Citations

Platelets are central to hemostasis and thrombosis. Excessive platelet activation contributes to arterial thrombotic events, including myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and complications of peripheral artery disease, whereas excessive platelet inhibition increases bleeding risk. Antiplatelet therapy remains a cornerstone of secondary prevention in atherosclerotic and thrombotic cardiovascular diseases, yet current treatment paradigms do not fully account for biological heterogeneity in platelet function, including differences related to sex, age, hormonal status, and disease context. This state-of-the-art review examines current antiplatelet strategies, fundamental mechanisms of signal transduction, clinical indications, and limitations of preclinical and clinical studies, with a focus on sex-specific considerations and opportunities for personalized antiplatelet therapy. Aspirin and P2Y 12 receptor antagonists are widely used for secondary prevention. However, women have been underrepresented in many pivotal clinical trials, limiting the precision of sex-specific estimates of efficacy and bleeding risk. In parallel, commonly used preclinical models often fail to recapitulate the physiological conditions in which platelets interact with the vasculature, leukocytes, and soluble factors. Emerging therapeutic approaches seek to refine platelet inhibition by targeting pathways that reduce thrombotic risk while preserving hemostasis. Advancing antiplatelet therapy will require integration of mechanistic platelet biology with diverse clinical trial populations, standardized platelet phenotyping, and disease-specific approaches that account for how platelet function is altered across health and vascular disease.

Background: Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a commonly used material for cranioplasties due to its advantages over other materials and autologous bone grafts. PEEK has an increased malleability, which increases postoperative aesthetics and adapts well to the cranial contours; it is also associated with a lower rate of infection when compared with autologous cranioplasties. Despite these benefits, there is limited information on the practical aspects of modifying PEEK cranioplasties after their initial placement. Case Series: We present 2 cases of patients who had previously undergone PEEK cranioplasty being treated with deep-brain stimulation (DBS), which was placed through their PEEK implant. The first was an 18-year-old male who had previously undergone cranial vault closure with bone grafts following a craniotomy. Later, when a deep-brain stimulator was planned, it was discovered that the bone grafts had significant resorption and a lack of structural integrity. Therefore, bone grafts were replaced with a custom PEEK implant cranioplasty before the DBS electrodes were placed via drilling through the PEEK implant to access the brain at a later surgery. The second patient was a 39-year-old male who developed epilepsy after a stroke, requiring craniotomy. DBS was unable to be performed initially due to significant resorption of the patient’s native bone. Therefore, a PEEK cranioplasty was performed in preparation for a staged, subsequent placement of DBS electrodes through the implant. Both patients recovered uneventfully following surgery, with noticeable improvement in functional (reduction in seizure frequency) and aesthetic outcomes. Systematic Review: A literature review was conducted using PubMed with keywords related to PEEK cranioplasties. After screening titles, abstracts, and full-text papers, it was found that 3 previously documented cases have involved drilling through PEEK implants: one by Mallela et al, involving SEEG electrode placement; one by Marrone et al, concerning a burr hole for evacuating a chronic subdural hematoma; and one by Ledesma et al, regarding the placement of subdural grid electrodes. Conclusions: This case series highlights how PEEK cranioplasties can be drilled through for therapeutic procedures, such as DBS electrode implantation, without compromising their structure. These cases illustrate the versatility, safety, and adaptability of PEEK implants for additional necessary interventions.

ABSTRACT Background Radiotherapy is a cornerstone of treatment for pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors, but dose selection remains uniform despite interpatient variability in tumor radiosensitivity. This is consequential in children, for whom toxicity can have lifelong effects. Genomic-adjusted radiation dose (GARD) integrates tumor genomics with delivered radiation dose to quantify the biological effect of radiotherapy and has been validated across adult malignancies. Its relevance in pediatric CNS tumors is unknown. Methods We performed a cohort study using gene expression and data from 246 pediatric patients with high-grade glioma, medulloblastoma, or ependymoma from the Children’s Brain Tumor Network. GARD was calculated using a sequencing-adapted radiosensitivity index integrated with radiation dose through the linear–quadratic model. Associations of GARD and physical radiation dose with event-free and overall survival were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models stratified by tumor type and anatomic location. Patients who did not receive radiotherapy comprised a negative control cohort (sham-GARD). Results Among patients receiving radiotherapy, physical dose was uniform, whereas GARD showed substantial interpatient variability in biological effect. Higher GARD was associated with improved event-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0·90, 95% CI 0·83–0·97; p=0·004) and overall survival (HR 0·90, 95% CI 0·83–0·99; p=0·018). Physical dose was not associated with either endpoint. Among patients who did not receive radiotherapy, sham-GARD was not associated with outcomes, supporting GARD as a treatment-specific predictor rather than a prognostic biomarker. Conclusions In pediatric CNS tumors, the biological effect of radiotherapy quantified by GARD was associated with outcomes, whereas physical dose was not. These findings challenge uniform radiotherapy dosing and support genomically informed dose individualization. Prospective evaluation of GARD-guided radiotherapy is warranted to optimize tumor control while minimizing long-term toxicity in children.

BACKGROUND: Although diabetes is a known driver of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, whether antecedent hyperinsulinemia drives preclinical diastolic dysfunction (DD) progression before overt hyperglycemia remains unknown. Therefore, we investigated whether elevated endogenous insulin and insulin resistance independently predict longitudinal DD progression and adverse cardiovascular outcomes. METHODS: In a community-based cohort study, we evaluated 1191 participants from the Olmsted County Heart Function Study (median age, 58.7 [interquartile range, 52.4–66.6 years]) who underwent echocardiography at baseline and after 4 years. Fasting insulin and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance were assessed. The primary end point was DD progression. Secondary outcomes (mortality, heart failure) were assessed in 2030 participants followed for a median of 10.97 (95% CI, 10.90–11.05) years for heart failure and a median of 18.1 (95% CI, 18.0–18.2) years for mortality. RESULTS: DD progression occurred in 7.5% of participants. Baseline fasting insulin and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance strongly predicted progression ( P <0.001). In multivariable analysis, every 1-SD increase in log-transformed insulin was associated with 65% increased odds of progression (odds ratio, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.33–2.07]; P <0.001), adjusting for age, creatinine, and NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide). Similar results were observed for homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (odds ratio, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.34–2.08]; P <0.001). In secondary analyses, elevated insulin independently predicted all-cause (hazard ratio, 1.11 per 1-SD [95% CI, 1.02–1.21]) and cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.02–1.33]). Homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance was similarly predictive of all-cause (hazard ratio, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.03–1.20]) and cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.02–1.32]). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated endogenous insulin and insulin resistance are predictors of progressive DD and long-term mortality, even after accounting for body mass index. Metabolic dysregulation may drive myocardial stiffening before diabetes onset, identifying a potential early therapeutic window for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction prevention.

Background Prognostic staging systems in transthyretin amyloid (ATTR) cardiomyopathy were developed before the introduction of disease‐modifying treatment. We therefore evaluated contemporary risk stratification according to different staging systems in patients with ATTR cardiomyopathy. Methods All patients with newly diagnosed ATTR cardiomyopathy and baseline biomarker measurements from 2019 to 2023 were included from Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. Prognostic outcomes were calculated with Kaplan–Meier analysis for 3e staging systems in the main analysis: the National Amyloidosis Centre (NAC) staging system; a modified Mayo staging system using hsTNT (high‐sensitivity troponin T) cutoff >65 ng/L; the extended NAC model with a fourth stage (NT‐proBNP [N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide] >10 000 ng/L). Results The study population consisted of 441 patients with a median age of 76 years, 93% were men, 85% were initiated on tafamidis, and 94% had wild‐type ATTR. Median follow‐up was 3.4 years, and 109 deaths occurred during follow‐up. The 3‐year survival for the Mayo stages were 92.3% (88.7–95.9) for stage I, 71.6% (63.0–81.3) for stage II, and 43.5% (32.4–58.5) for stage III. For the NAC system, 3‐year survival were 92.0% (89.0–95.7), 67.5% (59.0–77.3), and 47.0% (34.7–63.5) for stages I, II, and III, respectively. The 3‐year survival by the extended NAC system was 92.0 (69.0–79.2), 69.0% (60.1–79.2), 53.2% (39.9–70.8) and 34.4% (17.4–68.0) for stages I, II, III, and IV, respectively. Conclusions In a contemporary cohort of patients with ATTR cardiomyopathy, the NAC and modified Mayo staging systems remained equally effective in delineating clinically meaningful prognostic groups, whereas the extended NAC system identified a stage IV subgroup with high mortality.

Context.— Transporting specimens can expose them to uncontrolled environmental factors. Whole blood viability is a commonly used preanalytic marker of quality for analysis of white blood cells. Objective.— To evaluate whole blood viability as a marker for transportation and specimen integrity for lymphocyte subset evaluation. Design.— More than 9000 whole blood specimens, transported during a 4-year period, and their lymphocyte subset evaluation results were analyzed retrospectively. Viability was measured by using Cellaca MX imaging cytometer, and lymphocyte and lymphocyte subset counts were determined with flow cytometry. Specimen cell viability results were stratified based on different transportation factors to discern their potential effects. Lymphocyte subset evaluation results from specimens with lower viability were compared with those from optimal viability specimens. Results.— Cell viability of transported specimens exhibited seasonal variation, decreasing during the warm summer months (median, 77.0% versus 83.4% in other seasons). The decline in viability negatively correlated with ambient temperature during transportation ( r = −0.7876). Longer transportation time (>60 hours) also caused a decrease in viability (median, 64.0%). While we observed a decrease in absolute cell counts for CD45 + lymphocytes, CD3 + T cells, CD8 + T cells, and CD19 + B cells in specimens with low viability (50%–80%), the differences were well within the assay’s total allowable error. Conclusions.— Control of preanalytic factors is critical for laboratory testing. Whole blood viability is a sensitive indicator of transport conditions and time, but it is not a specific predictor of quality for the main lymphocyte populations in cellular immunology testing.

Background: Despite guideline support for plain radiography (XR) in low-risk pediatric blunt trauma, CT remains the predominant imaging modality for cervical spine evaluation, increasing radiation exposure. We evaluated contemporary XR utilization and its diagnostic performance in children meeting consensus criteria for XR-first imaging. Study Design: We performed a prospective, multicenter observational study of 19,995 children enrolled in the Western Pediatric Cervical Spine Study across 72 U.S. trauma centers (2022–2025). Children appropriate for XR screening (Glasgow Coma Scale score >13, asymptomatic, non-obtunded) were identified using consensus criteria. XR utilization, sensitivity, and negative predictive value (NPV) were assessed, and multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of XR use. Results: XR was performed in 39% of patients overall and varied significantly by trauma center type (pediatric 48% vs adult 14% vs mixed 15%; p<0.001), whereas CT was used in 60%. Among XR-appropriate children (n=12,650), an estimated 7,705 CT examinations could potentially have been replaced with XR. In the overall cohort, XR sensitivity for any cervical spine injury was 30.3% (95% CI 26.2–34.6%) with an NPV of 95.2% (95% CI 94.7–95.7%). In XR-appropriate children, only two clinically significant cervical spine injuries were missed, yielding a sensitivity of 75.0% (95% CI 34.9–96.8%) and an NPV of 99.9% (95% CI 99.9%–100.0%). Conclusions: Plain radiography is substantially underutilized in children meeting consensus criteria for XR-first imaging. In appropriately selected patients, XR demonstrated an NPV of 99.9% for clinically significant cervical spine injury, supporting broader implementation of XR-first imaging strategies to reduce CT utilization and pediatric radiation exposure.

Objectives: Expanded coverage for telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic allowed providers to bill for telemedicine services that were previously not reimbursable, including telemedicine critical care (TCC) services for critically ill patients. We aimed to characterize TCC billing practices among Medicare beneficiaries before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Design, Setting, and Patients: This was a serial cross-sectional study of adult Medicare Fee-For-Service beneficiaries with at least one bill for critical care at acute care hospitals from January 2018 to September 2024. TCC billing was identified using provider billing codes; multivariate regression models were used to determine characteristics associated with receipt of TCC. Key outcomes were patient-, provider-, and hospital-level characteristics associated with TCC billing. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Billing for TCC increased from 0.002% of critical care bills pre-pandemic to 0.01% of critical care bills during and after the pandemic. Patients billed for TCC were disproportionately likely to have COVID-19 but were otherwise relatively similar to critically ill patients not billed for TCC. Internal medicine/critical care providers accounted for the highest proportion of pandemic TCC bills (46.0%). TCC billing occurred more often at minor teaching hospitals (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.21; 95% CI, 1.03–1.43) and at safety-net hospitals (aOR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.04–1.70). TCC billing was less likely at small-sized hospitals (aOR, 0.39; 95% CI 0.26–0.58) and medium-sized hospitals (aOR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.47–0.95), government-owned hospitals (aOR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.57–0.86), for-profit hospitals (aOR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.48–0.71), rural hospitals (aOR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55–0.89), and critical access hospitals (aOR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.47–0.73). Conclusions: Billing for TCC among hospitalized critically ill Medicare beneficiaries increased during the pandemic but remained low as a proportion of all critical care bills. There was variability in utilization across subspecialties and lesser utilization at rural and critical access hospitals. Further studies are needed to characterize the clinical and economic consequences of this shift.

Abstract Background Multi-modality therapy has improved survival for many patients with brain metastases. However, neurocognitive sequelae remain a challenge. While advances in radiotherapy have reduced toxicity, the potential interaction with targeted therapy and immunotherapy and the consequent impact on neurocognitive outcomes remain poorly defined. We appraised the current evidence on neurocognitive outcomes in the era of modern combined-modality therapy. Methods This systematic review adhered to PRISMA guidelines and included clinical trials reporting neurocognitive outcomes in patients with brain metastases receiving radiotherapy ± concurrent systemic therapies. Studies published through December 31, 2024 were identified through PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science using pre-defined MeSH term-based search strings. Results 39 studies from 1997-2024 involving 6,617 patients met inclusion criteria (n = 27 whole-brain radiotherapy [WBRT]; n = 12 radiosurgery), including six studies evaluating combined-modality therapy in 1,161 patients. Baseline cognitive evaluation was performed inconsistently, but neurocognitive deficits were frequently observed prior to treatment. Most randomized trials reported improved cognitive outcomes and quality of life with advanced radiotherapy techniques (e.g., hippocampal avoidance, radiosurgery) vs WBRT. Among 20 randomized trials comparing radiotherapy with or without a concurrent investigational systemic therapy, only four included neurocognitive assessments. There was no evidence of cognitive sequelae with combined-modality therapy, though evaluable trials were limited due to inconsistent reporting of neurocognitive functioning. Conclusion As survival improves in patients with brain metastases, preserved cognition is an important outcome measure. The lack of neurocognitive endpoints in pivotal brain metastasis trials represents a critical evidence gap. The interaction between radiotherapy and novel systemic therapies, and their combined effects on neurocognition, remain unknown. To address this, we recommend 1) integrating sensitive, pragmatic, and tailored neurocognitive assessments into oncology trials to quantify additive toxicity, 2) early and systematically incorporating neuropsychology into care pathways, 3) expanding radiation dose-sparing and radioprotective strategies, and 4) evaluating the utility of cognitive rehabilitation programs.

Deregulated inflammatory signaling via STAT family transcription factors, particularly STAT1, underlies a variety of immune-related diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease. Whereas activation of STATs by JAKs via canonical receptor-driven JAK–STAT signaling is well understood, little is known about JAK-independent mechanisms of STAT activation. Here, we identify the understudied nonreceptor tyrosine kinase TNK1 as a therapeutically targetable, JAK-independent activator of STAT signaling. Using a multiomics approach, we mapped a network of TNK1 substrates associated with protein condensates and proinflammatory signaling, including STAT1. We found that TNK1, but not its sister kinase ACK1, directly phosphorylates STATs at well described STAT-activating JAK sites. In cells, TNK1-mediated STAT1 phosphorylation and activation occurs independently of JAKs. Imaging and interactomics data suggest that TNK1 interacts with STAT1 in cytosolic condensates, which likely compartmentalize TNK1-substrate interactions. We show that an intrinsically disordered proline-rich region in TNK1, which includes a 14-3-3 docking phosphorylation site, is required for the formation of kinase-active TNK1 condensates and STAT1 phosphorylation. Mutations within the proline-rich region that eliminate 14-3-3 binding increase formation of TNK1 condensates, suggesting a model in which 14-3-3 acts as a clamp that constrains the flexible PRR to inhibit condensate formation and STAT1 activation. Finally, we show that TNK1 is a targetable driver of STAT1-mediated inflammation in the gut as inhibition of TNK1 reduces active STAT1 in the colon and ameliorates colitis symptoms in mice.