Manisty, Charlotte

Abstract Background Ionizing radiation (IR) accelerates atherosclerosis through induction of cellular senescence, DNA damage, defective efferocytosis, and dysregulation of clonal hematopoiesis (CH) drivers. Although low-dose colchicine reduces ischemic cardiovascular events in coronary artery disease, the precise molecular mechanisms underlying its vasculoprotective effects remain incompletely defined, and whether it mitigates radiation-associated vascular injury is unknown. Methods Bone marrow–derived macrophages (BMDMs) were pretreated with low-dose colchicine and exposed to 2 Gy IR. Molecular effects were assessed by RNA-seq, immunoblotting, and molecular docking. In vivo effects were tested in a partial carotid ligation (PLCL) model using spatial proteomics. Human monocyte-derived macrophages (HMDMs) from thoracic malignancy patients were analyzed before and after radiation therapy (RT). Results Low-dose colchicine suppressed IR-induced macrophage senescence signaling while preserving NRF2 activity. In a cell-free assay, colchicine directly activated aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) in a dose-dependent manner (EC 50 1–5 nM), identifying ALDH2 as a direct molecular target of colchicine. Following irradiation, colchicine restored ALDH2, reduced mitochondrial (mt)ROS - dependent p90 ribosomal S6 kinase ( p90RSK ) activation and lipid peroxidation, preserved TET2 and DNMT3A expression, and rescued impaired efferocytosis while preventing nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD⁺) and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) depletion. These protective effects were ALDH2-dependent, as they were lost with ALDH2 inhibition or depletion and were mimicked by pharmacologic ALDH2 activation. In vivo, colchicine attenuated radiation-induced atherosclerosis and macrophage senescence-associated stemness (SAS). Consistently, macrophages from patients after RT showed reduced ALDH2 with increased mtROS, lipid peroxidation, and senescence. Conclusion These findings identify ALDH2 as a previously unrecognized molecular target of colchicine that links mitochondrial redox control to suppression of radiation-induced macrophage senescence and atherosclerosis and may contribute to the efficacy of low-dose colchicine in cardiovascular disease.

Src homology 2-domain containing protein tyrosine phosphatase 2 (SHP2), encoded by the Ptpn11 gene (Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 11), is a key downstream effector of PD-1/PD-L1 signaling and is likely important, in addition to immune modulation, in tumor development and vascular homeostasis. SHP2 conveys PD-1 mediated inhibitory signaling in T cells, and is emerging as a therapeutic target. Importantly, there is an association between immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), immune-related adverse events (irAEs), and cardiovascular complications, underscoring the need to understand SHP2’s role in these processes. This review aims to summarize current knowledge on SHP2/PTPN11 biology, its role in immune regulation, cancer progression, and vascular homeostasis, and to discuss emerging therapeutic strategies targeting this pathway. The concept of using SHP2 inhibitors with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is being investigated to address ICI resistance and to improve anti-tumor efficacy substantially. SHP2 is also being studied in non-cancer cell contexts, and signaling responses can differ by large magnitudes depending on the biological context and stimuli. Under normal circumstances, SHP2 promotes vascular homeostasis in endothelial cells (ECs) and myeloid cells and inhibits inflammation, and the reduction in SHP2 activity by oxidative stress, such as in atherosclerosis or diabetes, upregulates inflammation. In contrast, in response to radiation, the fibrotic response and subsequent lung injury were increased by endothelial SHP2 induction via Notch-Jag1 signaling. Vascular smooth muscle cells SHP2 act as a pro-atherogenic effector by enhancing ERK/MAPK signaling, and the upregulation of mitochondria localized SHP2 can also induce cellular senescence-associated inflammation by upregulating mitochondrial reactive oxygen species. Taken together, the two opposite signaling effects of SHP2 suggest that both the immune and vascular system responses appear to be more modulated by the redox, cell, and compartment-specific signaling of SHP2. More studies are needed for mitigating cardiovascular toxicity to patients, particularly with ICI-based treatment regimens.

Abstract This position statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology Cardio-Oncology Study Group in collaboration with the International Cardio-Oncology Society presents practical, easy-to-use and evidence-based risk stratification tools for oncologists, haemato-oncologists and cardiologists to use in their clinical practice to risk stratify oncology patients prior to receiving cancer therapies known to cause heart failure or other serious cardiovascular toxicities. Baseline risk stratification proformas are presented for oncology patients prior to receiving the following cancer therapies: anthracycline chemotherapy, HER2-targeted therapies such as trastuzumab, vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors, second and third generation multi-targeted kinase inhibitors for chronic myeloid leukaemia targeting BCR-ABL, multiple myeloma therapies (proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs), RAF and MEK inhibitors or androgen deprivation therapies. Applying these risk stratification proformas will allow clinicians to stratify cancer patients into low, medium, high and very high risk of cardiovascular complications prior to starting treatment, with the aim of improving personalised approaches to minimise the risk of cardiovascular toxicity from cancer therapies.

Background Constant flow and concentration CO2 has previously been efficacious in attenuating ventilatory oscillations in periodic breathing (PB) where oscillations in CO2 drive ventilatory oscillations. However, it has the undesirable effect of increasing end-tidal CO2, and ventilation. We tested, in a model of PB, a dynamic CO2 therapy that aims to attenuate pacemaker-induced ventilatory oscillations while minimising CO2 dose. Methods First, pacemakers were manipulated in 12 pacemaker recipients, 6 with heart failure (ejection fraction (EF)=23.7±7.3%) and 6 without heart failure, to experimentally induce PB. Second, we applied a real-time algorithm of pre-emptive dynamic exogenous CO2 administration, and tested different timings. Results We found that cardiac output alternation using pacemakers successfully induced PB. Dynamic CO2 therapy, when delivered coincident with hyperventilation, attenuated 57% of the experimentally induced oscillations in end-tidal CO2: SD/mean 0.06±0.01 untreated versus 0.04±0.01 with treatment (p<0.0001) and 0.02±0.01 in baseline non-modified breathing. This translated to a 56% reduction in induced ventilatory oscillations: SD/mean 0.19±0.09 untreated versus 0.14±0.06 with treatment (p=0.001) and 0.10±0.03 at baseline. Of note, end-tidal CO2 did not significantly rise when dynamic CO2 was applied to the model (4.84±0.47 vs 4.91± 0.45 kPa, p=0.08). Furthermore, mean ventilation was also not significantly increased by dynamic CO2 compared with untreated (7.8±1.2 vs 8.4±1.2 L/min, p=0.17). Conclusions Cardiac pacemaker manipulation can be used to induce PB experimentally. In this induced PB, delivering CO2 coincident with hyperventilation, ventilatory oscillations can be substantially attenuated without a significant increase in end-tidal CO2 or ventilation. Dynamic CO2 administration might be developed into a clinical treatment for PB. Trial Registration number ISRCTN29344450.

Abstract Aims Prognostic benefit from CRT compared with controls is well established. Symptomatic response rates, however, are controversial and have never been systematically evaluated with standard subtraction of control rates to establish the incremental symptomatic response effect of CRT pacing. Methods and results First, we identified 150 consecutive CRT papers and assessed researchers’ perceptions of the symptomatic response to CRT. The mean quoted response rate was 66%. Only 26 studies acknowledged the existence of response without the device. Secondly, we examined actual symptomatic response rates in the randomized trials (CARE-HF, COMPANION, CONTAK-CD, MIRACLE, MIRACLE-ICD, MIRACLE-ICD II, MUSTIC, and REVERSE) totalling 3904 patients. The NYHA status improved in 51% of those randomized to CRT vs. 35% of controls (incremental effect 16%). This incremental improvement was significantly greater in open studies (with no device for controls) than in blinded studies (control arm receiving a device but no CRT, such as a defibrillator or a CRT programmed off), 20% vs. 13%, P &lt; 0.001. Conclusions Quoting CRT responder rates in isolation without recognizing spontaneous ‘response’ is common but unwise. The incremental symptomatic response rate from CRT pacing is ∼16%, much lower than widely reported. This value is similar to that for drugs in heart failure and should not be considered disappointing: they both exert powerful prognostic benefits. For scientific purposes, e.g. to explore potential improvements, symptomatic benefit from CRT should be quantified, like all other effects, by comparison with a control.