Schmalstieg, William F.

Background: There is growing support for high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy (DMT) in multiple sclerosis (MS), but escalation (ESC) approaches remain common. Objective: To describe decision-making in a pragmatic trial of early high-efficacy treatment (EHT) versus ESC. Methods: DELIVER-MS is a multi-center, pragmatic, randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a parallel observational study (OBS), which enrolled treatment-naïve people with RRMS in 31 UK/US sites. Primary outcome was as follows: 36-month brain volume loss according to initial treatment approach (EHT vs. ESC). Stepwise multivariable logistic regression was used to predict participation in RCT versus OBS and choice of EHT versus ESC within the OBS cohort. Results: In total, 816 people with MS were enrolled. Participants declined randomization due to preference for a particular DMT (85%), efficacy concerns (20%), and safety concerns (9%). RCT versus OBS participation was associated with lower relapse rate ( p = 0.043) and greater brain parenchymal fraction ( p = 0.002). Among 374 in the OBS cohort, 125 (33%) chose ESC and 249 (67%) chose EHT. People commencing EHT had higher education attainment ( p < 0.001) and relapse rate ( p = 0.025). Conclusion: Baseline DELIVER-MS data demonstrate that participants with milder disease are more likely to participate in RCT. The choice of EHT versus ESC was associated with demographic factors and disease activity. Clinical trial registration: NCT03535298

Objective: To compare progressive motor impairment onset attributable to a “critical” central nervous system (CNS) demyelinating lesion in patients with highly restricted versus unlimited magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesion burden. Methods: We identified 135 patients with progressive motor impairment for ⩾1 year attributable to a “critical” demyelinating lesion with: MRI burden of 1 lesion (“progressive solitary sclerosis”), 2–5 lesions (“progressive paucisclerosis”), or unrestricted (>5) lesions and “progressive unilateral hemiparesis.” Neuroradiology review of brain and spinal cord MRI documented unequivocally demyelinating lesions. Results: A total of 33 (24.4%) patients had progressive solitary sclerosis; 56 (41.5%) patients had progressive paucisclerosis; and 46 (34.1%) patients had progressive unilateral hemiparesis. Median age at onset of progressive motor impairment was younger in progressive solitary sclerosis (49 years; range 24–73) and progressive paucisclerosis (50 years; range 30–64) than in progressive unilateral hemiparesis (54 years; range 39–77; p = 0.02 and p = 0.003, respectively). Within progressive unilateral hemiparesis, motor-progression onset was similar between those with 4–10, 11–20, or >20 brain lesions (55, 54, 53 years of age, respectively; p = 0.44). Conclusion: Motor-progression age is similar, but paradoxically earlier, in cohorts with highly restricted CNS lesion burden than in those with unrestricted lesion burden with progressive unilateral hemiparetic MS. The “critical” demyelinating lesion rather than total brain MRI lesion burden is the major contributor to motor-progression onset in these cohorts.

Objective: To report progressive motor impairment from a critically located central nervous system (CNS) demyelinating lesion in patients with restricted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-lesion burden. Methods: We identified 38 patients with progressive upper motor-neuron impairment for >1 year, 2–5 MRI CNS-demyelinating lesions, with one seemingly anatomically responsible for progressive motor impairment. Patients with any alternative etiology for progressive motor impairment were excluded. A neuroradiologist blinded to clinical evaluation reviewed multiple brain and spinal-cord MRI, selecting a candidate critically located demyelinating lesion. Lesion characteristics were determined and subsequently compared with clinical course. Results: Median onset age was 47.5 years (24–64); 23 (61%) women. Median follow-up was 94 months (18–442); median Expanded Disability Status Scale Score (EDSS) at last follow-up was 4.5 (2–10). Clinical presentations were progressive: hemiparesis/monoparesis 31; quadriparesis 5; and paraparesis 2; 27 patients had progression from onset; 11 progression post-relapse. Total MRI lesions were 2 ( n = 8), 3 ( n = 12), 4 ( n = 12), and 5 ( n = 6). Critical lesions were located on corticospinal tracts, chronically atrophic in 26/38 (68%) and involved cervical spinal cord in 27, cervicomedullary/brainstem region in 6, thoracic spinal cord in 4, and subcortical white matter in 1. Conclusion: Progressive motor impairment may ascribe to a critically located CNS-demyelinating lesion in patients with highly restricted MRI burden. Motor progression from a specific demyelinating lesion has implications for understanding multiple sclerosis (MS) progression.