Citations

Abstract PURPOSE For large brain metastases, it is unknown whether single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (sSRS) or multi-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (fSRS) is optimal. We aimed to compare rates of local progression and necrosis between sSRS and fSRS for large brain metastases. METHODS Patients with intact or resected brain metastases with a target volume ≥ 4.2 cc (corresponding to a diameter ≥ 2 cm) treated with Gamma Knife (GK) or linear accelerator-based SRS from 2014-2022 were included in this retrospective review. RESULTS A total of 343 large brain metastases in 276 patients were included; 171 lesions were treated with sSRS (96% with GK) and 172 lesions with fSRS (100% with linear accelerator). Median lesion volume was 19.8 cc and 8.4 cc for fSRS and sSRS, respectively. Resection was performed prior to SRS in 228 (66%), with the remaining 115 metastases treated intact. There was no difference in rate of local progression between sSRS versus fSRS, or between resected versus intact targets (p >0.8 for both). Cumulative incidence of local progression (with death as a competing risk) at 1 and 3 years for patients receiving sSRS was 24% and 30%, respectively, compared to 22% and 34% for fSRS. FSRS was associated with significantly higher rates of necrosis than sSRS (HR 5.58, 2.38-13.08, p < 0.001). This association remained significant after controlling for target volume. Cumulative incidence of necrosis (with death as a competing risk) at 1 and 3 years for patients receiving sSRS was 1% and 3%, respectively, compared to 10% and 18% for fSRS. Necrosis rates were significantly higher with fSRS for both intact and resected targets (P < 0.02 for both). CONCLUSION While local control for large resected or intact brain metastases appears similar after sSRS or fSRS, this retrospective study shows higher rates of necrosis after fSRS. Prospective validation is needed.

Abstract OBJECTIVE This study aimed to analyze the hemorrhagic risk of melanoma brain metastases following SRS. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted using a prospective institutional database between 1990 and 2021. Lesional hemorrhage was categorized as definite or possible, and hemorrhage severity was graded using CTCAE. RESULTS The study identified 291 patients with 1083 lesions. The mean age of patients was 60 ± 15 years, with 61% being male. Median follow-up was 11 months, corresponding to 581 patient-years. Among the patients, 82 (28%) experienced 135 lesional hemorrhages (13%). Of these, 88 lesions in 61 patients were grade 1-2 hemorrhages, 42 lesions in 25 patients were grade 3, and five lesions in five patients progressed from grade 1 to 3. Surgical intervention was required for 17 lesions (2%) in 16 patients (5%). Lesional hemorrhage was associated with radiosurgery performed between 2015 and 2021 (OR, 0.373; 95% CI, 0.231-0.60; p < 0.001), increasing marginal dose (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.98; p = 0.017), antiplatelet use (OR, 0.192; 95% CI, 0.082-0.45; p < 0.001), and WBRT (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.330-0.77; p = 0.0017). The cumulative lesional hemorrhage risk reached 17–20% at 36 months following radiosurgery, with 95-96% of hemorrhages occurring within the initial year. Median OS was 11 months (95% CI, 9-13 months). Patients who received radiosurgery between 2015 and 2021 exhibited a median OS of 17 months (95% CI, 10-24 months; p < 0.001), while those without hemorrhage had a median OS of 12 months (95% CI, 10-14 months; p = 0.054). CONCLUSIONS Definitive hemorrhage risk was 17% for melanoma brain metastases after SRS within the first three years, with 95% of lesional hemorrhages occurring within the initial year. Surgical intervention was necessary in 5% of patients. Hemorrhage risk and overall survival improved after 2015.

Introduction Epidural steroid injections and epidural blood patches commonly involve the injection of a small amount of radiocontrast media under fluoroscopy to properly identify the target tissue or anatomic space and prevent off-target or intravascular delivery of therapeutic or diagnostic drugs. Iodinated low osmolar non-ionic contrast media is the standard preparation used as it is considered safe and cost-effective, but gadolinium-based preparations have been used as an alternative for patients with an ‘iodine’-related or radiocontrast media allergy label to prevent hypersensitivity reactions. The risk of neurotoxic events when gadolinium is inadvertently injected into the intrathecal space has been reported in recent years, raising concerns when gadolinium-based contrast media is used in lieu of iodinated low osmolar non-ionic contrast media. Methods A retrospective review was conducted of patients who received gadolinium-based contrast media for procedures with risk of inadvertent intrathecal access from January 1, 2019 to May 1, 2022. Information on patient demographics, allergy label information, and procedure description was documented for all patients who received gadolinium-based contrast media for axial spine procedures (including epidural steroid injections, epidural blood patch procedures, and selective nerve root blocks), and all side effects reported within 1 month of the procedure were recorded. Saved fluoroscopy images of all procedures for which there was concern for possible gadolinium-based contrast media-related side effect were reviewed for evidence of inadvertent intrathecal gadolinium-based contrast media administration. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed using REDCap and IBM SPSS Statistics V.28. Results We identified 508 patients who received gadolinium-based contrast media during a fluoroscopically guided axial spine procedure. These patients underwent 697 epidural procedures and 23 patients were identified as experiencing an adverse event that could be consistent with possible, probable, or clear signs of exposure to intrathecal gadolinium. Our calculated adverse event rate was 3.3%. Ten patients required additional medical evaluation or treatment. Discussion Almost all patients in our cohort had an allergy label on their chart that guided the provider to switch to gadolinium-based contrast media, but most were incomplete, ill-defined, or related to allergy to iodine but not iodinated contrast media. Such practice is not recommended based on current guidelines. The current study raises concern regarding the use of gadolinium-based contrast media in axial spine procedures, with the risk of potential severe adverse events, without evidence-based need for avoiding iodinated contrast media.

Background: In patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), persistent inflammation and increasing disease activity are associated with increased risk of adverse events (AEs). Objectives: To assess relationships between RA disease activity and AEs of interest in patients treated with tofacitinib or tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). Design: This was a post hoc analysis of a long-term, postauthorization safety endpoint trial of tofacitinib versus TNFi. Methods: In ORAL Surveillance, 4362 patients aged ⩾50 years with active RA despite methotrexate, and ⩾1 additional cardiovascular (CV) risk factor, were randomized 1:1:1 to tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily or TNFi for up to 72 months. Post hoc time-dependent multivariable Cox analysis evaluated the relationships between disease activity [Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)], inflammation [C-reactive protein (CRP)], and AEs of interest. The AEs included major adverse CV events (MACE), malignancies excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC), venous thromboembolism (VTE), serious infections, herpes zoster (HZ), nonserious infections excluding HZ (NSI), and death. Results: Across treatments, risk for NSI was higher when patients had CDAI-defined active disease versus remission; MACE and VTE risks trended higher, but did not reach significance. Hazard ratios for MACE, malignancies excluding NMSC, VTE, infections, and death rose by 2–9% for each 5-mg/L increment in serum CRP. The interaction terms evaluating the impact of treatment assignment on the relationship between disease activity and AEs were all p > 0.05. Conclusion: In ORAL Surveillance, higher NSI risk was observed in the presence of active RA versus remission. The risk of MACE and VTE directionally increased in active disease versus remission, although statistical power was limited due to small event numbers in these categories. The relationship between active disease and AEs was not impacted by treatment with tofacitinib versus TNFi. Registration: NCT02092467.

Background Ovarian cancer (OC), a highly lethal cancer in women, has a 48% 5-year overall survival rate. Prior studies link the presence of IL-17 and Th17 T cells in the tumor microenvironment to improved survival in OC patients. To determine if Th17-inducing vaccines are therapeutically effective in OC, we created a murine model of Th17-inducing dendritic cell (DC) (Th17-DC) vaccination generated by stimulating IL-15 while blocking p38 MAPK in bone marrow-derived DCs, followed by antigen pulsing. Methods ID8 tumor cells were injected intraperitoneally into mice. Mice were treated with Th17-DC or conventional DC (cDC) vaccine alone or with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). Systemic immunity, tumor associated immunity, tumor size and survival were examined using a variety of experimental strategies. Results Th17-DC vaccines increased Th17 T cells in the tumor microenvironment, reshaped the myeloid microenvironment, and improved mouse survival compared with cDC vaccines. ICB had limited efficacy in OC, but Th17-inducing DC vaccination sensitized it to anti-PD-1 ICB, resulting in durable progression-free survival by overcoming IL-10-mediated resistance. Th17-DC vaccine efficacy, alone or with ICB, was mediated by CD4 T cells, but not CD8 T cells. Conclusions These findings emphasize using biologically relevant immune modifiers, like Th17-DC vaccines, in OC treatment to reshape the tumor microenvironment and enhance clinical responses to ICB therapy.

ABSTRACT The rapid pace of name changes of medically important fungi is creating challenges for clinical laboratories and clinicians involved in patient care. We describe two sources of name change which have different drivers, at the species versus the genus level. Some suggestions are made here to reduce the number of name changes. We urge taxonomists to provide diagnostic markers of taxonomic novelties. Given the instability of phylogenetic trees due to variable taxon sampling, we advocate to maintain genera at the largest possible size. Reporting of identified species in complexes or series should where possible comprise both the name of the overarching species and that of the molecular sibling, often cryptic species. Because the use of different names for the same species will be unavoidable for many years to come, an open access online database of the names of all medically important fungi, with proper nomenclatural designation and synonymy, is essential. We further recommend that while taxonomic discovery continues, the adaptation of new name changes by clinical laboratories and clinicians be reviewed routinely by a standing committee for validation and stability over time, with reference to an open access database, wherein reasons for changes are listed in a transparent way.

Abstract Enasidenib (ENA) is an inhibitor of isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) approved for the treatment of patients with IDH2-mutant relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this phase 2/1b Beat AML substudy, we applied a risk-adapted approach to assess the efficacy of ENA monotherapy for patients aged ≥60 years with newly diagnosed IDH2-mutant AML in whom genomic profiling demonstrated that mutant IDH2 was in the dominant leukemic clone. Patients for whom ENA monotherapy did not induce a complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) enrolled in a phase 1b cohort with the addition of azacitidine. The phase 2 portion assessing the overall response to ENA alone demonstrated efficacy, with a composite complete response (cCR) rate (CR/CRi) of 46% in 60 evaluable patients. Seventeen patients subsequently transitioned to phase 1b combination therapy, with a cCR rate of 41% and 1 dose-limiting toxicity. Correlative studies highlight mechanisms of clonal elimination with differentiation therapy as well as therapeutic resistance. This study demonstrates both efficacy of ENA monotherapy in the upfront setting and feasibility and applicability of a risk-adapted approach to the upfront treatment of IDH2-mutant AML. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03013998.