Citations

Introduction: Higher mtDNA-CN reflects better mitochondrial function, while lower levels indicate mtDNA release and increased inflammation. Although mtDNA-CN serves as a marker of cardiovascular health, the importance and mechanism of risk associated with mtDNA in high-risk individuals with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) remains poorly understood. To address this gap, we leveraged the ISCHEMIA Biorepository to: (1) evaluate the association between mtDNA-CN and all-cause death (ACD); and (2) define a transcriptomic profile associated with high mtDNA-CN and ACD risk for high-risk patients with CAD. Hypothesis: Higher mtDNA-CN is associated with reduced ACD risk and inflammation in high-risk patients enrolled in the ISCHEMIA Biorepository. Methods: Low pass whole genome sequencing and whole blood RNA-Seq were performed on 594 ISCHEMIA and ISCHEMIA-CKD participants with moderate-severe ischemia. Data were processed using the NYU deciphEHR pipeline and mtDNA was quantified using mitoAnalyzer. mtDNA-CN was median split, with samples having values ≤ median classified as the 'low' group and those > median as the 'high' group. Unadjusted group differences were assessed using Chi-squared tests. Survival analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazard models, adjusted for age, sex, diabetes, eGFR, dialysis status, ischemia severity, and left ventricular ejection fraction. Adjusted differential gene expression (DGE) and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) were performed to explore molecular mechanisms underlying mtDNA-CN. Results: Median age was 67 (IQR: 57–78); 19% were female, 84% white, and 6% Hispanic. Hypertension (84%), diabetes (43%), and obesity (45%) were common; 26% had eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . Median mtDNA-CN was 153 counts per sample. After multivariate adjustment , mtDNA-CN > median was associated with a 48% reduction in ACD (aHR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.30–0.90; P = 0.020) (Figure 1A) . DGE revealed downregulation of inflammatory genes in the mtDNA-CN group, including S100A9 (FC=-.41, p=3.32e-10) and S100A12 (FC=-.56, p=3.32e-10). Inflammatory pathways such as the inflammasome complex (NES=-2.17, p=9.32e-03) and interleukin-1 production (NES= -2.02, p=6.60e-03) were downregulated among participants in the high mtDNA-CN ( Figure 1B) . Conclusion: Higher mtDNA-CN is associated with lower risk of ACD and reduced inflammasome activity, suggesting that enhanced mitochondrial health may mitigate inflammasome-related pathology linked to ACD in patients with CAD.

ABSTRACT Suicidality contributes substantially to global morbidity and mortality, yet despite its heritability, its biological etiology remains largely elusive. We conducted multi-ancestry genome-wide association study meta-analyses of suicidal ideation (259,747 cases), suicide attempt (64,993 cases), suicide death (9,197 cases), and suicidal behavior (suicide attempt/ death, 75,300 cases), across 54 cohorts (e.g., the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Million Veteran Program, UK Biobank). We identified 77 significant loci across meta-analyses, including 59 previously unreported for suicidality. SNP-based heritability ranged from 2.0-6.7% and there were strong, yet incomplete, genetic correlations between suicidality phenotypes (0.70-0.88). Fine-mapping prioritized putative causal SNPs and 20 credible genes. Enrichment analyses implicated synaptic pathways and neuronal populations predominantly in subcortical brain regions (e.g., amygdala excitatory, medium spiny, hippocampal CA1-3). Together, these findings establish suicidality as a polygenic set of traits with both shared and distinct genetic influences, providing a foundation for future studies of suicide biology and etiology.

Abstract Disclosure: A.A. Khan: Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Amgen Inc, Amolyt Pharma, Ascendis Pharma. B.L. Clarke: Amolyt Pharma, Ascendis Pharma, EnteraBio, Extend Bio, Takeda. M.R. Rubin: Ascendis Pharma, MBX Biosciences. P.E. Schwarz: Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Genmab, Novo Nordisk. D.M. Shoback: Ascendis Pharma. C. Gagnon: Amgen Inc, Ascendis Pharma, Novo Nordisk, Shire, Takeda. A. Palermo: None. L.G. Abbott: Abbott Laboratories, Ascendis Pharma, Clarus, Shire, Takeda. L. Kohlmeier: Amgen Inc, Ascendis Pharma, Radius Health, Inc. E. Tsourdi: Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ascendis Pharma, Kyowa Kirin, Takeda, UCB. F. Cetani: None. R. Jain: Amgen Inc, Ascendis Pharma. C. Zhao: Ascendis Pharma. B. Lai: Ascendis Pharma. M.A. Makara: Ascendis Pharma. J. Ukena: Ascendis Pharma. C.T. Sibley: Ascendis Pharma. A.D. Shu: Ascendis Pharma. L. Rejnmark: Amolyt Pharma, Ascendis Pharma, BridgeBio, Kyowa Kirin, Takeda. Background: Hypoparathyroidism is an endocrine disease caused by insufficient levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH) and is associated with reduced quality of life and a high comorbidity burden. Conventional therapy for hypoparathyroidism (active vitamin D and elemental calcium) aims to alleviate hypocalcemia but does not address insufficient PTH and may increase the risk of renal complications. Palopegteriparatide is a prodrug of PTH(1-34), administered subcutaneously once daily, designed to provide active PTH within the physiological range for 24 hours/day. It is approved by the Food and Drug Administration, European Commission, and Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. This analysis evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of palopegteriparatide in adults with chronic hypoparathyroidism through week 156 of the PaTHway trial. Methods: PaTHway is a phase 3 trial with a 26-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled period followed by an ongoing open-label extension period. Serum biochemistries were assessed at baseline and regular intervals. Renal function was assessed by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Safety assessments included 24-hour urine calcium and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Results: At week 156, 89% (73/82) of participants remained in the trial; of those, 96% were independent from conventional therapy (no active vitamin D and ≤600 mg/day elemental calcium) and 88% had normal albumin-adjusted serum calcium levels (8.3-10.6 mg/dL) with a mean (SD) of 8.9 (0.6) mg/dL. Mean (SD) serum phosphate (3.4 [0.6] mg/dL) and calcium x phosphate product (30.6 [5.4] mg2/dL2) levels remained within normal ranges through week 156. Mean (SD) eGFR at week 156 was 78.0 (14.5) mL/min/1.73 m2, reflecting a mean (SD) increase of 8.8 (11.9) mL/min/1.73 m2 from baseline (P&lt;0.0001); 59% and 43% of participants had an increase in eGFR of ≥5 mL/min/1.73 m2 and ≥10 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. Among participants with baseline eGFR &lt;60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (n=23), the mean (SD) increase in eGFR was 14.0 (8.9) mL/min/1.73 m2 from baseline to week 156. Mean (SD) 24-hour urine calcium levels normalized with palopegteriparatide treatment, remaining below the upper limit of normal (≤250 mg/day) through week 156 (162.1 [117.8] mg/day). TEAEs were mostly grade 1 or 2, with no new safety signals identified. Conclusion: Through year 3 of the PaTHway trial, retention rate was high and palopegteriparatide demonstrated consistent longer-term safety and efficacy, which included the maintenance of serum and urine biochemistries within normal levels and sustained improvement in renal function. Presentation: Saturday, July 12, 2025

Abstract Disclosure: D.S. Ali: None. Z. Chung: None. L. Kamel: None. S. Björnsdottir: Shire. B.L. Clarke: Shire, Takeda, Ascendis, Calcilytix. S. Hahner: None. L.C. Hofbauer: Amgen Inc, Ascendis, UCB, Ascendis, Amolyte. P. Houillier: None. S.W. Ing: Amgen Inc, Radius Health, Inc, Takeda, AscendAlexion, Amolyt, Ascendis, Calcilytix, Kyowa Kirin. M.A. Levine: Takeda, Amolyt, Calcilytix. M. Mannstadt: Takeda, Amolyt, Calcilytix. L. Rejnmark: Takeda, Amolyt, Ascendis, Calcilytix. D.M. Shoback: Amolyt, Ascendis, member of the advisory board (PARADIGHM). M. Brandi: Takeda, Eli Lilly & Company, Calcilytix, Kyowa Kirin, UCB, Abiogen, Alexion, Amolyt, Amorphical, Bruno Farmaceutici, CoGeDi, Echolight. A.A. Khan: Takeda, Amgen Inc, Alexion, Ascendis, Amolyt, Calcilytix. Background: Hypoparathyroidism (HypoPT) is a rare endocrine disorder that requires close evaluation and follow up during pregnancy to minimize maternal and fetal complications. The primary objectives of this study are to evaluate the use of rhPTH (1-84) during pregnancy by analyzing data from the PARADIGHM disease registry, and to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes among patients who continued PTH therapy during pregnancy versus those on conventional therapy (CT). Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of data in the PARADIGHM registry. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in women treated with rhPTH (1-84) were compared to women who received CT. Results: We analyzed 39 pregnancies of 32 women. Of those, 4 women (6 pregnancies) used rhPTH (1-84) either before or during pregnancy and 28 women (33 pregnancies) continued CT during pregnancy. The mean (SD) maternal age at enrollment was 31.7 (5.6) years. Postsurgical HypoPT was the most common etiology (68.8%). The mean gestational age at delivery was 36 (2.4) weeks (PTH-treated) vs 38.3 (3.3) weeks (CT) (p=0.162). Preterm delivery rates were higher in the PTH-treated group (50% vs. 27%, p=0.591), but this was not statistically significant. Two women had pre-eclampsia, one in each group (PTH-treated and CT). In the PTH-treated group, one pregnancy resulted in a stillbirth, and one infant was born with congenital anomalies (16.7% each). Conclusions: The safety of rhPTH (1-84) use in pregnancy cannot be determined at this time. The PTH-treated group exhibited trends towards higher rates of preterm delivery, but the rates of stillbirth, and congenital anomalies were low and comparable in both groups of women. Larger studies are necessary to determine the optimal approach to manage women with HypoPT during pregnancy. Presentation: Sunday, July 13, 2025

Abstract eSource – particularly EHR-to-EDC – is an emerging paradigm in clinical research that enables automated transfer of electronic health record (EHR) data into electronic data capture (EDC) systems, with the potential to reduce site burden, improve data quality and accelerate oncology clinical trial workflows. However, widespread implementation remains limited due to technical, regulatory and operational barriers. To address these challenges, the European Institute for Innovation through Health Data (i~HD) launched the eSource Scale-Up Task Force in 2024. This multi-stakeholder initiative brings together leading oncology centres and pharmaceutical sponsors to establish a consensus-driven roadmap for eSource adoption. Central to this effort are three foundational resources: readiness criteria for early adopters, a performance indicator framework for monitoring success and an operational playbook to guide implementation. This article provides a structured overview of the Task Force’s objectives, collaborative model and outputs, with specific attention to its focus on interoperability, regulatory alignment and real-world validation. While initially developed for oncology, the Task Force’s framework is applicable across therapeutic areas characterized by data-intensive workflows.

Importance Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with or without prostate biopsy, has become the standard of care for diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer. Resource capacity limits widespread adoption. Biparametric MRI, which omits the gadolinium contrast sequence, is a shorter and cheaper alternative offering time-saving capacity gains for health systems globally. Objective To assess whether biparametric MRI is noninferior to multiparametric MRI for diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants A prospective, multicenter, within-patient, noninferiority trial of biopsy-naive men from 22 centers (12 countries) with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (elevated prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level and/or abnormal digital rectal examination findings) from April 2022 to September 2023, with the last follow-up conducted on December 3, 2024. Interventions Participants underwent multiparametric MRI, comprising T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast–enhanced (DCE) sequences. Radiologists reported abbreviated biparametric MRI first (T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted), blinded to the DCE sequence. After unblinding, radiologists reported the full multiparametric MRI. Patients underwent a targeted biopsy with or without systematic biopsy if either biparametric MRI or multiparametric MRI was suggestive of clinically significant prostate cancer. Main outcomes and measures The primary outcome was the proportion of men with clinically significant prostate cancer. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of men with clinically insignificant cancer. The noninferiority margin was 5%. Results Of 555 men recruited, 490 were included for primary outcome analysis. Median age was 65 (IQR, 59-70) years and median PSA level was 5.6 (IQR, 4.4-8.0) ng/mL. The proportion of patients with abnormal digital rectal examination findings was 12.7%. Biparametric MRI was noninferior to multiparametric MRI, detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in 143 of 490 men (29.2%), compared with 145 of 490 men (29.6%) (difference, −0.4 [95% CI, −1.2 to 0.4] percentage points; P = .50). Biparametric MRI detected clinically insignificant cancer in 45 of 490 men (9.2%), compared with 47 of 490 men (9.6%) with the use of multiparametric MRI (difference, −0.4 [95% CI, −1.2 to 0.4] percentage points). Central quality control demonstrated that 99% of scans were of adequate diagnostic quality. Conclusion and relevance In men with suspected prostate cancer, provided image quality is adequate, an abbreviated biparametric MRI scan, with or without targeted biopsy, could become the new standard of care for prostate cancer diagnosis. With approximately 4 million prostate MRIs performed globally annually, adopting biparametric MRI could substantially increase scanner throughput and reduce costs worldwide. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04571840

Abstract Aims Aortic valve-sparing root replacement is recommended over composite root replacement for aortic root aneurysms, especially in younger patients, but long-term outcomes in low-volume nationwide settings remain unclear. The objectives are to compare long-term survival, stroke, and reoperation rates between the two procedures in a low-volume national setting. Methods and results Patients were identified from the Western Danish Heart Registry and the Danish Heart Registry. Cases were validated by review of operative descriptions. The primary outcome was long-term survival from all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes included stroke, reoperation, recurrent aortic regurgitation, and aortic stenosis. Groups were balanced using propensity score matching. Echocardiographic data were provided for the matched cohort. We identified 760 patients treated with composite root replacement and 179 patients with aortic valve-sparing root replacement between January 2010 and April 2022. Mean follow-up was 6.5 years. Composite root replacement patients were younger [50.7 years (SD 14.1) vs. 55.2 (SD 13.5), P &lt; 0.001], but more comorbid with a median EuroSCOREII of 5.5 [interquartile range (IQR): 3.3–11.7] vs. 3.4 (IQR: 2.6–5.0) (P &lt; 0.001). After matching 157 patients per group, aortic valve-sparing root replacement showed improved 10-year survival [91.2%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 82.3–95.8 vs. 80.4%, 95% CI 70.0–87.5, log-rank P = 0.026], with lower 10-year stroke risk (4.9%, 95% CI 1.8–13.0 vs. 18.9%, 95% CI 11.7–29.9, log-rank P = 0.007). Risk of reoperation was nonsignificant (log-rank P = 0.12), which was consistent in the crude population when accounting for competing risk of death (log-rank P = 0.09). Conclusion In this nationwide study, aortic valve-sparing root replacement was associated with better long-term survival and lower stroke risk, supporting its role as a durable surgical option for selected patients.

ABSTRACT The International Consensus Conference “Optimising Performance of the Elite Athlete,” held in November 2024, brought together 29 scientists, some coaches, and athletes to establish evidence‐based consensus statements aimed at enhancing elite athletic performance and health. The conference addressed critical themes including training strategies, nutrition, female athlete considerations, injury management, and emerging technologies. Key conclusions emphasize individualized, sport‐specific approaches to training and nutrition, integrating concurrent training modalities to improve endurance, resilience, and efficiency. Nutrition strategies highlight the importance of tailored energy and macronutrient periodization, recognition of low energy availability risks, and cautious use of dietary supplements. Special attention was directed to female athletes, advocating for improved monitoring of menstrual cycles and hormonal status, while acknowledging current knowledge gaps in hormonal influences on performance and injury risk. Injury prevention remains a challenge, with tendon overuse and Achilles tendon ruptures significantly impacting athlete careers; rehabilitation should rely on criteria‐based progression and multidisciplinary input. Emerging technologies, including wearable sensors and multi‐omics analyses, hold promise for personalized training and nutrition but require further validation in elite contexts. Despite robust consensus, the panel identified substantial research gaps, particularly regarding female athletes, longitudinal training effects, and efficacy of novel interventions. This consensus provides a practical, scientifically grounded framework to optimize elite athlete performance and health, while underscoring the need for continued research to address outstanding questions and promote inclusive evidence‐based practices.

Purpose To develop an expert consensus statement on the diagnosis, management, and rehabilitation of medial meniscal root tears (MMRTs) using a modified Delphi technique. Methods A working group developed statements on MMRT diagnosis, nonoperative management, surgical indications, surgical management, alignment, and rehabilitation using modified Delphi techniques. Fifty‐six experts were surveyed over 3 rounds to reach consensus, with agreement measured on a 5‐point Likert scale. Statements were included, revised, or excluded on the basis of predefined thresholds (≥75% agreement, <20% disagreement). Experts suggested revisions or new statements in the first 2 rounds, and final consensus statements were included. Results All 56 experts completed 3 survey rounds. Experts agreed that root tears may occur with no known history of trauma, typically in older patients, and that it should be diagnosed with an magnetic resonance imaging. In symptomatic patients with MMRTs without advanced osteoarthritis should be repaired using an anatomic transtibial pull‐out technique (performing a pie‐crusting technique can be helpful for visualization). Nonoperative management is advised for patients with advanced osteoarthritis. High tibial osteotomy may be considered for significant varus malalignment during MMRT repair. The only statement without consensus was the management of asymptomatic MMRTs with mild medial compartment cartilage wear, indicating ongoing debate. Conclusions Overall, 98% of statements reached consensus. There is agreement that magnetic resonance imaging is the gold standard for diagnosis. Symptomatic MMRTs without advanced osteoarthritis should be repaired early using an anatomic transtibial pull‐out technique. End‐stage knee osteoarthritis warrants nonoperative management of MMRTs, and a structured postoperative protocol with limited weightbearing and range of motion is essential after repair. No agreement was reached on managing asymptomatic MMRTs in patients without significant medial compartment degeneration. Meniscal centralization sutures may help in cases of substantial extrusion, but their routine use is debated. Level of Evidence Level V, consensus of expert opinion.