Kassa, Roman

Background Elevated intrathecal immunoglobulin G (IgG; oligoclonal bands (OCBs)) or IgG in people with progressive motor impairment due to “critical” demyelinating lesions are of uncertain significance. Objective Compare clinical/radiological features of people with “critical” demyelinating lesion-induced progressive motor impairment with/without elevated intrathecal IgG synthesis. Methods A total of 133 people with progressive motor impairment attributable to “critical” demyelinating lesions (corticospinal tract location, consistent with the progressive motor deficit) were compared regarding clinical and radiological presentation with and without ≥2 unique cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) OCB and/or IgG index ≥0.85. Results Ninety-eight (74%) had CSF-elevated OCB and/or IgG index, higher with increased magnetic resonance imaging-lesion burden. No differences were found with/without CSF abnormalities in sex (46 of 98 female (47%) vs. 22 of 35 (63%), p = 0.11), onset-age (median 49 vs. 50 years, p = 0.5), progression from onset (62 of 98 (63%) vs. 25 of 35 (71%)), progression post-relapse (36 of 98 (37%) vs. 10 of 35 (29%), p = 0.4), and duration between demyelinating disease onset and CSF examination (30 (0–359) vs. 48 (0–323) months p = 0.7). “Critical” lesions were radiologically similar, most commonly cervical spine located (72 of 98 (74%) vs. 19 of 35 (54%), p = 0.18) both with/without CSF abnormalities. Conclusions People with “critical” demyelinating lesion-induced progressive motor impairment typically have elevated intrathecal IgG (OCB and/or IgG) and similar clinical and radiological presentation regardless of CSF findings, therefore representing valid presentations of progressive demyelinating disease.

Background: New inflammatory activity is of unclear frequency and clinical significance in progressive multiple sclerosis (MS); it is uncertain in patient cohorts with motor progression due to critical demyelinating lesions. Objectives: The aim of this study is to determine the likelihood of central nervous system (CNS) inflammatory activity, assessed by new clinical relapses or active magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions, following onset of motor progression due to critical demyelinating lesions. Methods: Patients with progressive upper motor neuron impairment for ⩾1 year attributable to critical demyelinating lesions with single CNS lesion (progressive solitary sclerosis (PSS)), 2 to 5 total CNS demyelinating lesions (progressive “pauci-sclerosis” (PPS)), or >5 CNS demyelinating lesions and progressive exclusively unilateral monoparesis or hemiparesis (PUHMS) were identified. Clinical data were reviewed for acute MS relapses, and subsequent MRI was reviewed for active T1-gadolinium-enhancing or T2-demyelinating lesions. Results: None of the 91 patients (22 PSS, 40 PPS, 29 PUHMS) identified experienced clinical relapses over a median clinical follow-up of 93 months (range: 12–518 months). Nine patients (10%) developed active lesions over median 84 months radiologic follow-up (range: 12–518 months). Active lesions occurred in 24% PUHMS, 5% PSS, and 3% PPS cohorts. Conclusion: New inflammatory activity, defined by active lesions and clinical relapses following motor progression in patients with critical demyelinating lesions, is low. Disease-modifying therapies that reduce demyelinating relapses and active MRI lesions are of uncertain benefit in these cohorts.

Objective: To compare progressive motor impairment onset attributable to a “critical” central nervous system (CNS) demyelinating lesion in patients with highly restricted versus unlimited magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesion burden. Methods: We identified 135 patients with progressive motor impairment for ⩾1 year attributable to a “critical” demyelinating lesion with: MRI burden of 1 lesion (“progressive solitary sclerosis”), 2–5 lesions (“progressive paucisclerosis”), or unrestricted (>5) lesions and “progressive unilateral hemiparesis.” Neuroradiology review of brain and spinal cord MRI documented unequivocally demyelinating lesions. Results: A total of 33 (24.4%) patients had progressive solitary sclerosis; 56 (41.5%) patients had progressive paucisclerosis; and 46 (34.1%) patients had progressive unilateral hemiparesis. Median age at onset of progressive motor impairment was younger in progressive solitary sclerosis (49 years; range 24–73) and progressive paucisclerosis (50 years; range 30–64) than in progressive unilateral hemiparesis (54 years; range 39–77; p = 0.02 and p = 0.003, respectively). Within progressive unilateral hemiparesis, motor-progression onset was similar between those with 4–10, 11–20, or >20 brain lesions (55, 54, 53 years of age, respectively; p = 0.44). Conclusion: Motor-progression age is similar, but paradoxically earlier, in cohorts with highly restricted CNS lesion burden than in those with unrestricted lesion burden with progressive unilateral hemiparetic MS. The “critical” demyelinating lesion rather than total brain MRI lesion burden is the major contributor to motor-progression onset in these cohorts.