Pitsiladis, Yannis

ABSTRACT The International Consensus Conference “Optimising Performance of the Elite Athlete,” held in November 2024, brought together 29 scientists, some coaches, and athletes to establish evidence‐based consensus statements aimed at enhancing elite athletic performance and health. The conference addressed critical themes including training strategies, nutrition, female athlete considerations, injury management, and emerging technologies. Key conclusions emphasize individualized, sport‐specific approaches to training and nutrition, integrating concurrent training modalities to improve endurance, resilience, and efficiency. Nutrition strategies highlight the importance of tailored energy and macronutrient periodization, recognition of low energy availability risks, and cautious use of dietary supplements. Special attention was directed to female athletes, advocating for improved monitoring of menstrual cycles and hormonal status, while acknowledging current knowledge gaps in hormonal influences on performance and injury risk. Injury prevention remains a challenge, with tendon overuse and Achilles tendon ruptures significantly impacting athlete careers; rehabilitation should rely on criteria‐based progression and multidisciplinary input. Emerging technologies, including wearable sensors and multi‐omics analyses, hold promise for personalized training and nutrition but require further validation in elite contexts. Despite robust consensus, the panel identified substantial research gaps, particularly regarding female athletes, longitudinal training effects, and efficacy of novel interventions. This consensus provides a practical, scientifically grounded framework to optimize elite athlete performance and health, while underscoring the need for continued research to address outstanding questions and promote inclusive evidence‐based practices.

Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to compare the measured physiological factors that limit running performance with real marathon results from world-class distance runners, evaluating the compatibility between measured data and predicted results based on the previously suggested model. Methods Four world-class East African marathon runners (three male, one female) underwent physiological running assessments to predict marathon performance times using a model based on V ˙ $\dot {\mathrm{V}}$ O 2 peak, percentage of V ˙ $\dot {\mathrm{V}}$ O 2 peak at the second ventilatory threshold, and running economy. Predictions were then compared to participants’ best marathon times. Results The measured V ˙ $\dot {\mathrm{V}}$ O 2 peak of the world-class runners was 75.1 ± 2.7 mL/kg/min. The second ventilatory threshold occurred at 85 ± 3 % of the peak, with a running economy of 63.7 ± 2.4 mL/kg/min at 19.6 ± 0.9 km/h. The predicted marathon performance time was 2:06:51 ± 0:03:17 h:min:s for the males and 2:17:36 h:min:s for the female. Comparing these predictions to their personal best times, the average difference was 00:55 ± 00:51 min:s (range: 00:20-02:08). Conclusions This research provides laboratory data on world-class road running athletes, reinforcing the link between marathon performance and V ˙ $\dot {\mathrm{V}}$ O 2 peak, the percentage of V ˙ $\dot {\mathrm{V}}$ O 2 peak at the second ventilatory threshold, and running economy. The examined athletes had lower V ˙ $\dot {\mathrm{V}}$ O 2 peak compared to predicted values, highlighting the importance of running economy and fractional utilization of V ˙ $\dot {\mathrm{V}}$ O 2 peak in achieving such performances. Future studies should continue to advance the field by including additional bioenergetic parameters measured during race conditions and expanding the participant cohort of elite marathoners, encompassing both sexes.