Citations

Objective: To evaluate magnetic resonance (MR) imaging artifact and image distortion associated with the Oticon Medical Sentio Ti bone conduction implant (BCI) and identify optimized imaging techniques. Study design: Cadaveric study. Intervention: One cadaveric head specimen was unilaterally implanted with Sentio Ti BCI according to the manufacturer's instructions. Main outcome measures: Imaging was performed with a Siemens 1.5 Tesla MR machine on XA60 software before and after implantation. Imaging was performed with both standard and metal mitigation techniques. Image scoring (diagnostic vs. nondiagnostic) and qualitative assessment of anatomic subsites were performed by 2 experienced neuroradiologists. Results: Image distortion and artifact were noted in all postimplant sequences. For all sequences, imaging of the ipsilateral middle ear, mastoid, and internal auditory canal (IAC) was nondiagnostic. The axial T1 turbo spin echo high bandwidth sequence had the best artifact reduction; however, the ipsilateral temporal bone remained nondiagnostic. Notably, nonecho planar diffusion-weighted imaging (non-EPI DWI) was nondiagnostic for both the ipsilateral temporal bone and the contralateral IAC and middle ear. Conclusions: After implantation of the Sentio Ti BCI, imaging of the ipsilateral temporal bone is rendered nondiagnostic on all MR sequences due to artifact despite the use of metal mitigation techniques. Importantly, the non-EPI DWI HASTE sequence, which is used for cholesteatoma surveillance, is nondiagnostic for all ipsilateral and most contralateral temporal bone subsites, making cholesteatoma surveillance challenging with an implant in place. This finding is critical for clinical decision-making, as rehabilitation of conductive hearing loss in the setting of chronic otitis media is among the most common indications for use of a BCI.

Background The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical benefits of guideline‐directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure (HF) in adults with congenital heart disease and HF with reduced ejection fraction. Methods HF with reduced ejection fraction was defined as stage B/C HF and systemic left ventricular ejection fraction <50%. GDMT score was assessed at baseline encounter (baseline GDMT score) and 1‐year follow‐up. GDMT uptitration was calculated as defined as ∆GDMT score from baseline. Cox regression was used to assess the relationship between HF therapy (baseline and ∆GDMT score) and outcomes (HF hospitalization and mortality). Results Of 778 patients (age 44±16, 480 [62%] males), baseline GDMT score was 2 (1, 3) and ∆GDMT score was 0.62 (95% CI, 0.55–0.69). Of 778, only 258 (33%) had GDMT uptitration (∆GDMT score >0). Higher use of GDMT at baseline (adjusted HR per 1 point increase in GDMT score 0.81, 95% CI, 0.74–0.88, P <0.001), and increased use of GDMT over time (adjusted HR for 1 point increase in ∆GDMT score HR 0.70, 95% CI, 0.61–0.79, P <0.001) were associated with lower risk of HF hospitalization. Higher baseline GDMT score (adjusted HR 0.85, 95% CI, 0.76–0.94, P <0.001), and ∆ GDMT score (adjusted HR 0.82, 95% CI, 0.71–0.94, P <0.000) were also associated with lower mortality. Conclusions GDMT use at baseline and GDMT uptitration were associated with improved outcomes and suggest a dose‐dependent relationship between use of GDMT and risk of adverse outcomes. Furthermore, 67% of patients did not receive GDMT uptitration, suggesting suboptimal therapy, and opportunities for improvement.

ABSTRACT Objective Management of vestibular schwannoma (VS) remains controversial. Very small VSs represent a pivotal group: on one hand, they pose the least risk to the patient from the perspective of being small; yet, not recommending treatment may result in missing a critical window for achieving the best outcome. This debate fundamentally hinges on whether treatment improves upon the natural history of the disease. There is an unproven assumption that very small tumors behave similarly to the broader observed population. To address this central question, we conducted a multicenter retrospective review to compare the natural history of tumor growth and hearing for patients with very small VS (1–3 mm) with a referent cohort with larger tumors. Methods All patients diagnosed with sporadic VS 1–3 mm were reviewed at 3 large skull base referral centers and compared with a referent cohort of patients with tumors > 3 mm. Tumor growth‐free survival rates, treatment‐free survival rates, and rates of maintenance of class A, B, or C hearing were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results In total, 123 patients with very small VS and a referent cohort of 326 patients were studied. Seventeen patients with very small VS experienced tumor growth at a median of 3.2 years after diagnosis (IQR 2.6–5.1), demonstrating a median growth rate of 1.0 mm per year (IQR 0.9–1.8). In comparison, 167 of the patients in the referent cohort experienced tumor growth at a median of 1.7 years after diagnosis (IQR 0.8–3.1). Tumor growth‐free survival rates (95% CI, number still at risk) at 5 years after diagnosis for the 2 cohorts were 84% (75–93, 39) and 45% (40–52, 100), respectively ( p < 0.001). Six patients with very small VS underwent treatment after tumor growth at a median of 3.2 years after diagnosis (IQR 3.2–3.8), compared with 138 patients in the referent cohort at a median of 2.2 years after diagnosis (IQR 1.4–3.6). Treatment‐free survival rates (95% CI, number still at risk) at 5 years after diagnosis for the 2 cohorts were 92% (86–98, 55) and 54% (49–61, 125), respectively ( p < 0.001). Among the 105 patients with very small VS and class A, B, or C hearing at diagnosis, 3 progressed to class D. Comparatively, among the 225 patients in the referent cohort with class A, B, or C hearing at diagnosis, 70 progressed to class D at a median of 2.6 years after diagnosis (IQR 1.0–4.8). Rates of maintenance of class A, B, or C hearing (95% CI, number still at risk) at 5 years after diagnosis were 96% (92–100, 28) for patients with very small VS and 65% (57–73, 70) for the referent cohort ( p < 0.001). Conclusions The natural history of tumor growth and hearing for very small VS diverges favorably from the cumulative natural history data and provides a more appropriate benchmark to compare clinical outcomes of upfront surgery or radiosurgery for this population. At 5 years after diagnosis, 96% of very small VS maintained class A, B, or C hearing and only 8% received treatment for growth within this multicenter cohort. Cumulatively, these data substantiate initial wait‐and‐scan management via size threshold surveillance in this population. Level of Evidence 3.

PURPOSE Integrating external control data into clinical trial designs and analyses has the potential to accelerate drug development processes. We reanalyzed the three experimental arms of the Individual Screening Trial of Innovative Glioblastoma Therapy (INSIGhT), a randomized phase II platform trial in newly diagnosed O 6 -methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase-unmethylated glioblastoma (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02977780 ). To evaluate the validity of using external data sets, we compared treatment effect estimates based on internal INSIGhT control data and matched external control data. METHODS The three experimental arms of INSIGhT (abemaciclib [n = 72], neratinib [n = 80], and CC-115 [n = 12]) did not improve survival compared with internal controls (standard chemoradiation [n = 70]). We derived external control patient-level data from multiple real-world and clinical trial data sets. We applied propensity score matching and Cox proportional hazards models to estimate treatment effects with external controls. Additionally, using this glioblastoma (GBM) data collection, we specified simulation scenarios to evaluate trial designs that integrate external controls. RESULTS After matching to external controls, no survival benefit was observed for patients receiving abemaciclib (hazard ratio [HR], 1.00 [95% CI, 0.75 to 1.34]), neratinib (HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.70 to 1.24]), or CC-115 (HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.41 to 1.88]). Simulations, together with the INSIGhT data and a collection of GBM data sets, allowed us to examine efficiencies and risks of clinical trial designs that leverage external control data. CONCLUSION The use of carefully matched external controls, to replace or augment the internal controls of INSIGhT, produced treatment effect estimates that were similar to previously published analyses. Single-arm trial designs and hybrid randomized designs incorporating propensity score–matched external control data evaluated treatment effects in the early-phase testing of experimental therapies in newly diagnosed GBM. The validity of this approach and risks of bias depended on the availability of comprehensive and accurate data on all potential confounders, in the absence of unmeasured confounding.

Emerging evidence suggests that systemic physiological factors may influence plasma biomarker concentrations of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and related neurodegenerative processes, potentially affecting their specificity for central nervous system pathology. This study examined the relationship of demographic factors and medical comorbidities with plasma biomarkers of AD and neurodegeneration in a community-dwelling cohort of Black/African American (B/AA) older adults (N = 141). Participants underwent plasma assessment of phosphorylated tau at threonine 217 (p-Tau217), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and neurofilament light chain (NfL). Results showed associations between plasma p-Tau217 and amyloid PET positivity, and significant intercorrelations among p-Tau217, GFAP, and NfL. Stepwise regression models incorporated demographics, amyloid PET status, and laboratory measures of renal, metabolic, and lipid function as predictors for each biomarker. p-Tau217 was primarily predicted by amyloid PET and renal function; GFAP by age and sex; and NfL by renal function, age, and sex. Findings indicate plasma biomarker concentrations in B/AA older adults reflect both central AD-related pathology and systemic physiological factors, particularly renal function, and demographic influences. Results underscore the importance of accounting for comorbid medical conditions and demographic characteristics when interpreting blood-based biomarkers and highlight the need for comprehensive medical phenotyping to improve diagnostic specificity and clinical utility.

ABSTRACT Aim The supply of donor kidneys (living and deceased) has fallen far behind the need, while the number of patients with end stage kidney disease continues to rise, increasing their risk of cardiovascular mortality. Kidney transplant candidates frequently exhibit large artery calcification, a major contributor to cardiovascular death. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between abdominal arterial calcification (AAC) and survival in patients awaiting kidney transplant. Methods We modified the coronary calcium scoring method (Modified Agatston Method) and applied it to quantify AAC. This retrospective study included all adult patients ( N = 4184) listed for kidney transplant from 2005 to 2023 who had undergone abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans. Patients were categorised into two groups: those who died while on the waiting list (DWL) and those who survived (SWL). Results Among 4184 candidates, 446 (10.7%) died while on the waiting list, and 3738 (89.3%) survived to transplant or study end. Patients in the DWL group had significantly higher AAC scores across all vascular sites. The median total AAC score was 3605.8 (IQR 780.1–9017.3) in the DWL group versus 940.1 (IQR 49.2–4915.0) in the SWL group. Each 1000‐point increase in total AAC was associated with a 5.1% increase in mortality risk (HR 1.051; p < 0.001). An AAC cutoff of > 1769 correlated with reduced 5‐year survival (45.4% vs. 77.4%, p < 0.001). Conclusion AAC scoring on non‐contrast abdominal CT represents a noninvasive biomarker of mortality in kidney transplant waitlist patients and may enhance risk stratification and personalised care.

Abstract Background Ultra‐high‐field 7 Tesla (7T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides improved resolution and signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) over standard clinical field strengths (1.5T, 3T). However, 7T scanners are costly, scarce, and introduce additional challenges such as susceptibility artifacts. Purpose We propose an efficient transformer‐based model (7T‐Restormer) to synthesize 7T‐like MRI (quantitative T1 MP2RAGE maps) from routine 1.5T or 3T T1‐weighted (T1W) images. Methods The proposed method leverages an efficient restoration transformer backbone and spatial attention layers to capture long‐range dependencies and generate high‐quality 7T‐like images. Our model was validated on an institutional dataset, comprised of 35 1.5T and 108 3T T1w MRI paired with corresponding 7T T1 maps of patients with confirmed multiple sclerosis (MS). A total of 141 patient cases (32 128 slices) were randomly divided into 105 (25 1.5T and 80 3T) training cases (19 204 slices), 19 (5 1.5T and 14 3T) validation cases (3476 slices), and 17 (5 1.5T and 12 3T) test cases (3145 slices). The synthetic 7T T1 maps were evaluated by comparing their similarity to the ground truth volumes using peak signal‐to‐noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index measure (SSIM), and normalized mean squared error (NMSE), and were compared against ResViT and ResShift. In addition, a blinded reader study was performed in which three clinicians scored the diagnostic image quality of each method on a 5‐point Likert scale (1 = non‐acceptable, 5 = excellent). Statistical significance ( α = 0.05) was assessed using two‐sided paired t ‐tests with Holm correction for multiple comparisons and Wilcoxon signed‐rank tests with Holm correction for reader scores. Effect sizes (Cohen's for paired data) were also computed to quantify practical significance. We interpreted and as small, medium, and large effects. Results For 1.5T inputs, 7T‐Restormer achieved an NMSE of 0.018 ± 0.003, PSNR of 25.0 ± 0.6 dB, and SSIM of 0.870 ± 0.019; for 3T inputs, the corresponding values were 0.019 ± 0.006, 24.5 ± 1.2 dB, and 0.874 ± 0.027. Across both field strengths, 7T‐Restormer provided the lowest NMSE and highest PSNR and SSIM among the three methods, reducing NMSE by approximately 5% and 25% relative to ResShift and ResViT at 1.5T and by 14% and 24% at 3T, respectively, and increasing PSNR by 0.5–1.5 dB (Holm‐adjusted p < 0.05, paired Cohen's = 1.37–6.84). Training on mixed 1.5T+3T data improved performance for 1.5T inputs compared with 1.5T‐only training (e.g., NMSE 0.018 vs. 0.019; p = 0.001, ), without degrading performance for 3T inputs ( p = 0.630, for NMSE). In the blinded reader study, 7T‐Restormer received higher diagnostic quality scores (3.50 ± 0.28) than ResShift (3.00 ± 0.27) and ResViT (2.33 ± 0.27), corresponding to mean improvements of 0.5–1.2 points on the 5‐point scale (Holm‐adjusted p = 0.014 and 0.004; paired Cohen's and 3.24, respectively). Conclusion We propose a novel method for predicting quantitative 7T MP2RAGE maps from 1.5T and 3T T1W scans with higher quality than existing state‐of‐the‐art methods. Future development and application of our approach may enhance diagnostic accuracy, treatment planning, and facilitate downstream tasks by making the benefits of 7T MRI more accessible to standard clinical workflows.

Abstract Background Emerging evidence suggests irreversible electroporation (IRE) with standard-of-care (SOC) chemotherapy may improve survival in patients with Stage 3 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) when compared to SOC alone. This study evaluates the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of Stage 3 PDAC patients treated with SOC plus IRE with the NanoKnife System versus SOC alone. Methods This prospective, multicenter study included two cohorts from the DIRECT registry: an IRE cohort from sites offering IRE as part of clinical care, and a comparator SOC cohort of prospectively enrolled and contemporaneous retrospective patients. Enrollment spanned 08/05/2019 to 02/05/2023, with follow-up through at least 24 months, death, or loss to follow-up. Included were 137 patients (99 IRE; 38 SOC), aged ≥18 years with Stage 3 PDAC and no progression after three months of SOC therapy. Results Median (interquartile range) time from diagnosis to enrollment was 8 (6-10) months for IRE and 4 (3-6) for SOC (p<0.0001). Median OS and PSF from enrollment were 18 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15-24) months and 9 (95% CI: 7-12) months for IRE, and 10 (95% CI: 8-14) months and 6 (5-8) months for SOC, respectively (p<0.0001 and p=0.009). Adverse events occurred in 80% (79/99) of IRE patients and 95% (36/38) of SOC patients; 29% (29/99) of the IRE cohort experiencing an IRE-related adverse event. Conclusions IRE was associated with improved OS versus SOC alone and may be an effective consolidative treatment for Stage 3 PDAC after three months of induction chemotherapy.