Citations

Abstract Increasing evidence recognizes Alzheimer's disease (AD) as a multifactorial and heterogeneous disease with multiple contributors to its pathophysiology, including vascular dysfunction. The recently updated AD Research Framework put forth by the National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer's Association describes a biomarker‐based pathologic definition of AD focused on amyloid, tau, and neuronal injury. In response to this article, here we first discussed evidence that vascular dysfunction is an important early event in AD pathophysiology. Next, we examined various imaging sequences that could be easily implemented to evaluate different types of vascular dysfunction associated with, and/or contributing to, AD pathophysiology, including changes in blood‐brain barrier integrity and cerebral blood flow. Vascular imaging biomarkers of small vessel disease of the brain, which is responsible for >50% of dementia worldwide, including AD, are already established, well characterized, and easy to recognize. We suggest that these vascular biomarkers should be incorporated into the AD Research Framework to gain a better understanding of AD pathophysiology and aid in treatment efforts.

AbstractCognitive change affecting patients after anaesthesia and surgery has been recognised for more than 100 yr. Research into cognitive change after anaesthesia and surgery accelerated in the 1980s when multiple studies utilised detailed neuropsychological testing for assessment of cognitive change after cardiac surgery. This body of work consistently documented decline in cognitive function in elderly patients after anaesthesia and surgery, and cognitive changes have been identified up to 7.5 yr afterwards. Importantly, other studies have identified that the incidence of cognitive change is similar after non‐cardiac surgery. Other than the inclusion of non‐surgical control groups to calculate postoperative cognitive dysfunction, research into these cognitive changes in the perioperative period has been undertaken in isolation from cognitive studies in the general population. The aim of this work is to develop similar terminology to that used in cognitive classifications of the general population for use in investigations of cognitive changes after anaesthesia and surgery. A multispecialty working group followed a modified Delphi procedure with no prespecified number of rounds comprised of three face‐to‐face meetings followed by online editing of draft versions.Two major classification guidelines [Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM‐5) and National Institute for Aging and the Alzheimer Association (NIA‐AA)] are used outside of anaesthesia and surgery, and may be useful for inclusion of biomarkers in research. For clinical purposes, it is recommended to use the DSM‐5 nomenclature. The working group recommends that ‘perioperative neurocognitive disorders’ be used as an overarching term for cognitive impairment identified in the preoperative or postoperative period. This includes cognitive decline diagnosed before operation (described as neurocognitive disorder); any form of acute event (postoperative delirium) and cognitive decline diagnosed up to 30 days after the procedure (delayed neurocognitive recovery) and up to 12 months (postoperative neurocognitive disorder).

202 Background: Cabazitaxel and prednisone (Cbz/pred) extend survival in mCRPC patients (pts) following docetaxel and first-line studies comparing Cbz to docetaxel are ongoing. Mito/pred also has anti-tumor activity in mCRPC and a non-overlapping mechanism of action and toxicity profile with Cbz. A multicenter phase 1 trial was initiated to establish the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of the combination of Cbz, Mito, and Pred(CAMP). Methods: Chemotherapy (chemo)-naive pts with mCRPC were enrolled in an accelerated titration design. The primary objective was to determine the MTD and RP2D of CAMP; secondary objectives included PSA response rate and duration of response. Cbz 20 and 25 mg/m2 were evaluated in combination with escalating doses of Mito (starting dose 4 mg/m2), both administered on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Pred 5 mg BID and pegfilgrastim were given with each cycle. Results: 23 pts were enrolled. The median age was 66 (range 51-78) and the median baseline PSA was 62.5 (range 3-791.2). There were 2 DLTs (sepsis and febrile neutropenia) observed at the dose level of Cbz 25 mg/m2 + Mito 10 mg/m2 (n = 4). There was 1 DLT (febrile neutropenia) observed with Cbz 20 mg/m2 (N = 12), establishing Cbz 20 mg/m2 + Mito 12 mg/m2 as the MTD and RP2D. The most common grade ³ 3 related adverse events were hematologic (neutropenia, n = 9; thrombocytopenia, n = 3; febrile neutropenia, n = 3). The median number of treatment cycles was 7.5 (range 2-16), and 2 pts remain on study. Greater than or equal to 50% maximal PSA declines from baseline were observed in 12 of 19 evaluable pts(63%). The median duration of response has not been reached (range 4.9-10.0+ months). Conclusions: The approved single-agent dose of Mito (12 mg/m2) was safely combined with Cbz 20 mg/m2, a dose with demonstrated activity in mCRPC and potentially less hematologic toxicity than 25 mg/m2. Preliminary efficacy data are encouraging with durable control of disease observed in a subset of pts. Further study of the treatment combination is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT01594918.

Abstract Background: MIF is a pleiotropic cytokine involved in tumor proliferation, invasiveness, angiogenesis, and the proinflammatory microenvironment. oxMIF is the pathogenic form mainly in tumor and its surrounding stroma. Imalumab (BAX69) is a novel recombinant, fully-human, monoclonal antibody that targets oxMIF, inhibiting tumorigenesis. Preclinical data demonstrated that imalumab has antitumor activities and acceptable toxicities. Methods: The primary endpoint of this dose-escalation study (3+3 design) was to assess maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The secondary endpoints were to assess antitumor activity, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD). Patients (pts) received intravenous (IV) imalumab [28-d cycles; 2 dose schedules (DS)]: biweekly in all solid tumors (DS1); weekly in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), metastatic ovarian cancer (OvCa) and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (DS2). Results: As of July 1 2015, 48 pts were treated in this study. DS1 = 19 pts in 6 cohorts (1, 3, 10, 25, 37.5, and 50 mg/kg), and DS2 = 29 pts in 2 cohorts (10 and 25 mg/kg) including expansion (10 mg/kg) into mCRC, OvCa and NSCLC. AUC and Cmax increased with dose. Dose escalation was stopped at 50 mg/kg (DS1) and 25mg/kg (DS2). An MTD was not reached for either DS. One pt reported dose-limiting toxicities: hypersensitivity pneumonitis (DS1; 50 mg/kg). There were no other grade 3 and 4 treatment related adverse events (trAEs). Grade 2 trAEs include: fatigue (n = 2), constipation (n = 1), peripheral edema (n = 1), infusion reaction (n = 1), and urticaria (n = 1). Stable disease (SD) ?4 mo was seen in 7 heavily pre-treated pts, including 1 pt with NSCLC who achieved SD for 13.4 mo. In DS2; Pre- and on-therapy tumor biopsies showed satisfactory tissue penetration of imalumab resulting in target saturation in all biopsy evaluable patients in all 3 tumor types. Biopsies revealed regulation of PI3K-AKT-mTOR downstream signaling, TNF-α signaling, anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1 and IL-10), and apoptosis. Based on clinical PK and PD study, 10mg/kg weekly was considered a biologically active dose and sufficient to reach ?95% target binding by the end of first cycle. Conclusions: Imalumab was well tolerated and showed single agent antitumor activity in heavily pretreated pts. An MTD was not reached. Recommended phase II dose (RP2D) is 10 mg/kg IV weekly. NCT01765790 Citation Format: Devalingam Mahalingam, Manish R. Patel, Jasgit C. Sachdev, Lowell L. Hart, Niels Halama, Ramesh K. Ramanathan, John Sarantopoulos, Xiaochun Liu, Salim Yazji, Dirk Jaeger, Deyaa Adib, Randolf Kerschbaumer, Apostolia Maria Tsimberidou. First-in-human phase 1 study assessing imalumab (BAX69), an anti-oxidized macrophage migration inhibitory factor (oxMIF) antibody in advanced solid tumors. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr CT046.

Abstract Background: MRX34 is a liposomal nanoparticle formulation with an encapsulated mimic of the naturally occurring microRNA-34 (miR-34), which is lost or expressed at reduced levels in many tumors. miR-34 inhibits key oncogenic pathways by repressing multiple important oncogenes including BCL2, E2F3, HDAC1, MET, MEK1, CDK4/6, PDGFR-ɑ/β, SIRT1, WNT1/3, NOTCH-1, β-catenin, CD44, Nanog and AXL. miR-34 also represses the expression of PD-L1 and DGKζ, thereby possibly triggering an anti-tumor immune response and cancer cell death. A multicenter Phase 1 clinical trial of MRX34 is being conducted in patients with advanced malignancies. Methods: Eligible patients were enrolled in a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation study and were given a MRX34 starting dose of 10 mg/m2, administered intravenously (IV) twice weekly (BIW) for 3 weeks in 28-day cycles. Enrollment is ongoing into a second MRX34 dosing schedule, daily x 5 (QD x 5) in 21-day cycles. The primary objectives are to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) for the two dosing schedules. Secondary objectives include assessments of safety, tolerability and the pharmacokinetic profile of MRX34 after intravenous dosing as well as to assess any biological and clinical activity. Results: As of July 2015, 75 patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled and evaluable: 44 Caucasians, 47 males, a median age of 61 years and a median of 4 prior treatments. Histologies included 30 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 7 pancreatic cancer, 4 cholangiocarcinoma, 3 each of bladder, breast, colorectal, cervix and lung. The remaining 19 patients represented various other malignancies <3 patients each. The 110 mg/m2 was deemed to be the MTD for the BIW dosing schedule. The MTD has not been determined yet for the QD x 5 schedule and dose escalation is continuing. The current dose levels are 70 mg/m2 QD x 5 for HCC and 93 mg/m2 QD x 5 for other solid tumors. The following treatment-emergent, all-causality adverse events (AEs) were most frequent among 47 patients in BIW cohorts vs 28 patients in QD x 5 cohorts: fever (64% vs 61%), fatigue (57% vs 39%), chills (57% vs 36%), back pain (55% vs 36%), nausea (49% vs 39%), diarrhea (43% vs 11%), headache (34% vs 14%), vomiting (32% vs 11%), anorexia (26% vs 14%), abdominal pain (23% vs 21%), dyspnea (23% vs 14%), insomnia (23% vs 14%), and dehydration (23% vs 4%). Most frequent grade 3/4 laboratory abnormalities were: lymphopenia (36% vs 71%), neutropenia (26% vs 36%), hyponatremia (26% vs 7%), AST elevation (26% vs 29%), leukopenia (23% vs 36%), hyperglycemia (19% vs 36%), thrombocytopenia (17% vs 29%), anemia (11% vs 21%), alkaline phosphatase elevation (11% vs 21%), and ALT elevation (9% vs 21%). One patient with HCC and another patient with melanoma achieved confirmed partial responses per RECIST. Conclusions: MRX34 has a manageable safety profile with confirmed partial responses in two patients with advanced HCC and melanoma. Due to better tolerability, QD x 5 schedule has been chosen for further study. Following MTD determination, enrollment will soon begin into the QD x 5 expansion cohorts for selected tumors. Citation Format: Muhammad Shaalan Beg, Andrew Brenner, Jasgit Sachdev, Samuel Ejadi, Mitesh Borad, Yang-Kon Kang, Ho Lim, T-Y Kim, Andreas Bader, Jay Stoudemire, Susan Smith, Sinil Kim, David Hong. Safety, tolerability, and clinical activity of MRX34, the first-in-class liposomal miR-34 mimic, in patients with advanced solid tumors. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2015 Nov 5-9; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2015;14(12 Suppl 2):Abstract nr C43.

Abstract Background: Nal-IRI (MM-398, nanoliposomal irinotecan) is designed for extended circulation relative to free irinotecan and to exploit leaky tumor vasculature for enhanced drug delivery to tumors. Tumor deposition of nal-IRI and subsequent conversion to SN-38 in both neoplastic cells and tumor associated macrophages (TAM) may positively correlate with response to therapy. In phase I studies of nal-IRI, activity has been shown in metastatic breast cancer (MBC), pancreatic and colorectal cancer. Ferumoxytol (FMX) is an iron-oxide superparamagnetic nanoparticle that has been used off-label for its MRI contrast properties. FMX has long-circulating pharmacokinetics and is taken up by TAMs with similar distribution patterns to nal-IRI in preclinical models. A single site pilot study established the feasibility of performing quantitative FMX MRI. Thirteen patients with advanced cancer (3 with ER/PR+ MBC) were imaged with FMX MRI and treated with nal-IRI. Median tumor lesion FMX uptake in the pilot study was 32.6 and 34.5 μg/mL at 1 h and 24 h, respectively. Lesions with FMX uptake above the median were associated with greater reductions in tumor size following treatment with nal-IRI as determined by CT lesion measurements. The relationship between FMX levels in tumor lesions and nal-IRI activity may serve as a potential biomarker for nal-IRI deposition and response in solid tumors. This study has been expanded to include additional MBC patients to further evaluate the technical feasibility of FMX MRI at multiple study sites, and to evaluate activity of nal-IRI in patients with MBC. Trial Design: Three cohorts of 10 patients with MBC in the following categories will be enrolled: ER and/or PR positive/HER2-negative, triple negative (TNBC) and MBC with brain metastases. An imaging phase will be followed by a treatment phase. The imaging phase consists of a baseline MRI scan, FMX infusion, and follow-up MRI scans at 1-4 and 24 h after infusion. The treatment phase begins 1-6 days after imaging and consists of nal-IRI 80 mg/m2 q2w. A pretreatment biopsy is required for correlative studies. Study Objectives: The primary objective of this multisite expansion is to investigate the feasibility of FMX quantitation in tumor lesions at multiple lesion sites in breast cancer. The secondary objective is to characterize the efficacy of nal-IRI in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Eligibility Criteria: The key inclusion criteria include patients with MBC, ECOG 0 or 1 with adequate bone marrow reserve and no prior topoisomerase 1 inhibitor or anti-VEGF treatment. ER and/or PR positive/HER2-negative and TNBC patients must have had 1-3 prior lines of chemotherapy in the metastatic setting and have at least 2 measurable lesions. Patients with brain metastasis must be neurologically stable and have new or progressive brain metastases after prior radiation therapy with at least one lesion measuring ≥ 1 cm in longest diameter on gadolinium-enhanced MRI. Status: This trial is currently recruiting patients. Citation Format: Sachdev JC, Ramanathan RK, Raghunand N, Anders C, Munster P, Minton S, Northfelt D, Blanchette S, Campbell K, Lee H, Klinz SG, Hendriks BS, Moyo V, Fitzgerald JB, Korn RL. A phase 1 study in patients with metastatic breast cancer to evaluate the feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging with ferrumoxytol as a potential biomarker for response to treatment with nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI, MM-398). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-02-14.