use of echocardiography in patients with suspected or confirmed KD.

Objective To provide evidence‐based recommendations and expert guidance for the management of Kawasaki disease (KD), focusing on clinical scenarios more commonly addressed by rheumatologists. Methods Sixteen clinical questions regarding diagnostic testing, treatment, and management of KD were developed in the Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes (PICO) question format. Systematic literature reviews were conducted for each PICO question. We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation method to assess the quality of evidence and formulate recommendations. Each recommendation required consensus from at least 70% of the Voting Panel. Results We present 1 good practice statement, 11 recommendations, and 1 ungraded position statement to guide the management of KD and clinical scenarios of suspected KD. These recommendations for KD are focused on situations in which input from rheumatologists may be requested by other managing specialists, such as in cases of treatment‐refractory, severe, or complicated KD. The good practice statement affirms that all patients with KD should receive initial treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). In addition, we developed 7 strong and 4 conditional recommendations for the management of KD or suspected KD. Strong recommendations include prompt treatment of incomplete KD, treatment with aspirin, and obtaining an echocardiogram in the setting of unexplained macrophage activation syndrome or shock. Conditional recommendations include use of IVIG with other adjuvant agents for patients with KD and high‐risk features of IVIG resistance and/or coronary artery aneurysms. These recommendations endorse minimizing risk to the patient by using established therapy promptly at disease onset and identifying situations in which adjunctive therapy may be warranted. Conclusion These recommendations provide guidance regarding diagnostic strategies, use of pharmacologic agents, and use of echocardiography in patients with suspected or confirmed KD.