Cherukuri, Sai

Background: Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a commonly used material for cranioplasties due to its advantages over other materials and autologous bone grafts. PEEK has an increased malleability, which increases postoperative aesthetics and adapts well to the cranial contours; it is also associated with a lower rate of infection when compared with autologous cranioplasties. Despite these benefits, there is limited information on the practical aspects of modifying PEEK cranioplasties after their initial placement. Case Series: We present 2 cases of patients who had previously undergone PEEK cranioplasty being treated with deep-brain stimulation (DBS), which was placed through their PEEK implant. The first was an 18-year-old male who had previously undergone cranial vault closure with bone grafts following a craniotomy. Later, when a deep-brain stimulator was planned, it was discovered that the bone grafts had significant resorption and a lack of structural integrity. Therefore, bone grafts were replaced with a custom PEEK implant cranioplasty before the DBS electrodes were placed via drilling through the PEEK implant to access the brain at a later surgery. The second patient was a 39-year-old male who developed epilepsy after a stroke, requiring craniotomy. DBS was unable to be performed initially due to significant resorption of the patient’s native bone. Therefore, a PEEK cranioplasty was performed in preparation for a staged, subsequent placement of DBS electrodes through the implant. Both patients recovered uneventfully following surgery, with noticeable improvement in functional (reduction in seizure frequency) and aesthetic outcomes. Systematic Review: A literature review was conducted using PubMed with keywords related to PEEK cranioplasties. After screening titles, abstracts, and full-text papers, it was found that 3 previously documented cases have involved drilling through PEEK implants: one by Mallela et al, involving SEEG electrode placement; one by Marrone et al, concerning a burr hole for evacuating a chronic subdural hematoma; and one by Ledesma et al, regarding the placement of subdural grid electrodes. Conclusions: This case series highlights how PEEK cranioplasties can be drilled through for therapeutic procedures, such as DBS electrode implantation, without compromising their structure. These cases illustrate the versatility, safety, and adaptability of PEEK implants for additional necessary interventions.

Objective We aimed to understand the impact of Cranial Remolding Orthotic therapy (CRO) on the quality of life of both infants with positional deformational head shape abnormalities (PDHSAs), including plagiocephaly and brachycephaly, and their caregivers. Design Survey study. Setting A single, tertiary academic center. Patients, Participants Families of infants with PDHSAs who underwent CRO between 2007 and 2022. Interventions CRO. Main Outcome Measure(s) Subjective assessment of caregiver perspectives. Results We obtained 242 responses (72% male) from 1013 patients contacted (response rate 23.9%). CRO was initiated at a median age of 6 months (IQR 5-7 months), with a median treatment duration of 4 months (IQR 3-5 months). Insurance covered costs fully for 9.8% of respondents and partially for 47.0%; 43.2% paid completely out-of-pocket. Most were “very satisfied” or “satisfied” with head shape (89.2%) and ear position (93.3%). CRO did not impact children's sleep (75.2%), “never” or “rarely” impacted children's play (90.5%), and never impacted most families’ attendance of social events (91.3%). Hair loss was temporary in 29.9% and permanent in 0.8%. Most families did not find CRO burdensome (73.1%) and “never” or “rarely” felt fatigued (68.5%). Conclusions The study sheds light on the mental and social effects of CRO on patients and caregivers, as well as physical adverse effects associated with treatment. Overall, patients’ families expressed satisfaction with results and felt that administering CRO had minimal negative impacts on themselves and their children.

Objective Recalcitrant palatal fistulas in patients with cleft palate history sometimes require free flap reconstruction. This study reviews the literature on described flaps and outcomes. Design A systematic review was conducted per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Setting All study designs were included. Non-English articles were excluded. Patients and Participants Patients with a history of cleft palate who underwent free flap reconstruction for a oronasal fistula. Interventions Free tissue transfer for a palatal fistula repair. Main outcomee measures Information regarding defect and flap characteristics were reviewed. Surgical outcomes such as flap loss rates, rates of recurrent fistula formation, and speech outcomes were also obtained. Results Our search returned 894 articles, of which 23 were included. All studies were retrospective case series and reports. A total of 65 patients were described with an average age of 19.3 (range 3–55) years and a median fistula size of 8.00 cm 2 (range 2.54 cm 2 – 24 cm 2 ). The most common flap was the radial forearm flap (n = 37). Nine patients (13.8%) had recurrent fistula formation with surgical revision successful in all cases in which the patient returned to the operating room. There were two partial flap losses and no total flap losses. Speech outcomes showed improvement in 27 patients across 10 studies. Conclusions Palatal fistula repair with free tissue transfer is safe with an acceptable risk profile and low flap loss rate. Early recurrence due to partial flap necrosis and dehiscence are successfully managed with flap readvancement.