Abstract OBJECTIVE This study aimed to analyze the hemorrhagic risk of melanoma brain metastases following SRS. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted using a prospective institutional database between 1990 and 2021. Lesional hemorrhage was categorized as definite or possible, and hemorrhage severity was graded using CTCAE. RESULTS The study identified 291 patients with 1083 lesions. The mean age of patients was 60 ± 15 years, with 61% being male. Median follow-up was 11 months, corresponding to 581 patient-years. Among the patients, 82 (28%) experienced 135 lesional hemorrhages (13%). Of these, 88 lesions in 61 patients were grade 1-2 hemorrhages, 42 lesions in 25 patients were grade 3, and five lesions in five patients progressed from grade 1 to 3. Surgical intervention was required for 17 lesions (2%) in 16 patients (5%). Lesional hemorrhage was associated with radiosurgery performed between 2015 and 2021 (OR, 0.373; 95% CI, 0.231-0.60; p < 0.001), increasing marginal dose (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.98; p = 0.017), antiplatelet use (OR, 0.192; 95% CI, 0.082-0.45; p < 0.001), and WBRT (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.330-0.77; p = 0.0017). The cumulative lesional hemorrhage risk reached 17–20% at 36 months following radiosurgery, with 95-96% of hemorrhages occurring within the initial year. Median OS was 11 months (95% CI, 9-13 months). Patients who received radiosurgery between 2015 and 2021 exhibited a median OS of 17 months (95% CI, 10-24 months; p < 0.001), while those without hemorrhage had a median OS of 12 months (95% CI, 10-14 months; p = 0.054). CONCLUSIONS Definitive hemorrhage risk was 17% for melanoma brain metastases after SRS within the first three years, with 95% of lesional hemorrhages occurring within the initial year. Surgical intervention was necessary in 5% of patients. Hemorrhage risk and overall survival improved after 2015.
BIOM-34. NON-NEOPLASTIC PLASMA EV SUBPOPULATIONS CORRELATE WITH TUMOR SIZE AND OVERALL SURVIVAL IN GLIOBLASTOMA INDEPENDENT OF STEROID USAGE
Abstract INTRODUCTION Extracellular Vesicles (EVs) are lipid bilayer particles present in almost all biofluids and carry tumor-specific molecular cargo. Plasma EVs are promising sources of biomarker discovery for glioblastoma (GBM). The clinical relevance of non-neoplastic plasma EVs in GBM remains unclear. In this study, we determine if associations exist between plasma EV subpopulation frequencies in GBM and clinical factors. METHODS Platelet-free plasma samples of 63 GBM, 43 Grade 2 glioma, and 45 healthy donors were included. All glioma plasma samples were collected before surgery. Plasma EV subpopulation frequency based on surface expression of EV-associated tetraspanins (CD9/CD81/CD63) and markers of cell origin (CD45/CD41a/CD11b/CD31) was determined by spectral flow cytometry. Clinical information including age, surgery, MGMT methylation status, corticosteroid usage, tumor volume, and overall survival data was recorded. RESULTS Compared to normal donors, GBM patients had increased CD9+, CD63+, CD81+, and CD11b+ EVs but decreased CD41a+ EVs. GBM patients also had the highest frequency of myeloid-derived CD9+CD11b+ EVs (20.17%) followed by grade 2 gliomas (13.78%) and normal donors (2.76%, p< 0.001). More GBM patients (29/63, 46.0%) received preoperative corticosteroids than grade 2 glioma patients (9/43, 20.9%; p = 0.008). Corticosteroid use was not associated with differences in EV subpopulation frequencies in GBM or grade 2 glioma patients. Pearson correlation analysis showed weak but statistically significant correlations between GBM total tumor volume and CD9+ EVs (p = 0.014), CD41a+ EVs (p = 0.037), and CD9+/CD63-/CD81- EVs (p = 0.007). In GBM patients, younger age (< 60 yrs, p = 0.01), gross total resection (p = 0.02), MGMT methylation (p = 0.002), high CD9+ EV expression (p = 0.011), low CD9+CD63-CD81- EV expression (p = 0.009) and low CD9+CD11b+ EV expression (p = 0.006) correlated with longer overall survival. CONCLUSION Differentially expressed non-neoplastic plasma EV subpopulations have significant clinical relevance in GBM including association with tumor volume and predicting survival. Validation of those markers in larger cohorts could reveal new prognostic biomarkers for GBM.